The INTEREURO Project: Logic and structure

Abstract

This article outlines both the overall structure of the INTEREURO Project (Comparative Research on Interest Group Politics in Europe) and the theoretical foci, research activities and data sets generated by its several modules. We provide this description for two purposes. First, it provides a necessary backdrop for understanding the remaining essays in this special issue. Importantly, we do not believe that the methodological challenges we faced are unique to the INTEREURO Project. Rather, they characterize any large-N research project on interest representation. Thus, we hope that these articles based on the INTEREURO Project are useful to a broad range of scholars. Our second purpose is to describe for the wider community of interest organization scholars the INTEREURO Project and the data generated thereby.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Research by several of the core members of the project (teams from Austria, Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands, Slovenia and Sweden) was supported by their national science foundations under a European Science Foundation grant (10-ECRP-008). National, regional or university funding supports the research of three other teams – from the United States, the United Kingdom and Spain. The identification of the team leaders and their sources of research support are noted below in the discussion of the individual research modules.

  2. 2.

    Note that this number is slightly different from the strategies module.

References

  1. Baumgartner, F.R., Berry, J.M., Hojnacki, M., Kimball, D.C. and Leech, B.L. (2009) Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berkhout, J. and Lowery, D. (2008) Counting organized interests in the E.U.: A comparison of data sources. Journal of European Public Policy 15 (4): 489–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernhagen, P. (2007) The Political Power of Business: Structure and Information in Public Policymaking. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bernhagen, P., Dür, A. and Marshall, D. (2014) Measuring interest group success spatially. Interest Groups & Advocacy: 202–218.

  5. Beyers, J. (2004) Voice and access. The political practices of european interest associations. European Union Politics 5 (2): 211–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Beyers, J. (2008) Policy issues, organisational format and the political strategies of interest organizations. West European Politics 31 (6): 1188–1211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Beyers, J., Dür, A., Marshall, D. and Wonka, A. (2014) Policy-centred sampling in interest group research: Lessons from the INTEREURO Project. Interest Groups & Advocacy 3 (2): 160–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Binderkrantz, A. (2005) Interest group strategies: Navigating between privileged access and strategies of pressure. Political Studies 53 (4): 694–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Campbell, J.L. (1998) Institutional analysis and the role of ideas in political economy. Theory and Society 27 (1): 377–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Druckman, J.N. (2001) On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame? Journal of Politics 63 (4): 1041–1066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dür, A. (2008) Interest groups in the European Union: How powerful are they? West European Politics 31 (6): 1212–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dür, A., Bernhagen, P. and Marshall, D. (2014) Interest Group Success in the European Union: When (and Why) Does Business Lose? Unpublished paper.

  13. Entman, R.M. (1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication. 43 (4): 51–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gray, V. and Lowery, D. (1996) The Population Ecology of Interest Representation: Lobbying Communities in the American States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jordan, G. and Maloney, W.A. (1997) The Protest Business: Mobilizing Campaign Groups. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jordan, G. and Maloney, W.A. (2007) Democracy and Interest Groups: Enhancing Participation? Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kohler-Koch, B. (2012) Post-Maastricht civil society and participatory democracy. Journal of European Integration 34 (7): 809–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kohler-Koch, B. and Buth, V. (2009) Civil Society in EU Governance – Lobby Groups like any Other? (TranState Working Papers, 108) Bremen, Germany: Sfb 597 ‘Staatlichkeit im Wandel’.

  19. Kohler-Koch, B., Quittkat, C. and Buth, V. (2009) Civil society organizations under the impact of the European commission’s consultation regime. Paper presented at the Connex Final Conference; 7–8 March, Mannheim, Germany.

  20. Kriesi, H., Tresch, A. and Jochum, M. (2007) Going public in the European Union. Action repertoires of western European collective political actors. Comparative Political Studies 40 (1): 48–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lowery, D. and Gray, V. (2004) A neopluralist perspective on research on organized interests. Political Research Quarterly 57 (1): 163–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lowi, T. (1964) American business, public policy, case studies and political theory. World Politics 16 (4): 677–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Michels, R. (1959 [1911]) Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mahoney, C. (2008) Brussels versus the beltway: Advocacy in the United States and the European Union. Washington DC, Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schmitter, P.C. and Streeck, W. (1999) The organization of business interests. Studying the associative action of business in advanced industrial democracies. Köln, Germany: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.

  26. Smith, M.A. (2000) American business and political power. Public Opinion, Elections and Democracy. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wilts, A. and Quittkat, C. (2004) Corporate interests and public affairs: Organised business-government relations in EU member states. Journal of Public Affairs 4 (2): 213–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to acknowledge the financial support of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research 461-10-519 and Research Fund-Flenders G.A. 171-11N.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Lowery.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beyers, J., Bonafont, L., Dür, A. et al. The INTEREURO Project: Logic and structure. Int Groups Adv 3, 126–140 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/iga.2014.8

Download citation

Keywords

  • interest groups
  • INTEREURO
  • European Union
  • methodology