Advertisement

Journal of International Business Studies

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 391–411 | Cite as

The liability of foreignness in international equity investments: Evidence from the US stock market

  • Bok Baik
  • Jun-Koo KangEmail author
  • Jin-Mo Kim
  • Joonho Lee
Article

Abstract

Using foreign institutional ownership data in the US from 1990 to 2007, we examine whether foreign institutional investors face liabilities of foreignness (LOF) in the US stock market. We find that foreign institutional investors prefer low information asymmetry stocks more than domestic institutional investors do, and this preference for low information asymmetry stocks is particularly strong among foreign institutional investors from countries with high LOF. More importantly, we find that a change in foreign institutional ownership is negatively related to future returns, whereas this relation does not exist for domestic institutional ownership. The negative relation between the change in foreign institutional ownership and future returns is more pronounced when investors face a greater LOF in the US stock market – for instance, when they are from countries with higher institutional distance, information asymmetry, unfamiliarity, and cultural differences. The negative effect of country-specific LOF factors on the return-forecasting power of foreign institutional investors is more evident when they trade stocks with higher information asymmetry. Overall, these findings suggest that foreign institutional investors face significant LOF costs in the US stock market, resulting in their poor ability to forecast returns.

Keywords

foreign institutional ownership domestic institutional ownership liability of foreignness return predictability information asymmetry 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank two anonymous referees, Young Soon Cheon, and David Reeb (the editor) for many detailed and helpful comments. Baik, Kang, Kim, and Lee acknowledge financial support from Seoul National University, Nanyang Technological University Academic Research Fund Tier 1, Rutgers Business School, and SMU School of Accountancy Research Center (SOAR), respectively.

References

  1. Aghion, P., Reenen, J.van, & Zingales, J. 2013. Innovation and institutional ownership. American Economic Review, 103 (1): 277–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amihud, Y. 2002. Illiquidity and stock returns: Cross-section and time-series effects. Journal of Financial Markets, 5 (1): 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bae, K.-H., Tan, H., & Welker, M. 2008. International GAAP differences: The impact on foreign analysts. The Accounting Review, 83 (3): 593–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baik, B., Kang, J.-K., & Kim, J.-M. 2010. Local institutional investors, information asymmetries, and equity returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 97 (1): 81–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell, R. G., Filatotchev, I., & Rasheed, A. A. 2012. The liability of foreignness in capital markets: Sources and remedies. Journal of International Business Studies, 43 (2): 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beugelsdijk, S., & Frijns, B. 2010. A cultural explanation of the foreign bias in international asset allocation. Journal of Banking and Finance, 34 (9): 2121–2131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradshaw, M. T., Bushee, B., & Miller, G. 2004. Accounting choice, home bias, and US investment in non-US firms. Journal of Accounting Research, 42 (5): 795–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, J., Goetzmann, W., & Ibbotson, R. 1999. Offshore hedge funds: Survival and performance, 1989–95. Journal of Business, 72 (1): 91–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brunnermeier, M., & Nagel, S. 2004. Hedge funds and the technology bubble. Journal of Finance, 59 (5): 2013–2040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bushee, B. 1998. The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. The Accounting Review, 73 (3): 305–333.Google Scholar
  11. Chan, K., Covrig, V., & Ng, L. 2009. Does home bias affect firm value? Evidence from holdings of mutual funds worldwide. Journal of International Economics, 78 (2): 230–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Choe, H., Kho, B.-C., & Stulz, R. 1999. Do foreign investors destabilize stock markets? The Korean experience in 1997. Journal of Financial Economics, 54 (2): 227–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Choe, H., Kho, B.-C., & Stulz, R. 2005. Do domestic investors have an edge? The trading experience of foreign investors in Korea. Review of Financial Studies, 18 (3): 795–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coval, J., & Moskowitz, T. 1999. Home bias at home: Local equity preference in domestic portfolios. Journal of Finance, 54 (6): 2045–2073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Daniel, K., Grinblatt, M., Titman, S., & Wermers, R. 1997. Measuring mutual fund performance with characteristic-based benchmarks. Journal of Finance, 52 (3): 1035–1058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Demirbag, M., Tatoglu, E., & Glaister, K. W. 2010. Institutional and transaction cost influences on partnership structure of foreign affiliates. Management International Review, 50 (6): 709–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Falkenstein, E. 1996. Preferences for stock characteristics as revealed by mutual fund portfolio holdings. Journal of Finance, 51 (1): 111–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fama, E., & MacBeth, J. 1973. Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests. Journal of Political Economy, 81 (3): 607–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferreira, M. A., & Matos, 2008. The colors of investors’ money: The role of institutional investors around the world. Journal of Financial Economics, 88 (3): 499–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gompers, P., & Metrick, A. 2001. Institutional investors and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116 (1): 229–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grinblatt, M., & Keloharju, M. 2001. How distance, language, and culture influence stockholdings and trades. Journal of Finance, 56 (3): 1053–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hirshleifer, D., Hou, K., & Teoh, H. 2009. Accruals, cash flows, and aggregate stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 91 (3): 389–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations, (2nd edn), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Hopkins, P., Botosan, C., Bradshaw, M., Callahan, C., Ciesielski, J., Farber, D., Kohlbeck, M., Hodder, L., Luax, B., Stober, T., Stocken, P., & Yohn, T. 2008. Response to the SEC release, ‘Acceptance from foreign private issuers of financial statements prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards without reconciliation to US GAAP File No. S7–13–07’. Accounting Horizons, 22 (2): 223–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hymer, S.H 1976. The international operations of national firms: A study of direct investment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  26. Ivković, Z., & Weisbenner, S. 2005. Local does as local is: Information content of the geography of individual investors’ common stock investments. Journal of Finance, 60 (1): 267–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kacperczyk, M., Sialm, C., & Zheng, L. 2005. On the industry concentration of actively managed equity mutual funds. Journal of Finance, 60 (4): 1983–2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kang, J.-K., & Stulz, R. 1997. Why is there a home bias? An analysis of foreign portfolio equity ownership in Japan. Journal of Financial Economics, 46 (1): 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Khurana, I. K., & Michas, P. N. 2011. Mandatory IFRS adoption and the US home bias. Accounting Horizons, 25 (4): 729–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kindleberger, C. 1969. American business abroad. New Haven, CT: University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Kogut, B., & Singh, H. 1988. The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19 (3): 411–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 1997. Legal determinants of external finance. Journal of Finance, 52 (3): 1131–1150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 1998. Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106 (6): 1113–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 1999. The quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 15 (1): 222–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Leuz, C., Nanda, D., & Wysocki, P. 2003. Earnings management and investor protection: An international comparison. Journal of Financial Economics, 69 (3): 505–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mata, J., & Freitas, E. 2012. Foreignness and exit over the life cycle of firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 43 (7): 615–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mezias, J. M. 2002. Identifying liabilities of foreignness and strategies to minimize their effects: The case of labor lawsuit judgments in the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 23 (3): 229–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nobes, C. 2001. GAAP 2001 – A survey of national accounting rules benchmarked against international accounting standards. International Forum on Accountancy Development (IFAD).Google Scholar
  39. O’Grady, S., & Lane, H. W. 1996. The psychic distance paradox. Journal of International Business Studies, 27 (2): 309–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Qian, G., Li, L., Li, J., & Qian, Z. 2008. Regional diversification and firm performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (2): 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rajgopal, S., Venkatachalam, M., & Jiambalvo, J. 2002. Institutional ownership and the extent to which stock prices reflect future earnings. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19 (1): 117–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shukla, R., & van Inwegen, G. 1995. Do locals perform better than foreigners? An analysis of UK and US mutual fund managers. Journal of Economics and Business, 47 (3): 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stulz, R., & Wasserfallen, W. 1995. Foreign equity investment restrictions, capital flight, and shareholder wealth maximization: Theory and evidence. Review of Financial Studies, 8 (4): 1019–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wermers, R. 2006. Performance evaluation with portfolio holdings information. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 17 (2): 207–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yan, S., & Zhang, Z. 2009. Institutional investors and equity returns: Are short-term institutions better informed? Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2): 893–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zaheer, S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (2): 341–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of International Business 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bok Baik
    • 1
  • Jun-Koo Kang
    • 2
    Email author
  • Jin-Mo Kim
    • 3
  • Joonho Lee
    • 4
  1. 1.College of Business, Seoul National UniversitySeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.Nanyang Business School, Nanyang Technological UniversitySingapore
  3. 3.Rutgers Business School, Rutgers UniversityNew JerseyUSA
  4. 4.School of Accountancy, Singapore Management UniversitySingapore

Personalised recommendations