Skip to main content

The elusive definition of the small state

International Politics volume 46, pages 65–83 (2009)Cite this article

Abstract

The small state has so far escaped a consensus definition because ‘the’ small state has in fact been conceived of very differently. Different studies of ‘the’ small state have characterized it quite distinctly. In fact, there is substantial disagreement even over what type of criteria, quantifiable or qualitative, are most appropriate to characterize the small state. However, I argue that such fundamental disagreement over what makes a state small has actually benefited the area of small states studies by providing it with conceptual flexibility to match different research designs as well as the quite substantial variations among actual small states in the world. In short, in the discipline of international relations as well as in reality, more than one definition of the small state does and should exist.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Aron, R. (1966) Peace and War. A Theory of International Relations. Translated by R. Howard and A.B. Fox. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baehr, P.R. (1975) Review: Small states: A tool for analysis. World Politics 27: 456–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, P.W. (1968) The Ministate Dilemma. Occasional Papers. New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braveboy-Wagner, J.A. (1989) The Caribbean in World Affairs, The Foreign Policies of the English-Speaking States. Foreign Relations of Latin America Series. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles, D.E. et al (1997) A Future for Small States, Overcoming Vulnerability. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christmas-Moller, W. (1983) Some Thoughts on the Scientific Applicability of the Small State Concept: A Research History and a Discussion. In: O. Höll (ed.) Small States in Europe and Dependence. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 35–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, C. and Payne, T. (eds.) (1987) Politics, Security and Development in Small States. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth Secretariat (1985) Vulnerability: Small States in the Global Society. Report of a Commonwealth Consultative Group. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.

  • Dahl, R. (1957) The concept of power. Behavioral Science 2: 201–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Däniken, F.von (1998) Is the Notion of Small State Still Relevant. In: L. Goetschel (ed.) Small States Inside and Outside the European Union: Interests and Policies. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 43–48.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. (2005) Textbook on International Law, 5th edn. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dommen, E. (1985) What Is a Microstate? In: E. Dommen and P. Hein (eds.) States, Microstates and Islands. London: Croom Helm, pp. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • East, M.A. (1975) Size and Foreign Policy Behavior: A Test of Two Models. In: C.W. Kegley Jr. et al. (eds.) International Events and the Comparative Analysis of Foreign Policy. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. and Newnham, J. (1998) The Penguin Dictionary of International Relations. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, A.B. (1959) The Power of Small States. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2004) State – Building. Governance and World Order in the 21st Century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handel, M. (1981) Weak States in the International System. Totowa, NJ: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hänggi, H. (1998) Small State as a Third State: Switzerland and Asia-Europe Interregionalism. In: L. Goetschel (ed.) Small States Inside and Outside the European Union: Interests and Policies. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 79–95.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hein, P. (1985) The Study of Microstates. In: E. Dommen and P. Hein (eds.) States, Microstates and Islands. London: Croom Helm, pp. 16–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrikson, A.K. (2001) A coming ‘Magnesian’ age? Small states, the global system, and the international community. Geopolitics 6: 49–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hey, J.A.K. (2003a) Introducing Small State Foreign Policy. In: J.A.K. Hey (ed.) Small States in World Politics. Explaining Foreign Policy Behavior. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, pp. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hey, J.A.K. (ed.) (2003b) Small States in World Politics. Explaining Foreign Policy Behavior. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R.O. (1969) Lilliputians dilemmas – Small states in international politics. International Organization 23: 291–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisanga, E.J. and Dancie, S.J. (eds.) (2007) Commonwealth Small States, Issues and Prospects. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J.S. (2004) Soft Power. The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olafsson, B.G. (1998) Small States in the Global System. Analysis and Illustrations from the Case of Iceland. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raeymaeker, O.D. (1974) Introduction. In: O. De Raeymaeker, W. Andries, L. Crollen, H. De Fraye and F. Govaerts (eds.) Small Powers in Asignment. Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapaport, J., Muteba, E. and Therattil, J.J. (1971) Small States & Territories, Status and Problems. United Nations Institute for Training and Research Study. New York: Arno Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, R.L. (1968) Alliances and Small Powers. Institute of War and Peace Studies of the School of International Affairs of Columbia University. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sveics, V.V. (1969) Small Nation Survival, Political Defense in Unequal Conflicts. New York: Exposition Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vital, D. (1967) The Inequality of States, A Study of the Small Power in International Relations. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vital, D. (1971) The Survival of Small States. Studies in Small/Great Power Conflict. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volgy, T.J. and Bailin, A. (2003) International Politics & State Strength. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of International Studies, Yonsei University, 134 Sinchon-Dong, Seodaemun-Gu, 120-749, Seoul, Korea

    Matthias Maass

Authors
  1. Matthias Maass
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maass, M. The elusive definition of the small state. Int Polit 46, 65–83 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2008.37

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2008.37

Keywords

  • small state
  • small states studies
  • definition
  • quantifiable criteria
  • qualitative criteria