Advertisement

Acta Politica

, Volume 42, Issue 2–3, pp 307–328 | Cite as

Interests, Identity and Political Allegiance in the European Union

  • Catherine E de Vries
  • Kees van Kersbergen
Article

Abstract

We take up a longstanding question within the field of European Union (EU) studies: What explains the variation in public support for European integration? There are two dominant explanations: the utilitarian self-interest and the national identity perspectives. The former viewpoint stresses that citizens are more likely to support European integration, if it results in a net benefit to their economy or pocketbook, while the latter perspective argues that identity considerations predominantly influence EU support. Drawing on the concept of double allegiance, we argue that these perspectives should be combined into one single explanatory framework rather than framed as alternatives. Using a multilevel model, we empirically substantiate the claim that interest- and identity-based explanations capture different sides of the same coin, as the more citizens perceive integration to threaten their (economic and social–psychological) security and well-being, the less likely they will support the EU.

Keywords

Euroscepticism political allegiance identity interests hierarchical models 

References

  1. Aiken, L.S. and West, S.G. (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Regressions, Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, G. (2002) The Sources of Democratic Consolidation, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, B. (1992) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, London: Verso.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, C.J. and Reichert, M.S. (1995) ‘Economic benefits and support for membership in the EU: a cross-national analysis’, Journal of Public Policy 15 (3): 231–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, C.J. and Kaltenthaler, K.C. (1996) ‘The dynamics of public opinion toward European integration, 1973–93’, European Journal of International Relations 2 (2): 175–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brambor, T., Clark, T.R. and Golder, M. (2006) ‘Understanding interaction models: improving empirical analysis’, Political Analysis 14 (1): 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brinegar, A. and Jolly, S. (2005) ‘Location, location, location: national contextual factors and public support for European integration’, European Union Politics 6 (2): 155–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brinegar, A., Kitschelt, H. and Jolly, S. (2004) ‘Varieties of Capitalism and Political Divides over European Integration’, in G. Marks and M.R. Steenbergen (eds.) European Integration and Political Conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 62–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bruter, M. (2003) ‘Winning hearts and minds for Europe: the impact of news and symbols on civic and cultural European identity’, Comparative Political Studies 36 (10): 1148–1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bryk, A.S. and Raudenbush, S.W . (1992) Hierarchical Linear Models: Application and Data Analysis Methods, London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Carey, S. (2002) ‘Undivided loyalties: is national identity an obstacle to European integration?’ European Union Politics 3 (4): 387–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carey, S. and Lebo, M. (2001) ‘In Europe, but not Europeans: The Impact of National Identity on Public Support for the European Union’, Paper presented at the 29th Joint Sessions of the European Consortium for Political Research, 6–11, Grenoble, France.Google Scholar
  13. Debets, P. and Brouwer, E. (1989) User's Manual to MSP: A Program for Mokken Scale Analysis for Polychotomous Items Version 1.50, Groninigen: ProGAMMA.Google Scholar
  14. Eichenberg, R.C. and Dalton, R.J. (1993) ‘Europeans and the European community: the dynamics of public support for European integration’, International Organization 47 (4): 507–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Franklin, M., Marsh, M. and McLaren, L. (1994) ‘The European question: opposition to unification in the wake of Maastricht’, Journal of Common Market Studies 35 (4): 455–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gabel, M.J. (1998) ‘Economic integration and mass politics: market liberalization and public attitudes in the European union’, American Journal of Political Science 42 (3): 936–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gabel, M.J. and Palmer, H.D. (1995) ‘Understanding variation in public support for European integration’, European Journal of Political Research 27 (1): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haesly, R. (2001) ‘Eurosceptics, Europhiles and instrumental Europeans: European attachment in Scotland and Wales’, European Union Politics 2 (1): 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2005) ‘Community, calculation and cues: public opinion on European integration’, European Union Politics 6 (4): 419–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kreft, I. and de Leeuw, J. (1998) Introducing Multilevel Modelling, London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lindberg, L.N. and Scheingold, S.A. (1970) Europe's Would-be Polity: Patterns of Change in the European Community, Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  22. Luedtke, A. (2005) ‘European integration, public opinion and immigration policy: testing the impact of national identity’, European Union Politics 6 (4): 83–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marks, G. (1999) ‘Territorial Identities in the European Union’, in J. J. Anderson (ed.) Regional Integration and Democracy: Expanding on the European Experience, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 69–91.Google Scholar
  24. McLaren, L. (2002) ‘Public support for European integration: cost/benefit analysis or perceived cultural threat’, Journal of Politics 64 (2): 551–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Milward, A.S. (1992) The European Rescue of the Nation-State, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Netjes, C.E. and Edwards, E.E. (2005) ‘Taking Europe to its extremes: examining cueing effects of right-wing populist parties on public opinion regarding European integration’, Discussion Paper SP IV 2005-202, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (WZB).Google Scholar
  27. Ray, L. (2004) ‘Don't Rock the Boat: Expectations, Fears, and Opposition to EU-Level Policy-Making’, in G. Marks and M. R. Steenbergen (eds.) European Integration and Political Conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Smith, A. (1991) National Identity, Handsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  29. Steenbergen, M.R. and Jones, B.S. (2002) ‘Modeling multilevel data structures’, American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 218–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Steenbergen, M.R. and Marks, G. (2004) ‘Introduction: Models of Political Conflict in the European Union’, in G. Marks and M. R. Steenbergen (eds.) European Integration and Political Conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Van Kersbergen, K. (2000) ‘Political allegiance and European integration’, European Journal of Political Research 37 (1): 1–17.Google Scholar
  32. Van Kersbergen, K. (2003) ‘Welfare state reform and political allegiance’, The European Legacy 8 (5): 559–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan Ltd 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catherine E de Vries
    • 1
  • Kees van Kersbergen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations