This paper examines the idea of tribes and territories, as an example of a theory developed and applied within higher education research of relevance to higher education policy. It traces the origins and meaning of the term, reviews its application by higher education researchers and discusses the issues it raises and the critiques it has attracted. It is concluded that while, like all theoretical frameworks, tribes and territories has strengths and weaknesses, it remains of use for thinking about academics, disciplines, their relations and associated policy areas.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Adams, J., Cochrane, M. and Dunne, L. (eds.) (2012) ‘Introduction’, in Applying Theory to Educational Research: An Introductory Approach with Case Studies, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 1–10.
Adler, N., Hellstrom, T., Jacob, M. and Norrgren, F. (2000) ‘A Model for the Institutionalisation of University-Industry Partnerships: The Fenix Research Programme’, in M. Jacob and T. Hellstrom (eds.) The Future of Knowledge Production in the Academy, Buckingham: Open University Press.
Askling, B. (2001) ‘Higher education and academic staff in a period of policy and system change’, Higher Education 41 (2): 157–181.
Bailey, F. (1977) Morality and Expediency: The Folklore of Academic Politics, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Bamber, V. (2012) ‘Learning and Teaching in the Disciplines: Challenging Knowledge, Ubiquitous Change’, in P. Trowler, M. Saunders and V. Bamber (eds.) Tribes and Territories in the 21st Century: Rethinking the Significance of Disciplines in Higher Education, London: Routledge, pp. 99–106.
Bath, D. and Smith, C. (2004) ‘Academic developers: an academic tribe claiming their territory in higher education’, International Journal for Academic Development 9 (1): 9–27.
Becher, T. (1981) ‘Towards a definition of disciplinary cultures’, Studies in Higher Education 6 (2): 109–122.
Becher, T. (1984) ‘The Cultural View’, in B. Clark (ed.) Perspectives on Higher Education: Eight Disciplinary and Comparative Views, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 165–198.
Becher, T. (1987) ‘The Disciplinary Shaping of the Profession’, in B. Clark (ed.) The Academic Profession: National, Disciplinary and Institutional Settings, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 271–303.
Becher, T. (1989a) Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Becher, T. (1989b) ‘Historians on history’, Studies in Higher Education 14 (3): 263–278.
Becher, T. (1990a) ‘Physicists on physics’, Studies in Higher Education 15 (1): 3–20.
Becher, T. (1990b) ‘The counter-culture of specialisation’, European Journal of Education 25 (3): 333–346.
Becher, T. (1994) ‘The significance of disciplinary differences’, Studies in Higher Education 19 (2): 151–161.
Becher, T. (1996) ‘The learning professions’, Studies in Higher Education 21 (1): 43–55.
Becher, T. (1999) Professional Practices: Commitment and Capability in a Changing Environment, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Becher, T. and Trowler, P. (2001) Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines, 2nd edn., Buckingham: Open University Press.
Bessant, J. (2002) ‘Dawkins’ higher education reforms and how metaphors work in policy making’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 24 (1): 87–99.
Biglan, A. (1973a) ‘The characteristics of subject matter in different academic disciplines’, Journal of Applied Psychology 57 (3): 195–203.
Biglan, A. (1973b) ‘Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments’, Journal of Applied Psychology 57 (3): 204–213.
Bird, E. (2001) ‘Disciplining the interdisciplinary: radicalism and the academic curriculum’, British Journal of Sociology of Education 22 (4): 463–478.
Blackmore, P. (2007) ‘Developing tribes and territories’, Educational Developments 8 (2): 1–4, 10–11 14.
Boffo, S. and Moscati, R. (1998) ‘Evaluation in the Italian higher education system: many tribes, many territories … many godfathers’, European Journal of Education 33 (3): 349–360.
Braxton, J. and Hargens, L. (1996) ‘Variation Among Academic Disciplines: Analytical Frameworks and Research’, in J. Smart (ed.) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. 11, New York: Agathon Press, pp. 1–46.
Brew, A. (2008) ‘Disciplinary and interdisciplinary affiliations of experienced researchers’, Higher Education 56 (4): 423–448.
Brint, S., Riddle, M., Turk-Bicakci, L. and Levy, C. (2005) ‘From the liberal to the practical arts in American colleges and universities: organizational analysis and curricular change’, Journal of Higher Education 76 (2): 151–180.
Carmichael, P. (2012) ‘Tribes, territories and threshold concepts: educational materialisms at work in higher education’, Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (S1): 31–42.
Cashin, W. and Downey, R. (1995) ‘Disciplinary Differences in What is Taught and in Students’ Perceptions of What they Learn and of How They are Taught’, in N. Hativa and M. Marincovich (eds.) Disciplinary Differences in Teaching and Learning: Implications for Practice, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 64, pp. 81–92.
Clifford, V. (2009) ‘Engaging the disciplines in internationalising the curriculum’, International Journal for Academic Development 14 (2): 133–143.
Creswell, J. and Bean, J. (1981a) ‘Research output, socialization and the Biglan model’, Research in Higher Education 15 (1): 69–91.
Creswell, J. and Bean, J. (1981b) ‘The Biglan studies of differences among academic areas’, Review of Higher Education 4 (3): 1–16.
Davies, M., Devlin, M. and Tight, M. (eds.) (2010) Interdisciplinary Higher Education: Perspectives and Practicalities, Bingley: Emerald.
Donald, J. (1995) ‘Disciplinary Differences in Knowledge Validation’, in N. Hativa and M. Marincovich (eds.) Disciplinary Differences in Teaching and Learning: Implications for Practice, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 64, pp. 7–17.
Entwistle, N. (2005) ‘Learning outcomes and ways of thinking across contrasting disciplines and settings in higher education’, Curriculum Journal 16 (1): 67–82.
Evans, C. (1988) Language People: The Experience of Teaching and Learning Modern Languages in British Universities, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Evans, C. (1993) English People: The Experience of Teaching and Learning English in British Universities, Buckingham: Open University Press.
Fejes, A., Johansson, K. and Dahlgren, M. (2005) ‘Learning to play the seminar game: students’ initial encounters with a basic working form in higher education’, Teaching in Higher Education 10 (1): 29–41.
Fuchs, S. (1992) The Professional Quest for Truth: A Social Theory of Science and Knowledge, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, London: Sage.
Hagstrom, W. (1965) The Scientific Community, New York: Basic Books.
Hughes, C. and Tight, M. (2013) ‘The metaphors we study by: the doctorate as a journey and/or as work’, Higher Education Research and Development 32 (5): 765–775.
Hyland, K. (2012) Disciplinary Identities: Individuality and Community in Academic Discourse, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnston, R. (1996) ‘Academic tribes, disciplinary containers and the realpolitik of opening up the social sciences’, Environment and Planning A 28 (11): 1943–1947.
Kekäle, J. (1999) ‘‘Preferred’ patterns of academic leadership in different disciplinary (sub)cultures’, Higher Education 37 (3): 217–238.
Kekäle, J. (2002) ‘Conceptions of quality in four different disciplines’, Tertiary Education and Management 8 (1): 65–80.
Klein, J. (1996) Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities and Interdisciplinarities, Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.
Kogan, M. (2005) ‘Modes of knowledge and patterns of power’, Higher Education 49 (1): 9–30.
Kolb, D. (1984) ‘Learning Styles and Disciplinary Differences’, in A. Chickering (ed.) The Modern American College: Responding to the New Realities of Diverse Students and a Changing Society, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 232–255.
Kolsaker, A. (2008) ‘Academic professionalism in the managerialist era: a study of English universities’, Studies in Higher Education 33 (5): 513–525.
Kuhn, T. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980/2003) Metaphors We Live By, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Land, R. (2012) ‘Crossing Tribal Boundaries: Interdisciplinarity as a Threshold Concept’, in P. Trowler, M. Saunders and V. Bamber (eds.) Tribes and Territories in the 21st Century: Rethinking the Significance of Disciplines in Higher Education, London: Routledge, pp. 174–185.
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, A. and Green, B. (2009) ‘Supervision as metaphor’, Studies in Higher Education 34 (6): 615–630.
Lindblom-Ylanne, S., Trigwell, K., Nevgi, A. and Ashwin, P. (2006) ‘How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context’, Studies in Higher Education 31 (3): 285–298.
Loads, D. (2010) ‘‘I’m a dancer’ and ‘I’ve got a saucepan stuck on my head’: metaphor in helping lecturers to develop being-for-uncertainty’, Teaching in Higher Education 15 (4): 409–421.
Lodahl, J. and Gordon, G. (1972) ‘The structure of scientific fields and the functioning of university graduate departments’, American Sociological Review 37 (1): 57–72.
Malaney, G. (1986) ‘Differentiation in graduate education’, Research in Higher Education 25 (1): 82–96.
Manathunga, C. and Brew, A. (2012) ‘Beyond Tribes and Territories: New Metaphors for New Times’, in P. Trowler, M. Saunders and V. Bamber (eds.) Tribes and Territories in the 21st Century: Rethinking the Significance of Disciplines in Higher Education, London: Routledge, pp. 44–56.
McCulloch, A. (2013) ‘The quest for the PhD: a better metaphor for doctoral education’, International Journal for Researcher Development 4 (1): 55–66.
Menter, I. (2011) ‘Four ‘academic sub-tribes’, but one territory? Teacher educators and teacher education in Scotland’, Journal of Education for Teaching 37 (3): 293–308.
Murray, J. and Kosnik, K. (2011) ‘Introduction: academic work and identities in teacher education’, Journal of Education for Teaching 37 (3): 243–246.
Neumann, R. (2001) ‘Disciplinary differences and university teaching’, Studies in Higher Education 26 (2): 135–146.
Neumann, R., Parry, S. and Becher, T. (2002) ‘Teaching and learning in their disciplinary contexts: a conceptual analysis’, Studies in Higher Education 27 (4): 405–417.
Nowotny, H., Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. (2001) Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in An Age of Uncertainty, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Pantin, C. (1968) The Relations between the Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Parker, J. (2002) ‘A new disciplinarity: communities of knowledge, learning and practice’, Teaching in Higher Education 7 (4): 373–386.
Parry, S. (2007) Disciplines and Doctorates, Dordrecht: Springer.
Pinch, T. (1990) ‘The culture of scientists and disciplinary rhetoric’, European Journal of Education 25 (3): 295–304.
Pirrie, A. (1999) ‘Rocky mountains and tired Indians: on territories and tribes. Reflections on multidisciplinary education in the health professions’, British Educational Research Journal 25 (1): 113–126.
Shahjahan, R. and Kezar, A. (2013) ‘Beyond the ‘national container’: addressing methodological nationalism in higher education research’, Educational Researcher 42 (1): 20–29.
Silver, H. (2003) ‘Does a university have a culture?’ Studies in Higher Education 28 (2): 157–169.
Smeby, J.-C. (1996) ‘Disciplinary differences in university teaching’, Studies in Higher Education 21 (1): 69–79.
Snow, C. (1959) The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Snow, C. (1964) The Two Cultures: And a Second Look, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stanley, L. (ed.) (1997) Knowing Feminisms: On Academic Borders, Territories and Tribes, London: Sage.
Stoecker, J. (1993) ‘The Biglan classification revisited’, Research in Higher Education 34 (4): 451–464.
Storer, N. (1967) ‘The hard sciences and the soft: some sociological observations’, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 55 (1): 75–84.
Storer, N. (1972) ‘Relations among Scientific Disciplines’, in S. Nagi and R. Corwin (eds.) The Social Contexts of Research, New York: Wiley, pp. 229–268.
Tight, M. (2007) ‘Bridging the divide: a comparative analysis of articles in higher education journals published inside and outside North America’, Higher Education 53 (2): 235–253.
Tight, M. (2008) ‘Higher education research as tribe, territory and/or community: a co-citation analysis’, Higher Education 55 (5): 593–605.
Tight, M. (2012) Researching Higher Education 2nd edn Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Tight, M. (2013a) ‘Discipline and methodology in higher education research’, Higher Education Research and Development 32 (1): 136–151.
Tight, M. (2013b) ‘Students: customers, clients or pawns?’ Higher Education Policy 26 (3): 291–307.
Tight, M. (2014a) ‘Discipline and theory in higher education research’, Research Papers in Education 29 (1): 93–110.
Tight, M. (2014b) ‘Theory Development and Application in Higher Education Research: The Case of Threshold Concepts’, in J. Huisman and M. Tight (eds.) Theory and Method in Higher Education Research, Vol. 2, Bingley: Emerald, forthcoming.
Tight, M. (2014c) ‘Theory development and application in higher education research: the case of academic drift’, Journal of Educational Administration and History. Forthcoming.
Tight, M. (forthcoming) ‘Working in separate silos? What citation patterns reveal about higher education research internationally’, Higher Education.
Tranfield, D. (2002) ‘Formulating the nature of management research’, European Management Journal 20 (4): 378–382.
Tribe, J. (1997) ‘The indiscipline of tourism’, Annals of Tourism Research 24 (3): 638–657.
Tribe, J. (2010) ‘Tribes, territories and networks in the tourism academy’, Annals of Tourism Research 37 (1): 7–33.
Trowler, P. (2009) ‘Beyond Epistemological Essentialism: Academic Tribes in the Twenty-First Century’, in C. Kreber (ed.) The University and its Disciplines: Teaching and Learning within and beyond Disciplinary Boundaries, London: Routledge, pp. 181–195.
Trowler, P. (2012) ‘Disciplines and Interdisciplinarity’, in P. Trowler, M. Saunders and V. Bamber (eds.) Tribes and Territories in the 21st Century: Rethinking the Significance of Disciplines in Higher Education, London: Routledge, pp. 5–29.
Trowler, P., Saunders, M. and Bamber, V. (eds.) (2012a) Tribes and Territories in the 21st Century: Rethinking the Significance of Disciplines in Higher Education, London: Routledge.
Trowler, P., Saunders, M. and Bamber, V. (eds.) (2012b) ‘Conclusion: Academic Practices and the Disciplines in the 21st Century’, in Tribes and Territories in the 21st Century: Rethinking the Significance of Disciplines in Higher Education, London: Routledge, pp. 241–258.
Välimaa, J. (1998) ‘Culture and identity in higher education research’, Higher Education 36 (2): 119–138.
Warhurst, R. (2008) ‘‘Cigars on the flight-deck’: new lecturers’ participatory learning within workplace communities of practice’, Studies in Higher Education 33 (4): 453–467.
Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Whitley, R. (1984) The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences, Oxford: Clarendon Press, Second edition published by Oxford University Press in 2000.
Ylijoki, O.-H. (2000) ‘Disciplinary cultures and the moral order of studying: a case-study of four Finnish university departments’, Higher Education 39 (3): 339–362.
About this article
Cite this article
Tight, M. Theory Development and Application in Higher Education Research: Tribes and Territories. High Educ Policy 28, 277–293 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2014.11
- tribes and territories
- theory development
- higher education research