Advertisement

Feminist Review

, Volume 113, Issue 1, pp 103–108 | Cite as

breaking the glass ceiling on Wikipedia

  • Dariusz Jemielniak
Open Space

introduction

Wikipedia suffers from a significant gender gap. According to different studies, as little as 8 to 16 per cent of editors are female (Lam et al., 2011; Wikimedia Foundation, 2011). These numbers may be somewhat distorted, as some females may choose to opt out of surveys or conceal their gender online in a community that is generally perceived as dominated by males (Hill and Shaw, 2013). Still, it is quite clear that, although for readers the proportions are pretty much equal, for editors the gender gap is really big (Glott et al., 2010; Bywater, 2011) and difficult to explain just by the stereotypical, geek-driven background of Wikipedia or simply the reproduction of inequalities (Morell, 2010).

One possible explanation is that Wikipedia is quite conflict-driven (Jemielniak, 2014), and the critical cooperative environment in which it thrives deters many female editors (Collier and Bear, 2012). The problem is not specific to Wikipedia alone as, in general, the F/L/OSS...

Notes

Acknowledgements

The described incident was part of fieldwork that was conducted with a research grant from the Polish National Science Center (no. UMO-2012/05/E/HS4/01498).

References

  1. Aaltonen, A. and Lanzara, G.F., 2010. Unpacking Wikipedia governance: the emergence of a bureaucracy of peers? Conference paper presented at the 3rd Latin American and European Meeting on Organisation Studies, 7–10 April. Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
  2. Butler, B., Joyce, E. and Pike, J., 2008. Don’t look now, but we’ve created a bureaucracy: the nature and roles of policies and rules in Wikipedia. Conference paper presented at the 26th annual SIGCHI conference on human actors in computing systems, 2-10 April, Florence.Google Scholar
  3. Bywater, M., 2011. Wikipedia: this is a man’s world. The Independent, 7 February. Available at: http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/features/wikipedia-this-is-a-mans-world-2206207.html [last accessed 12 September 2012].
  4. Carstensen, T., 2009. Gender trouble in Web 2.0: gender perspectives on social network sites, wikis and weblogs. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 1(1), pp. 106–127.Google Scholar
  5. Collier, B. and Bear, J., 2012. Conflict, criticism, or confidence: an empirical examination of the gender gap in wikipedia contributions. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, New York: ACM Press, pp. 383–392.Google Scholar
  6. Eckert, S. and Steiner, L., 2013. Wikipedia’s gender gap. In C.L. Armstrong, ed. Media Disparity: A Gender Battleground. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, pp. 87–98.Google Scholar
  7. Filipacchi, A., 2013. Wikipedia’s sexism toward female novelists. The New York Times, 24 April. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/2004/2028/opinion/sunday/wikipedias-sexism-toward-female-novelists.html [last accessed 24 April 2013].Google Scholar
  8. Glott, R., Schmidt, P. and Ghosh, R., 2010. Wikipedia survey—overview of results, United Nations University UNU-Merit, March. Available at: http://wikipediasurvey.org [last accessed 28 August 2012].
  9. Graells-Garrido, E., Lalmas, M. and Menczer, F., 2015. First women, second sex: gender bias in Wikipedia. Preprint, Arxiv, 2 June [9 February]. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1502.02341 [last accessed 4 April 2016].
  10. Hill, B.M. and Shaw, A., 2013. The Wikipedia gender gap revisited: characterizing survey response bias with propensity score estimation. Working paper, Berkman Center.Google Scholar
  11. Jemielniak, D., 2014. Common Knowledge? An Ethnography of Wikipedia. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jemielniak, D., 2015. Naturally emerging regulation and the danger of delegitimizing conventional leadership: drawing on the example of Wikipedia. In H. Bradbury, ed. The SAGE Handbook of Action Research. London: Sage Publications, pp. 522–528.Google Scholar
  13. Lam, S.K., Uduwage, A., Dong, Z., Sen, S., Musicant, D.R., Terveen, L. and Riedl, J., 2011. WP: clubhouse? An exploration of Wikipedia’s gender imbalance. Presentation made at WikiSym 2011: 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration, 3-5 October. Mountain View, CA.Google Scholar
  14. Morell, M.F., 2010. Participation in online creation communities: ecosystemic participation? Conference paper presented at JITP 2010: the politics of open source, 6-7 May. University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Available at: http://scholarworks.umass.edu/jitpc2010/1/ [last accessed 28 August 2012].
  15. Morrison, A.M., White, R.P. and Van Velsor, E., 1992. Breaking the Glass Ceiling: Can Women Reach the Top of America’s Largest Corporations? Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  16. Reagle, J.M., 2013. ‘Free as in sexist?’ Free culture and the gender gap. First Monday, 7 January. Available at: http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/4291/3381 [last accessed 10 January 2013].
  17. Reagle, J.M. and Rhue, L., 2011. Gender bias in Wikipedia and Britannica. International Journal of Communication, 5(2011), pp. 1138–1158.Google Scholar
  18. Travis, J., 2013. Wikipedia and American women writers: closing the gender gap through collaborative learning. Polymath: An Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences Journal, 3(3), pp. 35–42.Google Scholar
  19. Wikimedia Foundation, 2011. Editor Survey Report. Wikimedia Foundation, April. Available at: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/76/Editor_Survey_Report_-_April_2011.pdf [last accessed 1 September 2012].
  20. Wikipedia.org, 2015. Szklany sufit, 25 July. Available at: https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Szklany_sufit [last accessed 11 November 2015].

Copyright information

© Feminist Review 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dariusz Jemielniak

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations