French Politics

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 266–286 | Cite as

French popularity functions: Different measures, different determinants?

Data, Measures and Methods

Abstract

French popularity functions are under-studied, at least when as compared to vote functions. After a first wave of studies conducted in the wake of Lafay’s pioneering work, scholarly works on French popularity functions have been few and far between in the last two decades. And this, despite the fact that public opinion data on French popularity have been collected systematically for a long time. What is more, all the popularity function work conducted to date has made use of either the IFOP measure of satisfaction or the Sofres confidence measure as its dependent variable. In this article we build a popularity function for the French executive that compares results obtained with each of these two related, but somewhat different, monthly measures of presidential popularity. We do this comparison for the time period where the two popularity measures overlap (1978–2012). The results indicate that both survey measures are indeed similar but different.

Keywords

presidential popularity popularity functions measurement French politics time series analysis 

References

  1. Anderson, C. (1995) Blaming the Government: Citizens and the Economy in Five European Democracies. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  2. Bélanger, É. (2004) Finding and using empirical data for vote and popularity functions in France. French Politics 2 (2): 235–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bellucci, P. and Lewis-Beck, M. (2011) A stable popularity function? Cross-national analysis. European Journal of Political Research 50 (2): 190–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boya, C., Malizard, J. and Agamaliyev, E. (2010) Fonction de popularité, hypothèse de responsabilité et dynamique des partis. Revue économique 61 (5): 859–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brody, R.A. (1991) Assessing the President. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, J.E. (1999) The polls: The dynamics of presidential favorability, 1991–1998. Presidential Studies Quarterly 29 (4): 896–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Conley, R.S. (2006) From Elysian fields to the Guillotine? The dynamics of presidential and prime ministerial approval in fifth Republic France. Comparative Political Studies 39 (5): 570–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edwards, III. G. (2002) On Deaf Ears: The Limits of the Bully Pulpit. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Fournier, P., Turgeon, M., Blais, A., Everitt, J., Gidengil, E. and Nevitte, N. (2011) Deliberation from within: Changing one’s mind during an interview. Political Psychology 32 (5): 885–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gerstlé, J. and François, A. (2011) Médiatisation de l’économie et fabrication de la popularité du président français (2007–2010). Revue française de science politique 61 (2): 249–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goodhart, C.A. and Bhansali, R.J. (1970) Political economy. Political Studies 18 (1): 43–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gronke, P. and Newman, B. (2003) FDR to Clinton, Mueller to?: A field essay on presidential approval. Political Research Quarterly 56 (4): 501–512.Google Scholar
  13. Hellwig, T. (2007) Globalization and perceptions of policy maker competence: Evidence from France. Political Research Quarterly 60 (1): 146–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hibbs, D.A. (1981) Economics and politics in France: Economic performance and political support for presidents Pompidou and Giscard d’Estaing. European Journal of Political Research 9 (2): 133–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hibbs, D.A., Rivers, R.D. and Vasilatos, N. (1982) The dynamics of political support for American presidents among occupational and partisan groups. American Journal of Political Science 26 (2): 312–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kernell, S. (1978) Explaining presidential popularity. American Political Science Review 72 (2): 506–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lafay, J.-D. (1977) Les conséquences électorales de la conjoncture économique: Essai de prévision chiffrée pour mars 1978. Vie et sciences économiques 75 (1): 1–7.Google Scholar
  18. Lafay, J.-D. (1985) Political change and stability of the popularity function: The French general election of 1981. In: H. Eulau and M. Lewis-Beck (eds.) Economic Conditions and Electoral Outcomes: The U.S. and Western Europe. New York: Agathon, pp. 78–97.Google Scholar
  19. Lecaillon, J. (1980) Salaires, chômage et situation politique. Revue d’économie politique 5 (5): 615–627.Google Scholar
  20. Lewis-Beck, M. (1980) Economic conditions and executive popularity: The French experience. American Journal of Political Science 24 (2): 306–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lewis-Beck, M.S. and Stegmaier, M. (2013) The VP-function revisited: A survey of the literature on vote and popularity functions after over 40 years. Public Choice 157 (3–4): 367–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. MacKuen, M. (1983) Political drama, economic conditions, and the dynamics of presidential popularity. American Journal of Political Science 27 (2): 165–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mueller, J. (1970) Presidential popularity from Truman to Johnson. American Political Science Review 64 (1): 18–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mueller, J. (1971) Trends in popular support for the wars in Korea and Vietnam. American Political Science Review 65 (2): 358–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mueller, J. (1973) War, Presidents, and Public Opinion. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Nannestad, P. and Paldam, M. (1994) The VP-function. A survey of the literature on vote and popularity functions after 25 years. Public Choice 79 (3–4): 213–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Norpoth, H. and Yantek, T. (1983) Macroeconomic conditions and fluctuations of presidential popularity. American Journal of Political Science 27 (4): 785–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ostrom, Jr. C.W. and Simon, D.M. (1985) Promise and performance: A dynamic model of presidential popularity. American Political Science Review 79 (2): 334–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ostrom, Jr. C.W. and Smith, R.M. (1992) Error correction, attitude persistence, and executive rewards and punishments: A behavioral theory of presidential approval. In: J.R. Freeman (ed.) Political Analysis: An Annual Publication of the Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  30. Paldam, M. (2008) Vote and popularity functions. In: C.K. Rowley and F.G. Schneider (eds.) Readings in Public Choice and Constitutional Political Economy. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Pew Research Center (2014) Public trust in government: 1958–2014, http://www.people-press.org/2014/11/13/public-trust-in-government/, accessed 16 July 2015.
  32. Schuman, H. and Presser, S. (1981) Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording and Content. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  33. Sigelman, L. (1981) Question-order effects on presidential popularity. Public Opinion Quarterly 45 (2): 199–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tourangeau, R., Rips, L.J. and Rasinski, K. (2000) The Psychology of Survey Response. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mathieu Turgeon
    • 1
  • Éric Bélanger
    • 2
  • Richard Nadeau
    • 3
  1. 1.Instituto de Ciência Política (IPOL)Brasília-DFBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceMontréalCanada
  3. 3.Département de Science Politique, Université de Montréal C.P. 6128MontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations