Since coming to power in 2010, the UK Coalition government has enacted a series of cuts to public spending, under the auspices of austerity. Underpinning these cuts is a neo-liberal model of citizenship, in which citizens are expected to be autonomous, independent and economically productive, and in which the responsibilities of citizenship outweigh the rights. This model of citizenship is characterised by a paradoxical approach to social reproduction. The Coalition government has taken a significant interest in social reproduction as a means of creating the next generation of ‘good’ neo-liberal citizens; yet, the current austerity measures involve the withdrawal of state support for social reproduction activities. Drawing on participant observation carried out with migrant women’s groups in Sheffield and Manchester, as well as interviews with group members, this article demonstrates how the government’s paradoxical approach to social reproduction, combined with gendered and racialised discourses of citizenship and ‘Britishness’, have led to policies that place ethnic minority migrant women in an untenable situation. The social reproduction activities of ethnic minority migrant women are the subject of intense government interest, because of the concern that they will be unable to produce ‘good’ neo-liberal citizens. In some cases, this has led to government policies clearly intended to dissuade ‘undesirable’ migrants from having children. In other cases, migrant women are expected to show their commitment to integration, both for themselves and their children, specifically by learning English, even as the government has drastically cut funding for English as a Second or Other Language (ESOL) classes. While seemingly paradoxical, this is in keeping with a racialised neo-liberal model of citizenship under which the ‘responsible’ migrant mother should be able to parent and learn English without government assistance. Nonetheless, these policies are actually self-defeating, as they prevent migrant women from exhibiting the very characteristics of neo-liberal citizenship that they are ostensibly trying to encourage.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
I am defining migrant women as any woman living presently in the UK, who does not have UK citizenship, and was not born in the UK.
Manchester City Council ‘Budget Report to the Executive 13th February 2013’, http://www.manchester.gov.uk/info/200110/budgets_and_spending/880/the_councils_revenue_budget/4, last accessed 7 June 2014.
UK Government, ‘Benefit Cap’, https://www.gov.uk/benefit-cap, last accessed 5 June 2014.
Gov.uk, ‘Jobseeker’s Allowance: 5. Further Information’, https://www.gov.uk/jobseekers-allowance/further-information, last accessed 15 June 2014.
In asserting that households should not be able to receive benefit payments higher than the average household weekly wage, the government neglects to consider the possibility that the average household weekly wage may be too low to meet household needs.
Manchester City Council, ‘Report for Resolution’, 16 February 2011, http://www.manchester.gov.uk/egov_downloads/AdultsDirectorate.pdf, last accessed 16 June 2014.
Department of Work and Pensions, ‘Housing Benefit is changing from 1 April 2013 for people who rent from a social sector landlord’, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_ data/file/229364/factsheet-hbsssc1.pdf, last accessed 15 June 2014.
Two-year-olds are eligible for fifteen hours a week of free childcare if their parents receive benefits or working tax credits, or if they are looked after by the local council, have special needs, receive Disability Living Allowance or have left care under a special guardianship order, child arrangements order or adoption order. See UK Government, ‘Free Early Education and Childcare’, https://www.gov.uk/free-early-education, last accessed 1 October 2014.
For the text of the speech, see Gov.uk ‘Speech on the Big Society’, delivered 23 May 2011, https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/speech-on-the-big-society, last accessed 1 December 2014.
UK Government, ‘Asylum Support’, https://www.gov.uk/asylum-support/overview, last accessed 5 June 2013.
UK Government, ‘Section 4 Support’, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/ 257422/section-4-support-inst.pdf, last accessed 15 June 2014.
Home Office, ‘Public Funds’, valid from 21 February 2014, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/ 284160/Public_funds_v12_0EXT.pdf, last accessed 15 June 2014.
NIDirect, ‘Benefits for Non-UK Nationals’, http://www.nidirect.gov.uk/benefits-for-non-uk-nationals, last accessed 10 June 2014.
Maternity Action, ‘Who is entitled to free NHS maternity care?’, http://www.maternityaction.org.uk/wp/advice-2/mums-dads-scenarios/3-women-from-abroad/entitlement-to-free-nhs-maternity-care-for-women-from-abroad/, last accessed 17 June 2014.
Department of Health, ‘Press Release: Extended NHS Charging for Visitors and Migrants’, 30 December 2013, https://www.gov.uk/government/news/extended-nhs-charging-for-visitors-and-migrants, last accessed 10 June 2014.
Abraham, M., Ngan-ling Chow, E., Maratou-Alipranti, L. and Tastsoglou, E. (2010) ‘Rethinking citizenship with women in focus’ in Abraham, M., Ngan-ling Chow, E., Maratou-Alipranti, L. and Tastsoglou, E. (2010) editors, Contours of Citizenship: Women, Diversity and Practices of Citizenship, Farnham, Surrey and Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing, 1–22.
Alakeson, V. and Hurrell, A. (2012) ‘Counting the costs of childcare’, London: The Resolution Foundation, http://www.resolutionfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Counting_the_costs_of_childcare_2.pdf, last accessed 3 November 2014.
Anthias, F., Morokvasic-Müller, M. and Kontos, M. (2013) ‘Introduction: Paradoxes of integration’ in Anthias, F., Morokvasic-Müller, M. and Kontos, M. (2013) editors, Paradoxes of Integration: Female Migrants in Europe, Heidelberg, New York and London: Springer Dordrecht, 1–16.
Anthias, F. and Yuval-Davis, N. (1992) Racialized Boundaries: Race, Nation, Gender, Colour and Class and the Anti-Racist Struggle, London and New York: Routledge.
Bakker, I. (2007) ‘Social reproduction and the constitution of a gendered political economy’ New Political Economy, Vol. 12, No. 4: 541–556.
Benhabib, S. (2004) The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents and Citizens, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blunkett, D. (2002) ‘Integration with diversity: globalisation and the renewal of democracy and civil society’ in Griffith, P. and Leonard, M. (2002) editors, Reclaiming Britishness, London: The Foreign Policy Centre, 65–77.
Borchorst, A. and Siim, B. (1987) ‘Women and the advanced welfare state—a new kind of patriarchal power?’ in Showstack Sassoon, A. (1987) editor, Women and the State, London and New York: Routledge.
Brenner, N. and Theodore, N. (2002) ‘Cities and the geographies of “actually existing neoliberalism”’ in Brenner, N. and Theodore, N. (2002) editors, Spaces of Neoliberalism: Urban Restructuring in North America and Western Europe, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Butler, P. (2012) ‘Free nursery places for two-year-olds to be funded from Sure Start pot’ The Guardian, 27 September, http://www.theguardian.com/education/2012/sep/27/free-nursery-places-funded-sure-start, last accessed 4 June 2014.
Bussemaker, J. (2005) ‘Introduction: An ethnographic portrait of a precarious life: getting by on even less’ in Bussemaker, J. (2005) editor, Citizenship and Welfare State Reform in Europe, London and New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis, 1–11.
Cameron, D. (2014) ‘David Cameron: We’re building an immigration system that puts Britain first’ The Telegraph, 28 July, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/10995875/David-Cameron-Were-building-an-immigration-system-that-puts-Britain-first.html, last accessed 15 August 2014.
Cheney, D. (1996) ‘Those whom the immigration law has kept apart let no one join together: a view on immigration incantation’ in Jarrett-Macauley, D. (1996) editor, Reconstructing Womanhood, Reconstructing Feminism, London and NY: Routledge, 58–84.
De Agostini, P. and Brewer, M. (2013) ‘Credit Crunched: Single parents, universal credit and the struggle to make work pay’, London: Gingerbread, http://www.gingerbread.org.uk/content/1933/Credit-crunched, last accessed 4 June 2014.
De Benedictis, S. (2012) ‘ “Feral” parents: austerity parenting under neoliberalism’ Studies in the Maternal Vol. 4, No. 2: 1–21, http://www.mamsie.bbk.ac.uk/back_issues/4_2/documents/DeBenedictis_SiM_4%282%292012.pdf, last accessed 3 November 2014.
Department of Health (2013) ‘Sustaining services, ensuring fairness: government response to the consultation on migrant access and financial contribution to NHS provision in England’, London: Department of Health, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/ 268630/Sustaining_services__ensuring_fairness_-_Government_response_to_consultation.pdf, last accessed 7 June 2014.
Department for Work and Pensions (2010) ‘Universal Credit: welfare that works’, London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/ 48897/universal-credit-full-document.pdf, last accessed 5 June 2013.
Department for Work and Pensions (2013) ‘Government response to the House of Commons Work and Pensions Select Committee’s third report of Session 2012-13: Universal Credit implementation: meeting the needs of vulnerable claimants’, London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/ 221715/uc-wpsc-response.pdf, last accessed 6 June 2013.
Department for Work and Pensions and Department for Education (2011) ‘A new approach to child poverty: tackling the causes of disadvantage and transforming families’ lives’, London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/ 177031/CM-8061.pdf, last accessed 4 June 2014.
Dwyer, P. (2002) ‘Making sense of social citizenship: some user views on welfare rights and responsibilities’ Critical Social Policy, Vol. 2, No. 2: 273–299.
Erel, U. (2011) ‘Reframing migrant mothers as citizens’ Citizenship Studies, Vol. 15, No. 6–7: 695–709.
Fawcett Society (2013a) ‘Single mothers: singled out’, London: Fawcett Society, http://uat.fawcettsociety.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Single-MothersSingled-Out-The-impact-of-2010-15-tax-and-benefit-changes-on-women-and-men.pdf, last accessed 11 December 2014.
Fawcett Society (2013b) ‘The changing labour market: delivering for women, delivering for growth’, London: Fawcett Society, http://www.fawcettsociety.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Fawcett-The-changing-labour-market.pdf, last accessed 3 December 2013.
Feminist Fightback Collective (2011) ‘Cuts are a feminist issue’ Soundings, Issue 49: 73–84.
Gedalof, I. (2007) ‘Unhomely homes: women, family and belonging in UK discourses of migration and asylum’ Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, Vol. 33, No. 1: 77–94.
Gedalof, I. (2009) ‘Birth, belonging and migrant mothers: narratives of reproduction in feminist migration studies’ Feminist Review, Issue 93: 81–100.
Gillies, V. (2005) ‘Raising the “meritocracy”: parenting and the individualization of social class’ Sociology, Vol. 39, No. 5: 835–853.
Gilroy, P. (1987) ‘There Ain’t No Black in the Union Jack’: The Cultural Politics of Race and Nation, London: Hutchinson.
Gough, J. (2002) ‘Neoliberalism and socialisation in the contemporary city: opposites, complements and instabilities’ in Brenner, N. and Theodore, N. (2002) editors, Spaces of Neoliberalism: Urban Restructuring in North America and Western Europe, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Her Majesty's (HM) Treasury (2010) ‘Budget 2010’, London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, available at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130129110402/http://cdn.hm-treasury.gov.uk/junebudget_complete.pdf, last accessed 6 June 2013.
Hernes, H.M. (1987) ‘Women and the welfare state: the transition from private to public dependence’ in Showstack Sassoon, A. (1987) editor, Women and the State, London and New York: Routledge.
Holston, J. (1999) ‘Spaces of insurgent citizenship’ in Holston, J. (1999) editor, Cities and Citizenship, Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press, 155–176.
Home Office (2012) ‘Statement of intent: family migration’ London: Home Office Publications, http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/sitecontent/documents/news/soi-fam-mig.pdf, last accessed 20 June 2012.
Jensen, T. (2012) ‘Tough love in tough times’ Studies in the Maternal Vol. 4, No. 2: 1–26, http://www.mamsie.bbk.ac.uk/documents/Jensen_SiM_4(2)2012.pdf, last accessed 3 November 2014.
Joshi, P. (2004) ‘Gender and procedural issues in the UK asylum system’, Refugee Women: Rights & Wrongs. Report of a Seminar at the European Social Form, organised by IMECE Turkish Speaking Women’s Group, British Red Cross Refugee Unit, Refugee Women’s Association, Refugee Women’s Resource Project and Iranian Community Centre, http://www.asylumaid.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Refugee-Women-Rights-and-Wrongs.pdf, last accessed 1 April 2010.
Klug, F. (1989) ‘Oh to be in England: the British case study’ in Yuval Davis, N. and Anthias, F. (1989) editors, Woman-Nation-State, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 16–35.
Kofman, E. (1997) ‘When society was simple: gender and ethnic divisions and the far and new right in France’ in Charles, N. and Hintjens, H. (1997) editors, Gender, Ethnicity and Political Ideologies, NY and London: Routledge, 91–106.
Laslett, B. and Brenner, J. (1989) ‘Gender and social reproduction: historical perspectives’ Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 15: 381–404.
Lentin, R. (2004) ‘Strangers and strollers: feminist notes on researching migrant m/others’ Women’s Studies International Forum, Vol. 27, No. 4: 301–314.
Lister, R. (2003) Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives, 2nd edition, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Luibheid, E. (2006) ‘Sexual regimes and migration controls: reproducing the Irish nation-state in transnational contexts’ Feminist Review, Issue 83: 60–79.
Mama, A. (1984) ‘Black women, the economic crisis and the British state’ Feminist Review, Issue 17: 21–35.
Mackintosh, M. (1984) ‘Gender and economics: the sexual division of labour and the subordination of women’ in Young, K., Wolkowitz, C. and McCullagh, R. (1984) editors, Of Marriage and the Market, 2nd edition, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Marshall, T.H. (2009 ) ‘Citizenship and social class’ in Manza, J. and Sauder, M. (2009) editors, Inequality and Society, New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Office for Budget Responsibility (2014) ‘Economic and fiscal outlook’, London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 76, http://cdn.budgetresponsibility.org.uk/37839-OBR-Cm-8820-accessible-web-v2.pdf, last accessed 8 June 2014.
Pateman, C. (1989) The Disorder of Women, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Pulkingham, J., Fuller, S. and Kershaw, P. (2010) ‘Lone motherhood, welfare reform and active citizen subjectivity’ Critical Social Policy, Vol. 30, No. 2: 267–291.
Purcell, M. (2003) ‘Citizenship and the right to the global city: reimagining the capitalist world order’ International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 27, No. 3: 564–590.
Rose, N. (1999) Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Runnymede Trust (2000) The Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain—The Parekh Report, London: Profile.
Samantrai, R. (2002) AlterNatives: Black Feminism in the Postimperial Nation, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Schinkel, W. and van Houdt, F. (2010) ‘The double helix of cultural assimilation and neo-liberalism: citizenship in contemporary governmentality’ British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 61, No. 4: 696–715.
Shepherd, J. (2011) ‘Anger over English lesson funding cuts’ The Guardian, 14 April, http://www.theguardian.com/education/2011/apr/14/english-lessons-funding-immigrants, last accessed 21 January 2013.
Showstack Sassoon, A. (1987a) ‘Introduction: the personal and the intellectual, fragments and order, international trends and national specificities’ in Showstack Sassoon, A. (1987) editor, Women and the State, London and New York: Routledge.
Showstack Sassoon, A. (1987b) ‘Women’s new social role: contradictions of the welfare state’ in Showstack Sassoon, A. (1987) editor, Women and the State, London and New York: Routledge.
Solomos, J. (2003) Race and Racism in Britain, 3rd edition, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Soysal, Y.N. (2012) ‘Citizenship, immigration, and the European social project: rights and obligations of individuality’ British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 63, No. 1: 1–21.
Tyler, I. (2013) Revolting Subjects: Social Abjection and Resistance in Neoliberal Britain, London and New York: Zed Books.
van Houdt, F., Suvarierol, S. and Schinkel, W. (2011) ‘Neoliberal communitarian citizenship: current trends toward “earned citizenship” in the United Kingdom, France and the Netherlands’ International Sociology, Vol. 26, No. 3: 408–432.
Waite, L. (2012) ‘Neo-assimilationist citizenship and belonging policies in Britain: meanings for transnational migrants in northern England’ Geoforum, Vol. 43, No. 2: 353–361.
Walby, S. (1994) ‘Is citizenship gendered?’ Sociology, Vol. 28, No. 2: 379–395.
Waugh, M. (2010) ‘The Mothers in Exile Project: women asylum seekers’ and refugees’ experiences of pregnancy and childbirth in Leeds’, Leeds: Women’s Health Matters (WHM), http://www.womenshealthmatters.org.uk/downloads/, last accessed 4 June 2014.
Werbner, P. and Yuval-Davis, N. (1999) ‘Introduction: women and the new discourse of citizenship’ in Werbner, P. and Yuval-Davis, N. (1999) editors, Women, Citizenship and Difference, London and New York: Zed Books, 1–38.
Whittaker, M. (2013) ‘Narrowed horizons: the fiscal choices at Spending Review 2013 and beyond’, London: The Resolution Foundation, http://www.resolutionfoundation.org/publications/narrowed-horizons-fiscal-choices/, last accessed 5 June 2013.
Women’s Budget Group (2012) ‘The Impact on women of the Budget 2012’, London: Women’s Budget Group, http://wbg.org.uk/pdfs/The-Impact-on-Women-of-the-Budget-2012-FINAL.pdf, last accessed 10 November 2013.
Women’s Budget Group (2013) ‘The impact on women of Budget 2013—A budget for inequality and recession’, London: Women’s Budget Group, http://www.wbg.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/WBG_Budget-Analysis_2013.pdf, last accessed 10 November 2013.
Yuval-Davis, N. (1997) Gender and Nation, London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage Publications.
The author would like to thank the women in Manchester and Sheffield who agreed to participate in this research project. The author would also like to thank Bridget Byrne and Jonathan Darling, as well as the Feminist Review editors and reviewers, for their valuable comments on this article.
About this article
Cite this article
Lonergan, G. migrant women and social reproduction under austerity. Fem Rev 109, 124–145 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2014.43
- social reproduction