Skip to main content
Log in

Do country-level institutional frameworks and interfirm governance arrangements substitute or complement in international business relationships?

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of International Business Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interfirm relationships among partners from institutionally distant environments are subject to governance difficulties, owing to the paucity of shared cognitive and regulatory frameworks. We examine the potential of formal contracting and relational governance developed at the partnership level to overcome the formal and informal institutional gap at the country level. Empirical results from a sample of 184 international partnerships of large US firms support an overall substitutive relationship between informal institutional frameworks and interorganizational relational arrangements whereby the performance benefits of relational governance are reinforced at higher degrees of informal institutional distance. Contrastingly, formal institutional frameworks and contractual governance are found to have a complementary relationship, with performance gains from formal contracting undermined at higher degrees of formal distance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. Given the context of our study, the most relevant formal institutions would be those associated with implementation of the contractual terms, protection of property rights, and legal frameworks.

  2. Other four aggregate indices quantify aspects of formal institutional environments marginally relevant to facilitating interfirm partnerships. Those four indices measure the absence of violence/terrorism and political stability, voice and accountability, government effectiveness, and control of corruption.

  3. We also examined for the possibility of off-diagonal (formal with informal) relationships between institutional and transaction-level arrangements. Neither of these two potential relationships (formal contracting with cultural distance as well as relational governance with legal dissimilarity (hazard)) turned out statistically significant.

  4. Please note that we are discussing a difference in the nature of relational governance rather than its extent. The influence of institutional similarity on the extent of relationalism is controlled out by modeling governance mechanisms as endogenous variables: the third stage of our three-stage estimator uses “residuals from regressing relational governance on institutional distance” (and other covariates) as indicators of relational governance. This essentially captures out the effect of institutional similarity on the extent of relational governance.

References

  • Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. 1990. A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. Journal of Marketing, 54 (1): 42–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyres, N., & Mayer, K. J. 2007. Contract design as a firm capability: An integration of learning and transaction cost perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 32 (4): 1060–1077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyres, N. S., Bercovitz, J., & Mayer, K. J. 2007. Complementarity and evolution of contractual provisions: An empirical study of IT services contracts. Organization Science, 18 (1): 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T.S 1977. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14 (3): 396–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aulakh, P. S., Kotabe, M., & Sahay, A. 1996. Trust and performance in cross-border marketing partnerships: A behavioral approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 27 (5): 1005–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkema, H. G., Bell, J., & Pennings, J. 1996. Foreign entry, cultural barriers, and learning. Strategic Management Journal, 17 (2): 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C., & Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bello, D. C., & Gilliland, D. I. 1997. The effect of output controls, process controls, and flexibility on export channel performance. Journal of Marketing, 61 (1): 22–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. 1967. The social construction of reality. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggart, N. W., & Beamish, T. D. 2003. The economic sociology of conventions: Habit, custom, practice, and routine in market order. Annual Review of Sociology, 29: 443–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björkman, I., Stahl, G. K., & Vaara, E. 2007. Cultural differences and capability transfer in cross-border acquisitions: The mediating roles of capability complementarity, absorptive capacity, and social integration. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (4): 658–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. 1992. Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busenitz, L. W., Gomez, C., & Spencer, J. W. 2000. Country institutional profiles: Unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (5): 994–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J., Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. 2010. An evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity: The co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment. Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (4): 567–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, S. J., Madhok, A., & Wu, T. 2006. Uncertainty, opportunism, and governance: The effects of volatility and ambiguity on formal and relational contracting. Academy of Management Journal, 49 (5): 1058–1077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, S., & Cooper, C. L. 1993. The role of culture compatibility in successful organizational marriage. Academy of Management Executive, 7 (2): 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, C. M., Isobe, T., & Makino, S. 2008. Which country matters? Institutional development and foreign affiliate performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29 (11): 1179–1205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S.-J., van Witteloostuijn, A., & Eden, L. 2010. From the editors: Common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (2): 178–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. C., Chen, X.-P., & Meindl, J. R. 1998. How can cooperation be fostered? The cultural effects of individualism–collectivism. Academy of Management Review, 23 (2): 285–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clague, C., Keefer, P., Knack, S., & Olson, M. 1999. Contract-intensive money: Contract enforcement, property rights, and economic performance. Journal of Economic Growth, 4 (2): 185–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94 (Supplement): S95–S120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craswell, R. 2000. Contract law: General theories. In B. Bouckaert & G. De Geest (Eds), Encyclopedia of law and economics: 1–24. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, J. B., Johnson, J. L., & Sakano, T. 1995. Japanese and local partner commitment to IJVs: Psychological consequences of outcomes and investments in the IJV relationship. Journal of International Business Studies, 26 (1): 91–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danis, W. M., & Parkhe, A. 2002. Hungarian-Western partnerships: A grounded theoretical model of integration processes and outcomes. Journal of International Business Studies, 33 (3): 423–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. 1998. Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23 (3): 491–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L., & North, D. 1971. Institutional change and American economic growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, H. C. 2004. Control of inter-organizational relationships: Evidence on appropriation concerns and coordination requirements. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29 (1): 27–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delios, A., & Henisz, W. J. 2003. Political hazards, experience, and sequential entry strategies: The international expansion of Japanese firms, 1980–1998. Strategic Management Journal, 24 (11): 1153–1164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y. L. 1996. The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: Initial conditions or learning processes? Strategic Management Journal, 17 (S1): 55–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y. L., & Prahalad, C. K. 1991. Managing DMNCs: A search for a new paradigm. Strategic Management Journal, 12 (S1): 145–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. 2008. Multinational enterprises and the global economy (2nd edn) Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H., & Nobeoka, K. 2000. Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (3): 345–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden, L., & Miller, S. R. 2004. Distance matters: Liability of foreignness, institutional distance and ownership strategy. In M.A. Hitt & J. Cheng (Eds), Advances in international management: 187–221. Boston, MA: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. 1988. Normative-affective factors: Toward a new decision-making model. Journal of Economic Psychology, 9 (2): 125–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N. 1990. The transformation of corporate control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furlotti, M. 2007. There is more to contracts than incompleteness: A review and assessment of empirical research on interfirm contract design. Journal of Management & Governance, 11 (1): 61–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gargiulo, M., & Ertug, G. 2006. The dark side of trust. In R. Bachmann & A. Zaheer (Eds), Handbook of trust research: 165–186. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A., & Hill, J. 2007. Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geringer, J. M. 1988. Joint venture partner selection: Strategies for developed countries. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gooderham, P. N., Nordhaug, O., & Ringdal, K. 1999. Institutional and rational determinants of organizational practices: Human resource management in European firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44 (3): 507–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandori, A. 1997. Governance structures, coordination mechanisms and cognitive models. Journal of Management and Governance, 1 (1): 29–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. 2003. Econometric analysis, (5th edn) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greif, A. 1993. Contract enforceability and economic institutions in early trade: The Maghribi Traders’ Coalition. The American Economic Review, 83 (3): 525–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greif, A. 1997. Contracting, enforcement, and efficiency: Economics beyond the law. In M. Bruno & B. Pleskovic (Eds), Annual world bank conference on development economics: 239–265. Washington DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greif, A. 2006. Institutions and the path to the modern economy: Lessons from medieval trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gubbi, S. R., Aulakh, P. S., Ray, S., Sarkar, M. B., & Chittoor, R. 2010. Do international acquisitions by emerging-economy firms create shareholder value? The case of Indian firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (3): 397–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, J., & Hesen, G. 2007. Contract law and the governance of interfirm technology partnerships: An analysis of different modes of partnering and their contractual implications. Journal of Management Studies, 44 (3): 342–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, J., Cloodt, D., & van Kranenburg, H. 2005. Intellectual property rights and the governance of international R&D partnerships. Journal of International Business Studies, 36 (2): 175–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, B. H., & Nickerson, J. A. 2003. Correcting for endogeneity in strategic management research. Strategic Organization, 1 (1): 51–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heide, J. B., & John, G. 1992. Do norms matter in marketing relationships? Journal of Marketing, 56 (2): 32–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heide, J. B., & Miner, A. S. 1992. The shadow of the future: Effects of anticipated interaction and frequency of contact on buyer–seller cooperation. Academy of Management Journal, 35 (2): 265–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helm, R., & Kloyer, M. 2004. Controlling contractual exchange risks in R&D interfirm cooperation: An empirical study. Research Policy, 33 (8): 1103–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henisz, W. J., & Williamson, O. E. 1999. Comparative economic organization – Within and between countries. Business and Politics, 1 (3): 261–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F., & Zeng, M. 2002. Cross-cultural differences and joint venture longevity. Journal of International Business Studies, 33 (4): 699–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. W. 1997. International business: Competing in the global market place. Chicago, IL: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Kim, H. 1997. International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 40 (4): 767–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. M. 2004. Opportunism is not the only reason why firms exist. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13 (2): 401–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. 1991. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd edn) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husted, B., & Folger, R. 2004. Fairness and transaction costs: The contribution of organizational justice theory to an integrative model of economic organization. Organization Science, 15 (6): 719–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joskow, P. L. 1990. The performance of long-term contracts: Further evidence from coal markets. The RAND Journal of Economics, 21 (2): 251–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsikeas, C. S., Skarmeas, D., & Bello, D. C. 2009. Developing successful trust-based international exchange relationships. Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (1): 132–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. 2010. The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, World Bank, Washington DC.

  • Kim, W. C., Hwang, P., & Burgers, W. 1993. Multinationals’ diversification and the risk-return trade-off. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (4): 275–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, B. 1996. Why hold-ups occur: The self-enforcing range of contractual relationships. Economic Inquiry, 34 (3): 444–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. 1991. Joint ventures and the option to expand and acquire. Management Science, 37 (1): 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. 1993. Learning, or the importance of being inert: Country imprinting and international competition. In S. Ghoshal & E. Westney (Eds), Organization theory and the multinational corporation: 136–154. New York: St Martin's Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., & Singh, H. 1988. The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19 (3): 411–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T. 1999. Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24 (2): 308–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T., & Roth, K. 2002. Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45 (1): 215–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T., Roth, K., & Dacin, M. T. 2008. Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: A critique and mew directions. Academy of Management Review, 33 (4): 994–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotabe, M., Martin, X., & Domoto, H. 2003. Gaining from vertical partnerships: Knowledge transfer, relationship duration, and supplier performance improvement in the US and Japanese automotive industries. Strategic Management Journal, 24 (4): 293–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, R., Martin, X., & Noorderhaven, N. G. 2006. When does trust matter to alliance performance? Academy of Management Journal, 49 (5): 894–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, H. W., & Beamish, P. W. 1990. Cross-cultural cooperative behavior in joint ventures in LDCs. Management International Review, 30 (Special Issue): 87–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurent, A. 1983. The cultural diversity of Western conceptions of management. International Studies of Management and Organizations, 13 (1–2): 75–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T. B., Hardy, C., & Phillips, N. 2002. Institutional effects of interorganizational collaboration: The emergence of proto-institutions. Academy of Management Journal, 45 (1): 281–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazzarini, S. G., Miller, G. J., & Zenger, T. R. 2004. Order with some law: Complementarity versus substitution of formal and informal arrangements. Journal of Law Economics & Organization, 20 (2): 261–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J., & Malmendier, U. 2010. Contractibility and the design of research agreements. American Economic Review, 100 (1): 214–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. J., & Wiethoff, C. 2000. Trust, trust development, and trust repair. In M. Deutsch & P.T. Coleman (Eds), The handbook of conflict resolution: 86–107. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. J., McAllister, D. J., & Bies., R. J. 1998. Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review, 23 (3): 438–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. 1985. Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63 (4): 967–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lui, S. S., & Ngo, H.-Y. 2004. The role of trust and contractual safeguards on cooperation in non-equity alliances. Journal of Management, 30 (4): 471–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. 2001. Antecedents and consequences of personal attachment in cross-cultural cooperative ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46 (2): 177–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. 2005. Transactional characteristics, institutional environment and joint venture contracts. Journal of International Business Studies, 36 (2): 209–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macaulay, S. 1963. Non-contractual relations in business: A preliminary study. American Sociological Review, 28 (1): 55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macneil, I. R. 1974. The many futures of contracts. Southern California Law Review, 47 (3): 696–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macneil, I. R. 1978. Contracts: Adjustment of long-term economic relations under classical, neoclassical, and relational contract law. Northwestern University Law Review, 72 (6): 854–906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macneil, I. R. 1980. The new social contract: An inquiry into modern contractual relations. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattli, W. 2001. Private justice in a global economy: From litigation to arbitration. International Organization, 55 (4): 919–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, K. J. 2006. Spillovers and governance: An analysis of knowledge and reputational spillovers in information technology. Academy of Management Journal, 49 (1): 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, K. J., & Argyres, N. S. 2004. Learning to contract: Evidence from the personal computer industry. Organization Science, 15 (4): 394–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, K. J., & Teece, D. J. 2008. Unpacking strategic alliances: The structure and purpose of alliance versus supplier relationships. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 66 (1): 106–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, D. J. 1995. Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (1): 24–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEvily, B., Perrone, V., & Zaheer, A. 2003. Trust as an organizing principle. Organization Science, 14 (1): 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E. 2004. Perspectives on multinational enterprises in emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 35 (4): 259–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E., Estrin, S., Bhaumik, S. K., & Peng, M. W. 2009. Institutions, resources, and entry strategies in emerging economies. Strategic Management Journal, 30 (1): 61–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morosini, P., Shane, S., & Singh, H. 1998. National cultural distance and cross-border acquisition performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 29 (1): 137–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, K., & Nollen, S. 1996. Culture and congruence: The fit between management practices and national culture. Journal of International Business Studies, 27 (4): 753–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Orru, M., Biggart, N. W., & Hamilton, G. G. 1991. Organizational isomorphism in East Asia. In W. Powell & P.J. DiMaggio (Eds), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis: 361–389. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxley, J. E. 1997. Appropriability hazards and governance in strategic alliances: A transaction cost approach. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 13 (2): 387–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxley, J. E. 1999. Institutional environment and the mechanisms of governance: The impact of intellectual property protection on the structure of interfirm alliances. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 38 (3): 283–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozawa, T. 2005. Institutions, industrial upgrading and economic performance in Japan. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. H., & Ungson, G. R. 1997. The effect of national culture, organizational complementarity, and economic motivation on joint venture dissolution. Academy of Management Journal, 40 (2): 279–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkhe, A. 1991. Interfirm diversity, organizational learning, and longevity in global strategic alliances. Journal of International Business Studies, 22 (4): 579–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piskorski, M. J., & Casciaro, T. 2006. When more power makes actors worse off: Turning a profit in the American economy. Social Forces, 85 (2): 1011–1036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5): 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poppo, L., & Zenger, T. 2002. Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal, 23 (8): 707–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pothukuchi, V., Damanpour, F., Choi, J., Chen, C. C., & Park, S. H. 2002. National and organizational culture differences and international joint venture performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 33 (2): 243–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puranam, P., & Vanneste, B. 2009. Trust and governance: Untangling a tangled web. Academy of Management Review, 34 (1): 11–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurti, R. 2005. Global regulatory convergence: The case of intellectual property rights. In R. Grosse (Ed), International business and government relations in the 21st century: 341–360. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, A., & Schmidt, S. M. 1998. A behavioral perspective on negotiating international alliance. Journal of International Business Studies, 29 (4): 665–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauch, J. E. 2001. Business and social networks in international trade. Journal of Economic Literature, 39 (4): 1177–1203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ring, P. S., & Van de ven, A. H. 1994. Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19 (1): 90–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. 1998. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23 (3): 393–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryall, M. D., & Sampson, R. C. 2009. Formal contracts in the presence of relational enforcement mechanisms: evidence from technology development projects. Management Science 55 (6): 906–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salbu, S. R. 1997. Evolving contract as a device for flexible coordination and control. American Business Law Journal, 34 (3): 329–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, A., & Scott, R. E. 2003. Contract theory and the limits of contract law. Yale Law Journal, 113 (3): 541–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. 1991. Unpacking institutional arguments. In W.W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis: 164–182. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. 2008. Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests, (3rd edn) Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, D. L., Sheppard, B. H., & Cheraskin, L. 1992. Business on a handshake. Negotiation Journal, 8 (4): 365–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shenkar, O. 2001. Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 32 (3): 519–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shenkar, O., & Zeira, Y. 1992. Role conflict and role ambiguity of chief executive officers in international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 23 (1): 55–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirmon, D. G., & Lane, P. J. 2004. A model of cultural differences and international alliance performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 35 (4): 306–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sitkin, S. B., & Roth, N. L. 1993. Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic “remedies” for trust/distrust. Organization Science, 4 (3): 367–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slotegraaf, R. J., Moorman, C., & Inman, J. J. 2003. The role of firm resources in returns to market deployment. Journal of Marketing Research, 40 (3): 295–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srikanth, K., & Puranam, P. 2011. Integrating distributed work: Comparing task design, communication, and tacit coordination mechanisms. Strategic Management Journal, 32 (8): 849–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stipanowich, T. J. 2010. Arbitration: The “new litigation”. University of Illinois Law Review, 2010 (1): 1–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe, K. M., & Zaheer, A. 1998. Uncertainty in the transaction environment: An empirical test. Strategic Management Journal, 19 (1): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terpstra, V., & David, K. 1991. The cultural environment of international business. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tihanyi, L., Griffith, D. A., & Russell, C. J. 2005. The effect of cultural distance on entry mode choice, international diversification, and MNE performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 36 (3): 270–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (1): 35–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Very, P., Lubatkin, M., & Calori, R. 1996. A cross-national assessment of acculturative stress in recent European mergers. International Studies of Management and Organization, 26 (1): 59–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. 1975. Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. 1991. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36 (2): 269–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. 1998a. The institutions of governance. The American Economic Review, 88 (2): 75–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. 1998b. Transaction cost economics: How it works; where it is headed. Economist, 146 (1): 23–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, D., & Shenkar, O. 2002. Institutional distance and the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 27 (4): 608–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. 1998. Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science, 9 (2): 141–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajac, E. J., & Olsen, C. P. 1993. From transaction cost to transactional value analysis: Implications for the study of interorganizational strategies. Journal of Management Studies, 30 (1): 131–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zander, U., & Kogut, B. 1995. Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organization Science, 6 (1): 76–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeitlin, J., & Herrigel, G. 2000. Americanization and its limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerubavel, E. 1997. Social mindscapes: An invitation to cognitive sociology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, M. 2006. Conducting R&D in countries with weak intellectual property rights protection. Management Science, 52 (8): 1185–1199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. G. 1986. Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. In B.M. Staw & L.L. Cummings (Eds), Research in organizational behavior. 53–111. JAI Press: Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the JIBS Area Editor, Gabriel Szulanski, and three anonymous reviewers for their support and valuable comments, which have assisted in the development of this paper. Financial support for this project from the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Grant 864-2007-0263) is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Majid Abdi.

Additional information

Accepted by Gabriel Szulanski, Area Editor, 20 January 2012. This paper has been with the authors for two revisions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abdi, M., Aulakh, P. Do country-level institutional frameworks and interfirm governance arrangements substitute or complement in international business relationships?. J Int Bus Stud 43, 477–497 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2012.11

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2012.11

Keywords

Navigation