Advertisement

Regional integration and the challenge of overlapping memberships on trade

  • Mwita Chacha
Article

Abstract

Despite a plethora of policy and scholarly discussions on how overlapping memberships affect the implementation of rules of origin meant to facilitate trade within regional trade agreements (RTAs) of developing countries, there has yet to be any theory development or empirical test to verify these claims. This article re-examines these previous discussions and articulates and empirically tests a theoretical model on the effects that overlapping memberships have had on intra-RTA trade. Using measures of overlapping memberships at both the RTA and country levels of analysis, I find that overlapping memberships in RTAs involving developing countries have had a negative effect on intra-RTA trade levels. These findings shed light on steps developing countries can take to address overlapping memberships and strengthen regional integration at a time when there is a push for north–south trade agreements such as those the European Union is negotiating with several of these developing countries.

Keywords

regional integration overlapping memberships rules of origin intra-RTA trade 

Notes

Supplementary material

41268_2014_BFjird201313_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (216 kb)
Online Appendix

References

  1. Alba, Joseph, Jung Hur and Park Donghyun (2010) ‘Do Hub-and-Spoke Free Trade Agreements Increase Trade? A Panel Data Analysis’, Manila: Asian Development Bank Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration, No. 46.Google Scholar
  2. Baldwin, Richard E. (2006) ‘Multilateralising Regionalism: Spaghetti Bowls as Building Blocs on the Path to Global Free Trade’, World Economy 29 (11): 1451–1518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bayer, Resat and Matthew C. Rupert (2004) ‘Effects of Civil Wars on International Trade, 1950–1992’, Journal of Peace Research 41 (6): 699–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bliss, Harry and Bruce Russett (1998) ‘Democratic Trading Partners: The Liberal Connection, 1962–1989’, Journal of Politics 60 (4): 1126–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brenton, Paul, Frank Flatters and Paul Kalenga (2005) ‘Rules of Origin and SADC: The Case for Change in the Mid Term Review of the Trade Protocol’, World Bank, Africa Region Working Paper Series No. 83, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  6. Brenton, Paul and Miriam Manchin (2003) ‘Making EU Trade Agreements Work: The Role of Rules of Origin’, World Economy 26 (5): 755–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charalambides, Nick (2005) ‘The Private Sector's Perspective, Priorities and Role in Regional Integration and Implications for Regional Trade Arrangements’, Maastricht: European Center for Development Policy Management (ECDPM) Discussion Paper No. 66.Google Scholar
  8. Collier, Paul (2003) Breaking the Conflict Trap: Civil War and Development Policy, Washington, DC: World Bank Publication.Google Scholar
  9. Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA) (2011) ‘Principles of the COMESA Rules of Origin’, http://www.comesa.int/lang-en/component/content/article/34-general-news/514-principles-of-the-comesa-rules-of-origin (accessed 20 January, 2011).Google Scholar
  10. East African Community (EAC) (2008) ‘Final Communique of the Joint COMESA-EAC-SADC Heads of State and Government Tripartite Summit’, http://www.eac.int/services/reports/doc_download/479-communique-the-joint-comesa-eac-sadc-heads-of-state-a-government-tripartite-summit.html (accessed 28 January, 2011).Google Scholar
  11. East African Community (EAC) (2010) ‘COMESA-EAC-SADC Tripartite Framework: State of Play’, =https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://www.eac.int/tripartite-summit.pdf (accessed 13 January, 2011).
  12. Estevadeordal, Antoni, Jeremy Harris and Kati Suominen (2007) ‘Multilateralizing Preferential Rules of Origin around the World’, paper presented at the WTO/HEI/NCCR Trade/CEPR conference ‘Multilateralizing Regionalism’, 10–12 September, Geneva.Google Scholar
  13. Estevadeordal, Antoni, Kati Suominen, Pablo Sanguinetti and Alberto Trejos (2005) ‘Rules of Origin in Preferential Trading Arrangements: Is All Well with the Spaghetti Bowl in the Americas? [with Comments]’, Economía 5 (2): 63–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. European Commission (2009) ‘Fact Sheet on the Interim Economic Partnership Agreements: SADC Group,’ http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2009/january/tradoc_142189.pdf (accessed 18 January, 2011).
  15. Feng, Yi and Gespare Genna (2003) ‘Regional Integration and Domestic Institutional Homogeneity: A Comparative Analysis of Regional Integration in the Americas, Pacific Asia, and Western Europe’, Review of International Political Economy 10 (2): 278–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Feng, Yi and Gaspare M. Genna (2005) ‘Measuring Regional Integration’, paper presented at the ‘Regional Economic Integration in Asia’ workshop, 25 February, Claremont, CA.Google Scholar
  17. Fratianni, Michele and Chang Hoon Oh (2009) ‘Size of Regional Trade Agreements and Regional Trade Bias’, Applied Economics Letters 16 (16): 1603–1606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Geda, Alemayehu and Haile Kebret (2007) ‘Regional Economic Integration in Africa: A Review of Problems and Prospects with a Case Study of Comesa’, Journal of African Economies 16 (5): 1–38.Google Scholar
  19. Genna, Gespare (2002) ‘Changing Power, Sovereignty, and Loyalty in the European Union’, Ph.D. dissertation, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA.Google Scholar
  20. Genna, Gespare (2011) ‘Does North America Have the Right Stuff? An Analysis of Compatibility and the Potential Deepening of North American Integration’, Politics & Policy 39 (1): 141–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Genna, Gespare and Taeko Hiroi (2004) ‘Power Preponderance and Domestic Politics: Explaining Regional Economic Integration in Latin America and the Caribbean, 1960–1997’, International Interactions 30 (2): 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gleditsch, Nils Petter, Peter Wallensteen, Mikael Eriksson, Margareta Sollenberg and Håvard Strand (2002) ‘Armed Conflict 1946–2001: A New Dataset’, Journal of Peace Research 39 (5): 615–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goldstein, Judith L., Douglas Rivers and Michael Tomz (2007) ‘Institutions in International Relations: Understanding the Effects of the GATT and the WTO on World Trade’, International Organization 61 (1): 37–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haftel, Yoram (2007) ‘Designing for Peace: Regional Integration Arrangements, Institutional Variation, and Militarized Interstate Disputes’, International Organization 61 (1): 217–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haftel, Yoram Z. and Alexander Thompson (2006) ‘The Independence of International Organizations: Concept and Applications’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (2): 253–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2010) ‘Direction of Trade Statistics (DOTS),’ http://www2.imfstatistics.org/DOT/ (accessed 16 October, 2010).Google Scholar
  27. International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2011) ‘World Economic Outlook,’ http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2011/01/pdf/text.pdf (accessed 30 January, 2012).
  28. Jakobeit, Cord, Trudi Hartzenberg and Nick Charalambides (2005) ‘Overlapping Membership in COMESA, EAC, SACU and SADC Trade Policy Options for the Region and for EPA Negotiations’, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ), Eschborn, Germany, =https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://www.gtz.de/de/dokumente/en-epa-overlapping-memberships-2005.pdf (accessed 12 October, 2010).
  29. Khandelwal, Padamja (2004) ‘COMESA and SADC: Prospects and Challenges for Regional Trade Integration’, International Monetary Fund Working Paper WP/04/227.Google Scholar
  30. Krishna, Kala (2005) ‘Understanding Rules of Origin’, NBER Working Paper Series Working Paper 11150, http://www.nber.org/papers/w11150 (accessed 23 March, 2011).
  31. Krueger, Anne O. (1997) ‘Problems with Overlapping Free Trade Areas’, in Takatoshi Ito and Anne O. Krueger, eds, Regionalism versus Multilateral Trade Agreements, 9–24, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lee, Jong-Wha, Innwon Park and Kwanho Shin (2008) ‘Proliferating Regional Trade Arrangements: Why and Whither?’ World Economy 31 (12): 1525–1557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Malamud, Andres (2001) ‘Spillover in European and South American Integration: An Assessment’, paper presented at the annual meeting of the Latin American Studies Association, 6–8 September, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  34. Manchin, Miriam and Annette O. Pelkmans-Balaoing (2007) ‘Rules of Origin and the Web of East Asian Free Trade Agreements’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4273.Google Scholar
  35. Mansfield, Edward M. (1998) ‘The Proliferation of Preferential Trading Arrangements’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 42 (4): 523–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mansfield, Edward M. and Helen V. Milner (1997) ‘The Political Economy of Regionalism: An Overview’, in Edward M. Mansfield and Helen V. Milner, eds, The Political Economy of Regionalism, 1–19, New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Mansfield, Edward D., Helen V. Milner and Jon C. Pevehouse (2007) ‘Vetoing Co-operation: The Impact of Veto Players on Preferential Trading Arrangements’, British Journal of Political Science 37 (3): 403–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mansfield, Edward D., Helen V. Milner and B. Peter Rosendorff (2002) ‘Why Democracies Cooperate More: Electoral Control and International Trade Agreements’, International Organization 56 (3): 477–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mansfield, Edward and Eric Reinhardt (2003) ‘Multilateral Determinants of Regionalism: The Effects of GATT/WTO on the Formation of Preferential Trade Agreements’, International Organization 57: 829–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Marshall, Monty G., Ted Robert Gurr and Keith Jaggers (2010) ‘Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transition, 1800–2009’, Center for Systemic Peace, http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm (accessed 6 November, 2010).
  41. Mattli, Walter (1999) The Logic of Regional Integration: Europe and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mauritius Government (2005) ‘Minister Dulloo: SADC Rules of Origin are Complex and Restrictive,’ =http://www.gov.mu/portal/site/Mainhomepage/menuitem.a42b24128104d9845dabddd154508a0c/?content_id=bff37005d8b0a010VgnVCM1000000a04a8c0RCRD (accessed 16 January, 2005).
  43. Medalla, Erlinda M. (2008) ‘Rules of Origin: Regimes in East Asia and Recommendations for Best Practice’, Makati, Philippines, Philippine Institute for Development Studies, Discussion Paper Series No. 2008-19.Google Scholar
  44. Milner, Helen V. (1999) ‘The Political Economy of International Trade’, Annual Review of Political Science 2 (1): 91–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Milner, Helen V. and Keiko Kubota (2005) ‘Why the Move to Free Trade? Democracy and Trade Policy in the Developing Countries’, International Organization 59 (1): 157–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Milner, Helen V. and Bumba Mukherjee (2009) ‘Democracy and Economic Globalization’, Annual Review of Political Science 12: 163–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Moravscik, Andrew (1997) ‘Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics’, International Organization 51 (4): 513–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Moravcsik, Andrew (1998) The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power From Messina to Maastricht, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Morrow, James D., Randolph M. Siverson and Tressa E. Tabares (1998) ‘The Political Determinants of International Trade: The Major Powers, 1907–1990’, American Political Science Review 92 (3): 649–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nyirabu, Mohabe (2004) ‘Appraising Regional Integration in Southern Africa’, African Security Review 13 (1): 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Oneal, John R., Bruce Russett and Michael L. Berbaum (2003) ‘Causes of Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885–1992’, International Studies Quarterly 47 (3): 371–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pevehouse, Jon C., Timothy Nordstrom and Kevin Warnke (2004) ‘The COW-2 International Organizations Dataset Version 2.0’, Conflict Management and Peace Science 21 (2): 101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Polachek, Solomon W. (1997) ‘Why Democracies Cooperate More and Fight Less: The Relationship between International Trade and Cooperation’, Review of International Economics 5 (3): 295–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. PTAData (2010) ‘Preferential Trade Agreements Database,’ http://ptas.mcgill.ca/Pages%20ptas/A-Z/A.htm, (accessed 6 September, 2010).
  55. Rocha, Manuel de la (2003) ‘The Cotonou Agreement and its Implications for the Regional Trade Agenda in Eastern and Southern Africa’, Washington, DC, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3090, =http://ssrn.com/abstract=636452, (accessed 11 June, 2011).
  56. Rogowski, Ronald (1989) Commerce and Coalitions: How Trade Affects Domestic Political Alignments, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  57. SADC Trade Protocol (1996) ‘Consolidated Trade Protocol’, Southern African Development Community, http://www.sadc.int/files/6213/2808/8365/CONSOLIDATED_PROTOCOL_ON_TRADE_vers_30-01-2012.pdf, (accessed 12 July, 2012).
  58. Salazar-Xirinachs, Jose M. (2002) ‘Proliferation of Sub-regional Trade Agreements in the Americas: An Assessment of Key Analytical and Policy Issues’, Journal of Asian Economics 13 (2): 181–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. South African Institute of International Affairs (SAIIA) (2009) ‘A Pending Crisis of Overlap,’ http://www.saiia.org.za/archive-eafrica/a-pending-crisis-of-overlap.html, (accessed 25 January, 2011).
  60. Steenbergen, Marco and Bradford Jones (2002) ‘Modeling Multilevel Data Structures’, American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 218–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tostensen, Arne (1993) ‘What Role for SADC(C) in the Post-apartheid Era?’, in Bertil Oden, ed., Southern Africa after Apartheid: Regional Integration and External Resources, 147–173, Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet.Google Scholar
  62. Tumbarello, Patrizia (2007) ‘Are Regional Trade Agreements in Asia Stumbling or Building Blocks? Some Implications for the Mekong-3 Countries’, Washington, DC, International Monetary Fund Working Paper WP/07/53.Google Scholar
  63. United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA) (2004) Assessing Regional Integration in Africa, Addis Ababa: United Nations Economic Commission for Africa.Google Scholar
  64. United Nations University (UNU-CRIS) (2008) ‘Regional Integration Knowledge System (RIKS), http://www.cris.unu.edu/, (accessed 4 September, 2010).
  65. Viner, Jacob (1950) The Customs Union Issue, New York, NY: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
  66. World Bank (2010) ‘World Development Indicators (WDI),’ http://data.worldbank.org/, (accessed 5 October, 2010).
  67. World Trade Organization (WTOa) (2010) ‘Scope of RTAs,’ http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/region_e/scope_rta_e.htm, (10 October, 2010).
  68. World Trade Organization (WTOb) (2010) ‘Regional Trade Agreements Information System (RTA-IS),’ http://rtais.wto.org/UI/PublicMaintainRTAHome.aspx, (accessed 6 September, 2010).
  69. Yoshimatsu, Hidetaka (2006) ‘Collective Action Problems and Regional Integration in ASEAN’, Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs 28 (1): 115–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mwita Chacha
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Nazarbayev UniversityAstanaKazakhstan

Personalised recommendations