Skip to main content
Log in

Does macroeconomy affect bank stability? A review of the empirical evidence

  • Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Banking Regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides a selected review of a large number of empirical studies on the relationship between business cycle and bank stability, both from a micro and an aggregate perspective. While not exhaustive, it tries to identify the common patterns of bank fragility, considering the evidence arising from works on banking sector crises, early warning systems and procyclicality of banks' behaviour. All these studies, even if starting from different points of view, have made it clear that the analysis of macroeconomic variables is of some help for banking supervisors in order to fully assess banks' health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Notes

  • Crockett, A. (2000) ‘Marrying the micro and macro-prudential dimensions of financial stability’, Remarks before the 11th International Conference of Banking Supervisors, Basel, September.

  • Davis, E. P. (1999) ‘Financial data needs for macroprudential surveillance — What are the key indicators of risks to domestic financial stability?’, Bank of England — Centre for Central Banking Studies, Handbooks in Central Banking, Lecture Series, No. 2.

  • Gavin, M. and Hausmann, R. (1996) ‘The roots of banking crises: The macroeconomic context’, Inter-American Development Bank Working Paper No. 318.

  • Kaminsky, G. L. and Reinhart, C. M. (1996) ‘The twin crises: The causes of banking and balance-of- payments problems’, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, International Finance Discussion Papers, No. 544.

  • In particular, they identify the beginning of a banking crisis in a bank run event, which leads to the closure, merging or take-over, by the public sector of one or more financial institutions. If there is no bank run, the beginning of a crisis is signalled by the closure, merging, take-over or large-scale public assistance of an important financial institution that marks the start of a series of similar outcomes for other intermediaries.

  • Hilbers, P., Lei, Q. and Zacho, L. (2001) ‘Real estate market developments and financial sector soundness’, IMF Working Papers, No. 129.

  • An attempt to overcome this drawback is done by Kaminsky8 who tries to construct composite early warning indicators for both banking and currency crises.

  • Kaminsky, G. L. (1998) ‘Currency and banking crises: The early warning of distress’, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, International Finance Discussion Papers, No. 629.

  • Demirguc-Kunt, A. and Detragiache, E. (1998) ‘The determinants of banking crises in developing and developed countries’, IMF Staff Papers, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 81–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • In their work, an episode of financial distress is classified as a crisis if one or more of the following conditions hold: (1) the ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans exceeds 10 per cent; (2) the cost of the rescue operation is at least 2 per cent of GDP; (3) banking sector problems results in a large-scale nationalisation of banks; (4) extensive bank runs take place.

  • Eichengreen, B. and Arteta, C. (2000) ‘Banking crises in emerging markets: Presumptions and evidence’, Working Papers, No. 115, Haas School of Business, University of California Berkeley, Center for International and Development Economic Research.

  • Hardy, D. C. and Pazarbasioglu, C. (1999) ‘Determinants and leading indicators of banking crises: Further evidence’, IMF Staff Papers, Vol. 46, No. 3(September/December).

  • Bell, J. and Pain, D. (2000) ‘Leading indicator model of banking crises — A critical review’, Bank of England Financial Stability Review, No. 9, pp. 113–129.

  • Demirguc-Kunt, A. and Detragiache, E. (1999) ‘Monitoring banking sector fragility: A multivariate logit approach with an application to 1996–1997 banking crises’, World Bank Working paper.

  • Eichengreen, B. and Rose, A. K. (1998) ‘Staying afloat when the wind shifts: External factors and emerging-market banking crises’, NBER Working Paper No. 6370.

  • Hanschel, E. and Monnin, P. (2004) ‘Measuring and forecasting stress in the banking sector: Evidence from Switzerland’, Mimeo, Swiss National Bank.

  • Laviola, S. (1998) ‘Bank's early warning systems: A review of recent literature’, Background Paper, Annex 3 to ECB Report SUP/98/35.

  • Sahajwala, R. and Van den Bergh, P. (2000) ‘Supervisory risk assessment and early warning systems’, Working Papers, No. 4, December, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.

  • For a review of the earlier EWS, see Laviola.17.

  • In the US, the Federal Reserve is the supervisory authority of the bank holding companies and it is responsible for both off-site and on-site examinations (inspections). General inspections are usually carried out yearly and they mainly focus on the analysis of credit quality, internal audit and business plan. After the inspection, the FED assigns its rating (BOPEC, Banks Subsidiaries, Other nonbank subsidiaries, Parent company, Earnings and Capital adequacy) that reflects the holding company's overall soundness. It ranges from 1 to 5 as the overall performance of the BHC worsens; the supervisory rating is strictly confidential. Conversely, the CAMELS (Capital adequacy, Asset quality, Management, Earnings, Liquidity, Sensitivity to market risk) is the on-site rating assigned once a year on a solo basis.

  • Jordan, S. J. and Rosengren, E. S. (2002) ‘Economic cycles and bank health’, Mimeo, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.

  • Laviola, S., Marullo-Reedtz, P. and Trapanese, M. (1999) ‘Forecasting bank fragility. The evidence from Italy’, in Kaufman, G. (ed.), ‘Research in Financial Services: Private and Public Policy’, Vol. 11, JAI Press, Greenwich (CT), pp. 35–60.

  • Nuxoll, D. A. (2003) ‘The contribution of economic data to bank-failure models’, FDIC Working Paper No. 3.

  • Gonzales-Hermosillo, B. (1999) ‘Determinants of ex-ante banking system distress: A macro-micro empirical exploration of some recent episodes’, IMF Working Papers, No. 33.

  • Mannasoo, K. and Mayes, D. G. (2005) ‘Investigating the early signals of banking sector vulnerabilities in Central and Eastern European emerging markets’, Mimeo, Bank of Estonia.

  • Glogova, E., Halling, M. and Hayden, E. (2005) ‘Using survival time analysis to predict bank failure’, Mimeo, Bank of Austria.

  • Berger, A. N., Davies, S. M. and Flannery, M. J. (1998) ‘Comparing market and supervisory assessments of bank performance: Who knows what when?’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 641–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krainer, J. and Lopez, J. A. (2001) ‘Incorporating equity market information into supervisory monitoring models’, Working Paper No. 14, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.

  • Cannata, F. and Quagliariello, M. (2005) ‘The value of market information in banking supervision: Evidence from Italy’, Journal of Financial Services Research, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 139–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gropp, R., Vesala, J. and Vulpes, G. (2002) ‘Equity and bond market signals as leading indicators of bank fragility’, ECB Working Paper No. 150.

  • Salas, V. and Saurina, J. (2002) ‘Credit risk in two institutional settings: Spanish commercial and saving banks’, Journal of Financial Services Research, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 203–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesola, J. (2001) ‘The role of macroeconomic shocks in banking crises’, Bank of Finland Discussion Papers, No. 6.

  • Cavallo, M. and Majnoni, G. (2002) ‘Do banks provision for bad loans in good times? Empirical evidence and policy implications’, in Levich, R.M., Majnoni, G. and Reinhart, C. (eds), ‘Ratings, Ratings Agencies and the Global Financial System’, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

  • Laeven, L. and Majoni, G. (2003) ‘Loan loss provisioning and economic slowdowns: Too much, too late’, Journal of Financial Intermediation, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 178–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Central Bank (2001) ‘Cyclicality of EU Bank's Loan Loss Provisions: Evidence and implications’, ECB.

  • Pain, D. (2003) ‘The provisioning experience of the major UK banks: A small panel investigation’, Bank of England Working Paper No. 177.

  • Arpa, M., Giulini, I., Ittner, A. and Pauer, F. (2001) ‘The influence of macroeconomic developments on Austrian banks: Implications for banking supervision’, BIS Papers, No. 1.

  • Quagliariello, M. (2006) ‘Banks' riskiness over the business cycle: A panel analysis on Italian intermediaries’, Working Papers, No. 599, Banca d'Italia.

  • Bikker, J. A. and Hu, H. (2002) ‘Cyclical patterns in profits, provisioning and lending of banks’, DNB Staff Reports, No. 86.

  • See also, Bikker and Metzemakers41.

  • Bikker, J. A. and Metzemakers, P. A. J. (2005) ‘Bank provisioning behaviour and procyclicality’, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 141–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valckx, N. (2003) ‘What determines loan loss provisioning in the EU?’, Mimeo, ECB.

  • Meyer, A. P. and Yeager, T. J. (2001) ‘Are small rural banks vulnerable to local economic downturns’, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, Vol. 83, pp. 25–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambacorta, L., Gobbi, G. and Panetta, F. (2001) ‘Il sistema bancario italiano nell'area dell'euro’, Bancaria, Vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach, S., Peng, W. and Shu, C. (2003) ‘Macroeconomic conditions and banking perfomance in Hong Kong: A panel data study’, Mimeo, Hong Kong Monetary Authority.

  • Vander Vennet, R., De Jonghe, O. and Baele, L. (2004) ‘Bank risks and the business cycle’, Working Paper No. 264, University of Ghent.

  • In a recent paper, Marcucci and Quagliariello,48 using Italian data, show that the bank capital channel may help explain the feedback effects.

  • Marcucci, J. and Quagliariello, M. (2008) ‘Is bank portfolio riskiness procyclical? Evidence from Italy using a vector autoregression’, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Vol. 18, pp. 46–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Quagliariello.

Additional information

1 Mario Quagliariello has received a Laurea in Economics from the University of Rome (Italy) and a PhD in Economics from the University of York (UK). Since 1999, he has been working as an Economist at the Bank of Italy, Banking and Financial Supervision. His interests concern macro-prudential analysis and stress tests, Basel II Capital Accord and procyclicality, the regulation of financial conglomerates and cost of regulation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quagliariello, M. Does macroeconomy affect bank stability? A review of the empirical evidence. J Bank Regul 9, 102–115 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/jbr.2008.4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jbr.2008.4

Keywords

Navigation