French Politics

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 175–184 | Cite as

Quantitative methods in political science: Research in France and the United States

Data, Measures and Methods

Abstract

We compare the recent methodological profile of political science work in France and the United States, applying a standardized content analysis of the research methods to leading political science journals in both countries over time periods of equal length. We find that, compared with the United States, qualitative work clearly dominates quantitative work in France, and there has been no apparent change over time in that regard during the period under investigation (1998–2013). We also find that French political science research does not offer a strong supply of mixed methods. Finally, and contrary to what is observed in the United States, when French political scientists do use quantitative methods they seem reticent about using ordinary least squares (OLS) or more sophisticated statistical methods. We see these results as further indication that the French and the American political scientists are locked in their own national epistemology.

Keywords

political science France United States methodology quantitative qualitative 

References

  1. Bennett, A., Barth, A. and Rutherford, K.R. (2003) Do we preach what we practice? A survey of methods in political science journals and curricula. PS: Political Science and Politics 36 (3): 373–378.Google Scholar
  2. Billordo, L. (2005) Publishing in French political science journals: An inventory of methods and sub-fields. French Politics 3 (2): 178–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Goguel, F. (1970) Géographie des élections françaises sous la Troisième et la Quatrième République. Paris, France: Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques.Google Scholar
  4. Gosnell, H.F. (1990) The marriage of math and young political science: Some early uses of quantitative methods. The Political Methodologist 3 (1): 2–4.Google Scholar
  5. Gow, D.J. (1985) Quantification and statistics in the early years of American political science, 1880–1922. Political Methodology 11 (1–2): 1–18.Google Scholar
  6. Hutter, J.L. (1972) Quantification in political science: An examination of seven journals. Midwest Journal of Political Science 16 (2): 313–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Keech, W. and Prothro, J.W. (1968) American government. Journal of Politics 30 (2): 417–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. King, G. (1990) On political methodology. Political Analysis 2 (1): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Krueger, J.S. and Lewis-Beck, M.S. (2007) Goodness-of-fit: R-squared, SEE and ‘best practice’. The Political Methodologist 15 (1): 2–4.Google Scholar
  10. Krueger, J.S. and Lewis-Beck, M.S. (2008) Is OLS dead? The Political Methodologist 15 (2): 2–4.Google Scholar
  11. Lancelot, A. (1986) 1981: les élections de l’alternance. Paris, France: Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques.Google Scholar
  12. Laurent, A. (2004) France’s 2002 presidential elections: Earlier and later territorial fractures. In: M.S. Lewis-Beck (ed.) The French Voter: Before and After the 2002 Elections. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 12–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lewis-Beck, C. and Lewis-Beck, M.S. (2015) Applied Regression: An Introduction, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Lewis-Beck, M.S. (2008a) Forty years of publishing in quantitative methodology. In: J.M. Box-Steffensmeier, H.E. Brady and D. Collier (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 814–827.Google Scholar
  15. Lewis-Beck, M.S. (2008b) Is comparative politics methodologically exceptional? APSA-CP 19 (1): 11–12.Google Scholar
  16. Mayer, N. (2008) Reflection on the methods of political science on both sides of the Atlantic. The Political Methodologist 15 (2): 5–7.Google Scholar
  17. Siegfried, A. (1913) Tableau politique de la France de l’Ouest sous la Troisième République. Paris, France: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  18. Smith, A. (1999) Public policy analysis in contemporary France: Academic approaches, questions and debates. Public Administration 77 (1): 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Somit, A. and Tanenhaus, J. (1964) The Development of American Political Science. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of IowaIowa CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations