Advertisement

Journal of Information Technology

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 128–147 | Cite as

Business value through controlled IT: toward an integrated model of IT governance success and its impact

  • Arne BuchwaldEmail author
  • Nils Urbach
  • Frederik Ahlemann
Research Article

Abstract

Owing to increasing regulatory pressure and the need for aligned information technology (IT) decisions at the interface of business and IT, IT governance (ITG) has become important in both academia and practice. However, knowledge of integrating the determinants and consequences of ITG success remains scarce. Although some studies investigate individual aspects of ITG success and its impact, none combine these factors into a comprehensive and integrated model that would lead to a more complete understanding of the ITG concept. To address this gap, our research aims at understanding what factors influence and result from successful ITG, and at determining how they can be translated into a model to explain ITG success and the impact thereof. Therefore, we conducted interviews with 28 IT decision makers in 19 multinational organizations headquartered in Europe. Our study synthesizes the fragmented previous research, provides new empirical insights gathered on the basis of a clear ITG conceptualization, and suggests three innovative constructs heretofore not related to ITG. Moreover, we elucidate in a holistic model the factors that make ITG successful, how ITG contributes to an IT organization’s success, and how it eventually unfolds throughout the overall organization. The resulting model allows organizational decision makers to develop an effective ITG implementation and to explain the implications of successful ITG, thus providing a justification for the respective investments.

Keywords

IT governance IS management IS success/failure IS alignment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the Institute for Research on Information Systems at EBS Business School and the CIO & Project Advisory competence center of Horváth & Partners Management Consultants for supporting the empirical study presented in this paper.

References

  1. Ali, S. and Green, P. (2005). Determinants of Effective Information Technology Governance: A study of IT intensity, in Proceedings of the International IT Governance Conference; Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  2. Ali, S. and Green, P. (2007). IT Governance Mechanisms in Public Sector Organisations: An Australian context, Journal of Global Information Management 15 (4): 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. and Mead, M. (1987). The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems, MIS Quarterly 11 (3): 369–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowen, P.L., Cheung, M.-Y.D. and Rohde, F.H. (2007). Enhancing IT Governance Practices: A model and case study of an organization’s efforts, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 8 (3): 191–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, A.E. and Grant, G.G. (2005). Framing the Frameworks: A review of IT governance research, Communications of the AIS 15: 696–712.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, C.V. (1997). Examining the Emergence of Hybrid IS Governance Solutions: Evidence from a single case site, Information Systems Research 8 (1): 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buckby, S., Best, P. and Stewart, J. (2008). The Current State of Information Technology Governance Literature, in A. Cater-Steel (ed.) Information Technology Governance and Service Management Frameworks and Adaptations, Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing, pp. 1–43.Google Scholar
  8. Cubeles-Márquez, A. (2008). IT Project Portfolio Management – The strategic vision of IT projects, European Journal for the Informatics Professional 9 (1): 31–36.Google Scholar
  9. De Haes, S. and Van Grembergen, W. (2008). An Exploratory Study into the Design of an IT Governance Minimum Baseline through Delphi Research, Communications of AIS 2008 (2): 443–458.Google Scholar
  10. De Haes, S. and Van Grembergen, W. (2009a). An Exploratory Study into IT Governance Implementations and Its Impact on Business/IT Alignment, Information Systems Management 26 (1): 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Haes, S. and Van Grembergen, W. (2009b). Exploring the Relationship between IT Governance Practices and Business/IT Alignment through Extreme Case Analysis in Belgian Mid-to-Large Size Financial Enterprises, Journal of Enterprise Information Management 22 (5): 615–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dooley, L.M. (2002). Case Study Research and Theory Building, Advances in Developing Human Resource 4 (3): 335–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research, Academy of Management Review 14 (4): 532–550.Google Scholar
  14. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1991). Better Stories and Better Constructs: The case for rigor and comparative logic, Academy of Management Review 16 (3): 620–627.Google Scholar
  15. Fröhlich, M., Glasner, K., Goeken, M. and Johannsen, W. (2007). Sichten Der IT-Governance, IT-Governance 1 (1): 3–8.Google Scholar
  16. Garrity, J. (1963). Top Management and Computer Profits, Harvard Business Review 41 (4): 6–174.Google Scholar
  17. Guldentops, E. (2004). Key Success Factors for Implementing IT Governance: Let’s not wait for regulators to tell us what to do, Information Systems Control Journal 2: 22–23.Google Scholar
  18. Heart, T., Maoz, H. and Pliskin, N. (2010). From Governance to Adaptability: The mediating effect of IT executives’ managerial capabilities, Information Systems Management 27 (1): 42–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Henderson, J.C. and Venkatraman, N. (1993). Strategic Alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations, IBM Systems Journal 31 (1): 4–16.Google Scholar
  20. Huang, R., Zmud, R.W. and Price, R.L. (2010). Influencing the Effectiveness of IT Governance Practices through Steering Committees and Communication Policies, European Journal of Information Systems 2010 (19): 288–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. IT Governance Institute (ITGI) (2003). Board Briefing on IT Governance, 2nd edn, Rolling Meadows: IT Governance Institute.Google Scholar
  22. IT Governance Institute (ITGI) (2007). Cobit 4.1: Framework, control objectives, management guidelines, maturity models, Rolling Meadows: IT Governance Institute.Google Scholar
  23. Klein, H.K. and Myers, M.D. (1999). A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems, MIS Quarterly 23 (1): 67–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lazic, M., Groth, M., Schillinger, C. and Heinzl, A. (2011a). The Impact of IT Governance on Business Performance, in Proceedings of the 17th Americas Conference on Information Systems, 4–7 August, Detroit, Michigan.Google Scholar
  25. Lazic, M., Heinzl, A. and Neff, A. (2011b). IT Governance Impact Model: How mature IT governance affects business performance. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 11(147): 1–43.Google Scholar
  26. Lee, C.-H., Lee, J.-H., Park, J.-S. and Jeong, K.-Y. (2008a). A Study of the Causal Relationship between IT Governance Inhibitors and ITs Success in Korea Enterprises, in Proceedings of the 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, Hawaii, USA.Google Scholar
  27. Lee, J., Lee, C. and Jeong, K.-Y. (2008b). Governance Inhibitors in IT Strategy and Management: An empirical study of Korean enterprises, Global Economic Review 37 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liang, T.-P., Chiu, Y.-C., Wu, S.P.J. and Straub, D. (2011). The Impact of IT Governance on Organizational Performance, in Proceedings of the 17th Americas Conference on Information Systems; Detroit, Michigan.Google Scholar
  29. Loh, L. and Venkatraman, N. (1992). Diffusion of Information Technology Outsourcing: Influence sources and the kodak effect, Information Systems Research 3 (4): 334–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meyer, M., Zarnekow, R. and Kolbe, L.M. (2003). IT-Governance: Begriff, Status quo und Bedeutung, Wirtschaftsinformatik 45 (4): 445–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Möller, D., Legner, C. and Heck, A. (2011). Understanding IT Transformation – An explorative case study, in Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2011); Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
  32. Nfuka, E. and Rusu, L. (2010). Critical Success Factors for Effective IT Governance in the Public Sector Organizations in a Developing Country: The case of Tanzania, in Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems; Pretoria, South Africa.Google Scholar
  33. Nfuka, E.N. and Rusu, L. (2011). The Effect of Critical Success Factors on IT Governance Performance, Industrial Management & Data Systems 111 (9): 1418–1448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Olson, M.H. and Chervany, N.L. (1980). The Relationship between Organizational Characteristics and the Structure of the Information Services Function, MIS Quarterly 4 (2): 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Peterson, R. (2004). Crafting Information Technology Governance, Information Systems Management 21 (4): 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Psoinos, A., Kern, T. and Smithson, S. (2000). An Exploratory Study of Information Systems in Support of Employee Empowerment, Journal of Information Technology 15 (3): 211–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ribbers, P.M., Peterson, R.R. and Parker, M.M. (2002). Designing Information Technology Governance Processes: Diagnosing contemporary practices and competing theories, in Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences; Big Island, Hawaii, USA.Google Scholar
  38. Sambamurthy, V. and Zmud, R.W. (1999). Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A theory of multiple contingencies, MIS Quarterly 23 (2): 261–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Segars, A.H. and Hendrickson, A.R. (2000). Value, Knowledge, and the Human Equation: Evolution of the information technology function in modern organizations, Journal of Labor Research 21 (3): 431–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sethibe, T., Campbell, J. and McDonald, C. (2007). IT Governance in Public and Private Sector Organizations: Examining the differences and defining future research directions, in Proceedings of the 18th Australasian Conference on Information Systems; Toowoomba, Australia.Google Scholar
  41. Simonsson, M. and Johnson, P. (2005). Defining IT Governance – A consolidation of literature, Stockholm, Sweden: KTH Royal Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  42. Simonsson, M., Johnson, P. and Ekstedt, M. (2010). The Effect of IT Governance Maturity on IT Governance Performance, Information Systems Management 27 (1): 10–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Straub, D., Boudreau, M.-C. and Gefen, D. (2004). Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research, Communications of the AIS 13: 380–427.Google Scholar
  44. Suddaby, R. (2010). Construct Clarity in Theories of Management and Organization, Academy of Management Review 35 (3): 346–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Urbach, N. and Ahlemann, F. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling in Information Systems Research Using the Partial Least Squares Approach, Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 11 (2): 5–40.Google Scholar
  46. Van Grembergen, W. (2002). Introduction to the Minitrack ‘IT Governance and its Mechanisms’, in Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences; Big Island, Hawaii, USA.Google Scholar
  47. Van Grembergen, W., De Haes, S. and Guldentops, E. (2004). Structures, Processes and Relational Mechanisms for IT Governance, in W. Van Grembergen (ed.) Strategies for Information Technology Governance, Hershey, PA: IGI Publishing, pp. 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Webb, P., Pollard, C. and Ridley, G. (2006). Attempting to Define IT Governance: Wisdom or folly? in Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences; Kauai, Hawaii, USA.Google Scholar
  49. Weill, P. (2004). Don’t Just Lead, Govern: How top-performing firms govern IT, MIS Quarterly Executive 3 (1): 1–17.Google Scholar
  50. Weill, P. and Ross, J.W. (2004). IT Governance – How top performers manage IT decision rights for superior results, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  51. Wu, W.W., Lin, S.-H., Cheng, Y.-Y., Liou, C.-H., Wu, J.-Y., Lin, Y.-H. and Wu, F.H. (2006). Changes in Mis Research: Status and themes from 1989 to 2000, International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management 1 (1): 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yin, R.K. (2009). Case Study Research – Design and methods, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  53. Zwicky, F. (1967). The Morphological Approach to Discovery, Invention, Research and Construction, in F. Zwicky and A. Wilson (eds.) New Methods of Thought and Procedure, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 273–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Information Technology Trust 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arne Buchwald
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Nils Urbach
    • 1
  • Frederik Ahlemann
    • 2
  1. 1.University of BayreuthBayreuthGermany
  2. 2.University of Duisburg-EssenEssenGermany

Personalised recommendations