Skip to main content

The Costs of Sovereign Default

Abstract

This paper empirically evaluates four types of costs that may result from an international sovereign default: reputational costs, international trade exclusion costs, costs to the domestic economy through the financial system, and political costs to the authorities. It finds that the economic costs are generally significant but short-lived, and sometimes do not operate through conventional channels. The political consequences of a debt crisis, by contrast, seem to be particularly dire for incumbent governments and finance ministers, broadly in line with what happens in currency crises.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Figure 1

Notes

  1. In fact, even in private markets debt contracts are not fully enforceable. Djankov and others (2007) show that creditor protection through the legal system is positively correlated with the development of the private credit market.

  2. Some recent litigation strategies against sovereigns in default appear to focus on becoming enough of a nuisance such that sovereigns would acquiesce to an out-of-court settlement, rather than seeking a direct enforcement of property rights. Those strategies, however, can succeed only if the plaintiffs hold a small fraction of the debt. For a detailed discussion of the law and economics of sovereign debt, see Panizza, Sturzenegger, and Zettelmeyer (forthcoming).

  3. Influential papers that base their results on the assumption that default causes a direct loss of output or trade access—in line with the sanctions view—includes Krugman (1988) and Sachs (1989).

  4. For recent reviews, see De Paoli, Hoggarth, and Saporta (2006); Hatchondo, Martinez, and Sapriza (2007); and Panizza, Sturzenegger, and Zettelmeyer (forthcoming).

  5. This paper does not explore the role of collateral. For a discussion of this issue see Dooley, Garber, and Folkerts-Landau (2007).

  6. This is analogous to the evaluation of the probability of default by a private company. Its default point, in theory, is the point at which existing liabilities equal the total market value of its assets, that is, its equity value is zero. See Merton (1974) and Kealhofer (2003). For an application to the sovereign case, see Gapen and others (2005).

  7. The first four columns of the table use data from Standard and Poor's and include all defaults on sovereign bonds and bank loans. Columns 5 and 6 are from Beim and Calomiris (2000) and also include defaults on suppliers’ credit. Column 7 is from Sturzenegger and Zettelmeyer (2006) and is based on primary data from Beim and Calomiris (2000), and Lindert and Morton (1989). The last column uses data from Detragiache and Spilimbergo (2001). The definitions of default episodes applied by each one of these sources are presented in Table A1.

  8. This is the case, for instance, of Nigeria, Zambia, and Sierra Leone in the 1970s; Egypt and El Salvador in the 1980s; and Sri Lanka, Thailand, Korea, and Tunisia in the 1990s.

  9. This is also the period in which we observe the first default on bank loans (Russia in 1918).

  10. Of these six episodes, two were related to World War II (Hungary in 1941 and Japan in 1942), and other two were largely politically motivated defaults by communist countries (Czechoslovakia in 1959 and Cuba in 1960). The remaining two were Costa Rica (1962) and Zimbabwe (1965).

  11. Our set of controls includes the investment over GDP ratio (INV_GDP), population growth (POP_GR), GDP per capita in the early 1970s (GDP_PC70s), percentage of the population that completed secondary education (SEC_ED), total population (POP), lagged government consumption over GDP (GOV_C1), an index of civil rights (CIV_RIGHT), the change in terms of trade (DTOT), the degree of openness (OPEN), a dummy variable taking a value of one in presence of a banking crisis (BK_CR), and three regional dummies for sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), Latin America and Caribbean (LAC), and transition economies (TRANS). Substituting country fixed for the regional dummies does not change the results.

  12. That is, if a country was in default from 1982 to 1986, END_DEF takes a value of one in 1987.

  13. To predict default we use model similar to that of Manasse, Roubini, and Schimmelpfennig (2003). Full regression results are available upon request.

  14. This is due to the fact that it does not make much sense to estimate the probability of default for industrial countries and, hence, Table 3 only includes developing countries. Furthermore, estimating the probability of default requires variables that are not available for all the countries included in the regressions reported in Table 2.

  15. In order to estimate the probability of the beginning of the default episode, we used the logit described in Table A2 but restricted the dependent variable to take value one only in the first year of a default episode.

  16. One problem with the regressions of Tables 2 and 3 is that they are based on annual information and hence they cannot capture the precise timing of the default. Levy, Yeyati, and Panizza (2005) study the impact of default on growth by looking at quarterly data for emerging economies and find that output contractions precede defaults, and that the trough of the contraction coincides with the quarter of default.

  17. Alternatively one could try to identify the “avoidable” or unjustified defaults directly, but there are few cases that could clearly be labeled as resulting from lack of willingness to pay. Nearly all unilateral sovereign debt repudiation cases have stemmed from communist revolutions or other radical political postures, and the economic downturns probably resulted more from those political changes than from the debt defaults themselves.

  18. An ever more recent literature focuses on reputation vis-à-vis domestic agents (see Panizza, Sturzenegger, and Zettelmeyer, forthcoming, for a survey).

  19. Argentine Finance Minister Alberto Hueyo stated: “To honor existing commitments is always highly honorable, but to do it when everyone is failing to and at times of hardship … is a thousand times more valuable” (quoted in Tomz, 2007).

  20. An under-researched topic concerns the relationship between the size of the haircut and the conditions under which defaulters re-access to capital market (Panizza, Sturzenegger, and Zettelmeyer, forthcoming, and Trebesch, 2009, include discussions of this issue).

  21. It is remarkable that GDP per capita by itself explains 80 percent of the variance of credit rating, a fact not highlighted in the original paper (thanks to Kevin Cowan for pointing this out).

  22. We also estimated the model using average ratings for the 2000–04 period, and the set of explanatory variables averaged over the 1990–2000 period. The results did not change.

  23. Using external debt over GDP yields identical results. Our data for external debt come from the World Bank's GDF. As this data set only includes data for developing countries, we set EXDEXP equal to zero for industrial countries (therefore EXDEXP can be thought of as the following interaction EE*(1−IND) where EE is a latent variable that contains data on external debt for industrial countries). In all our estimations we drop countries that were in default over the entire 1999–2004 period. The results are robust to keeping these countries in the sample.

  24. The results are essentially identical if we add a dummy variable for countries that defaulted between year t–26 and t–50.

  25. In the case of column 5 we obtain the residuals by running a random effect model and in the case of column 6 we obtain the residuals by running a fixed effects model.

  26. See also Martinez and Sandleris (2008).

  27. Kohlscheen and O’Connell (2007) accumulation of international reserves is justified by the fact that, by allowing countries to survive without trade credit, reserves put defaulters in a stronger bargaining position during the renegotiation of defaulted debt.

  28. There exists some evidence on the relationship between currency crisis and trade credit. Love and Zaidi (2004) and World Bank (2004) find that, in the case of East Asia, the 1997 crisis had a negative impact on trade credit, albeit smaller than that on total bank lending.

  29. In order to make sure that our results are not driven by outliers, we dropped all observations for which the dependent variable had a z-score greater than 5.

  30. In particular: (where C is trade credit and T trade, C d and T d measure the effect of default on trade and trade credit). See Love, Preve, and Sarria-Allende (2005) for a similar interpretation.

  31. Note that our data for trade credit only cover suppliers of trade credit based in the OECD countries. If a default were to cause a diversion of trade towards non-OECD countries (a fact consistent with Rose's finding), we would be interpreting a change in trade credit pattern as a reduction in credit.

  32. We use the same set of controls used by Rose (2005) in his fixed effect regressions (log of total GDP, log of GDP per capita, regional trade agreement dummy, colony dummy, and currency union dummy) but also augment the regressions with a variable measuring default interacted with average trade between country i and country j.

  33. Running these regressions using imports as the trade measure yields less significant results (not shown here).

  34. We code a country-year as a banking crisis if one of the following conditions apply: either Glick and Hutchinson (1999) define the episode as a major banking crisis, or Caprio and Klingebiel (2003) define the episode as a systemic crisis, or the country year is included in the list in Dell’Ariccia, Detragiache, and Rajan (2005).

  35. Note that the definition of external-finance-dependent industries is based on data for advanced economies.

  36. We use the same sample restriction used in Dell’Ariccia, Detragiache, and Rajan (2005). In particular, we focus on the 1980–2000 period and restrict the sample to all the countries that observed at least a banking crisis or a default over this period. We drop from the sample the top and bottom 5 percent of observations. The last column of Table 10 uses a specification that is identical to the one used by Dell’Ariccia, Detragiache, and Rajan (2005) and obtains results which are similar (although not identical) to those obtained by those authors.

  37. This might happen for at least two reasons. Firstly, in the attempt to avoid default, banks might be forced to increase their holdings of government bonds, which later collapse in value, and secondly, the climate of uncertainty and the weakening of the banks’ financial position may trigger a deposit run.

  38. This framework is inspired in Sturzenegger and Zettelmeyer (2006, Chapter 11).

  39. The impact of the crisis is even higher when the window is restricted to six months. In this case the probability of a change in the executive goes from 12 to 23 percent, an increase of nearly 100 percent.

  40. The table does not include dictatorships or countries that were transitioning towards democracy at the time of default.

  41. This is why we did not attempt to estimate a formal econometric model but just showed that the well-known result that sharp devaluations may be politically costly also applies to episodes of sovereign default.

References

  • Ades, Alberto, Federico Kaune, Paulo Leme, Rumi Masih, and Daniel Tenengauzer, 2000, “Introducing GS-ESS: A New Framework for Assessing Fair Value in Emerging Markets Hard-Currency Debt,” Global Economics Paper No. 45 (New York, Goldman Sachs).

  • Aguiar, Mark, and Gita Gopinath, 2006, “Defaultable Debt, Interest Rates and the Current Account,” Journal of International Economics, Vol. 69, No. 1, pp. 64–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alichi, Ali, 2008, “A Model of Sovereign Debt in Democracies,” IMF Working Paper 08/152 (Washington, International Monetary Fund).

  • Alvarez, Michael, José Cheibub, Fernando Limongi, and Adam Przeworski, 1999, “ACLP Political and Economic Database,” Available via the Internet: www.ssc.upenNumberedu/~cheibub/data/ACLP_Codebook.PDF.

  • Arellano, Cristina, 2008, “Default Risk and Income Fluctuations in Emerging Economies,” American Economic Review, Vol. 98, No. 3, pp. 690–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano, Cristina, and Jonathan Heathcote, 2008, “Dollarization and Financial Integration,” (unpublished; Minneapolis, University of Minnesota).

  • Arellano, Manuel, and Stephen Bond, 1991, “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 58, pp. 277–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arteta, Carlos, and Galina Hale, 2008, “Sovereign Debt Crises and Credit to the Private Sector,” Journal of International Economics, Vol. 74, No. 1, pp. 53–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beim, David O., and Charles W. Calomiris, 2000, Emerging Financial Markets (New York, McGraw-Hill/Irwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blustein, Paul, 2005, And the Money Kept Rolling In (and Out): The World Bank, Wall Street, the IMF, and the Bankrupting of Argentina (New York, Public Affairs).

    Google Scholar 

  • Borensztein, Eduardo, and Ugo Panizza, 2006, “Do Sovereign Defaults Hurt Exporters?” IDB Working Paper No. 553 (Washington, Inter-American Development Bank).

  • Bulow, Jeremy, and Kenneth Rogoff, 1989a, “Sovereign Debt: Is to Forgive to Forget?” American Economic Review, Vol. 79, No. (1 March), pp. 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulow, Jeremy, and Kenneth Rogoff, 1989b, “A Constant Recontracting Model of Sovereign Debt,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 97, No. 1, pp. 155–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvo, Guillermo, Leonardo Leiderman, and Carmen M. Reinhart, 1993, “Capital Inflows to Latin America: The Role of External Factors,” IMF Staff Papers, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 108–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, Richard, and Frank Packer, 1996, “Determinants and Impact of Sovereign Credit Ratings,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Economic Policy Review, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 37–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprio, Gerard, and Daniela Klingebiel, 2003, “Episodes of Systemic and Borderline Financial Crises” (unpublished; Washington, World Bank).

  • Chuan, Punam, and Federico Sturzenegger, 2005, “Defaults Episodes in the 1980s and 1990s: What Have We Learned?” in Managing Economic Volatility and Crises, ed. by Joshua Aizenman and Brian Pinto (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhry, Bhagwan, 1991, “What Is Different about International Lending?” Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 4, No. 1 (Spring), pp. 121–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Richard N., 1971, “Currency Devaluation in Developing Countries,” Essays in International Finance No. 86 (Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University).

  • Dell’Ariccia, Giovanni, Isabel Schnabel, and Jeromin Zettelmeyer, 2002, “Moral Hazard and International Crisis Lending: A Test,” IMF Working Paper 02/181 (Washington, International Monetary Fund).

  • Dell’Ariccia, Giovanni, Enrica Detragiache, and Raghuram Rajan, 2005, “The Real Effect of Banking Crises,” IMF Working Paper 05/63 (Washington, International Monetary Fund).

  • De Paoli, Bianca, Glenn Hoggarth, and Victoria Saporta, 2006, “Costs of Sovereign Default,” Financial Stability Paper No. 1 (Bank of England).

  • Detragiache, Enrica, and Antonio Spilimbergo, 2001, “Crises and Liquidity: Evidence and Interpretation,” IMF Working Paper 01/2 (Washington, International Monetary Fund).

  • Díaz-Alejandro, Carlos F., 1983, “Stories of the 1930s for the 1980s,” in Financial Policies and the World Capital Market: The Problem of Latin American Countries, ed. by Pedro Aspe Armella, Rudiger Dornbusch, and Maurice Obstfeld (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Djankov, Simeon, Caralee McLiesh, and Andrei Shleifer, 2007, “Private Credit in 129 Countries,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 84, No. 2, pp. 299–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dooley, Michael, 2000, “International Financial Architecture and Strategic Default: Can Financial Crises be Less Painful?” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Vol. 53, Issue. 1, pp. 361–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dooley, Michael, Peter Garber, and David Folkerts-Landau, 2007, “The Two Crises of International Economics,” NBER Working Paper No. 13197 (Cambridge, Massachusetts, National Bureau of Economic Research).

  • Eaton, Jonathan, and Mark Gersovitz, 1981, “Debt with Potential Repudiation: Theoretical and Empirical Analysis,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 48, No. 2 (April), pp. 289–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichengreen, Barry, and Richard Portes, 1995, Crisis? What Crisis? Orderly Workouts for Sovereign Debtors (London, Centre for Economic Policy Research).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichengreen, Barry, Ricardo Hausmann, and Ugo Panizza, 2005, “The Mystery of Original Sin,” in Other People's Money: Debt Denomination and Financial Instability in Emerging Market Economies, ed. by Barry Eichengreen and Ricardo Hausmann (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • English, William B, 1996, “Understanding the Costs of Sovereign Default: American State Debts in the 1840s,” American Economic Review, Vol. 86, No. 1 (March), pp. 259–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flandreau, Marc, and Frederic Zumer, 2004, “The Making of Global Finance 1880–1913,” OECD Development Center Research Monograph (Paris, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development).

  • Frankel, Jeffrey A, 2005, “Contractionary Currency Crashes in Developing Countries,” IMF Staff Papers, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 149–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gapen, Michael, Dale Gray, Cheng Hoom Lim, and Yingbin Xiao, 2005, “Measuring and Analyzing Sovereign Risk with Contingent Claims,” IMF Working Paper 05/155 (Washington, International Monetary Fund).

  • Gelos, R. Gaston, Ratna Sahay, and Guido Sandleris, 2004, “Sovereign Borrowing by Developing Countries: What Determines Market Access?” IMF Working Paper 04/221 (Washington, International Monetary Fund).

  • Glick, Rueven, and M. Hutchinson, 2001, “Banking Crises and Currency Crises: How Common Are the Twins,” in Financial Crises in Emerging Markets, ed. by R. Glick, R. Moreno, and M. Spiegel (New York, Cambridge University Press).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, Herschel I., and John B. Van Huyck, 1988, “Sovereign Debt as a Contingent Claim: Excusable Default, Repudiation, and Reputation,” American Economic Review, Vol. 78, No. 5, pp. 1088–1097.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchondo, Juan Carlos, Leonardo Martinez, and Horacio Sapriza, 2007, “The Economics of Sovereign Defaults,” Economic Quarterly, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, Vol. 93, No. 2, pp. 163–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaminsky, Graciela, and Carmen M. Reinhart, 1999, “The Twin Crises: The Causes of Banking and Balance-of-Payments Problems,” American Economic Review, Vol. 89, No. 3, pp. 473–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kealhofer, Stephen, 2003, “Quantifying Credit Risk I: Default Prediction,” Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 59, No. 1, pp. 30–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kletzer, Kenneth M., and Brian D. Wright, 2000, “Sovereign Debt as Intertemporal Barter,” American Economic Review, Vol. 90, No. 3, pp. 621–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlscheen, Emanuel, and Stephen A. O’Connell, 2007, “A Sovereign Debt Model with Trade Credit and Reserves” (unpublished; University of Warwick).

  • Kraay, Aart, and Vikram Nehru, 2006, “When is External Debt Sustainable?” World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 341–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, Paul, 1988, “Financing vs. Forgiving a Debt Overhang,” Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 253–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy Yeyati, Eduardo, forthcoming, “Optimal Debt: On the Insurance Value of International Debt Flows to Developing Economies,” Open Economies Review.

  • Levy Yeyati, Eduardo, and Ugo Panizza, 2005, The Elusive Costs of Sovereign Defaults IDB Research Department Working Paper #581 (Washington, Inter-American Development Bank).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindert, Peter, and Peter Morton, 1989, “How Sovereign Debt Has Worked,” in Developing Country Debt and the World Economy, ed. by Jeffrey Sachs (Chicago and London, The University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, Inessa, and Rida Zaidi, 2004, “Trade Credit and Financing Constraints: Evidence from the East Asian Crisis” (unpublished; Washington, World Bank).

  • Love, Inessa, Lorenzo Preve, and Virginia Sarria-Allende, 2005, “Trade Credit and Bank Credit: Evidence from Recent Financial Crises,” World Bank Policy Research Technical Report 3716.

  • Manasse, Paolo, Nouriel Roubini, and Axel Schimmelpfennig, 2003, “Predicting Sovereign Debt Crises,” IMF Working Paper 03/221 (Washington, International Monetary Fund).

  • Martinez, Jose Vicente, and Guido Sandleris, 2008, “Is it Punishment? Sovereign Defaults and the Decline in Trade,” Universidad Torcuato Di Tella Working Paper No. 1/2008 (Buenos Aires).

  • McGillivray, Fiona, and Alastair Smith, 2000, “Trust and Cooperation Through Agent-Specific Punishments,” International Organization, Vol. 54, No. 4, pp. 584–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGillivray, Fiona, and Alastair Smith, 2004, “The Impact of Leadership Turnover on Trading Relations Between States,” International Organization, Vol. 58, No. 3, pp. 567–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGillivray, Fiona, and Alastair Smith, 2005, “The Impact of Leadership Turnover and Domestic Institutions on International Cooperation in a Noisy World,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 49, No. 5, pp. 639–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGillivray, Fiona, and Alastair Smith, 2006, “Credibility in Compliance and Punishment: Leader Specific Punishments and Credibility,” Journal of Politics, Vol. 68, No. 2, pp. 248–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, Enrique G., and Vivian Z. Yue, 2008, “A Solution to the Default Risk-Business Cycle Disconnect,” NBER Working Paper No. 13861 (Cambridge, Massachusetts, National Bureau of Economic Research).

  • Merton, Robert C, 1974, “On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 449–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchener, Kris James, and Marc D. Weidenmier, 2005, “Supersanctions and Sovereign Debt Repayment,” NBER Working Paper No. 11472. (Cambridge, Massachusetts, National Bureau of Economic Research).

  • Ozler, Sule, 1993, “Have Commercial Banks Ignored History? American Economic Review, Vol. 83, No. 3, pp. 608–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panizza, Ugo, Federico Sturzenegger, and Jeromin Zettelmeyer, forthcoming, “The Economics and Law of Sovereign Debt and Sovereign Default,” Journal of Economic Literature.

  • Pescatori, Andrea, and Amadou N.R. Sy, 2007, “Are Debt Crises Adequately Defined? IMF Staff Papers, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 306–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, Raghuram G., and Luigi Zingales, 1998, “Financial Dependence and Growth,” American Economic Review, Vol. 88, No. 3, pp. 559–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, Carmen, and Kenneth Rogoff, 2008, “The Forgotten History of Domestic Debt,” NBER Working Paper No. 13946. (Cambridge, Massachusetts, National Bureau of Economic Research).

  • Reinhart, Carmen, Kenneth Rogoff, and Miguel A. Savastano, 2003, “Debt Intolerance,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: 1 (Washington, The Brookings Institution).

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, Christine, and Daniel A. Dias, 2008, “Duration of Capital Market Exclusion: Stylized Facts and Determining Factors” (unpublished; UCLA).

  • Rochet, Jean Charles, 2006, “Optimal Sovereign Debt: An Analytical Approach,” IDB Research Department Working Paper No. 573 (Washington, Inter-American Development Bank).

  • Rose, Andrew K, 2005, “One Reason Countries Pay Their Debts: Renegotiation and International Trade,” Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 77, No. 1, pp. 189–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Andrew K., and Mark M. Spiegel, 2007, “Non-Economic Engagement and International Exchange: The Case of Environmental Treaties” (unpublished; University of California Berkeley).

  • Sachs, Jeffrey, 1989, “The Debt Overhang of Developing Countries,” in Debt, Growth and Stabilization: Essays in Memory of Carlos Diaz Alejandro, ed. by Jorge de Macedo and Ronald Findlay (Oxford, Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturzenegger, Federico, and Jeromin Zettelmeyer, 2006, Debt Defaults and Lessons from a Decade of Crises (Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutter, Matthias, 2003, “The Political Economy of Fiscal Policy: An Experimental Study on the Strategic Use of Deficits,” Public Choice, Vol. 116, No. 3–4 (September), pp. 313–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomz, Michael, 2002, “Democratic Default: Domestic Audiences and Compliance with International Agreements” (unpublished; Stanford University).

  • Tomz, Michael, 2007, Reputation and International Cooperation: Sovereign Debt Across Three Centuries (Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomz, Michael, and Mark Wright, 2007, “Do Countries Default in Bad Times?” Journal of the European Economic Association, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 352–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trebesch, Cristoph, 2009, “The Cost of Aggressive Sovereign Debt Policies: How Much is the Private Sector Affected?” IMF Working Paper 29/09 (Washington, International Monetary Fund).

  • World Bank, 2004, “Financing Developing Countries’ Trade,” Chapter 5 in Global Development Finance 2004: Harnessing Cyclical Gains for Development (Washington, World Bank).

  • Wright, Mark, 2003, “Reputations and Sovereign Debt,” (unpublished; Stanford University).

Download references

Authors

Additional information

*Eduardo Borensztein is Regional Economic Advisor for the Southern Cone at the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB). Ugo Panizza is Chief of the Debt and Finance Analysis Unit Division on Globalization and Development Strategies, UN Conference on Trade and Development. Research on this paper was initiated when both authors were with the IDB Research Department. The authors would like to thank two anonymous referees, Bob Flood, Guillermo Calvo, Jeff Frieden, Eduardo Levy Yeyati, Guido Sandleris, and the participants of seminars at the IDB and the International Economic Association for useful suggestions and comments, and Patricio Valenzuela and Monica Yañez for excellent research assistance.

Appendices

Appendix I

Table A1

Table a1 Private Lending to Sovereign: Default and Rescheduling

Appendix II

Table A2

Table a2 Logit model for the probability of default

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Borensztein, E., Panizza, U. The Costs of Sovereign Default. IMF Econ Rev 56, 683–741 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/imfsp.2009.21

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/imfsp.2009.21

JEL Classifications

  • F34
  • F36
  • H63
  • G15