Skip to main content
Log in

Social imperatives in systems development: A conceptual model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
OR Insight

Abstract

The focus of this article is on systems development; and the development of a methodology appropriate for complex organisations. A conceptual systems development methodology OASES is presented. It is developed from findings from studies conducted within five NHS hospitals located in the North-East of England. OASES is a non-instrumental (in effect does not pertain to directives or rules) soft systems-based methodology. It therefore emphasises an alternative social imperative which will be of primary interest to soft operations research scholars. We find not only the existence of numerous social imperatives in systems development, but also that overall success during systems development is achieved by ensuring conflict neither exist between the systems and the organisations culture, the worldview of its stakeholders, or the prevailing business environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agerfalk, P. and Fitzgerald, B. (2006) Flexible and distributed software processes: Old petunias in new bowls? Communications of the ACM 49 (10): 26–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avision, D. and Fitzgerald, G. (1995) Information Systems Development: Methodologies, Techniques and Tools. London: McGraw Hill Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avison, D. (1991) MERISE: A european methodology for developing information systems. European Journal of Information Systems 1 (3): 183–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benoit, G. (2001) Critical theory as a foundation for pragmatic information systems design. Information Research 6 (2): http://informationr.net/ir/6-2/paper98.html.

  • Bostrom, R. and Heinen, J. (1977) MIS problems and failures: A socio-technical perspective, part I: The causes. MIS Quarterly 1 (3): 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (1981) Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Ruyter, K. (1996) Focus versus nominal group interviews: A comparative analysis. Marketing Intelligence and Planning 14 (6): 44–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewusi-Mensah, K. (1997) Critical issues in abandoned information systems development projects. Communications of the ACM 40 (9): 74–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, B., Hartnett, G. and Conboy, K. (2006) Customising agile methods to software practices at Intel Shannon. European Journal of Information Systems 15 (2): 200–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauld, R. (2007) Public sector information system project failures: Lessons from a New Zealand hospital organization. Government Information Quarterly 24 (1): 102–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1972) Knowledge and Human Interests. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1973) Theory and Practice. Boston, MA: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiskanen, A., Newman, M. and Simila, J. (2000) The social dynamics of software development. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 10 (1): 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim, R. and Klein, H. (1994) Realizing emancipatory principles in information systems development: The case for ETHICS. MIS Quarterly 18 (1): 83–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim, R., Klein, H. and Lyytinen, K. (1995) Information Systems Development: Conceptual and Philosophical Foundations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim, R., Klein, H. and Lyytinen, K. (1996) Exploring the intellectual structures of information systems development: A social action theoretic analysis. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 6 (1–2): 1–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim, R., Klein, H. and Newman, M. (1991) Information systems development as social action: Theoretical perspective and practice. Omega 19 (6): 587–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, K. and King, W. (1982) The manager-analyst interface in systems development. MIS Quarterly 6 (1): 49–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keen, P. (1981) Information systems and organisational change. Communications of the ACM 24 (1): 24–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, H. and Kleinman, D. (2002) The social construction of technology: Structural considerations. Science, Technology, & Human Values 27 (1): 28–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Land, F. and Hirschheim, R. (1993) Participative systems design: Rationale, tools and techniques. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis 10: 91–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, S. (2002) Identifying risks during information systems development: Managing the process. Information Management and Computer Security 10 (3): 126–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, S. (2007) Twenty-five years of national information systems in the NHS. Public Money and Management 27 (2): 135–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, S. and Ojiako, G.U. (2007) Interventions for information systems introduction in the NHS. Health Informatics Journal 13 (4): 283–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, S. and Ojiako, G.U. (2008) Market led systems development: When customers become users. Industrial Management and Data Systems 108 (2): 173–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantei, M. and Teorey, T. (1989) Incorporating behavioural techniques into the systems development life cycle. MIS Quarterly 13 (3): 257–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (1980) Towards an appropriate social theory for applied systems thinking: Critical theory and soft systems methodology. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis 7: 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, E. (1981) Participative systems design: Structure and method. Systems, Objectives, Solutions 1 (1): 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, E. (1983) Designing Human Systems: The ETHICS Method. Manchester, UK: Manchester Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Donnell, D. and Henriksen, L. (2002) Philosophical foundations for a critical evaluation of the social impact of ICT. Journal of Information Technology 17 (2): 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ojiako, GU. and Maguire, S. (2008) Success criteria for systems led transformation in organisations: Implications for global operations management. Industrial Management and Data Systems 108 (7): 887–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ojiako, GU., Maguire, S., Koh, L., Grainger, T. and Wainwright, D. (2010) Softer perspectives on enhancing the patient experience using IS/IT. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance 23 (2): 187–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, A. and Mingers, J. (1996) A framework for linking Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) and Jackson Systems Development (JSD). Information Systems Journal 6: 109–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (1978) Critical social theory: An introduction and critique. British Journal of Sociology 29 (1): 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senn, J. (1978) A management view of systems analysts: Failures and shortcomings. MIS Quarterly 2 (3): 25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood-Harper, A. and Avison, D. (1992) Reflections from the experience of using Multiview: Through the lens of soft systems methodology. Systemist 14 (3): 136–145.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maguire, S., Ojiako, U. & Chipulu, M. Social imperatives in systems development: A conceptual model. OR Insight 23, 187–206 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/ori.2010.6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ori.2010.6

Keywords

Navigation