Advertisement

Comparative European Politics

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 18–35 | Cite as

Providing Venues for Contestation: The Role of Expert Committees and Informal Dialogue among Ministers in European Economic Policy Coordination

  • Uwe Puetter
Original Article

Abstract

This article analyses the role of expert committees and informal dialogue among ministers as venues for norm contestation. The argument is that the incorporation of venues for contestation into standardized procedures for decision-making at the European level is pivotal to the generation of viable common policy guidelines. This is all the more important in the case of European economic policy coordination as this policy area is characterized by a decentralized governance framework which relies only on a limited set of constitutional principles. Owing to the thin and abstract nature of these norms, norm contestation occurs by default. The article delineates the institutional environment in which contestation takes place and asked whether the key procedures for decision-making have the potential to accommodate contestation as a permanent feature of policy-making. Moreover, it investigates how the enlargement of the Union puts the viability of existing working methods at risk. In particular, the larger number of actors questions the principle of equal access to contestation.

Keywords

EU governance committees council norms Economic and Monetary Union enlargement 

References

  1. Brouhns, G. (1999) ‘La coordination des politiques dans l’UEM et le role de l’Euro 11’, Ministère des Finances Belgique, Service d’Etudes et de Documentation, 59(2).Google Scholar
  2. Council of the European Union (1999) The Euro and Economic Policy — Legal and Political Texts Adopted by the Council of the European Union and the European Council, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  3. European Council (2000) ‘Lisbon, presidency conclusions, March 23–24, press release, No. 100/1/00, http://ue.eu.int/newsroom/.
  4. European Council (2005) ‘Brussels, presidency conclusions’, Press Release, No. 7619/1/05, REV1.Google Scholar
  5. Hall, P. (1993) ‘Policy paradigms, social learning and the state: the case of economic policy making in Britain’, Comparative Politics 25: 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Heipertz, M. and Verdun, A. (2004) ‘The dog that would never bite? What we can learn from the origins of the Stability and Growth Pact’, Journal of European Public Policy 11 (5): 765–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jenkins-Smith, H.C. and Sabatier, P.A. (1993) ‘The dynamics of policy-oriented learning’, in H. C. Jenkins-Smith, P.A. Sabatier (eds.) Policy Change and Learning:An Advocacy Coalition Approach, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  8. Joerges, C. (2002) ‘Deliberative supranationalism — two defences’, European Law Journal 8: 133–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kissling-Näf, I. and Knoepfel, P. (1998) ‘Social learning in policy networks’, Policy & Politics 26 (3): 343–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Korkman, S. (2001) ‘Fiscal policy coordination in EMU: should it go beyond the SGP?’, in A. Brunila, M. Buti and D. Franco (eds.) The Stability and Growth Pact — The Architecture of Fiscal Policy in EMU, Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 287–312.Google Scholar
  11. Majone, G. (1993) ‘Wann ist Policy-Deliberation wichtig?’, in A. Héritier (ed.) Policy-Analyse – Kritik und Neuorientierung, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, special issue (Sonderheft), No. 24.Google Scholar
  12. Müller, H. (2004) ‘Arguing, bargaining, and all that. reflections on the relationship of communicative action and rationalist theory in analysing international negotiation’, European Journal of International Relations 10 (3): 395–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Official Journal of the European Union (2003) Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, Available online.Google Scholar
  14. Puetter, U (2006) The Eurogroup — How a Secretive Circle of Ministers Shapes European Economic Governance, Manchester: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sabatier, P. A. (1988) ‘An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein’, Policy Sciences 21: 129–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Stark, J. (2001) ‘Genesis of a pact’, in A. Brunila, M. Buti and D. Franco (eds.) The Stability and Growth Pact — The Architecture of Fiscal Policy in EMU, Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 139–157.Google Scholar
  17. Ungerer, H. (1997) A Concise History of European Monetary Integration, Westport: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
  18. Verdun, A. (2000) ‘Governing by committee: The case of monetary policy’, in T. Christiansen and E. Kirchner (eds.) Committee Governance in the European Union, Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 132–144.Google Scholar
  19. Weiler, J. (1999) The Constitution of Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan Ltd 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Uwe Puetter
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Public PolicyAssociate Professor and Head, Central European UniversityBudapest, Nador u. 9Hungary

Personalised recommendations