Advertisement

Journal of Public Health Policy

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 91–104 | Cite as

Measuring youth exposure to alcohol marketing on social networking sites: Challenges and prospects

  • David H Jernigan
  • Anne E Rushman
Original Article

Abstract

Youth exposure to alcohol marketing has been linked to increased alcohol consumption and problems. On relatively new and highly interactive social networking sites (SNS) that are popular with youth, tools for measuring youth exposure to alcohol marketing in traditional media are inadequate. We critically review the existing policies of Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube designed to keep branded alcohol content away from underage youth. Looking at brand and user activity on Facebook for the 15 alcohol brands most popular among US youth, we found activity has grown dramatically in the past 3 years, and underage users may be accounting for some of this activity. Surveys of youth and adult participation in alcohol marketing on SNS will be needed to inform debate over these marketing practices.

Keywords

alcohol advertising internet youth self-regulation 

References

  1. Gore, F.M. et al (2011) Global burden of disease in young people aged 10–24 years: A systematic analysis. Lancet 377 (9783): 2093–2102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Jernigan, D. (2012) The Size of the Global Alcohol Market and Its Penetration in the African Region. Brazzaville: WHO African Regional Office.Google Scholar
  3. Global Marketers 2011. (2012) Database on the Internet, http://adage.com/datacenter/globalmarketers2011/ – 37, accessed 9 September 2013.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, P., De Bruijn, A., Angus, K., Gordon, R. and Hastings, G. (2009) Impact of alcohol advertising and media exposure on adolescent alcohol use: A systematic review of longitudinal studies. Alcohol and Alcoholism 44 (3): 229–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jernigan, D.H. (2011) Framing a public health debate over alcohol advertising: The center on alcohol marketing and youth 2002–2008. Journal of Public Health Policy 32 (2): 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Bruijn, A., van den Wildenberg, E. and van den Broeck, A. (2012) Commercial Promotion of Drinking in Europe: Key Findings of Independent Monitoring of Alcohol Marketing in Five European countries. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Dutch Institute for Alcohol Policy (STAP).Google Scholar
  7. Pew Internet and American Life Project. (2013) Trend Data (Adults). Washington DC: The Pew Charitable Trusts, http://www.pewinternet.org/Static-Pages/Trend-Data-(Adults)/Whos-Online.aspx, accessed 15 July 2013.
  8. Rideout, V.J., Foehr, U.G. and Roberts, D.F. (2010) Generation M2: Media in the Lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.Google Scholar
  9. Center on Alcohol Marketing and Youth. (2004) Clicking with Kids: Alcohol Marketing and Youth on the Internet. Washington DC: Health Policy Institute, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
  10. Chester, J., Montgomery, K. and Dorfman, L. (2010) Alcohol Marketing in the Digital Age. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Media Studies Group.Google Scholar
  11. European Centre for Monitoring Alcohol Marketing. (2009) Alcohol Advertising in New Media: Trends in Alcohol Marketing. Utrecht, The Netherlands: European Centre for Monitoring Alcohol Marketing.Google Scholar
  12. Nicholls, J. (2012) Everyday, everywhere: Alcohol marketing and social media-current trends. Alcohol and Alcoholism 47 (4): 486–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Griffiths, R. and Casswell, S. (2010) Intoxigenic digital spaces? Youth, social networking sites and alcohol marketing. Drug and Alcohol Review 29 (5): 525–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cormode, G. and Krishnamurthy, B. (2008) Key differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0. First Monday 13 (6), http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2125/1972, accessed 15 July 2013.
  15. Jernigan, D.H. and Ross, C. (2010) Monitoring youth exposure to advertising on television: The devil is in the details. Journal of Public Affairs 10 (1–2): 36–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fowler, G.A. (2012) Facebook: One billion and counting. New York City: Wall Street Journal, http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390443635404578036164027386112.html, accessed 15 July 2013.
  17. Rogowsky, M. (2013) Here’s looking at YouTube, kid: Eight years, one billion users, and really just getting started. Forbes, http://www.forbes.com/sites/markrogowsky/2013/03/21/heres-looking-at-youtube-kid-8-years-one-billion-users-and-really-just-getting-started/, accessed 15 July 2013.
  18. Koetsler, J. (2012) Twitter reachers 500 M users, 140 M in the US. San Francisco: Venturebeat, http://venturebeat.com/2012/07/30/twitter-reaches-500-million-users-140-million-in-the-u-s/, accessed 15 July 2013.Google Scholar
  19. Korotun, L. (2012) Russia to ban alcohol ads. Moscow: The Voice of Russia, http://english.ruvr.ru/2012_07_05/Russia-to-ban-alcohol-ads/, accessed 17 July 2013.
  20. Cann, L. (2013) Push by health advocates to ban alcohol advertising online to protect children. Perth: Perth Now; [cited 16 July 2013]; available from: http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/western-australia/push-by-health-advocates-to-ban-alcohol-advertising-online-to-protect-children/story-fnhocxo3-1226671885275, accessed 16 July 2013.
  21. Hastings, G. and Sheron, N. (2013) Alcohol marketing: grooming the next generation. British Medical Journal 346: f1227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. The Nielsen Company. (2012) State of the Media: The Social Media Report 2012. New York: The Nielsen Company, http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/newswire/2012/social-media-report-2012-social-media-comes-of-age.html, accessed 15 July 2013.
  23. comScore. (2013) US Digital Future in Focus 2013: Key Insights from 2012 and What They Mean for the Coming Year. Reston, VA: comScore.Google Scholar
  24. Madden, M., Lenhart, A., Cortesi, S., Gasser, U., Duggan, M. and Smith, A. (2013) Teens, Social Media, and Privacy. Washington DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
  25. Consumer Reports. (2011) That Facebook Friend Might Be 10 Years Old and Other Troubling News, http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/magazine-archive/2011/june/electronics-computers/state-of-the-net/facebook-concerns/index.htm?loginMethod=auto&copyrightYear=2013, accessed 16 July 2013.
  26. Richtel, M. and Helft, M. (2011) Facebook users who are under age raise concerns. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com. New York: New York Times, =http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/12/technology/internet/12underage.html?pagewanted=all, accessed 15 July 2013.
  27. Federal Trade Commission. (2008) Self-regulation in the Alcohol Industry: Report of the Federal Trade Commission. Washington DC: Federal Trade Commission.Google Scholar
  28. Schultz, E.J. (2011) Corking alcohol ads to youth in the digital age. New York: Advertising Age, http://adage.com/article/news/alcohol-ads-greater-scrutiny-digital-age/149213/, accessed 20 August 2013.
  29. Siegel, M., DiLoreto, J., Johnson, A., Fortunato, E. and DeJong, W. (2011) Development and pilot testing of an internet-based survey instrument to measure the alcohol brand preferences of US youth. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 35 (4): 765–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kanakamedala, K. and Jernigan, D. (2012) Alcohol marketing in digital and social media: Results and implications of brand scans. American Public Health Association, 31 October, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  31. Mullman, J. (2009) Southern comfort pours entire media budget into digital. Advertising Age. 29 July.Google Scholar
  32. Marshall, J. (2011) Jack Daniel’s is first spirits brand to buy Twitter ads. Clickz Marketing News & Expert Advice, http://www.clickz.com/clickz/news/2046786/jack-daniels-spirits-brand-twitter-ads, accessed 22 March 2012.
  33. Bradshaw, T. (2011) Facebook strikes Diageo advertising deal. London: Financial Times, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/d044ea24-e203-11e0-9915-00144feabdc0.html, accessed 15 July 2013.
  34. Schultz, E.J. (2011) Heineken strikes deal with Facebook: ‘Consequential’ new pact is for consulting, product access. New York: Advertising Age, http://adage.com/article/digital/heineken-strikes-deal-facebook/231433/, accessed 14 July 2013.
  35. Siegel, M. et al (2013) Brand-specific consumption of alcohol among underage youth in the United States. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 37 (7): 1195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Integrity. (2013) Integrity: Instant global ID and age verification – Our Clients. Washington DC, http://integrity.aristotle.com/our-clients/, accessed 29 September 2013.
  37. Mullman, J. (2007) Attorneys general of 21 states lash out at Bud.tv age checks. New York: Advertising Age, http://adage.com/article/digital/attorneys-general-21-states-lash-bud-tv-age-checks/115068/, accessed 29 September 2013.
  38. US Department of the Treasury Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau. (2013) Use of Social Media in the Advertising of Alcohol Beverages. Washington DC: US Department of the Treasury, http://www.ttb.gov/industry_circulars/archives/2013/13-01.html, accessed 16 July 2013.
  39. Shurtleff, M.L. et al (2011) RE: Alcohol Reports, Paperwork Comment; Project No. P114503. A Communication from the Chief Legal Officers of the Following States: Arizona, Connecticut, Delaware, Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Washington, Wyoming, http://www.ftc.gov/os/comments/alcoholstudy2011-pra/00071-58515.pdf, accessed 8 September 2011.

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • David H Jernigan
    • 1
  • Anne E Rushman
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of HealthBehavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Center on Alcohol Marketing and Youth, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations