Abstract
The paper explores the challenges of capturing context in criminology with reference to one kind of small-N situation – violent crime in rural communities. An illustrative analysis of the violent crime prevention research and select adjunct debates about method, including case-based approaches, was undertaken. First, the paper explores the need for methods offering diversity-oriented ways of understanding country, community, and the individual in situ in the community. Second, it examines how the challenges of “context” are being described in wider debates: about the technical limitations of “big Q” methods for criminology; about the relevance of research evidence; about case-based analyses. Third, it sketches the value of Charles Ragin's diversity-oriented, small-N method for enriching understandings of context. The paper concludes that Ragin's method can add value to local rural crime prevention practice and related micro-social policy development by illuminating the “black box” of individual cases.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bell, E., Hall, R. “Dead in the Water”: Is Rural Violent Crime Prevention Floating Face-down because Criminology Can't Handle Context?. Crime Prev Community Saf 9, 252–274 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cpcs.8150051
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cpcs.8150051