Journal of Information Technology

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 75–89 | Cite as

Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization

Research Article

Abstract

This article describes an emergent logic of accumulation in the networked sphere, ‘surveillance capitalism,’ and considers its implications for ‘information civilization.’ The institutionalizing practices and operational assumptions of Google Inc. are the primary lens for this analysis as they are rendered in two recent articles authored by Google Chief Economist Hal Varian. Varian asserts four uses that follow from computer-mediated transactions: ‘data extraction and analysis,’ ‘new contractual forms due to better monitoring,’ ‘personalization and customization,’ and ‘continuous experiments.’ An examination of the nature and consequences of these uses sheds light on the implicit logic of surveillance capitalism and the global architecture of computer mediation upon which it depends. This architecture produces a distributed and largely uncontested new expression of power that I christen: ‘Big Other.’ It is constituted by unexpected and often illegible mechanisms of extraction, commodification, and control that effectively exile persons from their own behavior while producing new markets of behavioral prediction and modification. Surveillance capitalism challenges democratic norms and departs in key ways from the centuries-long evolution of market capitalism.

Keywords

surveillance capitalism big data Google information society privacy internet of everything 

References

  1. Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J.A. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty, New York, NY: Crown Business.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, N. (2010). Why Google keeps your data forever, tracks you with ads, ArsTechnica.8 March [WWW document] http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/03/google-keeps-your-data-to-learn-from-good-guys-fight-off-bad-guys.ars (accessed 21 November 2014).
  3. Angwin, J. (2012). Google faces new privacy probes, Wall Street Journal. 16 March [WWW document] http://online.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304692804577283821586827892 (accessed 21 November 2014).
  4. Angwin, J. (2014). Dragnet Nation: A quest for privacy, security, and freedom in a world of relentless surveillance, New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
  5. Arendt, H. (1998). The Human Condition, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Assange, J. (2014). When Google Met WikiLeaks, New York, NY: OR Books.Google Scholar
  7. Auletta, K. (2009). Googled: The end of the world as we know it, New York, NY: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  8. Barker, A. and Fontanella-Khan, J. (2014). Google feels political wind shift against it in Europe, Financial Times. 21 May [WWW document] http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/7848572e-e0c1-11e3-a934-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3JjXPNno5 (accessed 21 November 2014).
  9. BBC (2010). Internet access ‘a human right’, BBC News. 8 March [WWW document] http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8548190.stm.
  10. BBC News (2014). Wearables tracked with Raspberry Pi. 1 August [WWW document] http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-28602997 (accessed 22 November 2014).
  11. Benkler, Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Berle, A.A. and Means, G.C. (1991). The Modern Corporation and Private Property, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Bhimani, A. and Willcocks, L. (2014). Digitisation, ‘Big Data’ and the Transformation of Accounting Information, Accounting and Business Research 44 (4): 469–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bond, R.M., Fariss, C.J., Jones, J.J., Kramer, A.D.I., Marlow, C., Settle, J.E. and Fowler, J.H. (2012). A 61-million-person Experiment in Social Influence and Political Mobilization, Nature 482 (Sept 13): 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. boyd, danah and Crawford, K. (2011). Six provocations for big data. Presented at the A Decade in Internet Time: Symposium on the Dynamics of the Internet and Society, Oxford Internet Institute. [WWW document] http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1926431.
  16. Bradshaw, T. (2014a). Google bets on ‘internet of things’ with $3.2bn Nest deal, Financial Times., 13 January [WWW document] http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/90b8714a-7c99-11e3-b514-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3hbfec0he (accessed 22 November 2014).
  17. Bradshaw, T. (2014b). Google buys UK artificial intelligence start-up, Financial Times. 27 January [WWW document] http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/f92123b2-8702-11e3-aa31-00144feab7de.html#axzz3HBfEc0HE (accessed 22 November 2014).
  18. Braudel, F. (1984). The Perspective of the World, New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  19. Brewster, T. (2014). Traffic lights, fridges and how they’ve all got it in for us, Register. 23 June [WWW document] http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/06/23/hold_interthreat/ (accessed 22 November 2014).
  20. Burdon, M. and McKillop, A. (2013). The Google Street View Wi-Fi Scandal and Its Repercussions for Privacy Regulation (Research Paper No. 14-07), University of Queensland TC Beime School of Law. [WWW document] http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2471316.
  21. Calo, R. (2014). Digital Market Manipulation, George Washington Law Review 82 (4): 995–1051.Google Scholar
  22. Chandler, Jr A.D. (1977). The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  23. Cisco (2013a). Embracing the internet of everything to capture your share of $14.4 trillion, Cisco Systems, Inc. [WWW document] http://www.cisco.com/web/about/ac79/docs/innov/IoE_Economy.pdf (accessed 9 June 2014).
  24. Cisco (2013b). The internet of everything: global private sector economic analysis, Cisco Systems, Inc. [WWW document] http://www.cisco.com/web/about/ac79/docs/innov/IoE_Economy_FAQ.pdf (accessed 22 November 2014).
  25. CNIL (2014, September 25). Google privacy policy: WP29 proposes a compliance package, Commission Nationale de L’informatique et Des Libertés. [WWW document] http://www.cnil.fr/english/news-and-events/news/article/google-privacy-policy-wp29-proposes-a-compliance-package/ (accessed 21 November 2014).
  26. Cohen, L. (2003). A Consumers’ Republic: The politics of mass consumption in postwar America, New York, NY: Knopf.Google Scholar
  27. Constantiou, I.D. and Kallinikos, J. (2014). New Games, New Rules: Big data and the changing context of strategy, Journal of Information Technology, advance online publication 9 September, doi: 10.1057/jit.2014.17.Google Scholar
  28. Davis, G. (2011). The Twilight of the Berle and Means Corporation, Seattle University Law Review 34 (4): 1121–1138.Google Scholar
  29. Davis, G. (2013). After the Corporation, Politics & Society 41 (2): 283–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dean, J. (2009). Challenges in building large-scale information retrieval systems, Google Fellow Presentation. [WWW document] http://static.googleusercontent.com/media/research.google.com/en/us/people/jeff/WSDM09-keynote.pdf (accessed 22 November 2014).
  31. Dean, J. and Ghemawat, S. (2008). MapReduce: Simplified data processing on large clusters, Communications of the ACM 51 (1): 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Döpfner, M. (2014). Why we fear Google, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. [WWW document] http://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/debatten/mathias-doepfner-s-open-letter-to-eric-schmidt-12900860.html (accessed 17 April 2014).
  33. Doyle, J. (2013, November 15). Google facing legal action in EVERY EU country over ‘data goldmine’ collected about users, Daily Mail Online. [WWW document] http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2302870/Google-facing-legal-action-EVERY-EU-country-data-goldmine-collected-users.html (accessed 21 November 2014).
  34. Durkheim, E. (1964). The Division of Labor in Society, New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  35. Dwoskin, E. (2014). What secrets your phone is sharing about you, Wall Street Journal. 14 January [WWW document] http://online.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303453004579290632128929194.
  36. EPIC (2014a). Google glass and privacy, Electronic Privacy Information Center. [WWW document] https://epic.org/privacy/google/glass/ (accessed 15 November 2014).
  37. EPIC (2014b). Investigations of Google Street View, Electronic Privacy Information Center. [WWW document] https://epic.org/privacy/streetview/ (accessed 21 November 2014).
  38. Farahany, N.A. (2012). Searching Secrets, University of Pennsylvania Law Review 160 (5): 1239–1308.Google Scholar
  39. Farzad, R. (2014). Google at $400 billion: a new no. 2 in market cap, BusinessWeek: Technology. 12 February [WWW document] http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-02-12/google-at-400-billion-a-new-no-dot-2-in-market-cap.
  40. Finamore, E. and Dutta, K. (2014). ‘Summoning the demon’: artificial intelligence is real threat to humanity, says PayPal founder, The Independent. [WWW document] http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/tesla-boss-elon-musk-warns-artificial-intelligence-development-is-summoning-the-demon-9819760.html (accessed 22 November 2014).
  41. Fink, E. (2014). This drone can steal what’s on your phone, CNNMoney. 20 March [WWW document] http://money.cnn.com/2014/03/20/technology/security/drone-phone/index.html (accessed 22 November 2014).
  42. Flynn, K. (2014). Facebook will share users’ political leanings with ABC news, BuzzFeed, Huffington Post. 31 October [WWW document] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/31/facebook-buzzfeed-politics_n_6082312.html (accessed 22 November 2014).
  43. Foroohar, R. (2014). Tech titans are living in a naïve, dangerously insular bubble, Time. 24 January[WWW document] http://business.time.com/2014/01/24/eric-schmidt-george-soros-a-tale-of-two-titans/.
  44. Forster, N. (1767). An Enquiry into the Causes of the Present High Price of Provisions, London, UK: J. Fletcher and Co.Google Scholar
  45. Gabriel, S. (2014). Sigmar Gabriel political consequences of the Google debate, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. 20 May [WWW document] http://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/debatten/the-digital-debate/sigmar-gabriel-consequences-of-the-google-debate-12948701.html.
  46. Gapper, J. (2014). We are the product facebook has been testing, FT. [WWW document] http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/6576b0c2-0138-11e4-a938-00144feab7de.html#axzz3R6dH0dDm (accessed 5 July 2014).
  47. Garside, J. (2014). From Google to Amazon: EU goes to war against power of US digital giants, Guardian. 5 July [WWW document] http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jul/06/google-amazon-europe-goes-to-war-power-digital-giants (accessed 21 November 2014).
  48. Gibbs, S. (2014). Google’s founders on the future of health, transport – and robots, Guardian. 7 July [WWW document] http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jul/07/google-founders-larry-page-sergey-brin-interview (accessed 21 November 2014).
  49. Hayek, F.A. (1988). The Fatal Conceit: The errors of socialism, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Herold, B. (2014). Google under fire for data-mining student email messages – education week, Education Week. 26 March [WWW document] http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2014/03/13/26google.h33.html.
  51. Hilbert, M. (2013). Technological Information Inequality As an Incessantly Moving Target: The redistribution of information and communication capacities between 1986 and 2010, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 65 (4): 821–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hoofnagle, C.J., King, J., Li, S. and Turow, J. (2010). How different are young adults from older adults when it comes to information privacy attitudes and policies? SSRN Electronic Journal [WWW document] http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1589864.
  53. Jammet, A. (2014). The Evolution of EU Law on the Protection of Personal Data, Center for European Law and Legal Studies 3 (6): 1–18.Google Scholar
  54. Kelly, H. (2014). Smartphones are fading. Wearables are next, CNNMoney. 19 March [WWW document] http://money.cnn.com/2014/03/19/technology/mobile/wearable-devices/index.html (accessed 22 November 2014).
  55. Kopczynski, P. (2014). French consumer rights watchdog sues Google, Facebook, Twitter for privacy violations, Reuters. 25 March [WWW document] http://rt.com/news/france-facebook-google-suit-129/ (accessed 21 November 2014).
  56. Kovach, S. (2013). Google’s plan to take over the world, Business Insider. 18 May [WWW document] http://www.businessinsider.com/googles-plan-to-take-over-the-world-2013-5 (accessed 22 November 2014).
  57. Kramer, A.D.I., Guillory, J.E. and Hancock, J.T. (2014). Experimental Evidence of Massive-Scale Emotional Contagion through Social Networks, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (24): 8788–8790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kwong, R. (2014). Did privacy concerns change your online behaviour?, FT Data Blog. 17 September [WWW document] http://blogs.ft.com/ftdata/2014/09/17/didprivacy-concerns-change-your-online-behaviour/ (accessed 21 November 2014).
  59. Lanier, J. (2013). Who Owns the Future? New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  60. Lanier, J. (2014). Should Facebook manipulate users?: Lack of transparency in Facebook study, The New York Times. 30 June [WWW document] http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/01/opinion/jaron-lanier-on-lack-of-transparency-in-facebook-study.html.
  61. LA Times, A. T. S (2014, August 1). 911 calls about Facebook outage angers L.A. County sheriff’s officials, Los Angeles Times. [WWW document] http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-911-calls-about-facebook-outage-angers-la-sheriffs-officials-20140801-htmlstory.html.
  62. Levy, S. (2009). Secret of googlenomics: data-fueled recipe brews profitability, Wired. [WWW document] http://archive.wired.com/culture/culturereviews/magazine/17-06/nep_googlenomics (accessed 22 November 2014).
  63. Lin, P. (2014). What if your autonomous car keeps routing you past Krispy Kreme? The Atlantic. 22 January [WWW document] http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/01/what-if-your-autonomous-car-keeps-routing-you-past-krispy-kreme/283221/ (accessed 22 November 2014).
  64. Locke, J. (2010). Two Treatises of Government. New York: Kessinger Publishing, LLC.Google Scholar
  65. Madden, M. (2014). Public perceptions of privacy and security in the post-Snowden era [WWW document] http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/11/12/public-privacy-perceptions/.
  66. Mance, H., Ahmed, M. and Barker, A. (2014). Google break-up plan emerges from Brussels, Financial Times. 21 November [WWW document] http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/617568ea-71a1-11e4-9048-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3JjXPNno5 (accessed 21 November 2014).
  67. Manyika, J. and Chui, M. (2014). Digital era brings hyperscale challenges, Financial Times. 13 August [WWW document] http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/f30051b2-1e36-11e4-bb68-00144feabdc0.html?siteedition=intl#axzz3JjXPNno5 (accessed 22 November 2014).
  68. Marthews, A. and Tucker, C. (2014). Government Surveillance and Internet Search Behavior, Cambridge, MA: Digital Fourth. [WWW document] http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=2412564.
  69. Mayer-Schönberger, V. and Cukier, K. (2013). Big Data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. Reprint edn Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  70. McKendrick, N. (1982). The Consumer Revolution of Eighteenth-Century England, in N. McKendrick, J. Brewer and J.H. Plumb (eds.) The Birth of a Consumer Society: The commercialization of eighteenth-century England, Bloomington, IL: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Menn, J., Schåfer, D. and Bradshaw, T. (2010). Google set for probes on data harvesting, Financial Times. 17 May [WWW document] http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/254ff5b6-61e2-11df-998c-00144feab49a.html#axzz3JjXPNno5 (accessed 21 November 2014).
  72. Michaels, J.D. (2008). All the President’s Spies: Private-public intelligence partnerships in the war on terror, California Law Review 96 (4): 901–966.Google Scholar
  73. Mick, J. (2011). ACLU fights for answers on police phone location data tracking, Daily Tech. 4 August [WWW document] http://www.dailytech.com/ACLU+Fights+for+Answers+on+Police+Phone+Location+Data+Tracking/article22352.htm (accessed 21 November 2014).
  74. Münstermann, B., Smolinski, B. and Sprague, K. (2014). The Enterprise IT Infrastructure Agenda for 2014, McKinsey & Company White Paper : 1–8.Google Scholar
  75. Newman, J. (2009). Google’s Schmidt Roasted for Privacy Comments, PCWorld. 11 December [WWW document] http://www.pcworld.com/article/184446/googles_schmidt_roasted_for_privacy_comments.html (accessed 21 November 2014).
  76. Newman, N. (2014). The costs of lost privacy: consumer harm and rising economic inequality in the age of Google, William-Mitchell Law Review 40 (2): 12.Google Scholar
  77. Nicas, J. (2014). JetBlue to add bag fees, reduce legroom, Wall Street Journal. 20 November [WWW document] http://online.wsj.com/articles/jetblue-to-add-bag-fees-reduce-legroom-1416406199.
  78. Nissembaum, H. (2011). A Contextual Approach to Privacy Online, Daedalus 140 (4): 32–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. O’Brien, K.J. (2012). European regulators may reopen Google Street View inquiries, The New York Times. 2 May [WWW document] http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/03/technology/european-regulators-to-reopen-google-street-view-inquiries.html.
  80. O’Brien, K.J. and Crampton, T. (2007). E.U. probes Google over data retention policy, The New York Times. 26 May [WWW document] http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/26/business/26google.html.
  81. O’Brien, K.J. and Miller, C.C. (2013). Germany’s complicated relationship with Google Street View, Bits Blog. 23 April [WWW document] http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/04/23/germanys-complicated-relationship-with-google-street-view/ (accessed 21 November 2014).
  82. Office of the Privacy Commission of Canada (2010). Google contravened Canadian privacy law, investigation finds, Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada. 19 October [WWW document] https://www.priv.gc.ca/media/nr-c/2010/nr-c_101019_e.asp (accessed 21 November 2014).Google Scholar
  83. Owen, J. (2014). Google in court again over ‘right to be above British law’ on alleged secret monitoring, The Independent. 8 December.Google Scholar
  84. Palfrey, J. (2008). The Public and the Private the United States Border with Cyberspace, Mississippi Law Journal 78 (2): 241–294.Google Scholar
  85. Parnell, B.-A. (2014). Is Google building SKYNET? Ad kingpin buys AI firm DeepMind, Register. 27 January [WWW document] http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/01/27/google_deep_mind_buy/ (accessed 22 November 2014).
  86. Pentland, A. (2009). Reality mining of mobile communications: Toward a new deal on data, in The Global Information Technology Report, World Economic Forum & INSEAD, pp. 75–80.Google Scholar
  87. PEW Research Center (2014). Digital life in 2015. (Research Report). [WWW document] http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/03/11/digital-life-in-2025/.
  88. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Plummer, Q. (2014). Google email tip-off draws privacy concerns, Tech Times. 5 August [WWW document] http://www.techtimes.com/articles/12194/20140805/google-email-tip-off-draws-privacy-concerns.htm (accessed 21 November 2014).
  90. Reidenberg, J.R. (2014). Data surveillance state in the United States and Europe, Wake Forest Law Review 48 (1): 583.Google Scholar
  91. Richards, N.M. (2013). The Dangers of Surveillance, Harvard Law Review 126: 1934–1965.Google Scholar
  92. Richards, N.M. and King, J.H. (2014). Big Data Ethics. (Accepted Paper Series) Saint Louis, MO: Wake Forest Law Review.Google Scholar
  93. Schmarzo, B. (2014). The value of data: Google gets It!!, EMC InFocus. 10 June [WWW document] https://infocus.emc.com/william_schmarzo/the-value-of-data-google-gets-it/.
  94. Schmidt, E. (2014). A chance for growth, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. 9 April [WWW document] http://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/debatten/eric-schmidt-about-the-good-things-google-does-a-chance-for-growth-12887909.html.
  95. Schwartz, P. (1989). The Computer in German and American Constitutional Law: Towards an American right of informational self-determination, American Journal of Comparative Law 37 (4): 675–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Semitsu, J.P. (2011). From Facebook to Mug Shot: How the dearth of social networking privacy rights revolutionized online government surveillance, Pace Law Review 31 (1): 291.Google Scholar
  97. Sklar, M.J. (1988). The Corporate Reconstruction of American Capitalism: 1890–1916: The market, the law, and politics, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  98. Smith, A. (1994). The Wealth of Nations. (E. Cannan, ed.), Later Printing edn New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
  99. Snelling, D. (2014). Google Maps is tracking you! How your smartphone knows your every move, Express.co.uk. 18 August http://www.express.co.uk/life-style/science-technology/500811/Google-Maps-is-tracking-your-every-move (accessed 21 November 2014).
  100. Solove, D.J. (2007). ‘I’ve Got Nothing to Hide’ and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy, San Diego Law Review 44: 745.Google Scholar
  101. Solove, D.J. (2013). Introduction: Privacy self-management and the consent dilemma, Harvard Law Review 126 (7): 1880–1904.Google Scholar
  102. Steingart, G. (2014). Google debate our weapons in the digital battle for freedom, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. 23 June [WWW document] http://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/debatten/the-digital-debate/google-debatte-waffen-im-digitalen-freiheitskampf-13005653.html.
  103. Streitfeld, D. (2013). Google admits Street View project violated privacy, New York Times. 12 March [WWW document] http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/13/technology/google-pays-fine-over-street-view-privacy-breach.html.
  104. Trotman, A. (2014). Google boss Larry Page: Europe needs to be more like Silicon Valley and support technology, Telegraph. 31 October [WWW document] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/google/11202850/Google-boss-Larry-Page-Europe-needs-to-be-more-like-Silicon-Valley-and-support-technology.html.
  105. Unger, R.M. (2007). Free Trade Reimagined: The world division of labor and the method of economics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  106. U.S. Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation (2013). A review of the data broker industry: collection, use and sale of consumer data for marketing purposes, Office of Oversight and Investigations. [WWW document] http://www.commerce.senate.gov/public/?a=Files.Serve&File_id=0d2b3642-6221-4888-a631-08f2f255b577.
  107. Vaidhyanathan, Siva. (2011). The Googilization of Everything, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  108. Varian, H.R. (2010). Computer Mediated Transactions, American Economic Review 100 (2): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Varian, H.R. (2014). Beyond Big Data, Business Economics 49 (1): 27–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Vasagar, J. (2014). Google could face ‘cyber courts’ in Germany over privacy rights, Financial Times. 27 May [WWW document] http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/a7580826-e59d-11e3-8b90-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3JjXPNno5 (accessed 21 November 21 2014).
  111. Wallbank, P. (2012). How much server space do Internet companies need to run their sites? Decoding the New Economy. 23 August [WWW document] http://paulwallbank.com/2012/08/23/how-much-server-space-do-internet-companies-need-to-run-their-sites/ (accessed 22 November 2014).
  112. Waters, R. (2014). FT interview with Google co-founder and CEO Larry Page – FT.com, Financial Times. 31 October [WWW document] http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/3173f19e-5fbc-11e4-8c27-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3JjXPNno5 (accessed 21 November 2014).
  113. Weatherill, L. (1993). The Meaning of Consumer Behavior in the Seventeenth and Early Eighteenth-Century England, in J. Brewer and R. Porter (eds.) Consumption and the World of Goods, London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  114. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Vol. 1 Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  115. Weiser, M. (1991). The Computer for the 21st Century, Scientific American 265 (3): 94–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. White House (2014). Big Data: seizing opportunities, preserving values (Report for the President), Washington D.C., USA: Executive Office of the President. [WWW document] http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/big_data_privacy_report_may_1_2014.pdf.
  117. Williamson, O.E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York; London: Free Press.Google Scholar
  118. Winkler, R. and Wakabayashi, D. (2014). Google to buy nest labs for $3.2 billion – update, EuroInvestor. 14 January [WWW document] http://www.euroinvestor.com/news/2014/01/14/google-to-buy-nest-labs-for-32-billion-update/12658007 (accessed 22 November 2014).
  119. Ziegler, C. (2012). Facebook IPO facts and figures: the house that 100 petabytes built, Verge. 1 February [WWW document] http://www.theverge.com/2012/2/1/2764905/facebook-ipo-facts-and-figures-the-house-that-100-petabytes-built (accessed 22 November 2014).
  120. Zittrain, J. (2014). Facebook could decide an election without anyone ever finding out, New Republic. 1 June [WWW document] http://www.newrepublic.com/article/117878/information-fiduciary-solution-facebook-digital-gerrymandering.
  121. Zuboff, S. (1981). Psychological and Organizational Implications of Computer-Mediated Work, MIT Working Paper, Center for Information Systems Research.Google Scholar
  122. Zuboff, S. (1982). New Worlds of Computer-Mediated Work, Harvard Business Review 60 (5): 142–152.Google Scholar
  123. Zuboff, S. (1985). Automate/Informate: The two faces of intelligent technology, Organizational Dynamics 14 (2): 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Zuboff, S. (1988). In the Age of the Smart Machine: The future of work and power, New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  125. Zuboff, S. (2013). Computer-Mediated Work, In Sociology of Work: An Encyclopedia, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. [WWW document] http://knowledge.sagepub.com/view/sociology-of-work/n41.xml.
  126. Zuboff, S. and Maxmin, J. (2002). The Support Economy: Why corporations are failing individuals and the next episode of capitalism, New York, NY: Viking Penguin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Information Technology Trust 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Harvard Business School EmeritaBostonUSA
  2. 2.Berkman Center for Internet and SocietyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations