Advertisement

Maritime Economics & Logistics

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 79–96 | Cite as

Strategic levers of port authorities for industrial ecosystem development

  • Rick M A Hollen
  • Frans A J van den Bosch
  • Henk W Volberda
Original Article

Abstract

Major ports such as Rotterdam, Antwerp, Houston and Singapore’s Jurong Port host large industrial complexes of (petro)chemical and other energy-intensive process industry firms. Port authorities face the challenge to contribute to both greater international competitiveness and better environmental performance of these complexes. The development of industrial ecosystems, in which firms located in port areas use one another’s residual energy and chemical effluents as input for their own production process, appears to be a promising strategic response to this challenge. In this article, we contribute to port research by examining how port authorities can foster this development within their port-industrial complex. We present a case study of the Port of Rotterdam to empirically capture how the Port of Rotterdam Authority has done so in the last decade by strategically making use of two generic types of policy instruments: (i) investments in physical and knowledge infrastructure and (ii) land allocation. On the basis of the case study and previous literature, we derive a set of strategic levers of port authorities to foster industrial ecosystem development. We discuss implications and challenges for port authorities.

Keywords

port-industrial complexes port authority strategic levers competitiveness environmental performance industrial ecosystems 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The article has benefited from the reviewers’ comments and the guidance of the guest editors. We acknowledge the cooperation with the Port of Rotterdam Authority and in particular with its Corporate Strategy Department. This research has been conducted in the context of the PhD research of the first author, which has been funded by the Port of Rotterdam Authority and which is part of the SmartPort knowledge collaboration between the Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Port of Rotterdam Authority, the City of Rotterdam and Deltalinqs.

References

  1. Acciaro, M., Ghiara, H. and Cusano, M.I. (2014) Energy management in seaports: A new role for port authorities. Energy Policy 71: 4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayres, R.U. (2002) On industrial ecosystems. In: R.U. Ayres and L.W. Ayres (eds.) A Handbook of Industrial Ecology. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 44–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baas, L.W. and Boons, F.A. (2004) An industrial ecology project in practice: Exploring the boundaries of decision-making levels in regional industrial systems. Journal of Cleaner Production 12 (8–10): 1073–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baas, L.W. and Huisingh, D. (2008) The synergistic role of embeddedness and capabilities in industrial symbiosis: Illustration based upon 12 years of experiences in the Rotterdam Harbour and industry complex. Progress in Industrial Ecology 5 (5–6): 399–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baird, A.J. (2000) Port privatisation: Objectives, extent, process, and the UK experience. International Journal of Maritime Economics 2 (3): 177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Birkinshaw, J., Hamel, G. and Mol, M.J. (2008) Management innovation. Academy of Management Review 33 (4): 825–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brooks, M.R. (2004) The governance structure of ports. Review of Network Economics 3 (2): 168–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brooks, M.R. and Cullinane, K. (eds.) (2006) Devolution, Port Governance and Port Performance, Vol. 17 Amsterdam: JAI Press (Elsevier).Google Scholar
  9. Costa, I. and Ferrão, P. (2010) A case study of industrial symbiosis development using a middle-out approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 18 (10–11): 984–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Debrie, J., Lavaud-Letilleul, V. and Parola, F. (2013) Shaping port governance: The territorial trajectories of reform. Journal of Transport Geography 27: 56–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Langen, P. and Visser, E. (2005) Collective action regimes in seaport clusters: The case of the lower Mississippi port cluster. Journal of Transport Geography 13 (2): 173–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Langen, P., Van den Berg, R. and Willeumier, A. (2012) A new approach to granting terminal concessions: The case of the Rotterdam World Gateway terminal. Maritime Policy & Management 39 (1): 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Delmas, M. and Toffel, M.W. (2004) Stakeholders and environmental management practices: An institutional framework. Business Strategy and the Environment 13 (4): 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deutz, P. and Gibbs, D. (2004) Eco-industrial development and economic development: Industrial ecology or place promotion? Business Strategy and the Environment 13 (5): 347–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Doménech, T. and Davies, M. (2011) The role of embeddedness in industrial symbiosis networks: Phases in the evolution of industrial symbiosis networks. Business Strategy and the Environment 20 (5): 281–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dooms, M., Verbeke, A. and Haezendonck, E. (2013) Stakeholder management and path dependence in large-scale transport infrastructure development: The port of Antwerp case (1960–2010). Journal of Transport Geography 27: 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ehrenfeld, J. and Gertler, N. (1997) Industrial ecology in practice: The evolution of interdependence at Kalundborg. Journal of Industrial Ecology 1 (1): 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eisenhardt, K.M. and Graebner, M.E. (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal 50 (1): 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Esty, D.C. and Porter, M.E. (1998) Industrial ecology and competitiveness: Strategic implications for the firm. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2 (1): 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Farrell, S. (2012) The ownership and management structure of container terminal concessions. Maritime Policy & Management 39 (1): 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haugstetter, H. and Cahoon, S. (2010) Strategic intent: Guiding port authorities to their new world? Research in Transportation Economics 27 (1): 30–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heeres, R.R., Vermeulen, W.J.V. and De Walle, F.B. (2004) Eco-industrial park initiatives in the USA and the Netherlands: First lessons. Journal of Cleaner Production 12 (8–10): 985–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ho, M.W. and Ho, K.H. (2006) Risk management in large physical infrastructure investments: The context of seaport infrastructure development and investment. Maritime Economics & Logistics 8 (2): 140–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hollen, R.M.A., Van den Bosch, F.A.J. and Volberda, H.W. (2013a) Business model innovation of the Port of Rotterdam Authority (2000–2012). In: B. Kuipers and R. Zuidwijk (eds.) Smart Port Perspectives: Essays in Honour of Hans Smits. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Erasmus Smart Port Rotterdam, pp. 29–47, ISBN: 978-90-819767-1-8.Google Scholar
  25. Hollen, R.M.A., Van den Bosch, F.A.J. and Volberda, H.W. (2013b) The role of management innovation in enabling technological process innovation: An inter-organizational perspective. European Management Review 10 (1): 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Homsombat, W., Yip, T.L., Yang, H. and Fu, X. (2013) Regional cooperation and management of port pollution. Maritime Policy & Management 40 (5): 451–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Joskow, P.L. (2013) Natural gas: From shortages to abundance in the United States. American Economic Review 103 (3): 338–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Korhonen, J., Von Malmborg, F., Strachan, P.A. and Ehrenfeld, J.R. (2004) Management and policy aspects of industrial ecology: An emerging research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment 13 (5): 289–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lam, J.S.L. and Notteboom, T. (2014) The greening of ports: A comparison of port management tools used by leading ports in Asia and Europe. Transport Reviews 34 (2): 169–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lowe, E.A. and Evans, L.K. (1995) Industrial ecology and industrial ecosystems. Journal of Cleaner Production 3 (1–2): 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mangan, A. and Olivetti, E. (2010) By-product synergy networks: Driving innovation through waste reduction and carbon mitigation. In: J. Harmsen and J.B. Powell (eds.) Sustainable Development in the Process Industries: Cases and Impact. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 81–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mirata, M. (2004) Experiences from early stages of a national industrial symbiosis programme in the UK: Determinants and coordination challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production 12 (8–10): 993–1002.Google Scholar
  33. Notteboom, T.E., Pallis, A.A. and Farrell, S. (2012) Terminal concessions in seaports revisited. Maritime Policy & Management 39 (1): 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Notteboom, T.E. and Winkelmans, W. (2001) Structural changes in logistics: How will port authorities face the challenge? Maritime Policy & Management 28 (1): 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. OECD. (2013) The Competitiveness of Global Port-Cities: Synthesis Report.Google Scholar
  36. Parola, F., Satta, G., Penco, L. and Profumo, G. (2013) Emerging port authority communication strategies: Assessing the determinants of disclosure in the annual report. Research in Transportation Business & Management 8: 134–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Parola, F., Tei, A. and Ferrari, C. (2012) Managing port concessions: Evidence from Italy. Maritime Policy & Management 39 (1): 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Port of Rotterdam Authority. (2012) Port Vision 2030: Port Compass.Google Scholar
  39. Richards, D.L. and Pearson, G.P. (eds.) (1998) The Ecology of Industry: Sectors and Linkages. Washington DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  40. Schwarz, E.J. and Steininger, K.W. (1997) Implementing nature’s lesson: The industrial recycling network enhancing regional development. Journal of Cleaner Production 5 (1–2): 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shrivastava, P. (1995) Environmental technologies and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal 16 (S1): 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Soylu, K. and Dumville, J.C. (2011) Design for environment: The greening of product and supply chain. Maritime Economics & Logistics 13 (1): 29–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tsvetkova, A. and Gustafsson, M. (2012) Business models for industrial ecosystems: A modular approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 29–30: 246–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Van den Bosch, F.A.J., Hollen, R.M.A., Volberda, H.W. and Baaij, M.G. (2011) The Strategic Value of the Port of Rotterdam for the International Competitiveness of the Netherlands: A First Exploration. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: INSCOPE/RSM Erasmus University, ISBN: 978-90-817220-2-5.Google Scholar
  45. Van der Lugt, L., Dooms, M. and Parola, F. (2013) Strategy making by hybrid organizations: The case of the port authority. Research in Transportation Business & Management 8: 103–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Verhoeven, P. (2010) A review of port authority functions: Towards a renaissance? Maritime Policy & Management 37 (3): 247–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Von Malmborg, F. (2004) Networking for knowledge transfer: Towards an understanding of local authority roles in regional industrial ecosystem management. Business Strategy and the Environment 13 (5): 334–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development). (1987) Our Common Future. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. World Bank. (2007) Port Reform Toolkit Module 3: Alternative Port Management Structures and Ownership Models. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  50. Yin, R.K. (2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  51. Zhou, L., Shan-ying, H., Li, Y., Jin, Y. and Zhang, X. (2012) Modeling and optimization of a coal-chemical eco-industrial system in China. Journal of Industrial Ecology 16 (1): 105–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zott, C. and Amit, R. (2010) Business model design: An activity system perspective. Long Range Planning 43 (2–3): 216–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rick M A Hollen
    • 1
  • Frans A J van den Bosch
    • 1
  • Henk W Volberda
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Strategic Management and EntrepreneurshipRotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University RotterdamDR RotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations