Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Enterprise behaviour under Cap-and-Trade conditions: an experimental study with system dynamic models

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Simulation

Abstract

Operating under Cap-and-Trade programme conditions has brought new challenges to industrial organizations pursuing green sustainable development by imposing more constraints on resource/energy acquisition and disposition in order to reduce green-house-gas emissions. New factors due to the conditions interact with each other and system production/service functions, causing complicated dynamic relationships that significantly affect the overall performance of participating enterprises. Managers now have to balance production economy and green improvement. This research shows a proactive approach based on system dynamics modelling to represent such complex systems and analyse the relationship to explore the underlining logic that drives system behaviour under related conditions. The analysis provides useful insights for decision or policymakers to pursue environmentally friendly and economically sound production. Conceptual models were developed and verified for functions, and simulation experiments were designed to implement the models and compare different strategies to analyse their impact on the system’s overall performance, such as long-term over-emission, continuous green investment on emissions reduction, and cost of purchasing emissions allowance or paying penalty (via over-emission tax).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azzone G and Noci G (1998). Identifying effective PMSs for the deployment of green manufacturing strategies. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 18 (4): 308–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BenDor TK (2012). The system dynamics of U.S. automobile fuel economy. Sustainability 4 (5): 1013–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai L (2008). The Application of System Dynamics in the Research of Sustainable Development. China Environmental Science Press: Beijing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P and Scholes J (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action. John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen GY (2005). A dynamic analysis on technological innovation in nonlinear systems. Systems Engineering 23 (12): 74–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du S, Dong J, Liang L and Zhang J (2009). Optimal production policy with emission permits and trading. Chinese Journal of Management Science 17 (3): 81–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • EN (Enigin News) (2010). China set to use iron hand to force energy efficiency, www.enigin.com/about/enigin-plc/news/-/enigin-news.

  • European Union (2012). The EU Emission Trading System (EU-ETS), http://eu.europa.eu/clima/publications.

  • Forrester JW (1961). Industrial Dynamics. MIT Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrity EJ (2011). System dynamics modeling of individual transferable quota fisheries and suggestions for rebuilding stocks. Sustainability 3 (1): 184–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgopoulou E et al (2008). BEAsT: A decision-support tool for assessing the environmental benefits and the economic attractiveness of best available techniques in industry. Journal of Cleaner Production 16 (3): 359–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasch C and Stasiskiene Z (2005). From environmental management accounting to sustainability management accounting. Environmental Research, Engineering and Management 4 (34): 77–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins H (2006). Small business champions for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 67 (3): 241–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang K (2009). China’s green economy report. New Corporate Finance 2 (6): 47–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson G and Winroth M (2010). Introducing environmental concern in manufacturing strategies: Implication for the decision criteria. Management Research Review 33 (9): 877–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kibira D, Jain S and McLean CR (2009). A system dynamics modeling framework for sustainable manufacturing. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, USA, pp 1–22.

  • Laurinkeviciute A and Stasiskiene Z (2010). Sustainable development decision-making model for small and medium enterprises. Environmental Research, Engineering and Management 2 (52): 14–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montalvo C (2008). General wisdom concerning the factors affecting the adoption of cleaner technologies: A survey 1990–2007. Journal of Cleaner Production 16 (1): S7–S13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBSC) (2011). Communiqué on energy consumption per 10,000 Yuan of GDP by region in 2011. National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBSC): Beijing.

  • Qiang R and Liao Q (2010). Research on enterprises energy saving and emission reduction based on system dynamics. Journal of Wuhan University of Science and Technology 32 (4): 126–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenzhen Emission Rights Exchange (2012). China Shenzhen Emission Exchange, www.cerx.cn/cn/.

  • Society of Manufacturing Engineers (SME) (1996). Green Manufacturing. SME Product ID: BB96WBD1. J.

  • Song S, Wei Y and Fan Y (2004). Study on system dynamics approach for sustainable development in China: A review. China Population, Resources and Environment 14 (2): 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastara SK (2007). Green supply-chain management: A state-of-the-art literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews 9 (1): 53–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman J (2012). Sustaining sustainability: Creating a systems science in a fragmented academy and polarized world. In: Weinstein MP and Turner RE. Sustainability Science: The Emerging Paradigm and the Urban Environment. Springer-Verlag: New York, 21–58.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tahir AC and Darton RC (2010). The process analysis method of selecting indicators to quantify the sustainability performance of a business operation. Journal of Cleaner Production 18 (16): 1598–1607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDSD—United Nations Division for Sustainable Development (2003). Environmental Management Accounting Procedures and Principles. EMARIC Environmental Management Accounting Research and Information Center, United Nations Publications: Herndon, USA.

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2007). http://www.epa.gov/epahome. Retrieved 12 December 2007.

  • Wang J and Li Y (2009). Strategic orientation and innovative behavior of private enterprises in responding to environmental regulations. China Industrial Economics 22 (9): 16–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang QP (1994). System Dynamics. (in Chinese). Qinghua University Press: Beijing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei Y, Wang K, Feng Z and Cong R (2010). Carbon Finance and Carbon Market: Models and Empirical Analysis. Science Press: Beijing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Li J and Wei L (2012). The impact of emission policies on supply chain based on system dynamics. Industrial Engineering and Management 17 (4): 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi WJ, Zou LL, Guo J, Wang K and Wei YM (2011). How can China reach its CO2 intensity reduction targets by 2020? A regional allocation based on equity and development. Energy Policy 39 (5): 2407–2415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Min X and Chen Y (2011). Reflection on the development of low-carbon cities from the perspective of systems engineering. Systems Engineering 29 (1): 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong Y, Jia X and Qian Y (2013). System Dynamics. 2nd edn, Science Press: Beijing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou M, Pan Y, Chen Z, Yang W and Li B (2012). Selection and evaluation of green production strategies: Analytic and simulation models. Journal of Cleaner Production 26 (5): 9–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71101094, 71172057, 71272089, and 71472126). We are also grateful to the referees and the editors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Management, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, P.R. China

    M Zhou, Y Pan, Z Chen & B Li

Authors
  1. M Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Y Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Z Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. B Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y Pan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, M., Pan, Y., Chen, Z. et al. Enterprise behaviour under Cap-and-Trade conditions: an experimental study with system dynamic models. J Simulation 10, 12–23 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/jos.2014.36

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jos.2014.36

Keywords

Search

Navigation