Abstract
In this article we reveal how network-enabled imitation processes impact young small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) internationalization, and how a firm’s network position as well as its experiential knowledge moderate imitative behavior in internationalization modes. Building on institutional, network, and organizational-learning theory, we suggest that firms imitate the internationalization modes of their peers in their network. Moreover, we argue that a firm’s imitation propensity depends on two important boundary conditions: network position and past experience. Applying a longitudinal event history analysis to analyze the complete population of 977 German biotechnology firms between 1996 and 2012 largely supports our hypotheses. Our findings reveal that firms imitate the internationalization modes of their peers in a precise manner. This implies that the imitation of others can initially serve as a presumably convenient low-risk shortcut to a planned or experience-driven internationalization process. Furthermore, our results confirm that this imitation process is channeled through formal network relations and that central network positions that are associated with superior information access, enhanced legitimacy, and status may promote deviating behavior. Acknowledging the interplay of different learning sources, our findings additionally show that initial internationalization mode choices of SMEs can have a lasting effect on subsequent internationalization behavior. Overall, our study contributes to a more nuanced view of imitative behavior of internationalizing SMEs and its boundary conditions, and highlights future research opportunities that exist for considering imitation and its implications in international business research.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
To be certain, we tested whether our results change when controlling for exporting firms or excluding exporting firms from our sample. Our results remained the same.
Note that the actual units of our analysis are days. However, in order to provide a clearer picture, our graphical representation depicts the evolution of the hazard rate over the observed years. Since Stata records dates t=0 to 1 January 1960, the year 2005 is denoted with 45 in our graphics.
References
Abrahamson, E., & Rosenkopf, L. 1997. Social network effects on the extent of innovation diffusion: A computer simulation. Organization Science, 8 (3): 289–309.
Ahuja, G. 2000. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45 (3): 425–455.
Ahuja, G., Polidoro, F., & Mitchell, W. 2009. Structural homophily or social asymmetry? The formation of alliances by poorly embedded firms. Strategic Management Journal, 30 (9): 941–958.
Al-Laham, A., & Souitaris, V. 2008. Network embeddedness and new-venture internationalization: Analyzing international linkages in the German Biotech industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 23 (5): 567–586.
Amburgey, T. L. 1986. Multivariate point processes in social research. Social Science Research, 15 (2): 190–206.
Amburgey, T. L., Kelly, D., & Barnett, W. P. 1993. Resetting the clock: The dynamics of organizational change and failure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38 (1): 51–73.
Andersson, T., Gleadle, P., Haslam, C., & Tsitsianis, N. 2010. Bio-pharma: A financialized business model. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21 (7): 631–641.
Autio, E., Sapienza, H. J., & Almeida, J. G. 2000. Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (5): 909–924.
Barkema, H. G., Bell, J. H., & Pennings, J. M. E. 1996. Foreign entry, cultural barriers and learning. Strategic Management Journal, 17 (2): 151–166.
Barkema, H. G., & Vermeulen, F. 1998. International expansion through start-up or acquisition: A learning perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 41 (1): 7–26.
Barreto, I., & Baden‐Fuller, C. 2006. To conform or to perform? Mimetic behaviour, legitimacy‐based groups and performance consequences. Journal of Management Studies, 43 (7): 1559–1581.
Bartholomew, S. 1997. National systems of biotechnology innovation: Complex interdependence in the global system. Journal of International Business Studies, 28 (2): 241–266.
Baum, J., & Oliver, C. 1991. Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36 (2): 187–218.
Beck, N., Brüderl, J., & Woywode, M. 2008. Momentum or deceleration? Theoretical and methodological reflections on the analysis of organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 51 (3): 413–435.
Beckman, C. M., & Haunschild, P. R. 2002. Network learning: The effects of partners’ heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47 (1): 92–124.
Benito, G. R. G., & Gripsrud, G. 1992. The expansion of foreign direct investments: Discrete rational location choices or a cultural learning process. Journal of International Business Studies, 23 (3): 461–476.
Biotechnologie.de/Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF). 2013. Die deutsche Biotechnologie-Branche 2013. Berlin: BMBF.
Bloodgood, J. M., Sapienza, H. J., & Almeida, J. G. 1996. The internationalization of new high-potential US ventures: Antecedents and outcomes. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 20 (4): 61–76.
Blossfeld, H.-P., Golsch, K., & Rohwer, G. 2007. Event history analysis with Stata. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bonacich, P. 1987. Power and centrality: A family of measures. American Journal of Sociology, 92 (5): 1170–1182.
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. 2002. UCINET for windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
Borgatti, S. P, Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. 2013. Analyzing social networks. London: Sage.
Boter, H., & Holmquist, C. 1996. Industry characteristics and internationalization processes in small firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 11 (6): 471–487.
Boxenbaum, E., & Jonsson, S. 2008. Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism 78–98. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Brouthers, K. D., Brouthers, L. E., & Werner, S. 1996. Dunning’s eclectic theory and the smaller firm: The impact of ownership and locational advantages on the choice of entry-modes in the computer software industry. International Business Review, 5 (4): 377–396.
Brouthers, K. D., & Nakos, G. 2004. SME entry mode choice and performance: A transaction cost perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28 (3): 229–247.
Bruneel, J., Yli-Renko, H., & Clarysee, B. 2010. Learning from experience and learning from others: How congenital and interorganizational learning substitute for experiential learning in young firm internationalization. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4 (2): 164–182.
Burgel, O., & Murray, G. C. 2000. The international market entry choices of start-up companies in high-technology industries. Journal of International Marketing, 8 (2): 33–62.
Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Casper, S. 2000. Institutional adaptiveness, technology policy, and the diffusion of new business models: The case of German biotechnology. Organization Studies, 21 (5): 887–914.
Chetty, S., & Campbell-Hunt, C. 2004. A strategic approach to internationalization: A traditional versus a “born-global” approach. Journal of International Marketing, 12 (1): 57–81.
Cleves, M., Gould, W., Gutierrez, R., & Marchenko, Y. V. 2010. An introduction to survival analysis using Stata, 3rd edn. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
Cloninger, P. A., & Oviatt, B. 2007. Service content and the internationalization of young ventures: An empirical test. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31 (2): 233–256.
Coviello, N., & Munro, H. 1997. Network relationships and the internationalization process of small software firms. International Business Review, 6 (4): 361–386.
Coviello, N. E. 2006. The network dynamics of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 37 (5): 713–731.
Cox, D. R. 1972. Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), 34 (2): 187–220.
Csaszar, F. A., & Siggelkow, N. 2010. How much to copy? Determinants of effective imitation breadth. Organization Science, 21 (3): 661–676.
Dacin, M. T., Oliver, C., & Roy, J. 2007. The legitimacy of strategic alliances: An institutional perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 28 (2): 169–187.
Davis, G. 1991. Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36 (4): 605–633.
Davis, P. S., Desai, A. B., & Francis, J. D. 2000. Mode of international entry: An isomorphism perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 31 (2): 239–258.
De Clercq, D., Sapienza, H. J., Yavuz, R. I., & Zhou, L. 2012. Learning and knowledge in early internationalization research: Past accomplishments and future directions. Journal of Business Venturing, 27 (1): 143–165.
Deephouse, D. L. 1999. To be different, or to be the same? It’s a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management Journal, 20 (2): 147–166.
Delerue, H., & Lejeune, A. 2012. Internationalization of biotechnology start-ups: Geographic location and mimetic behaviour. International Small Business Journal, 30 (4): 388–405.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. 1983. The Iron Cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48 (2): 147–160.
Dohse, D. 2000. Technology policy and the regions – The case of the BioRegio contest. Research Policy, 29 (9): 1111–1133.
Doreian, P., & Fujimoto, K. 2004. Identifying linking-pin organizations in inter-organizational networks. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 10 (1): 45–68.
Ellis, P. D. 2011. Social ties and international entrepreneurship: Opportunities and constraints affecting firm internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 42 (1): 99–127.
Eriksson, K., Johanson, J., & Majkgård, A. 1997. Experiential knowledge and cost in the internationalization process. Journal of International Business Studies, 28 (2): 337–360.
Erramilli, M. K. 1991. The experience factor in foreign market entry behavior of service firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 22 (3): 479–501.
Fernhaber, S. A., Gilbert, B. A., & McDougall, P. P. 2008. International entrepreneurship and geographic location: An empirical examination of new venture internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (2): 267–290.
Fernhaber, S. A., & Li, D. 2010. The impact of interorganizational imitation on new venture international entry and performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34 (1): 1–30.
Fernhaber, S. A., & Li, D. 2013. International exposure through network relationships: Implications for new venture internationalization. Journal of Business Venturing, 28 (2): 316–334.
Fernhaber, S. A., McDougall‐Covin, P. P., & Shepherd, D. A. 2009. International entrepreneurship: Leveraging internal and external knowledge sources. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3 (4): 297–320.
Fletcher, M., & Harris, S. 2012. Knowledge acquisition for the internationalization of the smaller firm: Content and sources. International Business Review, 21 (4): 631–647.
Fletcher, M., Harris, S., & Richey, J. 2013. Internationalization knowledge: What, why, where, and when? Journal of International Marketing, 21 (3): 47–71.
Forsgren, M. 2002. The concept of learning in the Uppsala internationalization process model: A critical review. International Business Review, 11 (3): 257–277.
Freeman, L. C. 1979. Centrality in social networks – Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1 (3): 215–239.
Garcia‐Pont, C., & Nohria, N. 2002. Local versus global mimetism: The dynamics of alliance formation in the automobile industry. Strategic Management Journal, 23 (4): 307–321.
Gassmann, O., & Keupp, M. M. 2007. The competitive advantage of early and rapidly internationalizing SMEs in the biotechnology industry: A knowledge-based view. Journal of World Business, 42 (3): 350–366.
Ghoshal, S. 1988. Environmental scanning in Korean firms: Organizational isomorphism in action. Journal of International Business Studies, 19 (1): 69–86.
Giesecke, S. 2000. The contrasting roles of government in the development of biotechnology industry in the US and Germany. Research Policy, 29 (2–3): 205–223.
Gnyawali, D. R., & Madhavan, R. 2001. Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: A structural embeddedness perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26 (3): 431–445.
Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91 (3): 481–510.
Greve, H. R. 1995. Jumping ship: The diffusion of strategy abandonment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40 (3): 444–473.
Greve, H. R. 1996. Patterns of competition: The diffusion of a market position in radio broadcasting. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41 (1): 29–60.
Greve, H. R. 1998. Performance, aspirations and risky organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43 (1): 58–86.
Guillén, M. F. 2003. Experience, imitation, and the sequence of foreign entry: Wholly owned and joint-venture manufacturing by South Korean firms and business groups in China, 1987–1995. Journal of International Business Studies, 34 (2): 185–198.
Gulati, R. 1999. Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20 (5): 397–420.
Gulati, R., & Gargiulo, M. 1999. Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology, 104 (5): 1439–1493.
Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Zaheer, A. 2000. Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (3): 203–215.
Haslam, C., Tsitsianis, N., & Gleadle, P. 2011. UK bio-pharma: Innovation, reinvention and capital at risk. Edinburgh: Institute of Chartered Accountants Scotland.
Haunschild, P. R. 1993. Interorganizational imitation: The impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38 (4): 564–592.
Haunschild, P. R., & Miner, A. S. 1997. Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (3): 472–500.
Haveman, H. A. 1993. Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38 (4): 593–627.
Henisz, W. J., & Delios, A. 2001. Uncertainty, imitation, and plant location: Japanese multinational corporations, 1990–1996. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46 (3): 443–475.
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. 2010. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind – Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival, 3rd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Huber, G. P. 1991. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2 (1): 88–115.
Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. 1977. The internationalization process of the firm – A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8 (1): 23–32.
Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. 2009. The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (9): 1411–1431.
Jones, M. V., Coviello, N., & Tang, Y. K. 2011. International entrepreneurship research (1989–2009): A domain ontology and thematic analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 26 (6): 632–659.
Kaiser, R., & Prange, H. 2004. The reconfiguration of national innovation systems – The example of German biotechnology. Research Policy, 33 (3): 395–408.
Keupp, M. M., & Gassmann, O. 2009. The past and future of international entrepreneurship: A review and suggestions for developing the field. Journal of Management, 35 (3): 600–633.
Kogut, B., & Singh, H. 1988. The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19 (3): 411–432.
Li, L., Li, D., & Dalgic, T. 2004. Internationalisation process of small and medium-sized enterprises: Toward a hybrid model of experiential learning and planning. Management International Review, 44 (1): 93–116.
Lieberman, M. B., & Asaba, S. 2006. Why do firms imitate each other? Academy of Management Review, 31 (2): 366–385.
Lin, Z., Yang, H., & Arya, B. 2009. Alliance partners and firm performance: Resource complementarity and status association. Strategic Management Journal, 30 (9): 921–940.
Low, M. B., & Abrahamson, E. 1997. Movements, bandwagons, and clones: Industry evolution and the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 12 (6): 435–457.
Lu, J. W. 2002. Intra- and inter-organizational imitative behavior: Institutional influences on Japanese firms’ entry mode choice. Journal of International Business Studies, 33 (1): 19–37.
Madhok, A., & Osegowitsch, T. 2000. The international biotechnology industry: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 31 (2): 325–335.
McDougall, P. P., & Oviatt, B. M. 1996. New venture internationalization, strategic change, and performance: A follow-up study. Journal of Business Venturing, 11 (1): 23–40.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology, 83 (2): 340–363.
Milanov, H., & Fernhaber, S. A. 2009. The impact of early imprinting on the evolution of new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 24 (1): 41–61.
Milanov, H., & Fernhaber, S. A. 2014. When do domestic alliances help ventures abroad? Direct and moderating effects from a learning perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 29 (3): 377–391.
Moen, Ø., Gavlen, M., & Endresen, I. 2004. Internationalization of small, computer software firms: Entry forms and market selection. European Journal of Marketing, 38 (9): 1236–1251.
Nakos, G., & Brouthers, K. D. 2002. Entry mode choice of SMEs in central and Eastern Europe. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27 (1): 47–63.
Oliver, A. L. 2009. Networks for learning and knowledge creation in biotechnology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oliver, C. 1991. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16 (1): 145–179.
Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. 1994. Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 25 (1): 45–64.
Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. 2004. Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organization Science, 15 (1): 5–21.
Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. 2008. Networks and institutions. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds), Handbook of organizational institutionalism 594–621. New York: Sage.
Pangarkar, N., & Klein, S. 1998. Bandwagon pressures and interfirm alliances in the global pharmaceutical industry. Journal of International Marketing, 6 (2): 54–73.
Phene, A., & Tallman, S. 2012. Complexity, context and governance in biotechnology alliances. Journal of International Business Studies, 43 (1): 61–83.
Phillips, D. J., & Zuckerman, E. W. 2001. Middle-status conformity: Theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets. American Journal of Sociology, 107 (2): 379–429.
Piazza, A., & Castellucci, F. 2014. Status in organization and management theory. Journal of Management, 40 (1): 287–315.
Podolny, J. M. 1993. A status-based model of market competition. American Journal of Sociology, 98 (4): 829–872.
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41 (1): 116–145.
Reuer, J. J., & Ragozzino, R. 2014. Signals and international alliance formation: The roles of affiliations and international activities. Journal of International Business Studies, 45 (3): 321–337.
Rothaermel, F. T., & Deeds, D. L. 2004. Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 25 (3): 201–221.
Rowley, T. J. 1997. Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22 (4): 887–910.
Sanders, W. G., & Tuschke, A. 2007. The adoption of institutionally contested organizational practices: The emergence of stock option pay in Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (1): 33–56.
Santos, F. M., & Eisenhardt, K. M. 2009. Constructing markets and shaping boundaries: Entrepreneurial power in nascent fields. Academy of Management Journal, 52 (4): 643–671.
Sapienza, H. J., Autio, E., George, G., & Zahra, S. A. 2006. A capabilities perspective on the effects of early internationalization on firm survival and growth. Academy of Management Review, 31 (4): 914–933.
Schwens, C., & Kabst, R. 2009. How early opposed to late internationalizers learn: Experience of others and paradigms of interpretation. International Business Review, 18 (5): 509–522.
Sharma, D. D., & Blomstermo, A. 2003. The internationalization process of born globals: A network view. International Business Review, 12 (6): 739–753.
Shrader, R. C., Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. 2000. How new ventures exploit trade-offs among international risk factors: Lessons for the accelerated internationalization of the 21st century. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (6): 1227–1247.
Sorenson, O., & Stuart, T. E. 2001. Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. American Journal of Sociology, 106 (6): 1546–1588.
Staber, U. 2010. Imitation without interaction: How firms identify with clusters. Organization Studies, 31 (2): 153–174.
Staehler, T., Dohse, D., & Cooke, P. 2007. Evaluation der Fördermaßnahmen BioRegio und BioProfile. Report commissioned by Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Consulting für Innovations-und Regionalanalysen, Institut für Weltwirtschaft an der Universität Kiel, Centre for Advanced Studies in the Social Sciences, Kiel.
Stern, I., Dukerich, J. M., & Zajac, E. 2014. Unmixed signals: How reputation and status affect alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 35 (4): 512–531.
Stuart, T. E., Hoang, H., & Hybels, R. C. 1999. Interorganizational endorsement and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44 (2): 315–349.
Stuart, T. E., Ozdemir, S. Z., & Ding, W. W. 2007. Vertical alliance networks: The case of university–biotechnology–pharmaceutical alliance chains. Research Policy, 36 (4): 477–498.
Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. 1983. Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880–1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28 (1): 22–39.
Washington, M., & Zajac, E. J. 2005. Status evolution and competition: Theory and evidence. Academy of Management Journal, 48 (2): 282–296.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wassmer, U. 2010. Alliance portfolios: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 36 (1): 141–171.
Westphal, J., Gulati, R., & Shortell, S. 1997. Customization or conformity? An institutional and network perspective on the content and consequences of TQM adoption. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (2): 366–394.
White, H. 1982. Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models. Econometrica, 50 (1): 1–25.
Yeniyurt, S., Townsend, J. D., Cavusgil, S. T., & Ghauri, P. N. 2009. Mimetic and experiential effects in international marketing alliance formations of US pharmaceutical firms: An event history analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (2): 301–320.
Yiu, D., & Makino, S. 2002. The choice between joint venture and wholly owned subsidiary: An institutional perspective. Organization Science, 13 (6): 667–683.
Yu, J., Gilbert, B. A., & Oviatt, B. M. 2011. Effects of alliances, time, and network cohesion on the initiation of foreign sales by new ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 32 (4): 424–446.
Zahra, S. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. A. 2000. International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (5): 925–951.
Zahra, S. A., Ucbasaran, D., & Newey, L. R. 2009. Social knowledge and SME’s innovative gains from internationalization. European Management Review, 6 (2): 81–93.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Accepted by Ulf Andersson, Area Editor, 5 February 2015. This article has been with the authors for three revisions.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oehme, M., Bort, S. SME internationalization modes in the German biotechnology industry: The influence of imitation, network position, and international experience. J Int Bus Stud 46, 629–655 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2015.8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2015.8