Higher Education Policy

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 147–172 | Cite as

Regulating Cross-border Higher Education: A Case Study of the United States

  • Jason E Lane
  • Kevin Kinser
  • Daniel Knox
Article

Abstract

In an increasing number of nations, foreign education providers are becoming part of the educational landscape. This aspect of cross-border higher education raises many questions about how such activities are regulated, particularly the role of the importing and exporting governments. Drawing on a principal-agent framework, this study uses the United States, which is an amalgamation of more than 50 independent regulatory systems, to analyze how governments regulate the importing and exporting of public colleges and universities. The analysis reveals that state regulations primarily focus on issues pertaining to the approval process of expansion, mandating administrative requirements, providing comparable programs, and guarding against unnecessary competition; whereas there is limited focus on quality. Further, states have more extensive regulations for importing activities than exporting activities. These findings can help inform scholars and policymakers interested in multinational cross-border educational activities and the study serves as a prototype for other investigations of cross-border educational regulations.

Keywords

cross-border higher education USA regulation educational expansion 

References

  1. Alchian, A. and Demsetz, H. (1972) ‘Production, information costs and economic organization’, The American Economic Review 62 (5): 777–795.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, R. (2009) International Branch Campuses: Markets and Strategies, London: Observatory for Borderless of Higher Education.Google Scholar
  3. Berdahl, R.O. (1971) Statewide Coordination of Higher Education, Washington, DC: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
  4. C-BERT. (2011) List of International Branch Campuses. http://www.globalhighered.org/branchcampuses.php.
  5. CHEA. (2011) Exploring the Future of International For-profit Higher Education and Quality Assurance: Where Are We Now and Where Do We Go from Here? Washington, DC: CHEA.Google Scholar
  6. CHEA, IAU, AUCC and ACE. (2004) Sharing Quality Higher Education across Borders: A Statement on Behalf of Higher Education Institutions Worldwide, Washington, DC: CHEA.Google Scholar
  7. Colorado Commission on Higher Education. (2008) Policies and Procedures for Statewide Extended Studies, Boulder, CO: Colorado Commission on Higher Education.Google Scholar
  8. Contreras, A. (2009) The Legal Basis for Degree-granting Authority in the United States, Boulder, CO: State Higher Education Executive Officers.Google Scholar
  9. Croom, P. (2010) ‘Motivations and Aspirations for International Branch Campuses’, in D.W. Chapman and R. Sakamoto (eds.) Cross Border Partnerships in Higher Education: Strategies and Issues, New York: Routledge, pp. 45–66.Google Scholar
  10. Daghlian v. DeVry U., Inc. (2007) 582 F. Supp. 2d 1231 (CD. Cal. 2007).Google Scholar
  11. Davis, J.H., Schoorman, F.D. and Donaldson, L. (1997) ‘Toward a stewardship theory of management’, Academy of Management Review 22 (1): 20–47.Google Scholar
  12. Dill, D. (1997) ‘Higher education markets and public policy’, Higher Education Policy 10 (3-4): 167–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duryea, E.D. (2000) The Academic Corporation: A History of College and University Governing Boards, London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  14. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989) ‘Agency theory: an assessment and review’, Academy of Management Review 27 (4): 118–143.Google Scholar
  15. ENQA. (2010) Quality Assurance in Transnational Higher Education, Brussels, Belgium: ENQA Secretariat.Google Scholar
  16. Ferreri, E. (2009) ‘Atlanta campus to cost NCCU’, Andnewsobserver, 14 January.Google Scholar
  17. Fleming, R.W. (1978) ‘Who Will be Regulated, and Why?’ in W.C. Hobbs (ed.) Government Regulations of Higher Education, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, pp. 18–32.Google Scholar
  18. Glenny, L.A. and Bowman, F.M. (1977) ‘State intervention in higher education’, Report prepared for the Sloan Commission on Government and Higher Education, Cambridge, MA: Sloan Commission on Government and Higher Education.Google Scholar
  19. Green, M., Kinser, K. and Eckel, P.D. (2008) On the Ground Overseas: U.S. Degree Programs and Branch Campuses Abroad, Washington, DC: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
  20. Goldstein, M.B., Lacey, A.D. and Janiga, N.S. (2006) The State of State Regulation of Cross-border Postsecondary Education, Washington, DC: Dow.Google Scholar
  21. Hines, E.R. (1988) ‘Higher education and state governments: renewed partnership, cooperation, or competition?’ ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 5, Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.Google Scholar
  22. Hodder, I. (1998) Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Material, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  23. Jaschik, S. (2008) ‘Awarding degrees without permission’, Inside Higher Education, 12 August.Google Scholar
  24. Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. (1976) ‘Theory of the firm: managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure’, Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4): 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kiewiet, D.R. and McCubbins, M. (1991) The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kinser, K. (2011) ‘Multinational Quality Assurance’, in J.E. Lane and K. Kinser (eds.) Multinational Colleges and Universities: Leadership, Administration, and Governance of International Branch Campuses (New Directions for Higher Education), San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 53–64.Google Scholar
  27. Kivisto, J.A. (2007) Agency Theory as a Framework for the Government-University Relationship, Tampere: Higher Education Group/Tampere University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Lane, J.E. (2007) ‘Spider web of oversight: latent and manifest regulatory controls in higher education’, Journal of Higher Education 78 (6): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lane, J.E. (2011) ‘Importing private higher education: international branch campuses’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 13 (4): 367–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lane, J.E. (2012) ‘Higher Education and Economic Competitiveness’, in J.E. Lane and D.B. Johnstone (eds.) Colleges and Universities as Economic Drivers: Measuring Higher Education's Role in Economic Development, Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
  31. Lane, J.E. and Kinser, K. (eds.). (2011) Multinational Colleges and Universities: Leadership, Administration, and Governance of International Branch Campuses (New Directions for Higher Education), San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 53–64.Google Scholar
  32. Lane, J.E. and Kivisto, J.A. (2008) ‘Interests, Information, and Incentives in Higher Education: Principal-Agent Theory and Its Potential Applications to the Study of Higher Education Governance’, in J.C. Smart (ed.) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research Vol. 23, New York: Springer, pp. 141–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lim, F.C.B. (2010) ‘Do too many rights make a wrong? A qualitative study of the experiences of a sample of Malaysian and Singapore private higher education providers in transnational quality assurance’, Quality in Higher Education 16 (3): 211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lowry, R.C. (2001) ‘Governmental structure, trustee selection, and public university prices and spending’, American Journal of Political Science 45 (4): 845–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Martin, M. (2007) Cross-Border Higher Education: Regulation, Quality Assurance, and Impact Vols. 1 and 2, Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning.Google Scholar
  36. Mayadas, A.F., Bourne, J. and Bacsich, P. (2009) ‘Online education today’, Science 323 (5910): 85–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McBurnie, G. and Zyguris, C. (2007) Transnational Education: Issues and Trends in Offshore Higher Education, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. McLendon, M.K. (2003) ‘Setting the governmental agenda for state decentralization of higher education’, Journal of Higher Education 74 (5): 479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Miller, G.J. (2005) ‘The political evolution of principal-agent models’, Annual Review of Political Science 8: 203–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moe, T. (1984) ‘Congressional controls of the bureaucracy: an assessment of the positive theory of Congressional D’, Legislative Studies Quarterly 9 (4): 547–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moe, T. (2005) ‘Power and political institutions’, Perspectives on Politics 3 (2): 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nicholson-Crotty, J. and Meier, K.J. (2003) ‘Politics, structure, and public policy: the case of higher education’, Educational Policy 17 (1): 80–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. OECD and UNESCO. (2005) Guidelines for Quality Provision in Cross-border Higher Education, Paris, France: OECD.Google Scholar
  44. Perrow, C. (1986) Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay, 3rd edn. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  45. Rizzo, M.J. and Ehrenberg, R.G. (2003) ‘Resident and nonresident tuition and enrollment at flagship state universities’, Cambridge, MA: NBER. NBER Working Paper No. 9516.Google Scholar
  46. SHEEO. (2008) State Higher Education Agency Contact Information. http://www.sheeo.org/agencies.asp.
  47. Slaughter, S. and Leslie, L. (1997) Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Slaughter, S. and Rhoades, G. (2004) Academic Capitalism and the New Economy, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  49. Spence, A.M. (1973) ‘Job market signaling’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 87 (3): 355–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stella, A. (2006) ‘Quality assurance of cross-border higher education’, Quality in Higher Education 12 (3): 257–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stripling, J. (2009) ‘Interstate commerce’, Inside Higher Ed, 12 February.Google Scholar
  52. Tuckman, H.P. (1970) ‘Determinants of college students migration’, Southern Economic Journal 37 (1): 183–195.Google Scholar
  53. Volkwein, J.F. (1986) ‘Campus autonomy and its relationship to measures of university quality’, Journal of Higher Education 57 (5): 510–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Volkwein, J.F. and Malik, S.M. (1997) ‘State regulation and administrative flexibility at public universities’, Review of Higher Education 38 (1): 17–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. WICHE. (2008) Knocking at the College Door: Projections of High School Graduates by State, Income and Race/Ethnicity, 1988 to 2018, Boulder, CO: WICHE.Google Scholar
  56. Zumeta, W. (2011) ‘State policies and private higher education in the USA: understanding the variation in a comparative perspective’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 13 (4): 425–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association of Universities 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jason E Lane
    • 1
  • Kevin Kinser
    • 1
  • Daniel Knox
    • 2
  1. 1.Rockefeller Institute of Government and Institute for Global Education Policy Studies, State University of New York at AlbanyAlbanyUSA
  2. 2.State University of New York System Administration, Office of the Provost, State University PlazaAlbanyUSA

Personalised recommendations