Towards the Two-cycle Degree Structure: Bologna, Reform and Path Dependency in German and Norwegian Universities

Abstract

This article describes and analyses changes made in the organisation of higher education studies in Germany and Norway, following the recommendations of the Bologna Declaration. In both countries, the characteristic modes of university study have been circumscribed by the tradition of Humboldtian values and ideals, albeit to a different extent. On the basis of a cross-national and historical comparison of degree structures, implementation measures undertaken, results gained and the interpretation of various groups of actors involved in the reform process, we argue that the Bologna process has created considerable tensions within the higher education systems in the two countries. The domestication of the Bologna process in Germany and Norway testifies not only to the durability of the Humboldtian legacy, but also to the susceptibility of the Bologna process to national adaptation processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    In fact, the Norwegian School Law of 1869 was unprecedented in Europe, as Latin was not required for entering the university.

  2. 2.

    Kunnskap og dannelse foran et nytt århundre. Innstilling fra Dannelsesutvalget for høyere utdanning, 2009.

  3. 3.

    The survey was based on a selection of faculty in a permanent position at Norwegian universities and state colleges. The sample consisted of a disproportionally stratified selection based on available scientific staff categories (professors, associated professors, assistant professors and lecturers), where the professor category was considerably overrepresented. Differences in opinions between the staff categories are negligible along all items discussed here.

References

  1. Adelman, C. (2008) The Bologna Club: What U.S. Higher Education Can Learn from a Decade of European Reconstruction, Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy, http://www.ihep.org/Research/GlobalPerformance.cfm.

  2. Alesi, B., Bürger, S., Kehm, B.M. and Teichler, U. (2005) Bachelor and Master Courses in Selected Countries Compared with Germany, Bonn: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berg, L. (1989) ‘Yrkesretting; retorikk eller realitet? Om arbeidslivets påvirkning av universitetsstudiers innhold’, NAVF melding 1989:6.

  4. Berg, L. (1997) Studieløpet. Om tidsbrukvalg, faglige valg og kunnskapsteoretiske valg, Oslo: NAVFs utredningsinstitutt.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bleiklie, I., Hostaker, R. and Vabo, A. (2000) Policy and Practice in Higher Education, London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bostad, I. (2009) ‘Dannelse med tellekanter’, Samtiden nr. 1/2009. Oslo: Aschehoug.

  7. Cerych, L. and Sabatier, P. (1986) Great Expectations and Mixed Performance. The Implementation of Higher Education Reforms in Europe, Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clark, W. (2006) Academic Charisma and the Origins of the Research University, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dahrendorf, R. (1965) Bildung ist Bürgerrecht, Hamburg: Nannen.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Høstaker, R. (1996) ‘Forskarutdanning og dei nye doktorgradane’, in I. Bleiklie (ed.) Kunnskap og makt. Norsk høyere utdanning i endring, Oslo: Tano Aschehoug.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Høstaker, R. (1997) University Life, LOS senteret: University of Bergen.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Høstaker, R. and Vabø, A. (2008) ‘Knowledge, society, higher education and the society of control’, Learning and Teaching 1 (1): 122–154 Bergham Journals.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Huisman, J. (2009) ‘The Bologna Process Towards 2020: Institutional Diversification or Convergence’, in B. Kehm, J. Huisman and B. Stensaker (eds.) The European Higher Education Area. Perspectives on a Moving Target, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, pp. 245–262.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jarausch, K. (1997) ‘The Humboldt Syndrome. West German Universities, 1945–1989 an Academic Sonderweg’, in M.G. Ash (ed.) German Universities Past and Present: Crisis or Renewal, Providence, RI: Berghahn Books, pp. 33–49.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kehm, B.M. (1999) Higher Education in Germany. Developments, Problems, and Perspectives, Bucarest: UNESCO-CEPES and Wittenberg: Institute for Higher Education Research.

    Google Scholar 

  16. König, R. (1980) Vom Wesen der deutschen Universität, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kyvik, S and Ødegård, E. (1990) ‘Universitetene i Norden foran 90-tallet. Endringer i styring og finansiering av forskning’, FPR-publikasjon nr. 13. Nordiska ministerrådets sekretariat.

  18. McClelland, C.E. (2008) State, Society and University in Germany 1700–1914, London, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Meinecke, F (1963) The German Catastrophe: Reflections and Recollections, Translated by S.B. Fay. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Michelsen, S. and Aamodt, P.O (2006) Kvalitetsreformen møter virkeligheten. Delrapport 1, Oslo/Bergen: NIFU-STEP/Rokkan-senteret.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mordt, G. (1991) ‘Integrasjon og godkjenning av private høyskoler og NKU’, Arbeidsnotat nr. 12 BI. Handelshøyskolen i Oslo.

  22. Nitzsche, F. (2008) On våre dannelsesinstitusjoners fremtid, Oslo: Spartacus.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Picht, G. (1964) Die deutsche Bildungskatastrophe, Walter-Verlag, Olten: Freiburg.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ringer, F. (1992) Fields of Knowledge: French Academic Culture in Comparative Perspective, 1890–1920, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schwach, V. (2009) ‘Masterprogrammer på engelsk i Norge’, I bredde og nisjer. Rapport 36. Oslo.

  26. Seip, Å.A. (1990) Lektoren. Profesjon, organisasjon og politikk 1890–1980, Olso: FAFO.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Skard, H. (1991) ‘Det ble kalt studentopprøret’, in T. Egeland (ed.) Festskrift til Kristian Ottosen, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Slagstad, R. (2000) Kunnskapens hus. Fra Hansteen til Hanseid, Oslo: Pax.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vabø, A (1996) ‘Yrkesretting av lavere grad’, in I. Bleiklie (ed.) Kunnskap og makt. Norsk høyere utdanning i endring, Oslo: Tano Aschehoug.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Vabø, A. (2002) ‘Mytedannelser i endringsprosesser i akademiske institusjoner’, Rapport nr. 1. Bergen. Stein Rokkan Senter for flerfaglig samfunnsforskning.

  31. Vabø, A. (2007) ‘The Principal-agent Relationship and its Impact on the Autonomy of the Academic Profession’, Werkstattberichte — 66, in W. Locke and U. Teichler (eds.) The Changing Condition for Academic Work and Career in Select Countries, Kassel: University of Kassel.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Vabø, A. and Aamodt, P.O. (2008) ‘Nordic Higher Education in Transition’, in D. Palfreyman and T. Tapper (eds.) Structuring Mass Higher Education. The Role of Elite Institutions, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Vom Bruch, R. (1997) ‘A Slow Farewell to Humboldt?’, in M.G. Ash (ed.) German Universities Past and Present: Crisis or Renewal, Providence, RI: Berghahn Books, pp. 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Waagene, E. and Arnesen, C.Å. (2009) ‘Bachelorgraden fra universitet — en selvstendig grad, eller delmål i et lengre utdanningsløp?’, Rapport, 7. Oslo: NIFUSTEP.

  35. Witte, J., Schreiterer, U., Hüning, L., Otto, E. and Müller-Böling, D. (2003) ‘Argumente für eine rasche und konsequente Umstellung auf Bachelor - und Masterstudiengänge an deutschen Hochschulen’, CHE-Positionspapier zu Bachelor - und Masterstudiengängen I: Gütersloh, http://www.che.de/downloads/Positionspapier1BMS.pdf.

  36. Wittrock, B. (1993) ‘The Modern University: The Three Transformations’, in S. Rothblatt and B. Wittrock (eds.) The European and American University Since 1800, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 303–360.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kehm, B., Michelsen, S. & Vabø, A. Towards the Two-cycle Degree Structure: Bologna, Reform and Path Dependency in German and Norwegian Universities. High Educ Policy 23, 227–245 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2010.7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Bologna process
  • degree structure
  • study programme
  • higher education reform