Advertisement

Foreign aid and the fragile consensus on state fragility

  • Jörg Faust
  • Jörn Grävingholt
  • Sebastian Ziaja
Article

Abstract

Most actors in the field of foreign aid agree with the call for coordinated engagement in fragile states in order to more effectively counter the consequences and origins of state failure. However, despite such demands, governments from OECD countries as well as multilateral agencies engaged in fragile states often continue to act in an uncoordinated manner and fail to reach higher levels of harmonisation. Why is effective coordination so hard to achieve? This article argues that three major challenges explain the persistent problems of donor harmonisation in fragile states: (1) the cognitive challenge of explaining the origins of state fragility and deducing effective instruments and interventions, (2) the political challenge of reconciling divergent political motives for engagement, as well as (3) the bureaucratic challenge related to the organisational logic of competing aid agencies.

Keywords

conflict studies development studies donor coordination foreign aid fragile states policy coherence 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Stephen Brown, Thomas Fues, Sven Grimm and Imme Scholz as well as two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and useful suggestions on earlier drafts of this article.

References

  1. AA (Federal Foreign Office), BMVg (Federal Ministry of Defence), and BMZ (Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development) (2012) For a Coherent German Government Policy towards Fragile States — Interministerial Guidelines, September 2012, Berlin, http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/cae/servlet/contentblob/626516/publicationFile/178870/120919_Leitlinien_Fragile_Staaten.pdf (accessed 25 November, 2013).
  2. Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson and James A. Robinson (2002) ‘Reversal of Fortune: Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (4): 1231–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Acharya, Arnab, Ana Teresa Fuzzo de Lima and Mick Moore (2006) ‘Proliferation and Fragmentation: Transactions Costs and the Value of Aid’, Journal of Development Studies 42 (1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alesina, Alberto and David Dollar (2000) ‘Who Gives Foreign Aid To Whom and Why?’ Journal of Economic Growth 5 (1): 33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, Benedict (1991) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, London: Verso.Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, Ian (2005) Fragile States: What is International Experience Telling Us? AusAid, http://aid.dfat.gov.au/Publications/Documents/fragile_states.pdf (accessed 25 November, 2013).
  7. Banerjee, Abhijit, Angus Deaton, Nora Lustig, Ken Rogoff and Edward Hsu (2006) ‘An Evaluation of World Bank Research, 1998–2005’, 24 September, 2006, mimeo, http://siteresources.worldbank.org/DEC/Resources/84797-1109362238001/726454-1164121166494/RESEARCH-EVALUATION-2006-Main-Report.pdf (accessed 4 November, 2013).
  8. Besley, Timothy and Torsten Persson (2011) ‘Fragile States and Development Policy’, Journal of the European Economic Association 9 (3): 371–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blaydes, Lisa and Mark Andreas Kayser (2011) ‘Counting Calories: Democracy and Distribution in the Developing World’, International Studies Quarterly 55 (4): 887–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. BMZ (Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development) (2005) Sector Strategy for Crisis Prevention, Conflict Transformation and Peace-building in German Development Cooperation: Strategy for Peacebuilding, June, Strategies 132, Bonn: BMZ.Google Scholar
  11. BMZ (2007) Development-oriented Transformation in Conditions of Fragile Statehood and Poor Government Performance Strategies 153, Bonn: BMZ.Google Scholar
  12. Bøås, Morten and Kathleen M. Jennings (2005) ‘Insecurity and Development: The Rhetoric of the ‘Failed State’’, The European Journal of Development Research 17 (3): 385–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Browne, Stephen (2006) Aid & Influence: Do Donors Help or Hinder? London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  14. Carment, David, Stewart Prest and Yiagadeesen Samy (2010) Security, Development, and the Fragile State: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Policy, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Chong, Alberto and Mark Gradstein (2008) ‘What Determines Foreign Aid? The Donors’ Perspective’, Journal of Development Economics 87 (1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Claessens, Stijn, Danny Cassimon and Bjorn Van Campenhout (2009) ‘Evidence on Changes in Aid Allocation Criteria’, World Bank Economic Review 23 (2): 185–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Collier, Paul (2007) The Bottom Billion: Why the Poorest Countries Are Failing and What Can Be Done About It, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Collier, Paul, Lani Elliott, Håvard Hegre, Anke Hoeffler, Marta Reynal-Querol and Nicholas Sambanis (2003) Breaking the Conflict Trap: Civil War and Development Policy, Washington DC: World Bank/Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Coppedge, Michael (2012) Democratization and Research Methods, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Deacon, Robert T. (2009) ‘Public Good Provision Under Dictatorship and Democracy’, Public Choice 139 (1–2): 241–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Desch, Michael C. (1996) ‘War and Strong States, Peace and Weak States?’ International Organization 50 (2): 237–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. DFID (Department for International Development) (2005) Why We Need to Work More Effectively in Fragile States, London: Department for International Development.Google Scholar
  23. DFID (2010) Building Peaceful States and Societies: A DFID Practice Paper, London: Department for International Development.Google Scholar
  24. Djankov, Simeon, Jose G. Montalvo and Marta Reynal-Querol (2009) ‘Aid with Multiple Personalities’, Journal of Comparative Economics 37 (2): 217–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dreher, Axel and Nathan M. Jensen (2007) ‘Independent Actor or Agent? An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of US Interests on International Monetary Fund Conditions’, The Journal of Law and Economics 50 (1): 105–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Drury, A. Cooper, Richard Stuart Olson and Douglas A. Van Belle (2005) ‘The Politics of Humanitarian Aid: U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance, 1964–1995’, The Journal of Politics 67 (2): 454–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Easterly, William (2001) The Elusive Quest for Growth: Economists’ Adventures and Misadventures in the Tropics, Cambridge/ London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Easterly, William (2002) ‘The Cartel of Good Intentions: Bureaucracy vs. Markets in Foreign Aid’, Journal of Policy Reform 5 (4): 232–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Easterly, William, ed. (2008) Reinventing Foreign Aid, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. Englehart, Neil A. (2009) ‘State Capacity, State Failure, and Human Rights’, Journal of Peace Research 46 (2): 163–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Evans, Gareth (2008) The Responsibility to Protect: Ending Mass Atrocity Crimes Once and For All, Washington DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  32. Fabra Mata, Javier and Sebastian Ziaja (2009) Users’ Guide on Measuring Fragility, Bonn/Oslo: German Development Institute/UNDP.Google Scholar
  33. Faust, Jörg (2008) ‘Are More Democratic Donor Countries More Development Oriented? Domestic Institutions and External Development Promotion in OECD Countries’, World Development 36 (3): 383–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Faust, Jörg (2011) ‘Donor Transparency and Aid Allocation’. Discussion Paper December, 2011, German Development Institute, Bonn.Google Scholar
  35. Faust, Jörg, Stefan Leiderer and Johannes Schmitt (2012) ‘Financing poverty alleviation vs. promoting democracy? Multi-donor budget support in Zambia’, Democratization 19 (3): 438–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Furness, Mark (2013) ‘Who Controls the European External Action Service? Agent Autonomy in EU External Policy’, European Foreign Affairs Review 18 (1): 103–26.Google Scholar
  37. Fund for Peace (2012) ‘Failed states index’, http://ffp.statesindex.org/rankings-2012-sortable (accessed 4 November, 2013).
  38. Gibson, Clark C., Krister Andersson, Elinor Ostrom and Sujai Shivakumar (2005) The Samaritan’s Dilemma: The Political Economy of Development Aid, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Glaeser, Edward L., Giacomo A. M. Ponzetto and Andrei Shleifer (2007) ‘Why Does Democracy Need Education?’ Journal of Economic Growth 12 (2): 77–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Grävingholt, Jörn, Sebastian Ziaja and Merle Kreibaum (2012) State Fragility: Towards a Multidimensional Empirical Typology. Bonn, DIE Discussion Paper March 2012.Google Scholar
  41. Gros, Jean-Germain (1996) ‘Towards a Taxonomy of Failed States in the New World Order: Decaying Somalia, Liberia, Rwanda and Haiti’, Third World Quarterly 17 (3): 455–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gundlach, Erich and Martin Paldam (2009) ‘A Farewell to Critical Junctures: Sorting Out Long-run Causality of Income and Democracy’, European Journal of Political Economy 25 (3): 340–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gutiérrez, Francisco, Diana Buitrago, Andrea González and Camila Lozano (2011) Measuring Poor State Performance: Problems, Perspectives and Paths Ahead, London: Crisis States Research Centre.Google Scholar
  44. Hameiri, Shahar (2007) ‘Failed States or Failed Paradigm? State Capacity and the Limits of Institutionalism’, Journal of International Relations and Development 10 (2): 122–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hansen, Henrik and Finn Tarp (2001) ‘Aid and Growth Regressions’, Journal of Development Economics 64 (2): 547–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Helman, Gerald B. and Steven R. Ratner (1992) ‘Saving Failed States’, Foreign Policy 89 (Winter): 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Herbst, Jeffrey (1990) ‘War and the State in Africa’, International Security 14 (4): 117–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. High-level Forum (2005) ‘Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness: Ownership, Harmonisation, Alignment, Results and Mutual Accountability, Joint Progress Toward Enhanced Aid Effectiveness’, Paris, 28 February — 2 March, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/11/41/34428351.pdf (accessed 6 October, 2005).
  49. Holsti, Kalevi J. (1996) The State, War, and the State of War, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Human Security Centre, The University of British Columbia (2005) Human Security Report 2005: War and Peace in the 21st Century, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Inglehart, Ronald and Christian Welzel (2009) ‘How Development Leads to Democracy: What We Know About Modernization’, Foreign Affairs 88 (2): 33–48.Google Scholar
  52. Kaldor, Mary, Mary Martin and Sabine Selchow (2007) ‘Human Security: A New Strategic Narrative for Europe’, International Affairs 83 (2): 273–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Keefer, Philip and Stephen Knack (1997) ‘Why Don’t Poor Countries Catch Up? A Cross-country Test of an Institutional Explanation’, Economic Inquiry 35 (3): 590–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Khan, Mushtaq (1995) ‘State Failure in Weak States: A Critique of New Institutional Explanations’, in John Harriss, Janet Hunter and Colin M. Lewis, eds, The New Institutional Economics and Third World Development, 71–86, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Klingebiel, Stephan and Katja Roehder (2004) Development-military Interfaces: New Challenges in Crises and Post-conflict Situations, Bonn: Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik, Reports and Working Papers May 2004.Google Scholar
  56. Knack, Stephen and Aminur Rahman (2007) ‘Donor Fragmentation and Bureaucratic Quality in Aid Recipients’, Journal of Development Economics 83 (1): 176–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lake, David A. and Matthew A. Baum (2001) ‘The Invisible Hand of Democracy: Political Control and the Provision of Public Services’, Comparative Political Studies 34 (6): 587–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lipset, Seymour Martin (1959) ‘Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy’, The American Political Science Review 53 (1): 69–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. M.A.E. (Ministère des Affaires étrangères) (2007) Fragile States and Situations of Fragility: France’s Policy Paper, Paris: Ministère des Affaires étrangères.Google Scholar
  60. Magen, Amichai, Thomas Risse and Michael A. McFaul, eds (2009) Promoting Democracy and the Rule of Law — American and European Strategies, London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mallaby, Sebastian (2002) ‘The Reluctant Imperialist: Terrorism, Failed States, and the Case for American Empire’, Foreign Affairs 81 (2): 2–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Marshall, Monty G. and Benjamin R. Cole (2011) Global Report 2011: Conflict, Governance, and State Fragility, Vienna, VA: Center for Systemic Peace.Google Scholar
  63. Martens, Bertin, Uwe Mummert, Peter Murrell and Paul Seabright (2002) The Institutional Economics of Foreign Aid, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. McCormick, Dorothy and Hubert Schmitz (2011) ‘Donor Proliferation and Co-ordination: Experiences of Kenya and Indonesia’, Journal of Asian and African Studies 46 (2): 149–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Migdal, Joel S. (1988) Strong Societies and Weak States: State-society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third World, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Milliken, Jennifer and Keith Krause (2002) ‘State Failure, State Collapse and State Reconstruction: Concepts, Lessons and Strategies’, Development and Change 33 (5): 753–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Moravcsik, Andrew (1997) ‘Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics’, International Organization 51 (4): 513–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. North, Douglass C., John Joseph Wallis, Steven B. Webb and Barry R. Weingast (2007) Limited Access Orders in the Developing World: A New Approach to the Problems of Development, Washington DC: The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper 4359.Google Scholar
  69. North, Douglass C., John Joseph Wallis and Barry R. Weingast (2009) Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2006) Whole of Government Approaches to Fragile States, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  71. OECD (2007) Principles for Good International Engagement in Fragile States and Situations, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  72. OECD (2011a) Aid Effectiveness 2005–2010: Progress in Implementing the Paris Declaration, Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  73. OECD (2011b) Supporting Statebuilding in Situations of Conflict and Fragility: Policy Guidance, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  74. OECD/DAC (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development / Development Assistance Committee) (2001) Helping Prevent Violent Conflict, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/Development Assistance Committee.Google Scholar
  75. OECD/DAC (2007) Fragile States: Policy Commitment and Principles for Good International Engagement in Fragile States and Situations, DAC High Level Meeting, Paris, 3–4 April.Google Scholar
  76. OECD/DAC (2008) Concepts and Dilemmas of State Building in Fragile Situations: From Fragility to Resilience, OECD/DAC Discussion Paper, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/59/51/41100930.pdf (accessed 19 November, 2008).
  77. OSCE (Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe) (2007) OSCE Handbook, Vienna: Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe.Google Scholar
  78. Owen, Taylor (2004) ‘Human Security — Conflict, Critique and Consensus: Colloquium Remarks and a Proposal for a Threshold-based Definition’, Security Dialogue 35 (3): 373–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Paris, Roland (2001) ‘Human Security: Paradigm Shift or Hot Air?’ International Security 26 (2): 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Patrick, Stewart (2011) Weak Links: Fragile States, Global Threats, and International Security, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rotberg, Robert I., ed. (2003) State Failure and State Weakness in a Time of Terror, Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  82. Schudel, Carl Jan Willem (2008) ‘Corruption and Bilateral Foreign Aid’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 52 (4): 507–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. SIDA (Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency) (2005) Policy: Promoting Peace and Security through Development Cooperation, Stockholm: Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency.Google Scholar
  84. Thacker, Strom Cronan (1999) ‘The High Politics of IMF Lending’, World Politics 52 (1): 38–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Tilly, Charles (1985) ‘War Making and State Making as Organized Crime’, in Peter B. Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer and Theda Skocpol, eds, Bringing the State Back In, 169–91, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Tschirgi, Neclâ (2006) ‘Security and Development Policies: Untangling the Relationship’, in Stephan Klingebiel, ed., New Interfaces between Security and Development: Changing Concepts and Approaches, 39–67, Bonn: Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik.Google Scholar
  87. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (1994) Human Development Report 1994: New Dimensions of Human Security, New York: United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
  88. UNDP (2006) Evaluation of UNDP Support for Conflict Affected Countries, New York: United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
  89. United Nations (2004) A More Secure World: Our Shared Responsibility: Report of the High-level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change, http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/59/565 (accessed 3 December, 2013).
  90. United Nations (2005a) 2005 World Summit Outcome: Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly, New York, http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/60/1 (accessed 25 November, 2013).
  91. United Nations (2005b) In Larger Freedom: Towards Development, Security and Human Rights for All: Report of the Secretary-General of the United Nations for decision by Heads of State and Government in September 2005, http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/gaA.59.2005_En.pdf (accessed 25 November, 2013).
  92. USAID (United States Agency for International Development) (2005) Fragile States Strategy, Washington: United States Agency for International Development.Google Scholar
  93. USAID (2013) Conflict Mitigation and Prevention, http://www.usaid.gov/what-we-do/working-crises-and-conflict/conflict-mitigation-and-prevention (accessed 26 February, 2013).
  94. Wendt, Alexander (1994) ‘Collective Identity Formation and the International State’, American Political Science Review 88 (2): 384–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Winters, Matthew (2012) ‘The Obstacles to Foreign Aid Harmonization: Lessons From Decentralization Support in Indonesia’, Studies in Comparative International Development 47 (3): 316–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. World Bank (2005) Fragile States: Good Practice in Country Assistance Strategies, http://www-wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2005/12/22/000090341_20051222094709/Rendered/PDF/34790.pdf (accessed 25 March, 2008).
  97. World Bank (2011) World Development Report 2011: Conflict, Security, and Development, Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  98. Zaum, Dominik (2012) ‘Beyond the ‘Liberal Peace’’, Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 18 (1): 121–32.Google Scholar
  99. Ziaja, Sebastian (2012) ‘What Do Fragility Indices Measure? Assessing Measurement Procedures and Statistical Proximity’, Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 6 (1): 39–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jörg Faust
    • 1
  • Jörn Grävingholt
    • 1
  • Sebastian Ziaja
    • 1
  1. 1.German Development Institute/Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE)BonnGermany

Personalised recommendations