Advertisement

Putting security in its place: EU security politics, the European neighbourhood policy and the case for practical reflexivity

  • Julien JeandesbozEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

This article advances the discussion on reflexivity among students of the EU security politics, in particular those scholars who foreground the critical dimension of their work. It argues that reflexivity is a practical concern in, and an integral part of, the research process. Efforts to locate security within a given political ordering need to be combined with an effort from scholars to examine their own knowledge-producing practices. Such an undertaking should not be considered as indulgence, narcissism or as an ex-ante or ex post, meta-theoretical commitment, but should take place in the research process itself, and particularly in the presentation of findings, as a fruitful contribution to research rather than as a safeguard or defence of one’s critical credentials. The article furthers this argument by mapping practical reflexivity onto research on the EU security politics and the European neighbourhood policy.

Keywords

critical approaches to security European neighbourhood policy reflexivity securitisation the European Union 

Notes

References

  1. Abélès, Marc, Irène Bellier and Maryon McDonald (1993) An Anthropological Approach to the European Commission, Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  2. Alegre, Susie, Didier Bigo and Julien Jeandesboz (2009) External Dimension of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, Brussels: European Parliament.Google Scholar
  3. Aliboni, Roberto (2005) ‘The Geopolitical Implications of The European Neighbourhood Policy’, European Foreign Affairs Review 10(1): 1–16.Google Scholar
  4. Amato, Giuliano and Judy Batt (1999a) ‘Mobility in an Enlarged European Union’. San Domenico: EUI Policy Paper RSC, No. 99/4.Google Scholar
  5. Amato, Giuliano and Judy Batt (1999b) ‘Final Report of the Reflection Group on The Long Term Implications of EU Enlargement: The Nature of the New Border’, San Domenico, Brussels: The Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies (EUI) with the Forward Studies Unit (European Commission).Google Scholar
  6. Amicelle, Anthony, Didier Bigo, Julien Jeandesboz and Francesco Ragazzi (2009) Catalogue of Security and Border Technologies at Use in Europe Today, Oslo: PRIO.Google Scholar
  7. Aradau, Claudia and Jef Huysmans (2014) ‘Critical Methods in International Relations: The Politics of Techniques, Devices and Acts’, European Journal of International Relations 20(3): 596–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Aradau, Claudia and Rens van Munster (2007) ‘Governing Terrorism Through Risk: Taking Precautions, (un)Knowing the Future’, European Journal of International Relations 13(1): 89–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Aradau, Claudia and Rens van Munster (2011) Politics of Catastrophe: Genealogies of the Unknown, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Balfour, Rosa and Alessandro Rotta (2005) ‘Beyond Enlargement. The European Neighbourhood Policy and Its Tools’, International Spectator 40(1): 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Balzacq, Thierry (2005) ‘The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context’, European Journal of International Relations 11(2): 171–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Balzacq, Thierry, ed. (2009a) The External Area of EU Justice and Home Affairs: Governance, Neighbours, Security, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Balzacq, Thierry, ed. (2009b) ‘The Frontiers of Governance: Understanding the External Dimension of Justice and Home Affairs’, in, The External Area of EU Justice and Home Affairs: Governance, Neighbours, Security, 1–32, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bigo, Judy (2003) The EU’s new borderland. London: Centre for European Reform.Google Scholar
  15. Batt, Judy, Dov Lynch, Antonio Missiroli, Martin Ortega and Dimitrios Triantaphyllou (2003) Partners and Neighbours: A CFSP for a Wider Europe, Paris: EU ISS.Google Scholar
  16. Bigo, Didier (1996) Polices en réseaux: l’expérience européenne, Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
  17. Bigo, Didier, Philippe Bonditti, Julien Jeandesboz and Francesco Ragazzi (2008) Security Technologies and Society: A State of The Art on Security, Technology, Borders and Mobility, Oslo: PRIO.Google Scholar
  18. Biscop, Sven and Jan Joel Andersson, eds, (2008) The EU and the European Security Strategy: Forging a Global Europe, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Bourdieu, Pierre (1990) ‘The Scholastic Point of View’, Cultural Anthropology 5(4): 380–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bourdieu, Pierre (2004a) Science of Science and Reflexivity, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  21. Bourdieu, Pierre (2004b) ‘The Mystery of the Ministry: From Particular Wills to the General Will’, Constellations 11(1): 37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bourdieu, Pierre and Loïc Wacquant (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  23. Brigg, Morgan and Roland Bleiker (2010) ‘Autoethnographic International Relations: Exploring The Self as a Source of Knowledge’, Review of International Studies 36(3): 779–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Browning, Christopher S. and Pertti Joenniemi (2008) ‘Geostrategies of the European Neighbourhood Policy’, European Journal of International Relations 14(3): 519–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Buchet de Neuilly, Yves (2005) L’Europe de la politique étrangère, Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
  26. Bueger, Christian and Felix Bethke (2014) ‘Actor-Networking The ‘Failed State’ — An Enquiry into the Life of Concepts’, Journal of International Relations and Development 17(1): 30–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Bueger, Christian and Manuel Mireanu (2015) ‘‘Negotiating Proximity: Practice, Participant Observation and Security’’, in Aradau Claudia, Huysmans Jef, Neal Andrew and Voelkner Nadine eds, Critical Security Methods: New Frameworks for Analysis, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Buzan, Barry and Lene Hansen (2009) The Evolution of International Security Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Buzan, Barry, Ole Waever and Jaap de Wilde (1998) Security: A New Framework For Analysis, Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  30. c.a.s.e. collective (2006) ‘Critical Approaches to Security in Europe: A Networked Manifesto Security Dialogue 37(4): 443–87.Google Scholar
  31. Ciută, Felix (2009) ‘Security and The Problem of Context: A Hermeneutical Critique of Securitisation Theory’, Review of International Studies 35(2): 301–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Council of the European Union (2003a) European Security Strategy 15895/03, Brussels: Council of the European Union.Google Scholar
  33. Council of the European Union (2003b) ‘Outcome of proceedings of High Level Working Group on Asylum and Migration on 24 November 2003’, Brussels, 15701/03.Google Scholar
  34. Council of the European Union (2004a) ‘Outcome of proceedings of High Level Working Group on Asylum and Migration on 14 May 2004’, Brussels, 10200/04.Google Scholar
  35. Council of the European Union (2004b) ‘Outcome of proceedings of High Level Working Group on Asylum and Migration on 19 March 2004’, Brussels, 7756/04.Google Scholar
  36. Cox, Robert (1981) ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’, Millennium — Journal of International Studies 10(2): 126–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Dannreuther, Roland, ed. (2003) European Foreign and Security Policy: Towards A Neighbourhood Strategy, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Eagleton-Pierce, Matthew (2011) ‘Advancing a Reflexive International Relations’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies 39(3): 805–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. European Commission (2003) Wider Europe - Neighbourhood: A New Framework for Relations with our Eastern and Southern Neighbours, COM(2003) 104 final, Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  40. European Commission (2004a) Communication on the Instruments for External Assistance under the Future Financial Perspectives COM(2004) 626 final, Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  41. European Commission (2004b) European Neighbourhood Policy: Strategy Paper COM(2004) 373 final, Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  42. European Commission (2007) A Stronger European Neighbourhood Policy COM(2007) 774 final, Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  43. European Commission (2013) ‘Publicly Available and Background Research on the ENP’, Brussels, http://ec.europa.eu/world/enp/pdf/background_material.pdf (accessed 11 August).
  44. Friedrichs, Jörg and Friedrich Kratochwil (2009) ‘On Acting and Knowing: How Pragmatism Can Advance International Relations Research and Methodology’, International Organization 63(4): 701–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Georgakakis, Didier (2011) ‘Don’t Throw Out the ‘Brussels Bubble’ with The Bathwater: From EU Institutions to the Field of Eurocracy’, International Political Sociology 5(3): 331–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Goujon, Alexandra (2005) ‘L’Europe élargie en quête d’identité: légitimation et politisation de la politique européenne de voisinage’, Politique européenne 15: 137–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Guild, Elspeth (2005) What is a Neighbour? Examining the EU Neighbourhood Policy from the Perspective of Movements of Persons, Yalta: Western NIS Forum for Refugee-Assisting NGOs.Google Scholar
  48. Gusterson, Hugh (1997) ‘Studying Up Revisited’, PolAR 20(1): 114–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hansen, Lene (2000) ‘The Little Mermaid’s Silent Security Dilemma and the Absence of Gender in the Copenhagen School’, Millennium — Journal of International Studies 29(2): 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hayoz, Nicolas, Leszek Jesién and Wim Van Meurs, eds, (2005) Enlarged EU — Enlarged Neighbourhood: Perspectives of the European Neighbourhood Policy, Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  51. Huysmans, Jef (1998a) ‘Security! What Do You Mean? From Concept to Thick Signifier’, European Journal of International Relations 4(2): 226–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Huysmans, Jef (1998b) ‘Dire et écrire la sécurité: le dilemme normatif des études de sécurité’, Cultures & Conflits 31–32: 177–202.Google Scholar
  53. Huysmans, Jef (1998c) ‘Revisiting Copenhagen: Or, On the Creative Development of a Security Studies Agenda in Europe’, European Journal of International Relations 4(4): 479–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Huysmans, Jef (2002) ‘Defining Social Constructivism in Security Studies: The Normative Dilemma of Writing Security’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 27(Special issue): 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Inayatullah, Naeem, ed. (2011) Autobiographical International Relations: I, IR, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Jackson, Patrick J. (2011) The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and its Implications for the Study of World Politics, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Jeandesboz, Julien (2007) ‘Labelling the ‘Neighbourhood’: Towards a Genesis of the European Neighbourhood Policy’, Journal of International Relations and Development 10(4): 387–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Jeandesboz, Julien (2008) An analysis of the Commission Communications on Future Development of FRONTEX and the Creation of a European Border Surveillance System (EUROSUR) PE 408.295, Brussels: European Parliament.Google Scholar
  59. Jeandesboz, Julien and Emmanuel-Pierre Guittet (2007) Politique de voisinage de l’Union européenne et sécurité intérieure de l’Union européenne et de ses Etats-membres EPMES 2006/202, Paris: Délégation aux affaires stratégiques/Ministère de la Défense.Google Scholar
  60. Jeandesboz, Julien (2009) ‘The Genesis of the European Neighbourhood Policy: Alternative narratives, bureaucratic competitions’, in Thierry Balzacq, ed. The External Dimension of Justice and Home Affairs: Governance, Neighbours, Security, 35-64, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  61. Kelley, Judith (2006) ‘New Wine in Old Wineskins: Promoting Political Reforms through the New European Neighbourhood Policy’, Journal of Common Market Studies 44(1): 29–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kempe, Iris, ed. (2001) Beyond EU Enlargement Volume 1: The Agenda of Direct Neighbourhood for Eastern Europe, Gutersloh: Bertelsmann Foundation.Google Scholar
  63. Krenzler, Horst Günter and Filippo Andreatta (1998) ‘The Geostrategic and International Political Implications of EU Enlargement’, San Domenico: EUI Policy Paper RSC, No. 98/06.Google Scholar
  64. Krenzler, Horst Günter and Kataryna Wolczuk (2001) ‘EU Justice and Home Affairs in the Context of Enlargement’, San Domenico: EUI Policy Paper RSC, No. 01/4.Google Scholar
  65. Kurowska, Xymena (2009) ‘‘Solana Milieu’: Framing Security Policy’, Perspectives on European Politics and Society 10(4): 523–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Kurowska, Xymena and Benjamin Tallis (2009) ‘EU Border Assistance Mission to Moldova and Ukraine: Beyond Border Monitoring?’ European Foreign Affairs Review 14(1): 47–64.Google Scholar
  67. Kurowska, Xymena and Benjamin Tallis (2013) ‘Chiasmatic Crossings: A Reflexive Revisit of a Research Encounter in European Security’, Security Dialogue 44(1): 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Kuus, Merje (2011) ‘Policy and Geopolitics: Bounding Europe in EUrope’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101(5): 1140–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Kuus, Merje (2013) ‘Foreign Policy and Ethnography: A Skeptical Intervention’, Geopolitics 18(1): 115–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Lavenex, Sandra (2004) ‘EU External Governance in ‘Wider Europe’’, Journal of European Public Policy 8(1): 680–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Lavenex, Sandra (2008) ‘A Governance Perspective on the European Neighbourhood Policy: Integration Beyond Conditionality’, Journal of European Public Policy 15(6): 938–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Lavenex, Sandra and Nicole Wichmann (2009) ‘The External Governance of EU Internal Security’, Journal of European Integration 31(1): 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Lavenex, Sandra and Frank Schimmelfennig (2009) ‘EU Rules Beyond EU Borders: Theorizing External Governance in European Politics’, Journal of European Public Policy 16(6): 791–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Leander, Anna (2002) ‘Do We Really Need Reflexivity in IPE? Bourdieu’s Two Reasons for Answering Affirmatively’, Review of International Political Economy 9(4): 601–09.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Leander, Anna (2008) ‘Thinking Tools’, in Audie Klotz and Deepa Prakash eds, Qualitative Methods in International Relations: A Pluralist Guide, 11–27, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Leander, Anna (2013) ‘Strong Objectivity’ in Security Studies: Ethnographic Contributions to Method Development Carlo Alberto Notebooks, 301, Torino: Collegio Carlo Alberto.Google Scholar
  77. Löwenheim, Oded (2010) ‘The ‘I’ in IR: An Autoethnographic Account’, Review of International Studies 36(4): 1023–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Lynch, Dov (2005) ‘The Security Dimension of the European Neighbourhood Policy’, International Spectator 40(1): 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. McDonald, Michael (2008) ‘Securitization and the Construction of Security’, European Journal of International Relations 14(4): 563–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Nader, Laura (1972) ‘Up the Anthropologist — Perspectives Gained From Studying Up’, in Dell Hymes ed., Reinventing Anthropology, 284–311, New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  81. Neal, Andrew W. (2009) ‘Securitization and Risk at the EU Border: The Origins of FRONTEX’, Journal of Common Market Studies 47(2): 333–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Neal, Andrew W. (2012) ‘Normalisation and Legislative Exceptionalism: Counterterrorist Lawmaking and the Changing Times of Security Emergencies’, International Political Sociology 6(3): 260–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Nello, Susan and Karen E. Smith (1997) ‘The Consequences of Eastern Enlargement and the European Union in Stages’, San Domenico: EUI Policy Paper RSC, No. 97/51.Google Scholar
  84. Peers, Steve (2000) ‘Justice and Home Affairs: Decision-Making After Amsterdam’, European Law Review 25(2): 183–91.Google Scholar
  85. Prodi, Romano (2002a) ‘Europe and the Mediterranean: Time for Action’. Speech. Louvain-la-neuve: Université catholique de Louvain-la-neuve, 26 November 02/589.Google Scholar
  86. Prodi, Romano (2002b) ‘A Wider Europe — A Proximity Policy as The Key to Stability’. Speech. Brussels Sixth ECSA-World Conference, 5–6 December, 02/619.Google Scholar
  87. Salter, Mark (2008) ‘Securitization and Desecuritization: A Dramaturgical Analysis of the Canadian Air Transport Authority’, Journal of International Relations and Development 11(4): 321–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Stone, Lawrence (1971) ‘Prosopography’, Daedalus 100(1): 46–79.Google Scholar
  89. Teti, Andrea (2012) ‘The EU’s First Response to the ‘Arab Spring’: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Partnership for Democracy and Shared Prosperity’, Mediterranean Politics 17(3): 266–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tulmets, Elsa (2010) ‘Experimentalist Governance in EU External Relations: Enlargemeent and the European Neighbourhood Policy’, in Charles F. Sabel and Jonathan Zeitlin eds, Experimentalist Governance in the European Union, 297–324, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  91. Van Meurs, Wim, ed. (2001) Beyond EU Enlargement Volume 2: The Agenda of Stabilisation for South Eastern Europe, Gutersloh: Bertelsmann Foundation.Google Scholar
  92. Vauchez, Antoine (2008) ‘The Force of a Weak Field: Law and Lawyers in the Government of the European Union (For a Renewed Research Agenda)’, International Political Sociology 2(2): 128–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Veyne, Paul (1984) Writing History: Essays in Epistemology, Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
  94. Villa Faber Group (2001) Thinking Enlarged: The Accession Countries and the Future of the European Union — A Strategy for Reform, Gutersloh, Munich: Bertelsmann Foundation, CAP.Google Scholar
  95. Villumsen, Trine (2011) ‘Science and Securitization: Objectivation, The Authority of the Speaker and Mobilization of Scientific Facts’, Security Dialogue 42(4–5): 385–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wallace, William (2003) Looking after the neighbourhood: Responsibilities for the EU-25, Paris: Notre Europe.Google Scholar
  97. Waever, Ole (2004) Aberystwyth, Paris, Copenhagen: New ‘Schools’ in Security Theory and Their Origins Between Core and Periphery, Montreal: Annual Convention of the International Studies Association.Google Scholar
  98. Weber, Katja, Michael E. Smith and Michael Baun, eds (2007) Governing Europe’s Neighbourhood: Partners or Periphery, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  99. Wichmann, Nicole (2007) ‘The Intersection Between Justice and Home Affairs and the European Neighbourhood Policy: Taking Stock of The Logics, Objectives and Practices’, Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies CEPS Working Documents, 275.Google Scholar
  100. Wolff, Sarah (2008) ‘Border Management in the Mediterranean: Internal, External and Ethical Challenges’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs 21(2): 253–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Yanow, Dvora and Peregrine Schwartz-Shea, eds, (2006) Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn, London: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  102. Zaiotti, Ruben (2007) ‘Of Friends and Fences: Europe’s Neighbourhood Policy and the “Gated Community Syndrome”’, Journal of European Integration 29(2): 143–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Zielonka, Jan, ed. (2002) Europe Unbound: Enlarging and Reshaping the Boundaries of the European Union, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political Science, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations