Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative regional integration in the EU and East Asia: Moving beyond integration snobbery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Politics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In comparative regional integration (RI) analysis, the European Union's (EU) advancing of its own experience as a model is a significant problem. This article explores this problem by focusing on comparative aspects of RI in the EU and East Asia. It argues that there are important and valid aspects of comparison, such as the origins and objectives of these two regions, but fewer points of comparison between the two when it comes to achieving their objectives. It suggests that historical differences between the two regions constitute the major reason that a direct comparison is neither useful nor productive. It analyses the centrality and the exceptionalism of the EU in much of the comparative RI literature. It agues that the promotion of the EU experience as a form of model or paradigm is far from analytically helpful – the method of comparative analysis needs be the focus of our study as much as the objects of comparison. The article examines how the centrality of the EU in some analysis can amount to a form of de facto snobbery in the positioning of the EU on a rather unsteady pedestal. This ‘integration snobbery’ – to coin a phrase utilized by an EU official – is not constructive for comparative analysis of the EU and East Asia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The interviews were conducted in Brussels in June 2006 2007. The author thanks the Commission officials for their participation.

  2. Commission official number 1.

  3. The European Commission's multimedia yearbook presenting some of the EU's ‘most important achievements of 2008’ lists the following 10 topics: controlling the use of chemicals in Europe; a joint response to the financial crisis; better rights for temporary workers; acting to keep children safe; equal rights for passengers with reduced mobility; a helping hand for stability and democracy; keeping Europe's lights on without risking the planet's health; healthy eating made easier; EU countries help each other cope with disaster; and EU funding becomes more transparent (see European Commission, Europe and you in 2008, ec.europa.eu/snapshot2008).

  4. Commission official 2.

  5. Commission official 3.

  6. Commission official 4.

  7. Commission official 5.

  8. Commission official 6.

  9. Commission official 7.

  10. Commission official 8.

References

  • Acharya, A. (2001) Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia. London, New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Acharya, A. (2006) Europe and Asia. Reflections on a tale of two regionalisms. In: B. Fort and D. Webber (eds.) Regional Integration in East Asia and Europe. Convergence or Divergence? London, New York: Routledge, pp. 312–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acharya, A. (2007) The emerging regional architecture of world politics. World Politics 59: 629–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acharya, A. and Johnston, A.I. (2007) Comparing regional institutions: An introduction. In: A. Acharya and A.I. Johnston (eds.) Crafting Cooperation. Regional International Institutions in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angresano, J. (2004) European Union integration lessons for ASEAN +3: The importance of contextual specificity. Journal of Asian Economics 14: 909–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASEAN. (2008a) ASEAN Charter, Singapore, http://www.aseansec.org/21069.pdf, accessed 12 September 2008.

  • ASEAN. (2008b) ASEAN: An overview, http://www.aseansec.org/92.htm, accessed 12 September 2008.

  • Asia Europe Meeting (ASEM). (2008) Statement on the international financial situation. Beijing, 24 October, http://www.aseminfoboard.org/content/documents/ASEM7_Statement-International-Financial-Situation.pdf, accessed 5 December 2008.

  • ASEAN Chairman. (2008) Chairman's statement of the 15th ASEAN Regional Forum. Singapore, 24 July, http://www.aseansec.org/21781.htm, accessed 12 September 2008.

  • Baldwin, R.E. (2006) Multilateralizing regionalism: Spaghetti bowls as building blocs on the path to global free trade. The World Economy 29 (11): 1451–1518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beeson, M. (2005) Rethinking regionalism: Europe and East Asia in comparative perspective. Journal of European Public Policy 12 (5): 969–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breslin, S. and Higgott, R. (2000) Studying regions: Learning from the old, constructing the new. New Political Economy 5 (3): 333–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caballero-Anthony, M. (2008) Non-traditional security and infectious diseases in ASEAN: Going beyond the rhetoric of securitization to deeper institutionalization. The Pacific Review 21 (4): 507–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calder, K.E. and Fukuyama, F. (2008) Introduction. In: K.E. Calder and F. Fukuyama (eds.) East Asian Multilateralism: Prospects for Regional Stability. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press, pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A.F., Hughes, C.W. and De Lombaerde, P. (eds.) (2008) Regionalisation and Global Governance: The Taming of Globalisation? New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2007) Multi-annual indicative programme for Asia 2007–2010, http://ec/europa.external-relations/asia/rsp-0710_en/pdf, accessed 8 May 2008.

  • European Commission. (2008) Europe and you in 2008, http://ec.europa.eu/snapfshot2008, accessed 14 November 2008.

  • Hale, D. (2008) The outlook for economic integration in East Asia. In: K.E. Calder and F. Fukuyama (eds.) East Asian Multilateralism: Prospects for Regional Stability. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 58–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidetaka, Y. (2005) Political leadership, informality, and regional integration in East Asia: The evolution of ASEAN plus three. European Journal of East Asian Studies 4 (2): 205–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurrell, A. (1995) Explaining the resurgence of regionalism in world politics. Review of International Studies 21: 331–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, S. (2007) Asian values and the Asia pacific community: Shared interests and common concerns. Politics and Policy 35 (1): 102–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manners, I. (2002) Normative power Europe: A contradiction in terms? Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (2): 235–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattli, W. (1999) The Logic of Regional Integration – Europe and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moxon-Browne, E. (2008) Political integration in the European Union: Any lessons for ASEAN? In: P. Murray (ed.) Europe and Asia: Regions in Flux. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 84–101.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, P. (2008a) Regional power Europe? The place of the EU in comparative regional integration analysis. In: A. Kösler and M. Zimmek (eds.) Elements of Regional Integration: A Multidimensional Approach. Baden-Baden, Germany: NOMOS, pp. 57–71.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, P. (2008b) Advancing regionalism: The EU's policy towards Asia. In: B. Andreosso O’Callaghan and M. Bruna Zolin (eds.) Asia and Europe: Connections and Contrasts. Venice, Italy: University of Venice Press, pp. 34–48.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ogilvie-White, T. (2006) Non-proliferation and counter-terrorism cooperation in Southeast Asia: Meeting global obligations through regional security architectures? Contemporary Southeast Asia 28 (1): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pempel, T.J. (2005) Emerging webs of regional connectness. In: T.J. Pempel (ed.) Remapping East Asia: The Construction of a Region. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomfret, R. (2007) Is regionalism an increasing feature of the world economy? The World Economy 30 (6): 893–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravenhill, J. (2001) APEC and the Construction of Pacific Rim Regionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosamond, B. (2000) Theories of European Integration. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosamond, B. (2005) Conceptualising the EU model of governance in world politics. European Foreign Affairs Review 10 (4): 463–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruffini, P.-B. (2006) Regional integration in East Asia: Which lessons to draw from the European experience? Paper presented at the Asia-Pacific Economic Association Conference; 29–30 July, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

  • Ruland, J. and Jetschke, A. (2008) 40 years of ASEAN: Perspectives, performance and lessons for change. The Pacific Review 21 (4): 397–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumford, C. and Murray, P. (2003) Globalization and the limitations of European integration studies: Interdisciplinary considerations. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 11 (1): 85–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sbragia, A. (2008) Review article: Comparative regionalism: What might it be? Journal of Common Market Studies 46 (Annual Review): 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjursen, H. (2006) The EU as a normative power: How can this be? Journal of European Public Policy 13 (2): 235–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley Foundation and Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) and the Swedish School of Advanced Asia Pacific Studies of The Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education. (2008) Challenges to Effective Multilateralism: Comparing Asian and European Experiences. Sweden: Sigtuna.

  • Warleigh-Lack, A. (2006) Towards a conceptual framework for regionalisation: Bridging ‘New Regionalism’ and ‘Integration Theory’. Review of International Political Economy 13 (5): 750–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warleigh-Lack, A. (2008) The EU, ASEAN and APEC in comparative perspective. In: P. Murray (ed.) Europe and Asia: Regions in Flux. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 23–41.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murray, P. Comparative regional integration in the EU and East Asia: Moving beyond integration snobbery. Int Polit 47, 308–323 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2010.13

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2010.13

Keywords

Navigation