It’s not all about the money: Explaining varying policy portfolios of regional representations in Brussels

Abstract

The literature on territorial lobbying in the European Union (EU) has paid much attention to the interaction between regional representations in Brussels and the member-state central governments, and the relations of these representations with the European institutions. Surprisingly, far less systematic research has been conducted on the policies that regional representations prioritize when they lobby in Brussels. In this article, we focus on the policy portfolios of these organizations and analyze variation concerning the domains and issues these regional representations prioritize. Empirically, we demonstrate that the size and the nature of a policy portfolio is not primarily affected by the capabilities of a regional representation, but rather results from structural ties of regional lobbyists with other public and private interests. This claim is corroborated by data collected through a telephone survey with 127 officials from regional offices and trans-regional associations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that we deliberately do not speak about an organizational policy agenda, as we seek to differentiate attention at the organizational level (portfolio) from the more aggregate policy agenda that is situated at the level of specific institutional venues (for instance the governmental agenda) or political systems (such as the EU political agenda).

  2. 2.

    Sometimes legislative proposals might be difficult to classify as regulatory or distributive. In these cases we coded them as mixed and analyzed them separately. Not a single variable turned out to be significant, which is in line with our other findings.

  3. 3.

    Owing to the fact that we promised anonymity to our respondents, we are not able to present very concrete cases including names of offices and/or the companies.

References

  1. Baumgartner, F.R. and Leech, B.L. (2001) Interest niches and policy bandwagons: Patterns of interest group involvement in national politics. Journal of Politics 63 (4): 1191–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Berkhout, J. and Lowery, D. (2007) Counting organized interests in the EU: A comparison of data sources. Journal of European Public Policy 15 (3): 489–513.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Borras, S. (1993) The ‘four motors for Europe’ and its promotion of R&D linkages. Regional and Federal Studies 3 (3): 163–176.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Börzel, T.A. (2010) Why you don’t always get what you want: EU enlargement and civil society in central and Eastern Europe. Acta Politica 45 (1–2): 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Braun, C. (2012) The captive or the broker? Explaining public agency-interest group interactions. Governance 25 (2): 291–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Broscheid, A. and Coen, D. (2007) Lobbying activity and fora creation in the EU: Empirically exploring the nature of the policy good. Journal of European Public Policy 14 (3): 346–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Browne, W.P. (1990) Organized interests and their issue niches: A search for pluralism in a policy domain. The Journal of Politics 52 (2): 477–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cammisa, A.M. (1995) Governments as Interest Groups. Londen: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Coen, D. and Richardson, J. (2009) Lobbying in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Criekemans, D. (2010) Regional sub-state diplomacy from a comparative perspective: Quebec, Scotland, Bavaria, Catalonia, Wallonia and Flanders. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 5 (1): 37–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Donas, T. and Beyers, J. (2013a) How regions assemble in Brussels: The organizational form of territorial representation in the European Union. Publius 43 (4): 527–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Donas, T. and Beyers, J. (2013b) Trans-regional networks in Brussels. Analyzing the information exchanges among regional offices. Paper Presented at the CES 20th International Conference of Europeanists. Amsterdam, 25–27 June.

  13. Fraussen, B. (2013) The visible hand of the state. On the organizational development of interest groups. Public Administration, doi:10.1111/padm.12056.

  14. Gray, V. and Lowery, D. (1996) A niche theory of interest representation. The Journal of Politics 58 (1): 91–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Green-Cowles, M. (2003) Non-state actors and false dichotomies: Reviewing IR/IPE approaches to European integration. Journal of European Public Policy 10 (1): 102–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Greenwood, J. (2003) Interest Representation in the European Union. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Greenwood, J. (2011) Actors of the common interest? The Brussels offices of the regions. Journal of European Integration 33 (4): 437–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Haider, D.D. (1974) When Governments Come to Washington. London, Collier: Macmillan Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Halpin, D.R. and Binderkrantz, A. (2009) Explaining breadth of policy engagement: Patterns of interest group mobilization in public policy. Journal of European Public Policy 18 (2): 201–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Halpin, D.R. and Jordan, G. (2011) The Scale of Interest Organization in Democratic Politics: Data and Research Methods. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Halpin, D.R. and Thomas, H.F. (2011) Evaluating the breadth of policy engagement by organized interests. Public Administration 90 (3): 582–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Halpin, D. and Nownes, A. (2013) Interest Group ‘Policy Agendas’: What Are They? And How Might We Study Them? Working Paper, www.darrenhalpin.com, accessed 13 December 2013.

  23. Heaney, M.T. (2004) Outside the issue niche. The multidimensionality of interest group identity. American Politics Research 32 (6): 611–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Heaney, M.T. and Lorenz, J.M. (2013) Coalition portfolios and interest group influence over the policy process. Interest Groups & Advocacy 2 (3): 251–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hooghe, L. (1995) Subnational mobilisation in the European Union. West European Politics 18 (3): 175–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (1996) Europe with the regions: Channels of regional representation in the European Union. Publius 26 (1): 73–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hooghe, L., Marks, G. and Schakel, A.H. (2010) The Rise of Regional Authority: A Comparative Study of 42 Democracies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Huyssuenne, M. and Jans, T. (2008) Brussels as the capital of a Europe of the regions? Brussels Studies 16: 1–11, http://www.brusselsstudies.be.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jeffrey, C. (1997) The Regional Dimension of the European Union. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Krackhardt, D. and Stern, R.N. (1988) Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly 51 (2): 123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lowi, T. (1972) Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public Administration Review 32 (4): 298–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Marbach, J. and Leckrone, J. (2002) Intergovernmental lobbying for the passage of TEA-21. Publius 32 (1): 45–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Marks, G., Nielsen, F., Ray, L. and Salk, J.E. (1996) Competencies, cracks, and conflicts – Regional mobilization in the European Union. Comparative Political Studies 29 (2): 164–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Marks, G., Haesly, R. and Mbaye, H. (2002) What do subnational offices think they are doing in Brussels? Regional and Federal Studies 12 (3): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Moe, T.M. (1980) The Organization of Interests. Incentives and the Internal Dynamics of Political Interest Groups. London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Moore, C. (2006) Schloss Neuwahnstein? Why the Länder continue to strengthen their representations in Brussels. German Politics 15 (2): 192–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Nielsen, F. and Salk, J. (1998) The ecology of collective action and regional representation in the EU. European Sociological Review 14 (3): 231–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. (1978) The External Control of Organizations. A Resource Dependence Perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rowe, C. (2011) Regional Representations in the EU: Between Diplomacy and Interest Mediation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  40. Salisbury, R.H. (1983) Interest representation: The dominance of institutions. American Political Science Review 78 (1): 64–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Schlozman, K.L. and Tierney, J.T. (1986) Organized Interest and American Democracy. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Schmitter, P.C. and Streeck, W. (1999 [1982]) The Organization of Business Interest. Studying Associative Action of Business in Advanced Industrial Societies. Cologne, Germany: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies. Discussion paper 99/1.

  43. Simon, H.A. (1985) Human nature in politics: The dialogue of psychology with political science. American Political Science Review 79 (2): 293–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Sodupe, K. (1999) The European Union and inter-regional co-operation. Regional and Federal Studies 9 (1): 58–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Soule, S.A. and King, B.G. (2008) Competition and resource partitioning in three social movement industries. American Journal of Sociology 113 (6): 1568–1610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Strolovitch, D.Z. (2007) Affirmative Advocacy. Race, Class, and Gender in Interest Group Politics. London: Chicago University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  47. Swenden, W., Brans, M. and De Winter, L. (2006) The politics of Belgium: Institutions and policy under bipolar and centrifugal federalism. West European Politics 29 (5): 863–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Tatham, M. (2008) Going solo: Direct regional representation in the European Union. Regional and Federal Studies 18 (5): 493–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Walker, E.T. and McCarthy, J.D. (2010) Legitimacy, strategy, and resources in the survival of community-based organizations. Social Problems 57 (3): 315–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Weynand, S. (1996) Inter-regional associations and the European integration process. Regional and Federal Studies 6 (2): 166–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Beyers.

Additional information

This article was submitted on 21st June 2013 and the review process was substantially completed before Jan Beyers was persuaded to succeed me as one of the editorial team. Grant Jordan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Donas, T., Fraussen, B. & Beyers, J. It’s not all about the money: Explaining varying policy portfolios of regional representations in Brussels. Int Groups Adv 3, 79–98 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/iga.2013.15

Download citation

Keywords

  • regional offices
  • territorial lobbying
  • policy portfolios
  • organizational agenda’s
  • European Union