To share or not to share: the effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivations on knowledge-sharing in enterprise social media platforms
- 1.1k Downloads
In order to foster knowledge-sharing among employees, an increasing number of companies has recently begun implementing social network-based enterprise social media platforms (ESMPs). Although employees are expected to adopt these platforms quickly and use them as actively as they use public and free social media, patterns of private and corporate usage differ. While some research on the determinants of using public and free social media like Facebook has been conducted, empirical studies on the factors determining active participation in ESMPs is scarce. Based on research derived from a survey of 492 respondents carried out in a large knowledge-intensive firm, this paper addresses this gap. The results of our empirical quantitative study reveal that extrinsic motivation in particular – that is, anticipated gains in reputation and reciprocal benefits – drives employees to share knowledge in ESMPs. Knowledge-sharing self-efficacy also facilitates participation, while the enjoyment in helping others does not. The study contributes to information systems and knowledge management research, as it reveals motivational factors that drive the individual adoption in terms of active use of ESMPs. Managerial implications are derived from these results.
Keywordsenterprise social media platforms enterprise 2.0 knowledge-sharing extrinsic and intrinsic motivation empirical quantitative study
- Blau, P.M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life, New York, London, Sydney: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
- Boateng, R., Mbarika, V. and Thomas, C. (2010). When Web 2.0 Becomes an Organizational Learning Tool: Evaluating Web 2.0 tools, Development and Learning in Organizations 24 (3): 17–20.Google Scholar
- Bock, G.W., Zmud, R.W., Kim, Y.-G. and Lee, J.-N. (2005). Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate, MIS Quarterly 29 (1): 87–111.Google Scholar
- Chui, M., Manyika, J., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Roxburgh, C., Sarrazin, H., Sands, G. and Westergren, M. (2012). The Social Economy: Unlocking value and productivity through social technologies [WWW document] http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/high_tech_telecoms_internet/the_social_economy (accessed 3 June 2015).
- Davenport, T.H. (1998). Putting the Enterprise into the Enterprise System, Harvard Business Review 76 (4): 121–131.Google Scholar
- Davenport, T.H. and Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How organizations manage what they know, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Erol, S., Granitzer, M., Happ, S., Jantunen, S., Jennings, B., Johannesson, P., Koschmider, A., Nurcan, S., Rossi, D. and Schmidt, R. (2010). Combining BPM and Social Software: Contradiction or chance? Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice 22 (6‐7): 449–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Günther, O., Krasnova, H., Riehle, D. and Schöndienst, V. (2009). Modeling Microblogging Adoption in the Enterprise, in 15th Americas Conference on Information Systems (San Francisco, CA, 2009); San Francisco, CA: scholarONE, 1–9.Google Scholar
- Healey, M. (2011). Rebooting the antisocial network [WWW document] http://reports.informationweek.com/abstract/83/8596/it-business-strategy/rebooting-the-antisocial-network.html (accessed 3 June 2015).
- Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B.C.Y. and Wei, K.-K. (2005). Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An empirical investigation, MIS Quarterly 29 (1): 113–143.Google Scholar
- Kollock, P. (1999). The Economies of Online Cooperation, in M.A. Smith and P. Kollock (eds.) Communities in Cyberspace, London: Routledge, pp. 220–239.Google Scholar
- Koplowitz, R. (2014). The Forrester Wave – Enterprise social platforms – Q2 2014 [WWW document] ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/software/kr/pdf/The_Forrester_Wave_Enterprise_Social_Platforms_Q22014.pdf (accessed 4 June 2015).
- Kügler, M., Smolnik, S. and Raeth, P. (2013). Determining the Factors Influencing Enterprise Social Software Usage: Development of a measurement instrument for empirical assessment, in 46th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (Wailea, Hawaii, 2013); Wailea, Hawaii: IEEE. 3635–3644.Google Scholar
- Liang, T.-P., Liu, C.-C. and Wu, C.-H. (2008). Can Social Exchange Theory Explain Individual Knowledge-sharing Behavior? A Meta-analysis, in International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), (Paris, 2008); Paris: Association for Information Systems, 1–18.Google Scholar
- Löcker, A.-K., Eraßme, D., Jakobs, E.-M., Schaar, A.K., Valdez, A.C. and Ziefle, M. (2014). Yet Another Platform? Motivational Factors for Using Online Communities in Business Contexts, in S. Trzcielinski and W. Karwowski, (eds.) Advances in the Ergonomics in Manufacturing: Managing the enterprise of the future, Kraków, Orlando, FL: AHFE Conference 2014, pp. 152–163.Google Scholar
- McAfee, A.P. (2006). Enterprise 2.0: The dawn of emergent collaboration, MIT Sloan Management Review 47 (3): 21–28.Google Scholar
- McAfee, A.P. (2009). Enterprise 2.0: New collaborative tools for your organization's toughest challenges, Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
- McAfee, A.P. (2011). Shattering the Myths about Enterprise 2.0, MIT Center for Digital Business Research Brief 8 (1): 1–6.Google Scholar
- Müeller, J. and Stocker, A. (2011). Enterprise Microblogging for Advanced Knowledge Sharing: The references@BT case study, Journal of Universal Computer Science 17 (4): 532–547.Google Scholar
- Musser, J. and O’Reilly, T. (2007). Web 2.0 – Principles and best practices, Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Radar.Google Scholar
- Organ, D.W., Podsakoff, P.M. and MacKenzie, S.B. (2006). Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences, Thousand Oaks, London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Orlikowski, W.J. (1992). Learning from notes: Organizational issues in groupware implementation, in Proceedings of the 1992 ACM Conference on Computer-supported Cooperative Work (Toronto, ON, Canada, 1992); Toronto, ON, Canada: ACM, 362–369.Google Scholar
- Ratcheva, V. (2008). The Knowledge Advantage of Virtual Teams – Processes supporting knowledge synergy, Journal of General Management 33 (3): 53–67.Google Scholar
- Steinfield, C.W., DiMicco, J.M., Ellison, N.B. and Lampe, C. (2009). Bowling Online: social networking and social capital within the organization, in The Fourth International Conference on Communities and Technologies (University Park, PA, 2009); University Park, PA: ACM, 245–254.Google Scholar
- Treem, J.W. and Leonardi, P.M. (2013). Social Media Use in Organizations – Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association, in C.T. Salmon (ed.) Communication Yearbook 36, New York: Routledge, pp. 143–189.Google Scholar
- Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. and Davis, F.D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a unified view, MIS Quarterly 27 (3): 425–478.Google Scholar
- Wasko, M.M. and Faraj, S. (2005). Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice, MIS Quarterly 29 (1): 35–57.Google Scholar