Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Beyond hypocrisy? Debating the ‘fact’ and ‘value’ of sovereignty in contemporary world politics

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Politics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is no exaggeration to say that sovereignty is the foundation both of International Relations (IR) as a field of enquiry and of international politics as an ‘actual existing’ field of practice. Whether seen as the archetypal IR101 topic or in debates about the rights and wrongs of humanitarian intervention, the capacity of international organisations to exert control over significant spheres of international politics, or in discussions about the legitimacy of bodies such as the International Criminal Court, sovereignty appears as the central referent point of international politics. Over recent years, however, there has been considerable debate over both the substantive content (‘fact’) and normative framing (‘value’) of sovereignty. The former comes about as a result of a series of political, economic and security challenges which see states as assuming a role as ‘one-amongst-many’ in an increasingly complex international topography; the latter stems from concerns about whether national states form the optimal site for the articulation of authority claims. This forum engages with both of these debates, focusing on how they relate to understandings of the emergence, development and possible emasculation of sovereignty in the contemporary world. In the introduction to the forum, we outline the ways in which scholars have contested the emergence of the sovereign state and examine the ethical issues surrounding the normative value of this form of rule. In the process, we lay out the ways in which the papers that make up this forum make uncomfortable, if important, contributions to the debate about the fact and value – or ‘is’ and ‘ought’ – of sovereignty in contemporary world politics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambrosius, L. (2007) Woodrow Wilson and the birth of a nation: American democracy and international relations. Diplomacy & Statecraft 18 (4): 689–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A., Ikenberry, G.J. and Risse, T. (2008) The End of the West: Crisis and Change in the Atlantic Order. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anghie, A. (2002) Colonialism and the birth of international institutions: Sovereignty, economy and the mandate system of the league of nations. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 34 (3): 513–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archibugi, D. (2008) The Global Commonwealth of Citizens. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bain, W. (2003) The idea of trusteeship in international society. The Round Table 92 (368): 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartelson, J. (1995) A Genealogy of Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (2006) Cosmopolitan Visions. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, M.T. (2004) The Battle for Asia: From Decolonisation to Globalisation. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Biccum, A. (2005) Development and the ‘New’ Imperialism: A reinvention of colonial discourse in DFID promotional literature. Third World Quarterly 26 (6): 1005–1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickerton, C.J., Cunliffe, P. and Gourevitch, A. (eds.) (2007) Politics Without Sovereignty: A Critique of Contemporary International Relations. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borowiak, A. (2008) Review essay: Theorizing Europe and its divisions. Political Theory 36 (1): 152–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. (2006) From international to global justice. In: J.S. Dryzek, B. Honig and A. Phillips (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 621–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, H. (1984) The Anarchical Society. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B. (2004) From International to World Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B. and Little, R. (2010) The evolution of international society. In: R. Denemark (ed.) ISA Compendium. New York: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, D. (2003) International justice. In: D. Archibugi (ed.) Debating Cosmopolitics. London: Verso, pp. 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, D. (2009) Hollow Hegemony: Rethinking Global Politics, Power and Resistance. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, J. (1994) Diasporas. Cultural Anthropology 9 (3): 302–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P. (2007) The Bottom Billion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, A. (2005) Logics of Hierarchy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. (2002) The new liberal imperialism. The Observer, Sunday 7 April.

  • Cox, M. (2004) Empire, imperialism and the Bush doctrine. Review of International Studies 30 (4): 585–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, M. (2005) Beyond the West: Terrors in Transatlantia. European Journal of International Relations 11 (2): 203–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danchev, A. (1996) On specialness. International Affairs 72 (4): 737–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, K., Burrell, S.A. and Kann, R.A. (1957) Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, J. (2006) Sovereign inequalities and hierarchy in anarchy. European Journal of International Relations 12 (2): 139–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, T. (2008) Good citizen Europe. International Affairs 84 (1): 13–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, N. (2005) Colossus. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follesdal, A. and Hix, S. (2005) Why There is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik. European Governance Papers (EUROGOV) No. C-05-02.

  • Fraser, N. (2005) Reframing justice in a globalizing world. New Left Review 36 (Nov–Dec): 69–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2008) Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. and Honneth, A. (2003) Redistribution or Recognition? London: Verso.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, R. (1981) War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, G. (1984) The Standard of ‘Civilization’ in International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2001) The Postnational Constellation. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. and Derrida, J. (2006) February 15th, or what binds us together: A plea for a common foreign policy, beginning in the core of Europe. In: L. Thommassen (ed.) The Derrida-Habermas Reader. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, F. (1999) Revolution and World Politics. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. (1995) Democracy and the Global Order. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. (2002) Law of states, law of peoples. Legal Theory 8 (1): 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. (2004) The Global Covenant. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. and Koenig-Archibugi, M. (eds.) (2003) Taming Globalization: Frontiers of Governance. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, J. and Sharman, J. (2005) The enduring place of hierarchy in world politics. European Journal of International Relations 11 (1): 63–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. (2009) Pathologies of Reason: On the Legacy of Critical Theory. Cambridge: Polity.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ignatieff, M. (2003) Empire Lite. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, J.G. (2002) America's imperial ambition. Foreign Affairs 81 (5): 44–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahn, B. (2006) Classical smoke, classical mirror: Kant and Mill in liberal international relations theory. In: B. Jahn (ed.) Classical Theory in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 178–203.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • James, A. (1984) Sovereignty: Ground-rule or gibberish? Review of International Studies 10 (1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, R. (2002) Power and weakness. Policy Review 113 (June and July): 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, S., Little, R. and Wohlforth, W.C. (eds.) (2007) Balance of Power in World History. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Keene, E. (2002) Beyond the Anarchical Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, S. (1999) Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, K. (2008) The question of European identity: Europe in the American Mirror. European Journal of Social Theory 81 (5): 44–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauren, P. (1996) Power and Prejudice: The Politics and Diplomacy of Racial Discrimination. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, G. (2005) Negotiated Revolutions. London: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, G. (2008) For a public international relations. International Political Sociology 2 (1): 17–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, M. (2005) Why Europe Will Run the Twenty-first Century. London: Atlantic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linklater, A. (1998) The Transformation of Political Community. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. (1988) States, War and Capitalism. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. (2003) Incoherent Empire. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manners, I. (2008) The normative ethics of the European Union. International Affairs 84 (1): 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. (2007) On political institutions and social movement dynamics: The case of the UN and the global indigenous movement. International Political Science Review 28 (3): 273–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Münkler, H. (2007) Empires: The Logic of World Domination from Ancient Rome to the United States. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, K. (2009) The Cultural Politics of Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nexon, D. (2009) The Struggle for Power in Early Modern Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nexon, D. and Wright, T. (2007) What's at stake in the American empire debate? American Political Studies Review 101 (3): 253–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osiander, A. (2001) Sovereignty, international relations and the Westphalian myth. International Organization 55 (2): 251–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, R. (2002) International peacebuilding and the ‘Mission Civilisatrice’. Review of International Studies 28 (4): 637–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philpott, D. (2001) Revolutions in Sovereignty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogge, G. (2008) World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reus-Smit, C. (1999) The Moral Purpose of the State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosecrance, R. (1998) The European Union: A new type of international actor. In: J. Zielonka (ed.) Paradoxes of European Foreign Policy. Hague, the Netherlands: Kluwer, pp. 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, J. (1994) The Empire of Civil Society: A Critique of the Realist Theory of International Relations. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, O. (2006) Globalized Islam: The Search for a New Ummah. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J.G. (1983) Continuity and transformation in the world polity: Towards a neorealist synthesis. In: R.O. Keohane (ed.) Neorealism and its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 131–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupp, L. (1997) Worlds of Women – The Making of an International Women's Movement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shilliam, R. (2006) What about Marcus Garvey?: Race and the transformation of sovereignty debate. Review of International Studies 32 (3): 379–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solana, J. (2005) Give Europe More Weight in the World: The Three Reasons for Europe. Rotherdam: Handelsblad, NRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spruyt, H. (1994) The Sovereign State and Its Competitors. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, S. (2009) Civilization and Empire. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teschke, B. (2003) The Myth of 1648. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teschke, B. (2006) Imperial visions from the Berlin Republic. New Left Review 40 (July–August): 128–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1990) Coercion, Capital and European States AD 990–1990. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R.B.J. (1993) Inside/Outside. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterfield, B. (2007) Barroso hails the European ‘Empire’. Daily Telegraph 18 July, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1557143/Barroso-hails-the-European-empire.html, accessed 1 May 2009.

  • Watson, A. (1992) The Evolution of International Society. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, C. (1995) Simulating Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A. and Friedheim, D. (1995) Hierarchy under Anarchy. International Organization 49 (4): 689–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wight, M. (1992) International Theory: The Three Traditions. Leicester, UK: Leicester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilde, L.G. (2007) Europe and the ‘Re-regulation of World Society’: A Critique of Habermas. Capital and Class 93: 47–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, R. (2001) Postcolonialism: An Historical Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of International Relations, London School of Economics, London, WC2A 2AE, UK

    George Lawson

  2. Political Science and IR Programme, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, 6140, New Zealand

    Robbie Shilliam

Authors
  1. George Lawson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robbie Shilliam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Lawson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lawson, G., Shilliam, R. Beyond hypocrisy? Debating the ‘fact’ and ‘value’ of sovereignty in contemporary world politics. Int Polit 46, 657–670 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2009.23

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2009.23

Keywords

Search

Navigation