Advertisement

Comparative European Politics

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 104–120 | Cite as

New Forms of Accountability and EU-Governance

  • Mark Bovens
Original Article

Abstract

As the European Union is turning into a polity, issues of accountability increasingly have found their way onto political and academic agendas. One recurring issue is whether these new multi-level forms of governance require new forms of accountability. The article explores the meaning of new accountabilities and whether these would help to overcome possible accountability deficits. Since accountability is an ambiguous and contestable concept, the contribution first analyses the concept and then narrows it substantially before discussing the meaning of these new forms of accountability, both theoretically and in practice. New forms of accountability are diagonal or horizontal in character and include accountability to administrative forums, to citizens, clients, and civil society. The conclusion is that new forms of accountability enhance policy learning and provide a series of formal and informal checks and balances but they are no alternative to traditional forms of popular control. We therefore need traditional and new forms of accountability regarding European governance.

Keywords

accountability European Union multi-level governance traditional and new accountabilities 

References

  1. Arnull, A. and Wincott, D. (2003) Accountability and Legitimacy in the European Union, New York and Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  2. Aucoin, P. and Heintzman, R. (2000) ‘The dialectics of accountability for performance in public management reform’, International Review of Administrative Sciences 66: 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbé, E. (2004) ‘The evolution of CFSP institutions: where does democratic accountability stand?’ The International Spectator 2: 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barberis, P. (1998) ‘The new public management and a new accountability’, Public Administration 76: 451–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Behn, R.D. (2001) Rethinking Democratic Accountability, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bellamy, C. and Taylor, J. (1995) ‘The new right conception of citizenship and the citizen's charter’, Government and Opposition 30: 469–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergman, T. and Damgaard, E. (eds.) (2000) Delegation and Accountability in the European Union, London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  8. Bono, G. (2002) ‘Democratic accountability of military and police co-operation within the EU’, Working Paper Series. PCAF Workshop on Parliamentary Oversight of International Military Cooperation/Institution. Geneva: DCAF.Google Scholar
  9. Bono, G. (2004) ‘The European Union as an International Security Actor: Challenges for Democratic Accountability’, in H. Born and H. Hänggi (eds.) The Double Democratic Deficit, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  10. Bovens, M. (1998) The Quest for Responsibility: Accountability and Citizenship in Complex Organisations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bovens, M. (2003) De digitale republiek: Democratie en rechtsstaat in de informatiemaatschappij, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bovens, M. (2005) ‘Public Accountability’, in E. Ferlie, L. Lynne and C. Pollitt (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 182–208.Google Scholar
  13. Bovens, M. (2006) ‘Analysing and assessing public accountability: a conceptual framework, European Governance Papers No. C-06-01.Google Scholar
  14. Commission (2000) ‘Misc: Reforming the Commission: A White paper, Part I, Brussels, 5.4.2000.Google Scholar
  15. Commission (2001) Implementing Activity Based Management in the Commission, Communication from the president in agreement with Mr Kinnock and Mrs Schreyer to the commission, Brussels, 25.07.2001: SEC (2001)1197/6&7.Google Scholar
  16. Costa, O., Jabko, N., Lequesne, C. and Magnette, P. (2003) ‘Diffuse control mechanisms in the European Union: towards a new democracy?’ Journal of European Public Policy 10/5: 666–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Curtin, D. (2004) Mind the Gap: The Evolving EU Executive and the Constitution, Third Walter van Gerven Lecture, Leuven Groningen: Europa Law Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. Curtin, D. (2006) ‘Delegation to EU Non-majoritarian Agencies and Emerging Practices of Public Accountability’, in D. Gerardin, R. Munoz and N. Petit (eds.) Regulation Through Agencies in the EU: A New Paradigm of European Governance, London: Edward Elgar, pp. 88–119.Google Scholar
  19. Day, P. and Klein, R. (1987) Accountabilities: Five Public Services,, London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  20. Dubnick, M.J. (2002) ‘Seeking salvation for accountability, paper presented at the 2002 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.Google Scholar
  21. Duggett, M. (1998) ‘Citizen's charter: a people's charter in the UK’, International Review of Administrative Sciences 64: 327–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. European Commission (2001) European Governance: A White paper, Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  23. European Commission (2003) Report from the Commission on European Governance, Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  24. Fisher, E. (2004) ‘The European Union in the age of accountability’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 24 (1): 495–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Flinders, M. (2001) The Politics of Accountability in the Modern State, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  26. Van Gerven, W. (2005) The European Union: A Polity of States and People, Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart.Google Scholar
  27. Harlow, C. (2002) Accountability in the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harlow, C. and Rawlings, R. (2006) ‘Promoting accountability in multi-level governance: a network approach’, European Governance papers No. C-06-02.Google Scholar
  29. Héritier, A. (2003) ‘Composite democracy in Europe: the role of transparency and access to information’, Journal of European Public Policy 10/5: 814–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Koppell, J.G.S. (2005) ‘Pathologies of accountability: ICANN and the challenge of “multiple accountabilities disorder”’, Public Administration Review 65 (1): 94–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Laffan, B. (2003) ‘Auditing and accountability in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy 10/5: 762–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lane, J.-E. (2000) New Public Management, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Lord, C. (2004) A Democratic Audit of the European Union, Basingstoke: Palgrave/MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Luhmann, N. (1966) Theorie der Verwaltungswissenschaft: Bestandsaufnahme und Entwurf, Köln-Berlin.Google Scholar
  35. Lupia, A. (2003) ‘Delegation and its Perils’, in K. Strom et al. (eds.) Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies, Oxford: OUP, pp. 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Magnette, P. (2003) ‘Between parliamentary control and the rule of law: the political role of the Ombudsman in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy 10/5: 677–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Magnette, P., Lequesne, C., Jabko, N. and Costa, O. (2003) ‘Conclusion: diffuse democracy in the European Union: the pathologies of delegation’, Journal of European Public Policy 10/5: 834–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mair, P. (2005) ‘Popular democracy and the European Union polity’, European Governance Papers (EUROGOV) no. C-05-03.Google Scholar
  39. Malena, C. (with Reiner Forster and Janmejay Singh) (2004) ‘Social accountability: an introduction to the concept and emerging practice. Social Development Papers No. 76, Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
  40. March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1995) Democratic Governance, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  41. McCandless, H.E. (2001) A Citizen's Guide to Public Accountability: Changing the Relationship Between Citizens and Authorities, Victoria B.C.: Trafford.Google Scholar
  42. Mehde, V. (2003) ‘Responsibility and accountability in the European Commission’, Common Market Law Review 40: 423–442.Google Scholar
  43. Meijer, A. and Schillemans, T. (2007) ‘Fictitional citizens and real effects: accountability to citizens in competitive markets’, Administration and Society, (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  44. Mulgan, R. (2000) ‘“Accountability”: an ever expanding concept?’ Public Administration 78: 555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mulgan, R. (2003) Holding Power to Account: Accountability in Modern Democracies, Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. O’Donnell, G. (1999) ‘Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies’, in A. Schedler, L. Diamond and M.F. Plattner (eds.) The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies, London: Lynne Rienner Publishers, pp. 29–51.Google Scholar
  47. Pollitt, C. (2003) The Essential Public Manager, London: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  48. Pollitt, C., Bathgate, K., Caulfield, J., Smullen, A. and Talbot, C. (2001) ‘Agency fever? Analysis of an international fashion’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 3: 271–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. (2005) Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis (2nd edn). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  50. Przeworski, A., Stokes, S.C. and Manin, B. (eds.) (1999) Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pujas, V. (2003) ‘The European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF): a European policy to fight against economic and financial fraud?’ Journal of European Public Policy 10/5: 778–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Scharpf, F. (1999) Governing Europe: Efficient and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schillemans, T. and Bovens, M. (2004) ‘Horizontale verantwoording bij zelfstandige bestuursorganen’, in S. van Thiel (ed.) Governance van uitvoeringsorganisaties: Nieuwe vraagstukken voor sturing in het publieke domein, Apeldoorn: Kadaster, pp. 27–37.Google Scholar
  54. Schmitter, P. (2000) How to Democratize the European Union…And Why Bother?, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  55. Scott, C. (2000) ‘Accountability in the regulatory state’, Journal of Law and Society 27 (1): 38–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Strom, K. (2000) ‘Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies’, European Journal of Political Research 37: 261–289.Google Scholar
  57. Strom, K. (2003) ‘Parliamentary Democracy and Delegation’, in K. Strom et al. (eds.) Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies, Oxford: OUP, pp. 55–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sullivan, H. (2003) ‘New forms of local accountability: coming to terms with “many hands”?’ Policy & Politics 31/3: 353–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Thatcher, M. (2002) ‘Delegation to independent regulatory agencies: pressures, Functions and contextual mediation’, West European Politics 25: 125–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. van Thiel, S. (2000) Quangocratization: Trends, Causes and Consequences, Utrecht: ICS.Google Scholar
  61. Ziller, J. (2001) ‘European models of government: towards a patchwork with missing pieces’, Parliamentary Affairs 54: 102–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan Ltd 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Bovens
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Public AdministrationUtrecht School of Governance, Utrecht UniversityThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations