Abstract
The small state has so far escaped a consensus definition because ‘the’ small state has in fact been conceived of very differently. Different studies of ‘the’ small state have characterized it quite distinctly. In fact, there is substantial disagreement even over what type of criteria, quantifiable or qualitative, are most appropriate to characterize the small state. However, I argue that such fundamental disagreement over what makes a state small has actually benefited the area of small states studies by providing it with conceptual flexibility to match different research designs as well as the quite substantial variations among actual small states in the world. In short, in the discipline of international relations as well as in reality, more than one definition of the small state does and should exist.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aron, R. (1966) Peace and War. A Theory of International Relations. Translated by R. Howard and A.B. Fox. New York: Praeger.
Baehr, P.R. (1975) Review: Small states: A tool for analysis. World Politics 27: 456–466.
Blair, P.W. (1968) The Ministate Dilemma. Occasional Papers. New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Braveboy-Wagner, J.A. (1989) The Caribbean in World Affairs, The Foreign Policies of the English-Speaking States. Foreign Relations of Latin America Series. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Charles, D.E. et al (1997) A Future for Small States, Overcoming Vulnerability. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
Christmas-Moller, W. (1983) Some Thoughts on the Scientific Applicability of the Small State Concept: A Research History and a Discussion. In: O. Höll (ed.) Small States in Europe and Dependence. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 35–53.
Clarke, C. and Payne, T. (eds.) (1987) Politics, Security and Development in Small States. London: Allen & Unwin.
Commonwealth Secretariat (1985) Vulnerability: Small States in the Global Society. Report of a Commonwealth Consultative Group. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
Dahl, R. (1957) The concept of power. Behavioral Science 2: 201–215.
Däniken, F.von (1998) Is the Notion of Small State Still Relevant. In: L. Goetschel (ed.) Small States Inside and Outside the European Union: Interests and Policies. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 43–48.
Dixon, M. (2005) Textbook on International Law, 5th edn. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Dommen, E. (1985) What Is a Microstate? In: E. Dommen and P. Hein (eds.) States, Microstates and Islands. London: Croom Helm, pp. 1–15.
East, M.A. (1975) Size and Foreign Policy Behavior: A Test of Two Models. In: C.W. Kegley Jr. et al. (eds.) International Events and the Comparative Analysis of Foreign Policy. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
Evans, G. and Newnham, J. (1998) The Penguin Dictionary of International Relations. London: Penguin Books.
Fox, A.B. (1959) The Power of Small States. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Fukuyama, F. (2004) State – Building. Governance and World Order in the 21st Century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Handel, M. (1981) Weak States in the International System. Totowa, NJ: Frank Cass.
Hänggi, H. (1998) Small State as a Third State: Switzerland and Asia-Europe Interregionalism. In: L. Goetschel (ed.) Small States Inside and Outside the European Union: Interests and Policies. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 79–95.
Hein, P. (1985) The Study of Microstates. In: E. Dommen and P. Hein (eds.) States, Microstates and Islands. London: Croom Helm, pp. 16–29.
Henrikson, A.K. (2001) A coming ‘Magnesian’ age? Small states, the global system, and the international community. Geopolitics 6: 49–86.
Hey, J.A.K. (2003a) Introducing Small State Foreign Policy. In: J.A.K. Hey (ed.) Small States in World Politics. Explaining Foreign Policy Behavior. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, pp. 1–11.
Hey, J.A.K. (ed.) (2003b) Small States in World Politics. Explaining Foreign Policy Behavior. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Keohane, R.O. (1969) Lilliputians dilemmas – Small states in international politics. International Organization 23: 291–310.
Kisanga, E.J. and Dancie, S.J. (eds.) (2007) Commonwealth Small States, Issues and Prospects. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
Nye, J.S. (2004) Soft Power. The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.
Olafsson, B.G. (1998) Small States in the Global System. Analysis and Illustrations from the Case of Iceland. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
Raeymaeker, O.D. (1974) Introduction. In: O. De Raeymaeker, W. Andries, L. Crollen, H. De Fraye and F. Govaerts (eds.) Small Powers in Asignment. Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press.
Rapaport, J., Muteba, E. and Therattil, J.J. (1971) Small States & Territories, Status and Problems. United Nations Institute for Training and Research Study. New York: Arno Press.
Rothstein, R.L. (1968) Alliances and Small Powers. Institute of War and Peace Studies of the School of International Affairs of Columbia University. New York: Columbia University Press.
Sveics, V.V. (1969) Small Nation Survival, Political Defense in Unequal Conflicts. New York: Exposition Press.
Vital, D. (1967) The Inequality of States, A Study of the Small Power in International Relations. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Vital, D. (1971) The Survival of Small States. Studies in Small/Great Power Conflict. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Volgy, T.J. and Bailin, A. (2003) International Politics & State Strength. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maass, M. The elusive definition of the small state. Int Polit 46, 65–83 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2008.37
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2008.37