Journal of Public Health Policy

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 14–25 | Cite as

The Arms Trade Treaty (ATT): A public health imperative

  • Maria ValentiEmail author
  • Robert Mtonga
  • Robert Gould
  • Michael Christ


The United Nations adopted an historic international Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) in April 2013. A 1997 meeting of Nobel Peace Prize laureates who called for an International Code of Conduct to address the ‘destructive effects of the unregulated arms trade’ initiated discussions that led to the Treaty. Public health institutions, including the World Health Organization and the International Committee of the Red Cross, and nongovernmental health groups such as International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War, made adoption of the ATT a public health imperative. The poorly regulated $70 billion annual trade in conventional arms fuels conflict, with devastating effects on global health. The ATT aims to ‘reduce human suffering’. It prohibits arms’ sales if there is knowledge that the arms would be used in the commission of genocide, attacks against civilians, or war crimes. The health community has much to contribute to ensuring ratification and implementation of the ATT.


armed violence arms trade public health violence prevention 



  1. The Arias Foundation for Peace and Human Progress. (1997) The international code of conduct on arms transfers. Statement by Nobel Laureates, New York City, 29 May,, accessed 4 September 2013.
  2. Parliamentarians for Global Action. (2013) PGA parliamentary handbook: Promoting signature, ratification and implementation of the Arms Trade Treaty, August,, accessed 19 September 2013.
  3. United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs (UNODA). (2013) Arms Trade Treaty,, accessed 19 September 2013.
  4. World Health Organization. (2001) Small arms and global health. WHO contribution to the UN Conference on Illicit Trade in small arms and light weapons, 9–20 July, WHO/NMH/VIP/01.1,, accessed 19 September 2013.
  5. United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs. (2013), accessed 6 September 2013.
  6. World Health Organization. 49th World Health Assembly, Geneva 1996,, accessed 19 September 2013.
  7. Krug, E.G., Dahlberg, L.L., Mercy, J.A., Zwi, A.B. and Lozano, R. (2002) World Report on Violence and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  8. International Committee of the Red Cross. (2013) Position on an Arms Trade Treaty, 1 October 2009,, accessed 6 September 2013.
  9. American Public Health Association. (2009) Policy statement database,, accessed 6 September 2013.
  10. United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs (UNODA). (2013) Signature and ratification: Arms Trade Treaty: Robust standards for responsible transfers,, accessed 19 September 2013.
  11. Control Arms. (2013) Summary analysis of the Arms Trade Treaty,, accessed 19 September 2013.
  12. Oxfam. (2013) The truth about the Arms Trade Treaty,, accessed 20 September 2013.
  13. American Bar Association Center for Human Rights. (2013) White paper on the proposed Arms Trade Treaty and the second amendment, 26 February,, accessed 20 September 2013.
  14. Valenti, M., Freeman, P. and Robbins, A. (2007) Special section: Small arms and light weapons in Africa – A major challenge to public health and development. Journal of Public Health Policy 28 (4): 387–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Odhiambo, W. (2004) International physicians for the prevention of nuclear war. One Bullet Story series, Kenya,, accessed 19 September 2013.
  16. Jackson, T.L. (2006) Workshop Summary: The Direct and Indirect Consequences of Small Arms Violence on Morbidity. Proceedings of the COST A25 Workshop in conjunction with the IPPNW Helsinki Congress; 8 September, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Valenti
    • 1
    Email author
  • Robert Mtonga
    • 2
  • Robert Gould
    • 3
  • Michael Christ
    • 1
  1. 1.International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW)SomervilleUSA
  2. 2.Zambian Healthworkers for Social ResponsibilityLusakaZambia
  3. 3.Physicians for Social ResponsibilityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations