Providing Venues for Contestation: The Role of Expert Committees and Informal Dialogue among Ministers in European Economic Policy Coordination
- 27 Downloads
This article analyses the role of expert committees and informal dialogue among ministers as venues for norm contestation. The argument is that the incorporation of venues for contestation into standardized procedures for decision-making at the European level is pivotal to the generation of viable common policy guidelines. This is all the more important in the case of European economic policy coordination as this policy area is characterized by a decentralized governance framework which relies only on a limited set of constitutional principles. Owing to the thin and abstract nature of these norms, norm contestation occurs by default. The article delineates the institutional environment in which contestation takes place and asked whether the key procedures for decision-making have the potential to accommodate contestation as a permanent feature of policy-making. Moreover, it investigates how the enlargement of the Union puts the viability of existing working methods at risk. In particular, the larger number of actors questions the principle of equal access to contestation.
KeywordsEU governance committees council norms Economic and Monetary Union enlargement
- Brouhns, G. (1999) ‘La coordination des politiques dans l’UEM et le role de l’Euro 11’, Ministère des Finances Belgique, Service d’Etudes et de Documentation, 59(2).Google Scholar
- Council of the European Union (1999) The Euro and Economic Policy — Legal and Political Texts Adopted by the Council of the European Union and the European Council, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
- European Council (2000) ‘Lisbon, presidency conclusions, March 23–24, press release, No. 100/1/00, http://ue.eu.int/newsroom/.
- European Council (2005) ‘Brussels, presidency conclusions’, Press Release, No. 7619/1/05, REV1.Google Scholar
- Jenkins-Smith, H.C. and Sabatier, P.A. (1993) ‘The dynamics of policy-oriented learning’, in H. C. Jenkins-Smith, P.A. Sabatier (eds.) Policy Change and Learning:An Advocacy Coalition Approach, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- Korkman, S. (2001) ‘Fiscal policy coordination in EMU: should it go beyond the SGP?’, in A. Brunila, M. Buti and D. Franco (eds.) The Stability and Growth Pact — The Architecture of Fiscal Policy in EMU, Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 287–312.Google Scholar
- Majone, G. (1993) ‘Wann ist Policy-Deliberation wichtig?’, in A. Héritier (ed.) Policy-Analyse – Kritik und Neuorientierung, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, special issue (Sonderheft), No. 24.Google Scholar
- Official Journal of the European Union (2003) Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, Available online.Google Scholar
- Stark, J. (2001) ‘Genesis of a pact’, in A. Brunila, M. Buti and D. Franco (eds.) The Stability and Growth Pact — The Architecture of Fiscal Policy in EMU, Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 139–157.Google Scholar
- Ungerer, H. (1997) A Concise History of European Monetary Integration, Westport: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
- Verdun, A. (2000) ‘Governing by committee: The case of monetary policy’, in T. Christiansen and E. Kirchner (eds.) Committee Governance in the European Union, Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 132–144.Google Scholar
- Weiler, J. (1999) The Constitution of Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar