Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The tacit mystery: reconciling different approaches to tacit knowledge

Knowledge Management Research & Practice

Cite this article

Abstract

In the management literature, tacit knowledge has been conceptualised in partial, divergent, and contradictory ways. This paper reconciles these different approaches by explaining how they address different aspects of the theory of tacit knowing developed through the seminal work of Michael Polanyi. To clarify Polanyi’s work, we provide a more inclusive theoretical framework for scholars concerned with the creation and transfer of knowledge. Using this framework, we examine the implications for theory and practice of these different conceptualisations and suggest areas for future research. We conclude by proposing that new insights can be gained by reconsidering the concepts of knowing, tacit integration and indwelling where tacit knowing is developed by practical immersion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvesson M and Kärreman D (2001) Odd couple: making sense of the curious concept of knowledge management. Journal of Management Studies 38 (7), 995–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosini V (2003) Tacit and Ambiguous Resources as Sources of Competitive Advantage. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosini V and Bowman C (2001) Tacit knowledge: some suggestions for operationalization. Journal of Management Studies 38 (6), 811–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews KR (1980) The Concept of Corporate Strategy, Revised edition, Richard D. Irwin, Homewood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argote L and Ingram P (2000) Knowledge transfer: a basis for a competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes 82 (1), 150–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C (1999) Tacit knowledge and management. In Tacit Knowledge in Professional Practice, Researcher and Practitioner Perspective (Sternberg RJ and Horvath JA, Eds), pp 123–140, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong SJ and Mahmud A (2008) Experiential learning and the acquisition of managerial tacit knowledge. Academy of Management Learning and Education 7 (2), 189–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assudani R H (2005) Catching the chameleon: understanding the elusive term ‘knowledge’. Journal of Knowledge Management 9 (2), 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athanassiou N and Nigh D (2000) Internationalization, tacit knowledge and the top management teams of MNCs. Journal of International Business Studies 31 (3), 471–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard C (1938) The Functions of the Executive. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17 (1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumard P (1999) Tacit Knowledge in Organizations. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becerra M, Lunnan R and Huemer L (2008) Trustworthiness, risk, and the transfer of tacit and explicit knowledge between alliance partners. Journal of Management Studies 45 (4), 691–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman S L, Down J and Hill CW (2002) Tacit knowledge as a source of competitive advantage in the National Basketball Association. Academy of Management Journal 45 (1), 13–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blacker F (1995) Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: an overview and interpretation. Organization Studies 16 (6), 1021–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloodgood JM and Chilton MA (2012) Performance implications of matching adaption and innovation cognitive style with explicit and tacit knowledge resources. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 10 (2), 106–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boiral O (2002) Tacit knowledge and environmental management. Long Range Planning 35 (3), 291–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordum A (2002) From tacit knowing to tacit knowledge – emancipation or ideology? Critical Quarterly 44 (3), 50–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockmann E and Anthony W (1998) The influence of tacit knowledge and collective mind on strategic planning. Journal of Managerial Issues 10 (2), 204–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brohm R (2006) The emancipatory power of the tacit dimension. Critical Perspectives on International Business 2 (3), 244–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burwood S (2007) Imitation, indwelling and the embodied self. Educational Philosophy and Theory 39 (2), 118–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo J (2002) A note on the concept of tacit knowledge. Journal of Management Inquiry 11 (1), 46–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavusgil S, Calantone R and Zhao Y (2003) Tacit knowledge transfer and firm innovation capability. The Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 18 (1), 6–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi B and Lee H (2002) Knowledge management strategy and its link to knowledge creation process. Expert Systems with Applications 23 (2), 173–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi B and Lee H (2003) An empirical investigation of KM styles and their effect on corporate performance. Information & Management 40 (5), 403–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coff R, Coff D and Eastvold R (2006) The knowledge-leveraging paradox: how to achieve scale without making knowledge imitable. Academy of Management Review 31 (2), 452–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins H (2007) Bicycling on the Moon: collective tacit knowledge and somatic-limit tacit knowledge. Organizations Studies 28 (2), 257–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collis D (1996) Organizational capability as a source of profit. In Organizational Learning and Competitive Advantage (Moingeon B and Edmondson A, Eds), pp 139–163, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Collis D and Montgomery C (1995) Competing on resources: strategy in the 1990s. Harvard Business Review 73 (4), 118–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook SDN and Brown JS (1999) Bridging epistemologies: the generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organizational Science 10 (4), 381–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan R, David P and Foray D (2000) The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness. Industrial and Corporate Change 9 (2), 211–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross R, Parker A, Prusak L and Borgatti SP (2001) Knowing what we know: supporting knowledge creation and sharing in social networks. Organizational Dynamics 30 (2), 100–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Eredita MA and Barreto C (2006) How does tacit knowledge proliferate? An episode-based perspective. Organization Studies 27 (12), 1821–1841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport T and Prusak L (1998) Working Knowledge, How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhanaraj C, Lyles M, Steensma H and Tihanyi L (2004) Managing tacit and explicit knowledge transfer in IJVs: the role of relational embeddedness and the impact on performance. Journal of International Business Studies 35 (5), 428–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duguid P (2005) ‘The art of knowing’: social and tacit dimensions of knowledge and the limits of the community of practice. The Information Society 21 (2), 109–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durrance B (1998) Some explicit thoughts on tacit learning. Training & Development 52 (12), 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans K, Kersh N and Kontiainen S (2004) Recognition of tacit skills: sustaining learning outcomes in adult learning and work re-entry. International Journal of Learning and Development 8 (1), 54–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiet JO (2002) The Systematic Search for Entrepreneurial Discoveries. Quorum Books, Westport, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foos T, Schum G and Rothenberg S (2006) Tacit knowledge transfer and the knowledge disconnect. Journal of Knowledge Management 10 (1), 6–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frappaolo C (2008) Implicit knowledge. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 6 (1), 23–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeze RD and Kulkarni U (2007) Knowledge management capability: defining knowledge assets. Journal of Knowledge Management 11 (6), 94–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat P (1999) Strategy and the Business Landscape, Text and Cases. Prentice-Hall, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat P (2002) Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review 76 (1), 37–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffin K and Koners U (2011) Tacit knowledge, lessons learnt, and new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management 28 (2), 300–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman M (2002) Types of knowledge and their roles in technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer 27 (3), 219–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gourlay S (2006a) Towards conceptual clarity for ‘tacit knowledge’: a review of empirical studies. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 4 (1), 60–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gourlay S (2006b) Conceptualizing knowledge creation: a critique of Nonaka’s theory. Journal of Management Studies 43 (7), 1415–1436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant RM (1991) The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review 33 (3), 114–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant RM (1996a) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17 (Winter Special Issue), 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant RM (1996b) Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science 7 (4), 375–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory S (1999) Tacit knowledge in sales: a practitioner’s perspective. In Tacit Knowledge in Professional Practice, Researcher and Practitioner Perspective (Sternberg RJ and Horvath JA, Eds), pp 183–192, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen MT (1999) The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly 44 (1), 82–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harlow H (2008) The effect of tacit knowledge on firm performance. Journal of Knowledge Transfer 12 (1), 148–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatsopoulos NG and Hatsopoulos GN (1999) The role of tacit knowledge in management. In Tacit Knowledge in Professional Practice, Researcher and Practitioner Perspective (Sternberg RJ and Horvath JA, Eds), pp 141–152, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedlund G (1994) A model of knowledge management and the N-form corporation. Strategic Management Journal 15 (2), 73–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedlund J, Forsythe GB, Horvath JA, Williams WM, Snook S and Sternberg RJ (2003) Identifying and assessing tacit knowledge: understanding the practical intelligence of military leaders. The Leadership Quarterly 14 (2), 117–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertog J and Huizenga E (2000) The knowledge Enterprise, Implementation of Intelligent Business Strategies. Imperial College Press, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks RC, Dattero R and Galup SD (2007) A metaphor for knowledge management: explicit islands in a tacit sea. Journal of Knowledge Management 11 (1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill RC and Levenhagen M (1995) Metaphors and mental models: sensemaking and sensegiving in innovative and entrepreneurial activities. Journal of Management 21 (6), 1057–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howells J (1996) Tacit knowledge, innovation and technology transfer. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 8 (2), 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen A and Dinur A (1998) Knowledge management processes and international joint ventures. Organization Science 9 (4), 454–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen A and Pien W (2006) An examination of collaboration and knowledge transfer: China-Singapore Suzhou Industrial Park. Journal of Management Studies 43 (4), 779–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janson A and McQueen RJ (2007) Capturing leadership tacit knowledge in conversations with leaders. Leadership & Organization Development Journal 28 (7), 646–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha SR (2002) Reconsidering Michael Polanyi’s Philosophy. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joia LA and Lemos B (2010) Relevant factors for tacit knowledge transfer within organisations. Journal of Knowledge Management 14 (3), 410–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones M (2005) Tacit knowledge sharing during ERP implementation: a multi-site case study. Information Resources Management Journal 18 (2), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keskin H (2005) The relationship between explicit and tacit oriented KM strategy, and firm performance. The Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge 7 (1), 169–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein JH (2008) Some directions for research in knowledge sharing. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 6 (1), 41–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut B and Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organization Science 3 (3), 383–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koskinen K (2003) Evaluation of tacit knowledge utilization in work units. Journal of knowledge Management 7 (5), 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard D and Sensiper S (1998) The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation. California Management Review 40 (3), 112–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton D (1992) Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal 13 (S1), 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin D and Cross R (2004) The strength of weak ties you can trust: the mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science 50 (11), 1477–1490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li M and Gao F (2003) Why Nonaka highlights tacit knowledge: a critical review. Journal of Knowledge Management 7 (4), 6–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin C (2007) To share or not to share: modeling tacit knowledge sharing, its mediators and antecedents. Journal of Business Ethics 70 (4), 411–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubit R (2001) The keys to sustainable competitive advantage: tacit knowledge and knowledge management. Organizational Dynamics 29 (3), 164–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March J and Simon H (1958) Organizations. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskell P and Malmberg A (1999) Localised learning and industrial competitiveness. Cambridge Journal of Economics 23 (2), 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdam R, Mason B and McCrory J (2007) Exploring the dichotomies within the tacit knowledge literature: towards a process of tacit knowing in organizations. Journal of Knowledge Management 11 (2), 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooradian N (2005) Tacit knowledge: philosophic roots and role in KM. Journal of Knowledge Management 9 (6), 104–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder U and Whiteley A (2007) Emerging and capturing tacit knowledge: a methodology for a bounded environment. Journal of Knowledge Management 11 (1), 68–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R and Winter S (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls MG and Cargill BJ (2008) Determining best practice production in an aluminium smelter involving sub-processes based substantially on tacit knowledge: an application of communities of practice. Journal of the Operational Research Society 59 (1), 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I (1991) The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review 69 (6), 96–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science 5 (1), 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I and Takeuchi H (1995) The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I and Von Krogh G (2009) Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization Science 20 (3), 635–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Toyama R and Konno N (2000) SECI, Ba and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning 33 (1), 5–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oğuz F and Şengün AE (2011) Mystery of the unknown: revisiting tacit knowledge in the organizational literature. Journal of Knowledge Management 15 (3), 445–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patriotta G (2003) Organizational Knowledge in the Making, How Firms Create, Use and Institutionalize Knowledge. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peet M (2012) Leadership transitions, tacit knowledge sharing and organizational generativity. Journal of Knowledge Management 16 (1), 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peteraf M (1993) The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal 14 (3), 179–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philipoom P and Steele D (2011) Shop floor control when tacit worker knowledge is important. Decision Sciences 42 (3), 655–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M (1962) Tacit knowing: its bearing on some problems of philosophy. Reviews of Modern Physics 34 (4), 601–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M (1969) The creative imagination. Psychological Issues 6 (2), 53–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M (1974) Personal Knowledge, Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. (First published in 1958, Corrected edition 1962), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M (1983) The Tacit Dimension. (First published in 1966), Peter Smith, Gloucester, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter M (1985) Competitive Advantage, Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad CK and Hamel G (1990) The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review 68 (3), 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray T (2008) Rethinking Michael Polanyi’s realism: from personal knowledge to intersubjectively viable communication. Prometheus 26 (3), 241–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray T (2009) Rethinking Polanyi’s concept of tacit knowledge: from personal knowing to imagined institutions. Minerva 47 (1), 75–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray T and Clegg S (2007) Can we make sense of knowledge management’s tangible rainbow? a radical constructivist alternative. Prometheus 25 (2), 161–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe PA and Christie MJ (2008) Sharing of tacit knowledge. In Entrepreneurial Learning (Harrison RT and Leitch CM, Eds), pp 188–202, Routledge, Abingdon, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salas E, Rosen MA and DiazGranados D (2010) Expertise-based intuition and decision making in organizations. Journal of Management 36 (4), 941–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott W (1971) Tacit knowing and the concept of mind. The Philosophical Quarterly 21 (82), 22–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultze U and Stabell C (2004) Knowing what you don’t know? Discourses and contradictions in knowledge management research. Journal of Management Studies 41 (4), 549–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidler-de Alwis R and Hartmann E (2008) The use of tacit knowledge within innovative companies: knowledge management in innovative enterprises. Journal of Knowledge Management 12 (1), 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selamat MH and Choudrie J (2007) Using meta-abilities and tacit knowledge for developing learning based systems: a case study approach. The Learning Organization 14 (4), 321–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senker J (1995) Tacit knowledge and models of innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change 4 (2), 425–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin M, Holden T and Schmidt RA (2001) From knowledge theory to management practice: towards an integrated approach. Information Processing and Management 37 (2), 335–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon H (1945) Administrative Behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations. Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowden D (2000) Organic knowledge management: part I The ASHEN model: an enabler of actions. Knowledge Management 3 (7), 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spender J (1996a) Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17 (S2), 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spender J (1996b) Competitive advantage from tacit knowledge? Unpacking the concept and its strategic implications. In Organizational Learning and Competitive Advantage (Moingeon B and Edmondson A, Eds), pp 56–73, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Spender J and Grant R (1996) Knowledge of the firm: overview. Strategic Management Journal 17 (S2), 5–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiger DM and Steiger NM (2008) Instance-based cognitive mapping: a process for discovering a knowledge worker’s tacit mental model. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 6 (4), 312–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg R (2003) WICS: a model of leadership in organizations. Academy of Management Learning and Education 2 (4), 386–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg R (2004) Successful intelligence as a basis for entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing 19 (2), 189–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Styhre A (2004) Rethinking knowledge: a Bergsonian critique of the notion of tacit knowledge. British Journal of Management 15 (2), 177–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suppiah V and Sandhu MS (2011) Organisational culture’s influence on tacit knowledge-sharing behaviour. Journal of Knowledge Management 15 (3), 462–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swart J and Powell J (2006) Men and measures: capturing knowledge requirements in firms through qualitative system modelling. Journal of the Operational Research Society 57 (1), 10–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor F (1911) The Principles of Scientific Management. Harper and Brothers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas H and Vladimirou E (2001) What is organizational knowledge? Journal of Management Studies 38 (7), 973–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas H (2003) Do we really understand tacit knowledge? In The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management (Easterby-Smith M and Lyles M, Eds), pp 410–427, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomi I (1999) Data is more than knowledge: implications of the reversed knowledge hierarchy for knowledge management and organizational memory. Journal of Management Information Systems 16 (3), 103–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner K and Makhija MV (2006) The role of organizational controls in managing knowledge. Academy of Management Review 31 (1), 197–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkitachalam K and Busch P (2011) Tacit knowledge: review and possible research directions. Journal of Knowledge Management 16 (2), 356–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner R (1987) Tacit knowledge in everyday intelligent behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52 (6), 1236–1247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner R and Sternberg R (1985) Practical intelligence in real-world pursuits: the role of tacit knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49 (2), 436–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner RK, Sujan J, Sujan M, Rashotte CA and Sternberg RJ (1999) Tacit knowledge in sales. In Tacit Knowledge in Professional Practice, Researcher and Practitioner Perspective (Sternberg RJ and Horvath JA, Eds), pp 155–182, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5 (2), 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte G and Classen S (2012) Using storytelling to elicit tacit knowledge from SMEs. Journal of Knowledge Management 16 (6), 950–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wier B, Stone D and Hunton J (2005) Does graduate business education contribute to professional accounting success? Accounting Horizons 19 (2), 85–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams P (2002) The competent boundary spanner. Public Administration 80 (1), 103–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson TD (2002) The nonsense of ‘knowledge management’. Information Research 8 (1), [WWW document] http://InformationR.net/ir/8-1/paper144.html (first accessed January 2007).

  • Yin E and Bao Y (2006) The acquisition of tacit knowledge in China: an empirical analysis of the ‘supplier-side individual level’ and ‘recipient-side’ factors. Management International Review 46 (3), 327–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile

    Cristian A Muñoz

  2. Nottingham University Business School, Nottingham, U.K.

    Simon Mosey & Martin Binks

Authors
  1. Cristian A Muñoz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Simon Mosey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Martin Binks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cristian A Muñoz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muñoz, C., Mosey, S. & Binks, M. The tacit mystery: reconciling different approaches to tacit knowledge. Knowl Manage Res Pract 13, 289–298 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2013.50

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2013.50

Keywords

search

Navigation