Advertisement

Feminist Review

, Volume 107, Issue 1, pp 84–89 | Cite as

pro-choice: all the way to the sex-selection gallows

  • Rahila Gupta
Open Space

Over the last few months, the debate on abortion rights has been rekindled yet again. However, instead of the debate being conducted between the usual suspects of the pro-choice and pro-life lobbies, the fault lines emerged within the pro-choice lobby itself. As some evidence seemed to be emerging about the prevalence of sex-selective abortion in the United Kingdom, the debate revolved around the question of whether the right to abortion was so sacrosanct that we should defend it even when it is used to abort female foetuses. Should we defend a woman’s right to choose even if it involves female foeticide?

Attempts to limit, erode or end a woman’s right to choose an abortion have surfaced from time to time in the United Kingdom, ever since abortion was legalised in 1967. Medical advances that allow a foetus to be viable at an increasingly early stage, in particular, have driven a juggernaut into abortion rights, with the legal limit having been reduced from twenty eight weeks to twenty...

References

  1. Bingham, J. and Newell, C. (2013) ‘Gender abortions: criminal charges not in “public interest” says CPS’ The Telegraph, 3 September, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/10287574/Gender-abortions-criminal-charges-not-in-public-interest-says-CPS.html, last accessed 1 October 2013.
  2. Chambers, C. (2013) ‘Feminism’ in Freeden, M., Sargent, L.T. and Stears, M. (2013) editors, The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies, Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  3. Connor, S. (2014) ‘The lost girls: illegal abortion widely used by some UK ethnic groups to avoid daughters “has reduced female population by between 1,500 and 4,700” ’, The Independent, 15 January, http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/the-lost-girls-illegal-abortion-widely-used-by-some-uk-ethnic-groups-to-avoid-daughters-has-reduced-female-population-by-between-1500-and-4700-9059790.html, last accessed 25 February 2014.
  4. Ditum, S. (2013) ‘Why women have a right to sex-selective abortion’ The Guardian, 19 September, http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/sep/19/sex-selective-abortion-womans-right, last accessed 1 October 2013.
  5. Furedi, A. (2013) ‘You can’t be pro-choice only when you like the choice’ Spiked, 16 September, http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/14032#.UpXqCNJdWSp, last accessed 1 October 2013.
  6. Gupta, R. (2013) ‘On sex-selective abortion, we must not make a fetish of choice’ The Guardian, 8 October, http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/oct/08/sex-selective-abortion-choice-right-life, last accessed 28 April 2014.
  7. Hundal, S. (2013) ‘India’s 60 million women that never were’ Al Jazeera, 8 August, http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2013/07/201372814110570679.html, last accessed 1 October 2013.
  8. Lucas, M.H. (2011) ‘Secularism vs communalism: learning from the ban on full face covering veil in France’ Secularism is a Women’s Issue (SIAWI), http://www.siawi.org/article2396.html, last accessed 1 October 2013.
  9. Ramesh, R. (2013) ‘Hunt to warn doctors on gender-based abortions’, The Guardian, 27 November, 11.Google Scholar
  10. The Telegraph (2012) ‘Abortion 24 week limit: Q&A’, 3 October, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9582428/Abortion-24-week-limit-QandA.html, last accessed 1 October 2013.
  11. Watt, H, Newell, C. and Khimji, Z. (2012) ‘Abortion investigation: available on demand—an abortion if it’s a boy you wanted’, The Telegraph, 23 February, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9099925/Abortion-investigation-Available-on-demand-an-abortion-if-its-a-boy-you-wanted.html, last accessed 1 October 2013.

Copyright information

© Feminist Review 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rahila Gupta

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations