Bail-in and asset encumbrance - Implications for banks’ asset liability management
- 78 Downloads
In response to the financial crisis the European Union proposes bail-ins as a new regulatory instrument. For banks this mechanism affects the funding costs that now depend on the amount of assets under encumbrance. The bank’s optimal level of asset encumbrance, however, is not necessarily optimal for its senior unsecured investors. In a new simulation framework, we access the effects of the bail-in regulation and the effect on the costs of banks and investors. Analyzing major EU banks’ funding structure we find funding cost should be up to 49 basis points higher to reflect the increased risk for senior unsecured investors. On the other hand all banks of our sample could lower their overall cost level by up to 17 basis points by increasing the level of asset encumbrance.
Keywordsasset encumbrance asset liability management covered bonds
The authors thank an anonymous referee for helpful comments, Rainer Grupp for research assistance and the participants of the LBBW Workshop, Frankfurt 2014 for helpful remarks. All remaining errors are our own.
References and Notes
- Houben, A. et al (2013) Asset Encumbrance, Financial Reform And The Demand For Collateral Assets. Bank for International Settlement, Committee on the Global Financial System. Technical Report no. 49, http://www.bis.org/publ/cgfs49.htm.
- EU Council (2013) Council Agrees Position On Bank Resolution. Brussels: Economic and Financial Affairs Council. Technical Report 11228/13.Google Scholar
- ECB (2014) Aggregate Report on the Comprehensive Assessment. Frankfurt am Main: European Central Bank. Technical report.Google Scholar
- Enthofer, H. (2013) Treasurer’s Handbook – Financial Markets: A Practitioner’s Guide, 2nd edn. Vienna: Linde Verlag.Google Scholar
- Moody’s (2012) Special Comment: Moody’s European Covered Bonds Monitoring Overview: Q2 2012. London: Moody’s Investor Service. Technical report.Google Scholar
- Bai, J. and Collin-Dufresne, P. (2011) The determinants of the CDS-Bond Basis during the Financial Crisis of 2007–2009. Working Paper. Available at: http://arno.uvt.nl/show.cgi?fid=127965.
- Pallavicini, A., Perini, D. and Brigo, D. (2011) Funding Valuation Adjustment: A consistent framework including CVA, DVA, collateral, netting rules and re-hypothecation. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1969114.
- Grossmann, R. (2011) CDS Spreads and Default Risk – A Leading Indicator? New York: Fitch Ratings. Technical Report.Google Scholar
- Glionna, J., Hernandez, M. and Monteleone, B. (2012) The implications of 0% recovery. New York: Credit Research Barclays Capital. Technical Report.Google Scholar
- Financial Stability Board (2014) Adequacy of loss-absorbing capacity of global systemically important banks in resolution. Consultative Document.Google Scholar
- We would like to thank an anonymous referee for pointing this out to us.Google Scholar
- Cœuré, B. (2013) The Implications of Bail-in Rules for Bank Activity and Stability. Opening Speech at the Conference on Financing the Recovery after the Crisis–The Roles Of Bank Profitability, Stability and Regulation. Bocconi University, Milan. MI, Vol. 30.Google Scholar