Negotiating place, space and borders: The New Sanctuary Movement

Abstract

This article examines immigration and immigrant rights through the activities of the New Sanctuary Movement (NSM). The NSM, which is led by religious activists, responds to the contradiction between the basic principles of freedom that have theoretically grounded the American political system and the practices that have allowed for the current measures taken against immigrants. This article employs narratives from NSM supporters, stories from undocumented individuals in sanctuary, and scholarly work to illustrate how the NSM works as a channel for mobilization and articulation of demands of supportive religious and political activists who seek comprehensive immigration reform, as well as providing sanctuary places for undocumented immigrants faced with deportation. The NSM in Ventura County, Los Angeles County and San Francisco, California, are used as case studies to conclude that the NSM has been effective in creating and taking advantage of political opportunities to improve public policies and immigrants’ ability to negotiate local, state and national political structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to David Thurston, editor of Sanctuary: National Newsletter of the New Sanctuary Movement, actual size is difficult to determine because of the fluid and loose structure of the NSM to date. (D. Thurston, 2008, personal communication) In “The New Sanctuary Movement: Protecting and Welcoming” posted by Religion.link.com there are 35 different networks in 10 states, 8 December 2008. http://www.religionlink.com/tip_081208.php.

  2. 2.

    The United States Congress passed legislation in 1990 to allow the president to grant Temporary Protected Status (TPS) to particular groups needing temporary safe haven, although El Salvadorans were specifically designated for TPS status in the immigration act. TPS granted legal temporary protection and work permits. The latest extension of TPS runs out in 2010. The US Department of Homeland Security extended TPS for eligible Honduran, Nicaraguan, and El Salvadoran nationals to continue living and working in the United States for an additional 18 months beginning in May 2007 (Ambassador Glazer confirms TPS Extension, 2007).

  3. 3.

    Most these objectives and interfaith participation can be found on the NSM website: www.newsanctuarymovement.org.

  4. 4.

    Interviews with pastors and Congregationalists were videotaped on 26 October 2007, at the United Church of Christ in Simi, California. These interviews were used extensively in this study.

  5. 5.

    www.newsanctuarymovement.org/graphics/documents/LEGAL_JUSTIFICATIONM_FOR_LEGAL_STATUS_CONGREGATIONS.pdf. It should be noted that if you publicize your activities it does not necessarily make you immune from prosecution. For example, in US v. Rubio-Gonzalez, the 5th Circuit found the definition of “harboring” can be “any conduct tending to substantially facilitate an alien's remaining in the US illegally” (US v. Rubio-Gonzalez, 674F.2d 1067, 1072 [5th Circuit 1982]).

  6. 6.

    All cases decided under 1324(a) involved defendants who kept silent about the aliens’ presence, rather than individuals who have reported the aliens’ presence to the ICE (formerly INS) but who have continued to shelter them. Therefore, a congregation giving sanctuary to an undocumented immigrant is unlikely to be prosecuted unless they are attempting to conceal the individual from ICE.

  7. 7.

    Out of a total population of 796,000 (U.S. Census Bureau, 2000). Also, for statistics nationwide, see “Size and Characteristics of the Unauthorized Migrant Population in the US” (Passel, 2006). According to this report, of the estimated 12 million undocumented workers, about 2.5 million live in California, more than in any other state. http://pewhispanic.org/reports/report.php?ReportID=61.

  8. 8.

    The NSM Pledge can be found at www.newsanctuarymovement.org.

  9. 9.

    Liliana's sanctuary story began in the May of 2007 when four ICE agents with papers authorizing her deportation arrived one morning at her home. However, Liliana was granted a week to put in order her life, which included her husband and two sons, one seven years old and the other two months old, and a four-year-old daughter.

References

  1. Ambassador Glazer confirms TPS Extension. 2007. Press Release United States Department of State, 2 May, http://sansalvador.usembassy.gov/pr-05022007.html.

  2. Bakalis, A . 2007. Church to be Billed for Costs of Protest: Simi Wants $40,000 for Police Presence at Event. Ventura County Star, 19 September: A1.

  3. Bakalis, A. and Z. Barlow . 2007. Bill for Protest Raising Eyebrows. Ventura County Star, 20 September: A1.

  4. Benford, R. and D. Snow . 2000. Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 26: 11–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Benford, R. and S. Hunt . 1994. Identity Talk in the Peace and Justice Movement. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 22 (4): 488–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Benson, R . 1997. An Insider's Critique of the Social Movement Framing Perspective. Sociological Inquiry 64 (4): 409–430.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Buff, R . 2008. Immigrant Rights in the Shadows of Citizenship. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Capps, R. and K. Fortuny . 2007. The Characteristics of Unauthorized Immigrants in California, Los Angeles County, and the United States. Washington, DC: Urban Institute, http://www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=411425, accessed 8 January 2009.

  9. Chairwoman Lynn Woolsey Statement at Subcommittee Hearing on “ICE Workplace Raids: The Impact on U.S. Citizen Children, Families, and Communities”. 2008. Press Release 20 May.

  10. Coutin, S.B . 1995. The Culture of Protest: Religious Activism and the U.S. Sanctuary Movement. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cunningham, H . 1995. God and Caesar at the Rio Grande: Sanctuary and the Politics of Religion. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. East Bay Churches Form New Sanctuary Movement to Advocate for Immigrant Families. 2007. The Catholic Voice 45(20), 19 November, http://www.catholicvoiceoakland.org/07-11-19/inthisissue6.htm, accessed 23 January 2009.

  13. Eisinger, P . 1973. The Conditions of Protest Behavior in American Cities. American Political Science Review 81: 11–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fine, G . 1995. Public Narration and Group Culture: Discerning Discourse in Social Movements. In Social Movements and Culture, eds. H. Johnston and B. Klandermans, 127–143. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Golden, R. and M. McConnell . 1986. Sanctuary: The New Underground Railroad. New York: Orbis.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gordon, J . 2005. Suburban Sweatshops: The Fight for Immigrant Rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hayduk, R . 2006. Democracy for All: Restoring Immigrant Voting Rights in the United States. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hondagneu-Sotelo, P . 2008. God's Heart Has No Borders: How Religious Activists Are Working for Immigrant Rights. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Immigration Raids Not In Sync With Policies. 2008. Contra Costa Timeshttp://www.cis.org/node/667, accessed 26 January 2009.

  20. Kisken, T. and M. Klampe . 2006. Undocumented Drive Wedge in Ventura County, Ventura County Star 2 April: B1.

  21. Kriesi, H., R. Koopmans, J. Duyvendak and M. Giugni . 1992. New Social Movements and Political Opportunities in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research 22: 219–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lippert, R . 2005. Sanctuary, Sovereignty, Sacrifice: Canadian Sanctuary Incidents, Power, and Law. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  23. McAdams, D., J. McCarthy and M. Zald . 1996. Introduction: Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Framing Processes–Toward a Synthetic, Comparative Perspective on Social Movements. In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements, eds. D. McAdam, J. McCarthy and M. Zald, 1–20. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. McAdams, D., J. McCarthy and M. Zald . 1988. Social Movements. In Handbook of Sociology, ed. N. Joseph, 696–737. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  25. McCarthy, J. and M. Zald . 1977. Resource Mobilization and Social Movements. The American Journal of Sociology 82 (6): 1212–1241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. New Sanctuary Movement. 2007. The New Sanctuary Movement: The First Six Months. Paper presented at the Third National Gathering, Los Angeles, CA, November.

  27. New Sanctuary Movement. 2009. NSM Report, September.

  28. Oines, J . 2007. Lecture at California Lutheran University, 26 November.

  29. Passel, J . 2006. Size and Characteristics of the Unauthorized Migrant Population in the U.S. Estimates Based on the March 2005 Current Population Survey. Washington DC, Pew Hispanic Center, 2 March.

  30. Preston, J . 2009. Agency Plans for Visa Push Made Legal. New York Times October 2: A15.

  31. Rodriguez, S . 2007. The Church is the Last Safe Haven. Sojourners Magazine 36.

  32. Sahagun, L . 2007. L.A. Church in Forefront of Sanctuary Movement. Los Angeles Times March 23: B1.

  33. Salvatierra, A . 2007. Sacred Refuge. Sojourner Magazine 36 (9): 12 16, 18–20.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Scherr, J . 2007. East Bay Sanctuary Covenant Turns 25. Berkeley Daily Planet, 23 March: P1.

  35. Snow, D., E.B. Rochford, S. Worden and R. Benford . 1986. Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation. American Sociological Review 51: 464–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tarrow, S . 1994. Power in Movement: Collective Action, Social Movements and Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tarrow, S . 1996. States and Opportunities: The Political Structuring of Social Movements. In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements, eds. D. McAdam, J. McCarthy and M. Zald, 41–61. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ticktin, M . 2007. Edited Transcript of Miriam Ticktin's Lunchtime Presentation to SSRC Staff on 22 May 2007, http://www.ssrc.org/features/view/human-rights-for-the-few-not-the-many/, accessed 8 February 2010.

  39. U.S. Census Bureau. 2000. America's Families and Living Arrangements. Washington DC: US Department of Commerce.

  40. Van Biema, D . 2007. Does the Bible Support Sanctuary? Time July 20. This article is posted at http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1645646,00.html?iid=sphere-inlie-bottom.

  41. Wood, R . 1994. Faith in Action: Religion for Political Success in Three Congregations. Sociology of Religion 55 (4): 397–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zald, M. and J.D. McCarthy, eds. 1979. The Dynamics of Social Movements: Resource Mobilization, Social Control, and Tactics. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Freeland, G. Negotiating place, space and borders: The New Sanctuary Movement. Lat Stud 8, 485–508 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/lst.2010.53

Download citation

Keywords

  • immigration
  • New Sanctuary Movement
  • political opportunity
  • Latino politics
  • social movements