Journal of International Business Studies

, Volume 45, Issue 2, pp 131–150 | Cite as

“Courting the multinational”: Subnational institutional capacity and foreign market insidership

  • Sinéad Monaghan
  • Patrick Gunnigle
  • Jonathan Lavelle
Article

Abstract

Significant contemporary challenges face an internationalizing firm, including the non-ergodic nature of investment, and the liability of outsidership. Recent revisions to the Uppsala internationalization process model reflect these challenges, whereby “insidership” is represented as realized, successful foreign market entry. Drawing upon socio-spatial concepts from international business and economic geography, this paper demonstrates the endogeneity of subnational institutions in shaping foreign market insidership within an advanced economy. Employing a multi-method research design with almost 60 subnational actors, the role and interaction of subnational institutions within the internationalization process are explored. Our findings illustrate how customized coalitions of subnational institutions effectively initiate, negotiate and accelerate insidership of inward investment within the foreign market both prior to and during formal entry. Key aspects of this dynamic include communicating tangible and intangible locational resources, initiating functional and relevant business relationships, and facilitating access to codified and tacit knowledge. This paper embellishes the Uppsala internationalization process model by demonstrating the capacity of subnational institutions to participate actively with foreign market insidership, and in so doing advances understanding of how the risk and uncertainty associated with foreign market entry are currently navigated.

Keywords

internationalization theories and foreign market entry subnational region multinational corporations (MNCs) and enterprises (MNEs) economic geography social network analysis 

References

  1. Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (Eds) 1994. Globalization, institutions and regional development in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., & Holm, U. 2007. Balancing subsidiary influence in the federative MNC: A business network view. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (5): 802–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson, U., Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. 1997. Organic acquisitions in the internationalization process of the firm. Management International Review, 37 (2): 67–84.Google Scholar
  4. Barry, F. 2004. Export-platform foreign direct investment: The Irish experience. European Investment Bank Papers, 9 (2): 8–37.Google Scholar
  5. Barry, F. 2007. Foreign direct investment and institutional co-evolution in Ireland. Scandinavian Economic History Review, 55 (3): 262–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beugelsdijk, S., McCann, P., & Mudambi, R. 2010. Introduction: Place, space and organization – Economic geography and the multinational enterprise. Journal of Economic Geography, 10 (4): 485–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beugelsdijk, S., & Mudambi, R. 2013. MNEs as border-crossing multi-location enterprises: The role of discontinuities in geographic space. Journal of International Business Studies, 44 (5): 413–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bevan, A., Estrin, S., & Meyer, K. 2004. Foreign investment location and institutional development in transition economies. International Business Review, 13 (1): 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Birkinshaw, J., Brannen, M. Y., & Tung, R. L. 2011. From a distance and generalizable to up close and grounded: Reclaiming a place for qualitative methods in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 42 (5): 573–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Borgatti, S. P., & Everett, M. G. 1999. Models of core/periphery structures. Social Networks, 21 (4): 375–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. 2002. Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
  12. Brennan, L., & Verma, R. 2010. Columbia FDI Profiles: Inward FDI in Ireland and its policy context, 2010. New York: Vale Columbia Centre for Sustainable International Investment.Google Scholar
  13. Brennan, L., & Verma, R. 2012. Columbia FDI Profiles: Inward FDI in Ireland and its policy context, 2012. New York: Vale Columbia Centre for Sustainable International Investment.Google Scholar
  14. Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. C. 1976. The future of the multinational enterprise. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. C. 1998. Analyzing foreign market entry strategies: Extending the internationalization approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 29 (3): 539–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cantwell, J. 2009. Location and the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (1): 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cantwell, J., Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. 2010. An evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity: The co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment. Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (4): 567–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cantwell, J., & Mudambi, R. 2000. The location of MNE R&D activity: The role of investment incentives. Management International Review, 40 (Special Issue 1): 127–148.Google Scholar
  19. Cantwell, J. A., & Mudambi, R. 2005. MNE competence-creating subsidiary mandates. Strategic Management Journal, 26 (12): 1109–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cantwell, J. A., & Mudambi, R. 2011. Physical attraction and the geography of knowledge sourcing in multinational enterprises. Global Strategy Journal, 1 (3–4): 206–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chan, C. M., Makino, S., & Isobe, T. 2010. Does subnational region matter? Foreign affiliate performance in the United States and China. Strategic Management Journal, 31 (11): 1226–1243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Conway, S. 2014. A cautionary note on data inputs and visual outputs in social network analysis. British Journal of Management, 25 (1): 102–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dai, L., Eden, L., & Beamish, P. W. 2013. Place, space, and geographical exposure: Foreign subsidiary survival in conflict zones. Journal of International Business Studies, 44 (6): 554–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. De Propris, L., & Driffield, N. 2006. The importance of clusters for spillovers from foreign direct investment and technology sourcing. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30 (2): 277–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Driffield, N. 2006. On the search for spillovers from foreign direct investment (FDI) with spatial dependency. Regional Studies, 40 (1): 107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dunning, J. H. 1977. Trade, location of economic activity, and the multinational enterprise: A search for an eclectic approach. In B. Ohlin, P. O. Hesselborn, & P. M. Wijkman (Eds), The international allocation of economic activity, 395–418. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dunning, J. H. 1988. The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19 (1): 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dunning, J. H. 2009. Location and the multinational enterprise: A neglected factor? Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (1): 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. 2008. Multinational enterprises and the global economy, 2nd edn. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  30. Eurostat. 2011. Regions in the European Union: Nomenclature of territorial units for statistics NUTS 2010/EU-27. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  31. Fuller, C., Bennett, R. J., & Ramsden, M. 2003. Organised for inward investment? Development agencies, local government, and firms in the inward investment process. Environment and Planning A, 35 (11): 2025–2051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fuller, C., & Phelps, N. A. 2004. Multinational enterprises, repeat investment and the role of aftercare services in Wales and Ireland. Regional Studies, 38 (7): 783–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Goerzen, A., Asmussen, C. G., & Nielsen, B. B. 2013. Global cities and multinational enterprise location strategy. Journal of International Business Studies, 44 (5): 427–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gunnigle, P., & McGuire, D. 2001. Why Ireland? A qualitative review of the factors influencing the location of US multinationals in Ireland with particular reference to the impact of labour issues. The Economic and Social Review, 32 (1): 43–67.Google Scholar
  35. Head, K., Ries, J., & Swenson, D. 1995. Agglomeration benefits and location choice: Evidence from Japanese manufacturing investments in the United States. Journal of International Economics, 38 (3–4): 223–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Head, K. C., Ries, J. C., & Swenson, D. L. 1999. Attracting foreign manufacturing: Investment promotion and agglomeration. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 29 (2): 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hoskisson, R. E., Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., & Peng, M. W. 2013. Emerging multinationals from mid-range economies: The influence of institutions and factor markets. Journal of Management Studies, 50 (7): 1295–1321.Google Scholar
  38. Hymer, S. H. 1976. International operations of national firms: A study of foreign direct investment. Boston, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  39. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. 1977. The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8 (1): 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. 2003. Business relationship learning and commitment in the internationalization process. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 1 (1): 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. 2006. Commitment and opportunity development in the internationalization process: A note on the Uppsala internationalization process model. Management International Review, 46 (2): 1–14.Google Scholar
  42. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. 2009. The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (9): 1411–1431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kilduff, M., & Brass, D. J. 2010. Organizational social network research: Core ideas and key debates. Academy of Management Annals, 4 (1): 317–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Loewendahl, H. B. 2001. Bargaining with multinationals: The investment of Siemens and Nissan in North-East England. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ma, X., Tong, T. W., & Fitza, M. 2013. How much does subnational region matter to foreign subsidiary performance? Evidence from Fortune Global 500 Corporations’ investment in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 44 (1): 66–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. MacKinnon, D., & Phelps, N. A. 2001. Devolution and the territorial politics of foreign direct investment. Political Geography, 20 (3): 353–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McCann, P. 2011. International business and economic geography: Knowledge, time and transactions costs. Journal of Economic Geography, 11 (2): 309–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McDermott, G. A., Corredoira, R. A., & Kruse, G. 2009. Public–private institutions as catalysts of upgrading in emerging market societies. Academy of Management Journal, 52 (6): 1270–1296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Meyer, K. E., & Gelbuda, M. 2006. Process perspectives in international business research in CEE. Management International Review, 46 (2): 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Meyer, K. E., & Nguyen, H. V. 2005. Foreign investment strategies and sub-national institutions in emerging markets: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Management Studies, 42 (1): 63–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Meyer, K. E., Mudambi, R., & Narula, R. 2011. Multinational enterprises and local contexts: The opportunities and challenges of multiple embeddedness. Journal of Management Studies, 48 (2): 235–252.Google Scholar
  52. Monaghan, S. 2012. Attraction and retention of foreign direct investment (FDI): The role of subnational institutions in a small, highly globalised economy. Irish Journal of Management, 31 (2): 45–61.Google Scholar
  53. Nguyen, T. V., Le, N. T. B., & Bryant, S. E. 2013. Sub-national institutions, firm strategies, and firm performance: A multilevel study of private manufacturing firms in Vietnam. Journal of World Business: 48 (1): 68–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. North, D. C. 2005. Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Peng, M. W., Sun, S. L., Pinkham, B., & Chen, H. 2009. The institution-based view as a third leg for a strategy tripod. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23 (3): 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Perri, A., Andersson, U., Nell, P. C., & Santangelo, G. D. 2013. Balancing the trade-off between learning prospects and spillover risks: MNC subsidiaries’ vertical linkage patterns in developed countries. Journal of World Business, 48 (4): 503–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Phelps, N. A. 2000. The locally embedded multinational and institutional capture. Area, 32 (2): 169–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Phelps, N. A., & Fuller, C. 2001. Taking care of business: After-care and the state-multinational enterprise nexus in Wales. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 19 (6): 817–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Phelps, N. A., & Wood, A. 2006. Lost in translation? Local interests, global actors and inward investment regimes. Journal of Economic Geography, 6 (4): 493–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Porter, M. E. 2000. Location, competition and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14 (1): 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rios-Morales, R., & Brennan, L. 2009. Ireland’s innovative governmental policies promoting internationalisation. Research in International Business and Finance, 23 (2): 157–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Santangelo, G. D., & Meyer, K. E. 2011. Extending the internationalization process model: Increases and decreases of MNE commitment in emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 42 (7): 894–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schweizer, R., Vahlne, J.-E., & Johanson, J. 2010. Internationalization as an entrepreneurial process. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 8 (4): 343–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Shi, W. S., Sun, S. L., & Peng, M. W. 2012. Sub-national institutional contingencies, network positions, and IJV partner selection. Journal of Management Studies, 49 (7): 1221–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Scott, J. 1999. Social network analysis: A handbook, 2nd edn. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  67. Vahlne, J.-E., & Johanson, J. 2013. The Uppsala model on evolution of the multinational business enterprise: From internalization to coordination of networks. International Marketing Review, 30 (3): 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Vahlne, J.-E., Schweizer, R., & Johanson, J. 2012. Overcoming the liability of outsidership: The challenge of HQ of the global firm. Journal of International Management, 18 (3): 224–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vernon, R. 1966. International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80 (2): 190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wellman, B. 1988. Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. In B. Wellman, & S. D. Berkowitz (Eds), Social structures: A network approach 19–61. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Williamson, O. E. 1975. Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  73. Young, S., Hood, N., & Wilson, A. 1994. Targeting policy as a competitive strategy for European inward investment agencies. European Urban and Regional Studies, 1 (2): 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zaheer, S., & Nachum, L. 2011. Sense of place: From location resources to MNE locational capital. Global Strategy Journal, 1 (1–2): 96–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zhou, C., Delios, A., & Yang, J. Y. 2002. Locational determinants of Japanese foreign direct investment in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19 (1): 63–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of International Business 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sinéad Monaghan
    • 1
  • Patrick Gunnigle
    • 1
  • Jonathan Lavelle
    • 1
  1. 1.Kemmy Business School, University of LimerickLimerickIreland

Personalised recommendations