Advertisement

Journal of Public Health Policy

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 60–64 | Cite as

Effectively addressing addiction requires changing the language of addiction

  • Linda RichterEmail author
  • Susan E Foster
Viewpoint

Abstract

Public knowledge and attitudes about addiction are largely inconsistent with scientific evidence. The gap between the facts and public and professional perceptions is due in part to the language used to describe the disease and those who have it. A key step in modifying public attitudes and improving how health professionals and policymakers address addiction is to better align the language of addiction with the scientific evidence. Unless we clarify the language, those with the disease will continue to experience the stigma associated with it and attempts to deliver comprehensive and effective evidence-based prevention, treatment, and disease management will be profoundly compromised.

Keywords

addiction substance use prevention treatment terminology 

References

  1. Rivlin, A. (2005) Views on alcoholism and treatment, http://www.facesandvoicesofrecovery.org, accessed 12 December 2011.
  2. Hazelden Foundation. (2009) Americans want insurance to cover addiction, http://www.hazelden.org, accessed 16 August 2011.
  3. American Society of Addiction Medicine. (2011) Public policy statement: Definition of addiction (long version), http://www.asam.org/for-the-public/definition-of-addiction, accessed 3 March 2013.
  4. Crews, F.T. and Boettiger, C.A. (2009) Impulsivity, frontal lobes and risk for addiction. Pharmacology Biochemistry & Behavior 93 (3): 237–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Shaffer, H.J., LaPlante, D.A., LaBrie, R.A., Kidman, R.C., Donato, A.N. and Stanton, M.V. (2004) Toward a syndrome model of addiction: Multiple expressions, common etiology. Harvard Review of Psychiatry 12 (6): 367–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Karim, R. and Chaudhri, P. (2012) Behavioral addictions: An overview. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 44 (1): 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blum, K. et al (2012) Sex, drugs, and rock’n’ roll: Hypothesizing common mesolimbic activation as a function of reward gene polymorphisms. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 44 (1): 38–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conason, A., Teixeira, J., Hsu, C.H., Puma, L., Knafo, D. and Geliebter, A. (2013) Substance use following bariatric weight loss surgery. JAMA Surgery 148 (2): 145–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Szalavitz, M. (2010) Does teen drug rehab cure addiction or create it? http://www.time.com, accessed 26 July 2013.
  10. Kelly, J.F. and Westerhoff, C.M. (2010) Does it matter how we refer to individuals with substance-related conditions? A randomized study of two commonly used terms. International Journal of Drug Policy 21 (3): 202–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University (CASAColumbia). (2000) Missed opportunity: national survey of primary care physicians and patients on substance abuse, http://www.casacolumbia.org, accessed 26 July 2013.
  12. Buck, J.A. (2011) The looming expansion and transformation of public substance abuse treatment under the Affordable Care Act. Health Affairs 30 (8): 1402–1410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. American Psychiatric Association. (2013) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edn. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University (CASAColumbia). (2012) Addiction medicine: closing the gap between science and practice, http://www.casacolumbia.org, accessed 3 March 2013.

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CASAColumbiaNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations