French Politics

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 22–35 | Cite as

The impact of election outcomes on satisfaction with democracy under a two-round system

  • Laurie Beaudonnet
  • André Blais
  • Damien Bol
  • Martial Foucault
Original Article


Previous research has found a positive relationship between having voted for a party that is part of the government and satisfaction with democracy. However, no research has examined this relationship in the specific case of a two-round system. Relying on original panel data survey conducted before and after the 2012 legislative election in France, this article addresses the question of how vote choices in the first and second rounds affect satisfaction with democracy. We find that both rounds have a similar impact and that voters who rallied a winning party in the second round are as happy with the democratic process as early supporters.


satisfaction with democracy electoral system two-round system France voting behaviour 


  1. Anderson, C.J., Blais, A., Bowler, S., Todd, D. and Listhaug, O. (2005) Losers’ Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, C.J. and Guillory, C.A. (1997) Political institutions and satisfaction with democracy: A cross-national analysis of consensus and majoritarian systems. American Political Science Review 91 (1): 66–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, C.J. and LoTempio, A.J. (2002) Winning, losing and political trust in America. British Journal of Political Science 32 (2): 335–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Birch, S. (2008) Electoral institutions and popular confidence in electoral processes: A cross-national analysis. Electoral Studies 27 (2): 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blais, A. (2004) How many voters change their mind in the month preceding an election? PS: Political Science and Politics 37 (4): 801–803.Google Scholar
  6. Blais, A. and Gélineau, F. (2007) Winning, losing, and satisfaction with democracy. Political Studies 55 (2): 425–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blais, A. and Indridason, I.H. (2007) Making candidates count: The logic of electoral alliances in two-round legislative elections. Journal of Politics 69 (1): 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blais, A. and Loewen, P.J. (2009) The French electoral system and its effects. West European Politics 32 (2): 345–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blais, A., Lachat, R., Hino, A. and Doray-Demers, P. (2011) The mechanical and psychological effects of electoral systems, a quasi-experimental study. Comparative Political Studies 44 (12): 1599–1621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bowler, S. and Donovan, T. (2002) Democracy, institutions and attitudes about citizen influence on government. British Journal of Political Science 32 (2): 371–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brunell, T.L. and Buchler, J. (2009) Ideological representation and competitive congressional elections. Electoral Studies 28 (3): 448–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Callander, S. (2005) Electoral competition in heterogeneous districts. Journal of Political Economy 113 (5): 1116–1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cox, G.W. (1997) Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Curini, L., Jou, W. and Memoli, V. (2012) Satisfaction with democracy and the winner–loser debate: The role of policy preferences and past experience. British Journal of Political Science 42 (2): 241–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dalton, R.J. (2004) Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duverger, M. (1954) Political Parties, their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  17. Ezrow, L. and Xezonakis, G. (2011) Citizen satisfaction with democracy and parties’ policy offerings. Comparative Political Studies 44 (9): 1152–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Henderson, A. (2008) Satisfaction with democracy: The impact of winning and losing in Westminster systems. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 18 (1): 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones, M.P. (1999) Electoral laws and the effective number of candidates in Presidential elections. The Journal of Politics 61 (1): 171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kim, M. (2009) Cross-national analyses of satisfaction with democracy and ideological congruence. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 19 (1): 49–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Piketty, T. (2000) Voting as communicating. Review of Economic Studies 67 (1): 169–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shugart, M.S. and Carey, J.M. (1992) Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Singh, S. (2013) Not all election winners are equal: Satisfaction with democracy and the nature of the vote. European Journal of Political Research.Google Scholar
  24. Singh, S., Karakoç, E. and Blais, A. (2012) Differentiating winners: How elections affect satisfaction with democracy. Electoral Studies 31 (1): 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Singh, S., Lago, I. and Blais, A. (2011) Winning and competitiveness as determinants of political support. Social Science Quarterly 92 (3): 695–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Taagepera, R. and Shugart, M.S. (1989) Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Wells, J.M. and Krieckhaus, J. (2006) Does national context influence democratic satisfaction? A multi-level analysis. Political Research Quarterly 59 (4): 569–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laurie Beaudonnet
    • 1
  • André Blais
    • 1
  • Damien Bol
    • 1
  • Martial Foucault
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversité de MontréalMontréalCanada
  2. 2.Sciences PoParisFrance

Personalised recommendations