Advertisement

Corrective justice for the civilian victims of war: compensation and the right to life

  • Marcus Schulzke
  • Amanda Cortney Carroll
Original Article
  • 53 Downloads

Abstract

The civilian right to life is a central concept in just war theory and international law. It plays an important role in restraining wars, as it is the basis for the principle of civilian immunity and the jus in bello principle of discrimination; yet, it is generally interpreted as only establishing a first-order duty, according to which belligerents must avoid harming civilians. In this essay, we argue that, in addition to this duty, the right to life also entails a second-order duty to compensate civilians whose right to life has been breached. We propose that states should have to pay compensatory damages to individual civilians harmed by their military actions and we discuss the standards of liability that can be used to determine when payment is owed.

Keywords

civilians civilian immunity jus post bellum just war theory justice 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the editors of the Journal of International Relations and Development, as well as the anonymous referees, for their helpful comments.

References

  1. Anscombe, Gertrude Elizabeth Margaret (1961) ‘War and Murder’, in The Collected Papers of G.E.M. Anscombe, Ethics, Religion and Politics, Vol. 3, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arneson, Richard J. (2006) ‘Just Warfare Theory and Civilian Immunity’, Cornell International Law Journal 39(1): 663–68.Google Scholar
  3. Bass, Gary J. (2004) ‘Jus Post Bellum’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 32(4): 384–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Battersby, Paul and Joseph M. Siracusa (2009) Globalization and Human Security, Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  5. Bedau, Hugo (1968) ‘The Right to Life’, Monist 52(4): 550–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bellamy, Alex J. (2006) Just Wars: From Cicero to Iraq, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  7. Bellamy, Alex J. (2009a) Responsibility to Protect, Malden, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
  8. Bellamy, Alex J. (2009b) ‘The Responsibility to Protect-Five Years On’, Ethics & International Affairs 24(2): 143–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boyle, Michael J. (2014) Violence After War: Explaining Instability in Post-Conflict States, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Carroll, Amanda Cortney and Marcus Schulzke (2013) ‘Compensating Civilians during War: A Place for Individuals in International Law’, Democracy and Security 9(4): 398–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cassidy, Robert (2008) Counterinsurgency and the Global War on Terror: Military Culture and Irregular War, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Coady Cecil, A. J. (2007) Morality and Political Violence, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coates, Anthony J. (1997) The Ethics of War, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Condura, Luke N. and Jacob N. Shapiro (2012) ‘Who Takes the Blame? The Strategic Effects of Collateral Damage’, American Journal of Political Science 56(1): 167–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crowe, Jonathan and Kylie Weston-Scheuber (2013) Principles of International Humanitarian Law, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dinstein, Yoram (2001) War, Aggression and Self-Defence, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dworkin, Ronald (1978) Taking Rights Seriously, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Downes, Anthony B. (2006) ‘Desperate Times, Desperate Measures: The Causes of Civilian Victimization in War’, International Security 30(4): 152–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Downes, Anthony B. (2007) ‘Restraint or Propellant? Democracy and Civilian Fatalities in Interstate Wars’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 51(6): 872–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Downes, Anthony B. (2008) Targeting Civilians in War, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Edmundson, William A. (2012) An Introduction to Rights, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Feinberg, Joel (1970) Doing and Deserving: Essays in the Theory of Responsibility, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Feinberg, Joel (1978) ‘Voluntary Euthanasia and the Inalienable Right to Life’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 7(2): 93–123.Google Scholar
  24. Feinstein, Lee and Erica De Bruin (2010) ‘Beyond Words: U.S. Policy and the Responsibility to Protect’, in R. H. Cooper and Juliette Voinov Kohler eds, Responsibility to Protect: The Global Moral Compact for the 21st Century, 179–98, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  25. Frowe, Helen (2014) Defensive Killing: An Essay on War and Self-Defence, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gardam, Judith Gail (1993) Non-Combatant Immunity as a Norm of International Humanitarian Law, Norwell, MA: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  27. Gardam, Judith Gail (1999) Humanitarian Law, Dartmouth: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  28. Gentry, John A. (2006) ‘Norms and Military Power: NATO’s War Against Yugoslavia’, Security Studies 15(2): 187–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Green, Michael (1992) ‘War, Innocence, and Theories of Sovereignty’, Social Theory and Practice 18(1): 39–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gross, Michael L. (2005) ‘Killing Civilians Intentionally: Double Effect, Reprisal, and Necessity in the Middle East’, Political Science Quarterly 120(4): 555–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gross, Michael L. (2006) Bioethics and Armed Conflict: Moral Dilemmas of Medicine and War, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  32. Gross, Michael L. (2009) Moral Dilemmas of Modern War: Torture, Assassination, and Blackmail in an Age of Asymmetric Conflict, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Guala, David (2006) Counterinsurgency Warfare: Theory and Practice, Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  34. Hultman, Lisa (2012) ‘COIN and Civilian Collaterals: Patterns of Violence in Afghanistan, 2004–2009’, Small Wars & Insurgencies 23(2): 245–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ipsen, Knut (2013) ‘Combatants and Non-Combatants’, in James D. Fleck ed., The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law, 79–114, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Joes, Anthony James (2007) Urban Guerrilla Warfare, Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Johnson, James Turner (1981) Just War Tradition and the Restraint of War: A Moral and Historical Inquiry, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Kahn, Paul W. (2002) ‘The Paradox of Riskless Warfare’, Philosophy and Public Policy Quarterly 22(3): 2–8.Google Scholar
  39. Kalmanovitz, Pablo (2011) ‘Sharing Burdens After War: A Lockean Approach’, Journal of Political Philosophy 19(2): 209–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Frances, M. Kamm (2007) Intricate Ethics: Rights, Responsibilities, and Permissible Harm, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Kaufman, Frederick (2007) ‘Just War Theory and Killing the Innocent’, in John W. Lango, Michael W. Brough and Harry van der Linden eds, Rethinking the Just War Tradition, 99–114, Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  42. Kilcullen, David (2009) The Accidental Guerrilla: Fighting Small Wars in the Midst of a Big One, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Knell, Hermann (2003) To Destroy a City: Strategic Bombing and its Human Consequences in World War II, Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
  44. Lee, Steven (2004) ‘Double Effect, Double Intention, and Asymmetric Warfare’, Journal of Military Ethics 3(3): 233–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lee, Steven (2012) Ethics and War: An Introduction, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Martin, Rex (1993) A System of Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. May, Larry (2012) After War Ends: A Philosophical Perspective, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McKeogh, Colm (2002) Innocent Civilians, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McKeogh, Colm (2007) ‘Civilian Immunity in War: From Augustine to Vattel’, in Igor Primoratz ed., Civilian Immunity in War, 62–83, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. McMahan, Jeff (2002) The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life, Cambridge, MA: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McMahan, Jeff (2006) ‘On the Moral Equality of Combatants’, Journal of Political Philosophy 14(4): 377–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McMahan, Jeff (2009) Killing in War, New York: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McMahan, Jeff (2010) ‘The Just Distribution of Harm Between Combatants and Noncombatants’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 38(4): 342–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mueller, John (1994) Policy and Opinion in the Gulf War, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  55. Nagel, Thomas (1972) ‘War and Massacre’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 1(2): 123–144.Google Scholar
  56. Orend, Brian (2000) War and International Justice: A Kantian Perspective, Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Orend, Brian (2002) ‘Justice after War’, Ethics & International Affairs 16(1): 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Orend, Brian (2006) The Morality of War, Orchard Park, NY: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
  59. Orend, Brian (2007) ‘Jus Post Bellum: The Perspective of a Just-War Theorist’, Leiden Journal of International Law 20(3): 571–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pattison, James (Forthcoming) ‘Jus Post Bellum and the Responsibility to Rebuild’, British Journal of Political Science.Google Scholar
  61. Prorok, Alyssa K. and Benjamin J. Appel (2014) ‘Compliance with International Humanitarian Law: Democratic Third Parties and Civilian Targeting in Interstate War’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 58(4): 713–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Raz, Joseph (1986) The Morality of Freedom, New York: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  63. Rodin, David (2002) War and Self-Defense, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rodin, David (2008) ‘The Moral Inequality of Soldiers: Why jus in bello Asymmetry is Half Right’, in David Rodin and Henry Shue eds, Just and Unjust Warriors: The Moral and Legal Status of Soldiers, 44–68, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Roht-Arriaza, Naomi (2004) ‘Reparations Decisions and Dilemmas’, Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 27(Winter): 157–219.Google Scholar
  66. Rudolph, J. Rummel (1995) ‘Democracy, Power, Genocide, and Mass Murder’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 39(1): 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rothbart, Daniel and Karina Korostelina (2011) Why They Die: Civilian Devastation in Violent Conflict, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sapolsky, Harvey M. and Jeremy Shapiro (1996) ‘Casualties, Technology, and America’s Future Wars’, Parameters 26(Summer): 119–27.Google Scholar
  69. Schulzke, Marcus (2013) ‘Ethically Insoluble Dilemmas in War’, Journal of Military Ethics 12(2): 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Shelton, Dinah (1999) Remedies in International Human Rights Law, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Slim, Hugo (2010) Killing Civilians: Method, Madness, and Morality in War, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Steinhoff, Uwe (2012) ‘Rights, Liability, and the Moral Equality of Combatants’, Journal of Ethics 16(4): 339–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Thomson, Judith Jarvis (1986a) ‘Self-Defense and Rights’, in William Parent ed., Rights, Restitution, and Risk: Essays in Moral Theory, 33–48, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Thomson, Judith Jarvis (1986b) ‘Some Ruminations on Rights’, in William Parent ed., Rights, Restitution, and Risk: Essays in Moral Theory, 49–65, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Tracy, Jonathan (2007) ‘Responsibility to Pay: Compensating Civilian Casualties of War’, Human Rights Brief 15(1): 16–19.Google Scholar
  76. Tyner, James A. (2009) Military Legacies: A World Made by War, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  77. Walsh, James Igoe (2014) ‘Precision Weapons, Civilian Casualties, and Support for the Use of Force’, Political Psychology, advance online publication 12 February, doi:10.1111/pops.12175.Google Scholar
  78. Waller, Immanuel (2011) Rights for Victims of Crime: Rebalancing Justice, Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  79. Walzer, Michael (1977) Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  80. Walzer, Michael (2004) Arguing About War, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Wicks, Elizabeth (2010) The Right to Life and Conflicting Interests, Cambridge, MA: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of LeedsLeedsUK
  2. 2.University of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations