Advertisement

Journal of Banking Regulation

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 149–162 | Cite as

Bail-in and asset encumbrance - Implications for banks’ asset liability management

  • Joachim Erhardt
  • Johannes Lübbers
  • Peter N Posch
Original Article
  • 78 Downloads

Abstract

In response to the financial crisis the European Union proposes bail-ins as a new regulatory instrument. For banks this mechanism affects the funding costs that now depend on the amount of assets under encumbrance. The bank’s optimal level of asset encumbrance, however, is not necessarily optimal for its senior unsecured investors. In a new simulation framework, we access the effects of the bail-in regulation and the effect on the costs of banks and investors. Analyzing major EU banks’ funding structure we find funding cost should be up to 49 basis points higher to reflect the increased risk for senior unsecured investors. On the other hand all banks of our sample could lower their overall cost level by up to 17 basis points by increasing the level of asset encumbrance.

Keywords

asset encumbrance asset liability management covered bonds 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank an anonymous referee for helpful comments, Rainer Grupp for research assistance and the participants of the LBBW Workshop, Frankfurt 2014 for helpful remarks. All remaining errors are our own.

References and Notes

  1. Demirgüc-Kunt, A. and Huizinga, H. (2010) Bank activity and funding strategies: The impact on risk and returns. Journal of Financial Economics 98(3): 626–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Karmel, R.S. (2014) A law professors perspective on too big to fail. Journal of Banking Regulation 15(3-4): 227–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Houben, A. et al (2013) Asset Encumbrance, Financial Reform And The Demand For Collateral Assets. Bank for International Settlement, Committee on the Global Financial System. Technical Report no. 49, http://www.bis.org/publ/cgfs49.htm.
  4. EU Council (2013) Council Agrees Position On Bank Resolution. Brussels: Economic and Financial Affairs Council. Technical Report 11228/13.Google Scholar
  5. Calomiris, C.W. (1999) Building an incentive-compatible safety net. Journal of Banking & Finance 23(10): 1499–1519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ECB (2014) Aggregate Report on the Comprehensive Assessment. Frankfurt am Main: European Central Bank. Technical report.Google Scholar
  7. Enthofer, H. (2013) Treasurer’s Handbook – Financial Markets: A Practitioner’s Guide, 2nd edn. Vienna: Linde Verlag.Google Scholar
  8. Moody’s (2012) Special Comment: Moody’s European Covered Bonds Monitoring Overview: Q2 2012. London: Moody’s Investor Service. Technical report.Google Scholar
  9. Ayadi, R. and Lastra, R.M. (2010) Proposals for reforming deposit guarantee schemes in Europe. Journal of Banking Regulation 11(3): 210–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kleftouri, N. (2013) Deposit protection systems design and effectiveness. Journal of Banking Regulation 16(1): 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hull, J., Predescu, M. and White, A. (2004) The relationship between credit default swap spreads, bond yields, and credit rating announcements. Journal of Banking & Finance 28(11): 2789–2811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bai, J. and Collin-Dufresne, P. (2011) The determinants of the CDS-Bond Basis during the Financial Crisis of 2007–2009. Working Paper. Available at: http://arno.uvt.nl/show.cgi?fid=127965.
  13. Kenyon, C. and Stamm, R. (2012) Discounting, LIBOR, CVA and Funding. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Choudhry, M. (2012) The Principles of Banking, 1st edn. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pallavicini, A., Perini, D. and Brigo, D. (2011) Funding Valuation Adjustment: A consistent framework including CVA, DVA, collateral, netting rules and re-hypothecation. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1969114.
  16. Grossmann, R. (2011) CDS Spreads and Default Risk – A Leading Indicator? New York: Fitch Ratings. Technical Report.Google Scholar
  17. Glionna, J., Hernandez, M. and Monteleone, B. (2012) The implications of 0% recovery. New York: Credit Research Barclays Capital. Technical Report.Google Scholar
  18. Financial Stability Board (2014) Adequacy of loss-absorbing capacity of global systemically important banks in resolution. Consultative Document.Google Scholar
  19. We would like to thank an anonymous referee for pointing this out to us.Google Scholar
  20. Cœuré, B. (2013) The Implications of Bail-in Rules for Bank Activity and Stability. Opening Speech at the Conference on Financing the Recovery after the Crisis–The Roles Of Bank Profitability, Stability and Regulation. Bocconi University, Milan. MI, Vol. 30.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joachim Erhardt
    • 1
  • Johannes Lübbers
    • 1
  • Peter N Posch
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Finance, Risk & Resource Management (FiRRM), Technical University of DortmundDortmundGermany

Personalised recommendations