Abstract
Scholars utilize a variety of research methods in studies of interest group formation, presence and influence. From aggregate counts of interest group populations to in-depth participant observation, scholars have used a variety of methods in studies of interest groups' role(s) in the policy process. The application of survey research has proven to be a successful method for obtaining group-specific information across a variety of group types and settings. Though organizational sampling and methods of survey dissemination can differ dramatically across studies, the subfield lacks a comprehensive review of the use of surveys within interest group research. This paucity leaves unanswered several questions regarding the frequency and efficacy of survey research within the subfield. What types of questions have been answered via surveys of organizations? What benefits are provided by this methodological approach? What challenges emerge when surveying interest groups and how have scholars overcome these obstacles? These questions are pertinent to scholars of interest groups and survey researchers alike, and this review provides guidance for the construction and dissemination of future interest group surveys.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Information about the approach used to identify studies for inclusion in this review, as well as information about the studies’ research questions and samples, can be found in an online appendix hosted on the Interest Groups & Advocacy website (www.palgrave-journals.com/iga).
For more information about the benefits of mixed methodological surveys, see Leeuw, E.D. (2005).
Detailed information about the INTEREURO project appears in a special issue of Interest Groups & Advocacy: Beyers et al. (2014b)
References
Baumgartner, F., Berry, J., Hojnacki, M., Kimball, D. and Leech, B. (2009) Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Berry, J. (1977) Lobbying for the People. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Berry, J. and Arons, D. (2003) A Voice for Nonprofits. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Beyers, J. (2004) Voice and access. The political practices of European interest associations. European Union Politics 5 (2): 211–240.
Beyers, J., Dür, A., Marshall, D. and Wonka, A. (2014a) Policy-centred sampling in interest group research: Lessons from the INTEREURO project. Interest Groups & Advocacy 3 (2): 160–173.
Beyers, J. et al (2014b) The INTEREURO project: Logic and structure. Interest Groups & Advocacy 3 (2): 126–140.
Binderkrantz, A. (2005) Interest group strategies: Navigating between privileged access and strategies of pressure. Political Studies 53 (4): 694–715.
Binderkrantz, A. (2009) Membership recruitment and internal democracy in interest groups: Do group–membership relations vary between group types? West European Politics 32 (3): 657–678.
Braun, C. (2012a) The captive or the broker? Explaining public agency–interest group interactions. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 25 (2): 291–314.
Braun, C. (2012b) The driving forces of stability: Exploring the nature of long-term bureaucracy–interest group interactions. Administration & Society 45 (7): 809–836.
Browne, W. (1990) Organized interests and their issue niches: A search for pluralism in a policy domain. The Journal of Politics 52 (2): 477–509.
Chalmers, A.W. (2011) Interests, influence and information: Comparing the influence of interest groups in the European Union. European Integration 33 (4): 471–486.
Chalmers, A.W. (2013) With a lot of help from their friends: Explaining the social logic of informational lobbying in the European Union. European Union Politics 14 (4): 475–496.
Cigler, A.J. (1985) From protest group to interest group: The making of the American Agriculture Movement Inc. In: J. Allan Cigler and B.A. Loomis (eds.) Interest Group Politics, 2nd edn. Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Constantelos, J. (2010) Playing the field: Federalism and the politics of venue shopping in the United States and Canada. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 40 (3): 460–483.
Constantelos, J. (2011) The Europeanization of interest group politics in Italy: business associations in Rome and the regions. Journal of European Public Policy 11 (6): 1020–1040.
Cox, T. and Vass, L. (2000) Government-interest group relations in Hungarian politics since 1989. Europe-Asia Studies 52 (6): 1095–1114.
Dalton, R., Recchia, S. and Rohrschneider, R. (2003) The environmental movement and the modes of political action. Comparative Political Studies 36 (7): 743–771.
Dür, A. and Mateo, G. (2012) Who lobbies the European Union? National interest groups in a multilevel polity. Journal of European Public Policy 19 (7): 969–987.
Dür, A. and Mateo, G. (2013) Gaining access or going public? Interest group strategies in five European countries. European Journal of Political Research 52 (5): 660–686.
Eising, R. (2004) Multilevel governance and business interests in the European Union. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 17 (2): 211–245.
Eising, R. (2007) Institutional context, organizational resources and strategic choices: Explaining interest group access in the European Union. European Union Politics 8 (3): 329–62.
Fried, A. (2007) US environmental interest groups and the promotion of environmental values: The resounding success and failure of earth day. Environmental Politics 7 (4): 1–22.
Furlong, S. and Kerwin, C. (2004) Interest group participation in rule making: A decade of change. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15 (3): 353–370.
Goldsmith, A. (2002) Business associations and better governance in Africa. Public Administration and Development 22 (1): 39–49.
Gray, V. and Lowery, D. (1996) A niche theory of interest representation. Journal of Politics 58 (1): 91–111.
Grossman, M. (2012) The Not-So-Special Interests. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Hall, R. and Miler, K. (2008) What happens after the alarm? Interest group subsidies to legislative overseers. Journal of Politics 70 (4): 990–1005.
Halpin, D. and Binderkrantz, A. (2011) Explaining breadth of policy engagement: Patterns of interest group mobilization in public policy. Journal of European Public Policy 18 (2): 201–219.
Hansen, J. (1985) The political economy of group membership. American Political Science Review 79 (1): 79–96.
Heaney, M. (2006) Brokering health policy: Coalitions, parties, and interest group influence. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 31 (5): 887–944.
Hoefer, R. (1996) Swedish corporatism in social welfare policy, 1986–1994: An empirical examination. Scandinavian Political Studies 19 (1): 67–80.
Hogan, R. (2005) State campaign finance laws and interest group electioneering activities. Journal of Politics 67 (3): 887–906.
Hojnacki, M. (1997) Interest groups’ decisions to join alliances or work alone. American Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 61–87.
Hojnacki, M. (1998) Organized interests’ advocacy behavior in alliances. Political Research Quarterly 51 (2): 437–459.
Hojnacki, M. and Kimball, D. (1998) Organized interests and the decision of whom to lobby in congress. The American Political Science Review 92 (4): 775–790.
Hojnacki, M. and Kimball, D. (1999) The who and how of organizations’ lobbying strategies in committee. Journal of Politics 61 (4): 999–1024.
Hojnacki, M. and Kimball, D. (2001) PAC contributions and lobbying contacts in congressional committees. Political Research Quarterly 51 (1): 161–180.
Hojnacki, M., Kimball, D., Baumgartner, F., Berry, J. and Leech, B. (2012) Studying organizational advocacy and influence: Reexamining interest group research. Annual Review of Political Science 15 (3): 79–99.
Holyoke, T. (2009) Interest group competition and coalition formation. American Journal of Political Science 52 (2): 360–375.
Holyoke, T., Henig, J., Brown, H. and Lacireno-Paquet, N. (2007) Institution advocacy and the political behavior of charter schools. Political Research Quarterly 60 (2): 202–214.
Imig, D. (1992) Resource mobilization and survival tactics of poverty groups. Western Political Quarterly 45 (2): 501–20.
Imig, D. and Meyer, D. (1993) Political opportunity and peace and justice advocacy in the 1980s: A tale of two sectors. Social Science Quarterly 74 (4): 750–70.
King, D. and Walker, J. (1992) The provision of benefits by interest groups in the United States. Journal of Politics 54 (2): 394–426.
Klüver, H. (2010) Europeanization of lobbying activities: When national interest groups spill over to the European level. Journal of European Integration 32 (2): 175–191.
Klüver, H. (2012a) Biasing politics? Interest group participation in EU policy-making. West European Politics 35 (5): 1114–1133.
Klüver, H. (2012b) Informational lobbying in the European Union: The effect of organisational characteristics. West European Politics 35 (3): 491–510.
Leeuw, E.D. (2005) To mix or not to mix data collection modes in surveys. Journal of Official Statistics 21 (2): 233–255.
Leighley, J. (1996) Group membership and the mobilization of political participation. Journal of Politics 58 (2): 447–463.
Lowery, D. (2014) Introduction to the special issue of IG&A on methodological issues of large-N research on interest representation. Interest Groups & Advocacy 3 (1): 123–125.
The LSE GV314 Group (2012) Groups and the limited pluralism of the set-piece consultation. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 14 (1): 175–186.
Marchetti, K. (2014) Crossing the intersection: The representation of disadvantaged identities in advocacy. Politics, Groups and Identities 2 (1): 104–119.
McFarland, A. (1984) Common Cause. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
McKay, A. (2012) Buying policy? The effects of lobbyists’ resources on their policy success. Political Research Quarterly 65 (4): 908–923.
Mitchell, N. (1990) The decentralization of business in Britain. Journal of Politics 52 (2): 622–637.
Montpetit, E. (2011) Between detachment and responsiveness: Civil servants in Europe and North America. West European Politics 34 (6): 1250–1271.
Nownes, A.J. and Freeman, P. (1998) Interest group activity in the States. Journal of Politics 60 (1): 86–112.
Nownes, A.J. and Neeley, G. (1996) Public interest group entrepreneurship and theories of group mobilization. Political Research Quarterly 49 (1): 119–146.
Pleines, H. (2011) Weakness as precondition of smooth integration? Representation strategies of functional interest groups from new member states at the EU level. Journal of European Integration 33 (4): 507–521.
Pross, A.P. (2013) Barriers to third-party advertising in Canadian elections. Canadian Public Administration 56 (3): 491–505.
Rasmussen, A. (2012) Interest group-party interaction in EU politics. Party Politics 18 (1): 81–98.
Reenock, C. and Gerber, B. (2007) Political insulation, information exchange, and interest group access to the bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (3): 415–440.
Rothenberg, L. (1992) Linking Citizens to Government: Group Politics at Common Cause. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sabatier, P. and McLaughlin, S. (1990) Belief congruence between interest group leaders and members: An empirical analysis of three theories and a suggested synthesis. Journal of Politics 52 (3): 914–935.
Salisbury, R.H., Heinz, J.P., Laumann, E.O and Nelson, R. (1987) Who works with whom? Interest group alliances and opposition. American Political Science Review 81 (4): 1217–1234.
Schlozman, K. and Tierney, J. (1986) Organized Interests and American Democracy. New York: Harper & Row Publishing.
Solberg, R. and Waltenberg, E. (2006) Why do interest groups engage the judiciary? Policy wishes and structural needs. Social Science Quarterly 87 (3): 558–572.
Strolovitch, D. (2007) Affirmative Advocacy. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Tsujinaka, Y. and Pekkanen, R. (2007) Civil society and interest groups in contemporary Japan. Pacific Affairs 80 (3): 419–437.
Walker, J. (1983) Origins and maintenance of interest groups in America. The American Political Science Review 77 (2): 390–406.
Walker, J. (1991) Mobilizing Interest Groups in America. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Whitmarsh, D. and Palmieri, M.G. (2008) Social acceptability of marine aquaculture: The use of survey-based methods for eliciting public and stakeholder preferences. Marine Policy 33 (3): 452–45.
Wright, J. (1990) Contributions, lobbying and committee voting in the U.S. house of representatives. American Political Science Review 84 (2): 417–38.
Zeigler, H. and Baer, M. (1969) Lobbying: Interaction and Influence in State Legislatures. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
Further Reading
Berry and Arons (2003); Binderkrantz (2008); Browne (1990); Cigler (1985); Grossman (2012); Hansen (1985); Hojnacki and Kimball (1999); Hojnacki and Kimball (2001); Hojnacki et al. (2012); Imig (1992); Imig and Meyer (1993); McFarland (1984); Rothenberg (1992); Salisbury et al. (1987); Schlozman and Tierney (1986); Whitmarsh and Palmieri (2008); Zeigler and Baer (1969)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supplementary information accompanies this article on the Interest Groups & Advocacy website (www.palgrave-journals.com/iga)
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marchetti, K. The use of surveys in interest group research. Int Groups Adv 4, 272–282 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/iga.2015.1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/iga.2015.1