Abstract
This paper presents a multi-method analysis of the implementation of an enterprise resource planning system. It argues the majority of research treats these systems as having essential technical properties that enable them to bring about positive organisational effects. In contrast, we adopt a post-essentialist perspective that understands discourse as constructing ERP systems, rather than reflecting their essential properties. Discourse analysis of interviews and focus groups was used to compare justifications for the implementation produced by members of the ERP project team with end users' reactions to the system. In contrast to previous studies, this opens the ERP black box by illustrating how the capabilities of these systems, and their organisational effects, are constructed through language. Moreover, it demonstrates the important function these constructions perform in legitimising or undermining ERP implementation. Statistical analysis of post-implementation questionnaires identified the predictors of established measures of users' reactions to IT systems. By comparing these data with end users' discursive reactions to the project, we identify several constructs for inclusion in future studies of users' reactions to ERP systems. The paper concludes by summarising the contributions and limitations of the study and its implications for future research and practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdinnour-Helm, S., Lengnick-Hall, M.L. and Lengnick-Hall, C.A. (2003). Pre-implementation Attitudes and Organizational Readiness for Implementing an Enterprise Resource Planning system, European Journal of Operational Research 146 (2): 258–273.
Adam, F. and O'Doherty, P. (2000). Lessons from Enterprise Resource Planning Implementations in Ireland – Towards Smaller and Shorter ERP Projects, Journal of Information Technology 15 (4): 305–316.
Amoako-Gyampah, K. and Salam, A.F. (2004). An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model in an ERP Implementation Environment, Information & Management 41 (6): 731–745.
Amoako-Gyampah, K. (2007). Perceived Usefulness, User Involvement and Behavioral Intention: An empirical study of ERP implementation, Computers in Human Behavior 23 (3): 1232–1248.
Avital, M. and Vandenbosch, B. (2000). SAP Implementation at Metalica: An organizational drama in two acts, Journal of Information Technology 15 (3): 183–194.
Bagchi, S., Kanungo, S. and Dasgupta, S. (2003). Modeling Use of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: A path analytic study, European Journal of Information Systems 12 (2): 142–158.
Butler, B.R. (2004). The Challenges of Complex IT Projects – The Report of a Working Group from The Royal Academy of Engineering and The British Computer Society.
Clegg, C.W., Carey, N., Dean, G., Hornby, P. and Bolden, R. (1997). Users' Reactions to Information Technology: Some multivariate models and their implications, Journal of Information Technology 12 (1): 15–32.
Clegg, C.W. and Shepherd, C. (2007). The Biggest Computer Programme in the World … Ever!' – Time for a Change in Mindset? Journal of Information Technology: Organisation, Management, Information and Systems 22: 212–221.
Conway, J.M. and Huffcutt, A.I. (2003). A Review and Evaluation of Exploratory Factor Analysis Practices in Organizational Research, Organizational Research Methods 6: 147–168.
Davenport, T.H. (1998). Putting the Enterprise into the Enterprise System, Harvard Business Review 76 (4): 121–131.
Deetz, S. (1996). Describing Differences in Approaches to Organization Science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and their legacy, Organization Science 7 (2): 191–207.
Dery, K., Grant, D., Harley, B. and Wright, C. (2006a). Work, Organisation and Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: An alternative research agenda, New Technology Work and Employment 21 (3): 199–214.
Dery, K., Hall, R. and Wailes, N. (2006b). ERPs as ‘Technologies-in-Practice’: Social construction, materiality and the role of organisational factors, New Technology Work and Employment 21 (3): 229–241.
Dick, P. and Cassell, C. (2002). Barriers to Managing Diversity in a UK Constabulary: The role of discourse, Journal of Management Studies 39 (5): 953–976.
Dolan, S. and Tizner, A. (1988). Implementing Computer Based Automation in the Office: A study of experienced stress, Journal of Organizational Behaviour 9: 183–187.
Elbanna, A.R. (2006). The Validity of the Improvisation Argument in the Implementation of Rigid Technology: The case of ERP systems, Journal of Information Technology 21 (3): 165–175.
Fabrigar, L.R., Wegener, D.T., MacCallum, R.C. and Strahan, E.J. (1999). Evaluating the Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Psychological Research, Psychological methods 4 (3): 272–299.
Fox, A. (1974). Beyond Contract: Work power and trust relations, London: Faber and Faber.
Gattiker, T.F. and Goodhue, D.L. (2002). Software-Driven Changes to Business Processes: An empirical study of impacts of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems at the local level, International Journal of Production Research 40 (18): 4799–4814.
Grant, D., Hall, R., Wailes, N. and Wright, C. (2006). The False Promise of Technological Determinism: The case of enterprise resource planning systems, New Technology Work and Employment 21 (1): 2–15.
Grint, K. and Woolgar, S. (1995). On Some Failures of Nerve in Constructivist and Feminist Analyses of Technology, Science Technology & Human Values 20 (3): 286–310.
Grint, K. and Woolgar, S. (1997). The Machine at Work: Technology, work and organization, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hall, R. (2002). Enterprise Resource Planning Systems and Organizational Change: Transforming the work organization, Strategic Change 11 (5): 263–270.
Hirt, S.G. and Swanson, E.B. (1999). Adopting SAP at Siemens Power Corporation, Journal of Information Technology 14 (3): 243–251.
Holman, D., Axtell, C., Clegg, C., Pepper, K., Waterson, P., Cantista, I. and Older-Gray, M. (2000). Change and Innovation in Modern Manufacturing Practices: An expert panel survey of UK companies, Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing 10 (2): 121–137.
Horton, R.P., Buck, T., Waterson, P.E. and Clegg, C.W. (2001). Explaining Intranet Use with the Technology Acceptance Model, Journal of Information Technology 16 (4): 237–249.
Igbaria, M. and Parasuraman, S. (1991). Attitudes Towards Microcomputers: Development and construct validation of a measure, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 35: 553–573.
Jacobsen, S., Shepherd, J., D'Aquila, M. and Carter, C. (2007). The ERP Market Sizing Report, 2006–2011: AMR research.
Jones, M. (1999). Structuration Theory, in W. Currie and B. Galliers (eds.) Rethinking Management Information Systems, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 103–135.
Kling, R. (1992). Audiences, Narratives, and Human-Values in Social-Studies of Technology, Science Technology & Human Values 17 (3): 349–365.
Koch, C. (2001). Enterprise Resource Planning – Information Technology as a Steamroller for Management Politics? Journal of Organizational Change Management 14 (1): 64–78.
Krumbholz, M., Galliers, J., Coulianos, N. and Maiden, N.A.M. (2000). Implementing Enterprise Resource Planning Packages in Different Corporate and National Cultures, Journal of Information Technology 15 (4): 267–279.
Lim, E.T.K., Pan, S.L. and Tan, C.W. (2005). Managing User Acceptance Towards Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems – Understanding the Dissonance Between User Expectations and Managerial Policies, European Journal of Information Systems 14 (2): 135–149.
Majchrzak, A. (1990). Effect of CAD on the Jobs of Drafters and Engineers: A quantitative case study, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 32: 245–262.
Majchrzak, A. and Borys, B. (1998). Computer-Aided Technology and Work: Moving the field forward, in C.L. Cooper and I.T. Robertson (eds.) International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, London: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 305–354.
Markus, M.L., Axline, S., Petrie, D. and Tanis, C. (2000). Learning from Adopters' Experiences with ERP: Problems encountered and success achieved, Journal of Information Technology 15 (4): 245–265.
McLoughlin, I. (1999). Creative Technological Change: The shaping of technology and organizations, London: Routledge.
Oliver, D. and Romm, C. (2002). Justifying Enterprise Resource Planning Adoption, Journal of Information Technology 17 (4): 199–213.
Parr, A. and Shanks, G. (2000). A Model of ERP Implementation, Journal of Information Technology 15: 289–303.
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Podsakoff, N.P. and Lee, J.Y. (2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies, Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (5): 879–903.
Pomerantz, A.M. (1986). Extreme Case Formations, A New Way of Legitimating Claims, Human Studies 9: 219–230.
Potter, J. (1996). Representing Reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction, London: Sage.
Ragowsky, A. and Somers, T.M. (2002). Special Section: Enterprise resource planning, Journal of Management Information Systems 19 (1): 11–15.
Robey, D., Ross, J.W. and Boudreau, M.C. (2002). Learning to Implement Enterprise Systems: An exploratory study of the dialectics of change, Journal of Management Information Systems 19 (1): 17–46.
Ross, J. (1999). Dow Corning Corporation: Business processes and information technology, Journal of Information Technology 14: 253–266.
Scott, J.A. and Kaindl, L. (2000). Enhancing Functionality in an Enterprise Software Package, Information & Management 37 (3): 111–122.
Shepherd, C. (2006). Constructing Enterprise Resource Planning: A thoroughgoing interpretivist perspective on technological change, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 79: 357–376.
Sumner, M. (2000). Risk Factors in Enterprise-Wide/ERP Projects, Journal of Information Technology 15 (4): 317–327.
Symon, G. (2005). Exploring Resistance From a Rhetorical Perspective, Organization Studies 26: 1–24.
Van Stijn, E. and Wensley, A. (2001). Organizational Memory and the Completeness of Process Modeling in ERP Systems: Some concerns, methods and directions for future research, Business Process Management Journal 7 (3): 181–194.
Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies, Management Science 46 (2): 186–204.
Wooffitt, R. (1992). Telling Tales of the Unexpected: The organization of factual discourse, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Yen, D.C., Chou, D.C. and Chang, J. (2002). A Synergic Analysis for Web-Based Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, Computer Standards & Interfaces 24 (4): 337–346.
Acknowledgements
We thank Catherine Cassell, Mark Robinson, Kate Shepherd, and Catherine Congreve, for their advice and assistance with this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix A
Appendix A
See Table A1
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shepherd, C., Clegg, C. & Stride, C. Opening the black box: A multi-method analysis of an enterprise resource planning implementation. J Inf Technol 24, 81–102 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2008.32
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2008.32