Skip to main content

Dispatching and loitering policies for unmanned aerial vehicles under dynamically arriving multiple priority targets

Abstract

The dynamic nature and growing size of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) systems demands quick methods for effective task allocation, routing and positioning of UAVs in reaction to and in anticipation of arriving targets. The importance of targets, along with the timeliness of completing their tasks determines how effective a system is performing. Through simulation, this paper examines a system with multiple UAVs assigned to respond to fixed-location, multiple-priority targets. Dispatching rules and loitering strategies are implemented to insure rapid service for high-priority targets and effective management of medium-priority levels. The design of a study is discussed, for multiple dispatching rules and loitering strategy combinations under varying conditions of: region size, on-scene service rate, arrival rate, and target priority. The decision policy with the think-ahead and distance-based dispatching rules created the greatest benefit, when implemented with the loitering policy based on arrival location probabilities with continual consideration of busy UAV's future availability.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

References

  1. Alighanbari M, Kuwata Y and How JP (2003). Coordination and control of multiple UAVs with timing constraints and loitering. In: American Control Conference, Proceedings of 2003, Vol. 6.

  2. Andersson T and Värbrand P (2007). Decision support tools for ambulance dispatch and relocation. Journal of the Operational Research Society 58: 195–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bednowitz N, Batta R and Nagi R (2011). Technical report, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA. http://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~batta/JOS_Supplement_Noah.pdf.

  4. Bellingham J, Tillerson M, Richards A and How JP (2001). Multi-task allocation and path planning for cooperating UAVs. In: Cooperative Control: Models, Applications and Algorithms, Conference on Coordination, Control and Optimization, November 2001, pp 1–19.

  5. Berman O (1981). Dynamic repositioning of indistinguishable service units on transportation networks. Transportation Science 15 (2): 115–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brotcorne L, Laporte G and Semet F (2003). Ambulance location and relocation models. European Journal of Operational Research 147: 451–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Casbeer DW, et al (2006). Cooperative forest fire surveillance using a team of small unmanned air vehicles. International Journal of Systems Science 36 (6): 351–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. De Koster R, Le-Anh, T and Van der Meer JR (2004). Testing and classifying vehicle dispatching rules in three real-world settings. Journal of Operations Management 22 (4): 369–386, doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2004.05.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Egbelu P and Tanchoco JMA (1984). Characterization of automatic guided vehicle dispatching rules. International Journal of Production Research 22 (3): 359–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Enright JJ and Frazzoli E (2005). UAV routing in a stochastic time-varying environment. In: IFAC World Congress, Prague, Czech Republic, July 2005.

  11. Enright JJ, Savla K, Frazzoli F and Bullo E (2009). Stocastic and dynamic routing problems for multiple UAVs. AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 34 (4): 1152–1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Flint M, Fernandz E and Polycarpou M (2003). Stochastic models of a cooperative autonomous UAV search problem. Military Operations Research 8: 13–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Geer H and Bolkcom C (2005). Unmanned aerial vehicles: Background and issues for congress Technical report, UNT Digital Library, Washington D.C., USA. http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs8638/.

  14. Gendreau M, Laporte G and Semet F (2001). A dynamic model and parallel tabu search heuristic for real time ambulance relocation. Parallel Computing 27 (12): 1641–1653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gendreau M, Laporte G and Semet F (2006). The maximal expected coverage relocation problem for emergency vehicles. The Journal of the Operational Research Society 57 (1): 22–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hakimi SL (1965). Optimum distribution of switching centers in a communication network and some related graph theoretic problems. Operations Research 13 (3): 462–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Harder RW, Hill RR and Moore JT (2004). A java universal vehicle router for routing unmanned aerial vehicles. International Transactions in Operational Research 11: 259–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Henchey M, Batta R, Karwan M and Crassidis A (2011). A flight time approximation model for unmanned aerial vehicles: Estimating the effects of flight dynamics and wind. Submitted to Military Operations Research.

  19. Hu C-H and Egbelu P (2000). A framework for the selection of idle vehicle home locations in an automated guided vehicle system. International Journal of Production Research 38: 543–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Justh EW and Krishnaprasad PS (2002). A simple control law for UAV formation flying Technical Report TR 2002-38, Institute for System Research.

  21. Kingston DB and Schumacher CJ (2005). Time-dependent cooperative assignment. In: Proceedings of the 2005 American Control Conference, Portland, OR, pp 4084–4089.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kinney G, Hill R and Moore J (2005). Devising a quick-running heuristic for an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) routing system. Journal of the Operational Research Society 56: 776–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kress M and Royset JO (2008). Aerial search optimization model (ASOM) for UAVs in special operations. Military Operations Research 13 (1): 23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Le-Anh T and De Koster R (2006). A review of design and control of automated guided vehicle systems. European Journal of Operational Research 171: 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee C, Lei L and Pinedo M (1997). Current trends in deterministic scheduling. Annals of Operations Research 70: 1–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mantel RJ and Landeweerd HRA (1995). Design and operational control of an AGV system. International Journal of Production Research 41: 257–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Maxwell M, Restrepo R, Henderson S and Topaloglu H (2010). Approximate dynamic programming for ambulance redeployment. INFORMS Journal on Computing 22: 266–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. McLain TW, Chandler P, Rasmussen S and Pachter M (2001). Cooperative control of UAV rendezvous. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Arlington, VA, June 2001, pp 2309–2314.

  29. Mishra S, Batta R and Szczerba RJ (2004). A rule based approach for aircraft dispatching to emerging targets. Military Operations Research, 9: 17–30.

  30. Mufalli F, Batta R and Nagi R (2011). Simultaneous sensor selection and routing of unmanned aerial vehicles for complex mission plans. Submitted to Computers and Operations Research.

  31. Murray C and Karwan MH (2010). An extensible modeling framework for dynamic reassignment and rerouting in cooperative airborne operations. Naval Research Logistics 53: 634–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Murry AT and Gottsegen JM (1997). The influence of data aggregation on the stability of p-median location model solutions. Geographical Analysis 29 (3): 200–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Reese J (2006). Solution methods for the p-median problem: An annotated bibliography. Networks 48: 125–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. ReVelle C and Swain R (1970). Central facilities location. Geographical Analysis 2: 30–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Schaack C and Larson RC (1989). An n-server cutoff priority queue. Operations Research 34 (2): 257–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Schumacher C, Chandler P, Pachter M and Pachter L (2007). Optimization of air vehicles operations using mixed-integer linear programming. Journal of the Operational Research Society 58 (4): 516–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Shetty V, Sudit M and Nagi R (2008). Priority-based assignment and routing of a fleet of unmanned combat aerial vehicles. Computers & Operations Research 35: 1813–1828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Shima T, Rasmussen SJ, Sparks AG and Passino KM (2006). Multiple task assignments for cooperating uninhabited aerial vehicles using genetic algorithms. Computers & Operations Research 33: 3252–3269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Stipanović DM, İnalhan G, Teo R and Tomlin CJ (2004). Decentralized overlapping control of a formation of unmanned aerial vehicles. Automatica 40: 1285–1296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Taylor IDS and Templeton JGC (1980). Waiting time in a multi-server cutoff-priority queue, and its application to urban ambulance service. Operations Research 28: 1168–1188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Weinstein AL and Schumacher C (2007). UAV scheduling via the vehicle routing problem with time windows Technical Report AFRL-VA-WP-TP-2007-306, Air Force Research Laboratory, January 2007. Conference paper submitted to the Proceedings of the 2007 AIAA Infotech Aerospace Conference and Exhibit.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been funded through the Office of Naval Research under contract number N00173-08-C-4009. The authors greatly acknowledge this support. We thank the two anonymous reviewers whose comments were helpful in improving the presentation of this work.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R Batta.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on Journal of Simulation website (http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jos/)

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bednowitz, N., Batta, R. & Nagi, R. Dispatching and loitering policies for unmanned aerial vehicles under dynamically arriving multiple priority targets. J Simulation 8, 9–24 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/jos.2011.22

Download citation

Keywords

  • defense studies
  • military
  • unmanned aerial vehicles
  • vehicle routing