Skip to main content
Log in

When do foreign subsidiaries outperform local firms?

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Journal of International Business Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study explores when foreign subsidiaries outperform comparable local firms by evaluating the performance of local firms acquired by multinationals vs continuing local firms. This comparison allows us to single out foreign ownership effects. We employ the propensity score matching method and difference-in-differences approach in order to control for the endogeneity problem inherent in multinational firms’ acquisition decisions. We find strong evidence that foreign-acquired local firms outperform comparable local firms in China, especially when the foreign firm acquires local target firms with higher absorptive capacity or with modernized ownership structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold, J. M., & Javorcik, B. S. 2009. Gifted kids or pushy parents? Foreign direct investment and plant productivity in Indonesia. Journal of International Economics, 79 (1): 42–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, O. 2009. Effects of foreign acquisitions on R&D activity: Evidence from firm-level data for France. Research Policy, 38 (6): 1021–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, L., Van Biesebroeck, J., & Zhang, Y. 2011. Creative accounting or creative destruction? Firm-level productivity growth in Chinese manufacturing. Journal of Development Economics, 97 (2): 339–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S., Chung, J., & Moon, J. J. 2013. When do wholly owned subsidiaries perform better than joint ventures? Strategic Management Journal, 34 (3): 317–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1): 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Loecker, J. 2007. Do exports generate higher productivity? Evidence from Slovenia. Journal of International Economics, 73 (1): 69–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnaut, R., Song, L., Tenev, S., & Yao, Y. 2005. China’s ownership transformation: Process, outcomes, prospects. Washington DC: The International Finance Corporation and the World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girma, S., & Görg, H. 2007. Evaluating the foreign ownership wage premium using a difference-in-differences matching approach. Journal of International Economics, 72 (1): 97–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hymer, S. H. 1976. The international operations of national firms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Imbens, G., & Wooldridge, J. M. 2009. Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature, 47 (1): 5–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kronborg, D., & Thomsen, S. 2009. Foreign ownership and long-term survival. Strategic Management Journal, 30 (2): 207–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuven, E., & Sianesi, B. 2003. PSMATCH2: Stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing. http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s432001.html, accessed 21 November 2009.

  • MacGarvie, M. 2006. Do firms learn from international trade? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88 (1): 46–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeb, D., Sakakibara, M., & Mahmood, I. P. 2012. From the editors: Endogeneity in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 43 (3): 211–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. 1983. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70 (1): 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A. 1965. Social structure and organizations. In J. March (Ed), Handbook of organizations, 142–193. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, S., & Mosakowski, E. 1997. The dynamics of the liability of foreignness: A global study of survival in financial services. Strategic Management Journal, 16 (6): 439–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Young-Kyu Kim and seminar participants at the Shanghai Jiao Tong University, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, the 2010 Strategic Management Society Annual Conference, and the 2012 Academy of Management Professional Development Workshop for helpful comments. Sea-Jin Chang appreciates financial support from the National University of Singapore, Research Grant R313-000-086-133. Jaiho Chung and Jon J Moon appreciate financial support from the SK Research Fund, Korea University Business School. Katie Brown, Hyejin Cho and Jiyoung Shin provided excellent research assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Accepted by Mariko Sakakibara, Area Editor, and John Cantwell, Editor-in-Chief, 17 June 2013. This paper has been with the authors for three revisions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chang, SJ., Chung, J. & Jungbien Moon, J. When do foreign subsidiaries outperform local firms?. J Int Bus Stud 44, 853–860 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.35

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.35

Keywords

Navigation