Skip to main content
Log in

The Responsibility to Protect 10 years on from the World Summit: A victory for common humanity?

  • Introduction
  • Published:
International Politics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the rapid growth in Responsibility to Protect (RtoP) literature over the course of the first decade since the World Summit Outcome, there has been relatively little analysis on the relationship between the RtoP and Humanity. This is despite the fact that humanity is often invoked as a catalyst for RtoP action by academics and policymakers. Addressing the lacuna, this special issue puts forward an interdisciplinary investigation into the relationship between the RtoP and Humanity. To do this, it draws insight from International Relations, Political Theory, History and International Law. Contributors analyse the moral foundations of the RtoP, the relationship between ethics, politics and the RtoP, the role of humanity in a divided world, how the RtoP is framed, public opinion data on humanitarian intervention as well as media coverage of genocide. In so doing, this special issue opens up new avenues for future research as the RtoP enters its second decade since the World Summit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bass, G.J. (2008) Freedom’s Battle: The Origins of Humanitarian Intervention. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, I. (1998) The Crooked Timber of Humanity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, A. (2011a) Global Politics and the Responsibility to Protect: From Words to Deeds. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, A. (2011b) Libya and the Responsibility to Protect: The exception and the norm. Ethics and International Affairs 25 (3): 263–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, A. (2013) The Responsibility to Protect: Added value or hot air? Cooperation and Conflict 48 (3): 333–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, A. (2014) From Tripoli to Damascus? Lesson learning and the implementation of the Responsibility to Protect. International Politics 51 (1): 23–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. (2008) The Responsibility to Protect: Ending Mass Atrocity Crimes Once and For All. Washington: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaita, R. (2000) A Common Humanity: Thinking about Love Truth and Justice. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geras, N. (2005) Genocide and crimes against humanity. In: J.K. Roth (ed.) Genocide and Human Rights. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 167–181.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Glover, J. (2001) Humanity, A Moral History of the Twentieth Century. London: Pimlico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hehir, A. (2013) The permanency of inconsistency: Libya, The Security Council and the Responsibility to Protect. International Security 38 (1): 137–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hehir, A. (2012) The Responsibility to Protect: Rhetoric, Reality and the Future of Humanitarian Intervention. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hilpold, P. (2012) Intervening in the name of humanity: R2P and the power of ideas. Journal of Conflict Security and Law 17 (1): 49–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (2001) Responsibility to Protect. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.

  • Keane, F. (1995) Season of Blood, A Rwandan Journey. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, A.W. and Egerton, F. (eds.) (2012) The Routledge Handbook on the Responsibility to Protect. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linklater, A. (2009) Human interconnectedness. International Relations 23 (3): 481–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. (2013) Libya and Syria: R2P and the spectre of the swinging pendulum. International Affairs 89 (5): 1265–1283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, R.W. (2013) Humanitarianism, responsibility or rationality? Evaluating intervention as state strategy. In: A. Hehir and R. Murray (eds.) Libya: The Responsibility to Protect and the Future of Humanitarian Intervention. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M.C. (1997) Cultivating Humanity: A Classical Defense of Reform in Liberal Education. London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M.C. (1993) Non-relative virtues: An Aristotelian approach. In: M.C. Nussbaum and A. Sen (eds.) The Quality of Life. New York: Clarendon, pp. 242–269.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (2011) The Better Angels of Our Nature: A History of Violence and Humanity. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teitel, R. (2011) Humanity’s Law. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, T. (2011) R2P alive and well after Libya. Ethics and International Affairs 25 (3): 287–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, J. (2014) Norm contestation and the Responsibility to Protect. Global Responsibility to Protect 5 (4): 365–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, N.J. (2005) A victory for common humanity? Journal of International Law and International Relations 2 (95): 95–105.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrian Gallagher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gallagher, A., Brown, G. The Responsibility to Protect 10 years on from the World Summit: A victory for common humanity?. Int Polit 53, 8–13 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2015.34

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2015.34

Keywords

Navigation