Advertisement

in defense of a multilingual political science

  • peter a kraus
Debate

Abstract

Linguistic diversity and multilingualism have implications for our understanding of politics that should be debated more thoroughly in connection with key epistemological and methodological issues in political science. Finding an appropriate approach to the linguistic frame of all political activities, and of the analysis of these activities, remains a crucial concern for those scholars in our discipline who are convinced that understanding politics requires understanding political culture, and that political cultures tend to overlap to a significant extent with linguistic cultures. From this perspective, the dominance of English in scholarly communication at the global level must be counterbalanced by a strong commitment to fostering and sustaining a multilingual ethos in our immediate academic environment.

Keywords

English language language politics linguistic diversity multilingualism political science 

References

  1. Addis, A. (2007) ‘Constitutionalizing deliberative democracy in multilingual societies’, Berkeley Journal of International Law 25 (2): 117–164.Google Scholar
  2. Altbach, P.G. (2007) ‘The imperial tongue: English as the dominating academic language’, Economic and Political Weekly 42 (36): 3608–3611.Google Scholar
  3. Boas, F. (1940) Race, Language, and Culture, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  4. Cardinal, L. and Sonntag, S.K. (eds.) (2015) State Traditions and Language Regimes, Montreal; Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Fishman, J.A. (1967) ‘Bilingualism with and without diglossia; Diglossia with and without bilingualism’, Journal of Social Issues 23 (2): 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Galtung, J. (1981) ‘Structure, culture, and intellectual style: An essay comparing saxonic, teutonic, gallic and nipponic approches’, Social Science Information 20 (6): 817–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Geertz, C. (2000) Available Light: Anthropological Reflections on Philosophical Topics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hohl, S. (2015) ‘Alles nur noch auf Englisch?’, available at: http://www.theorieblog.de/index.php/2015/03/alles-nur-noch-auf-englisch/, accessed 10 January 2016.
  9. Kraus, P.A. (2015) ‘Between the Expression of Power and the Power of Expressivity’, in C. Späti (ed.) Language and Identity Politics: A Cross-Atlantic Perspective, Oxford: Berghahn Books, pp. 38–57.Google Scholar
  10. Kraus, P.A. and Kazlauskaitė-Gürbüz, R. (2014) ‘Addressing linguistic diversity in the European Union: Strategies and dilemmas’, Ethnicities Special Issue ‘The Diversities of Europe’ Ethnicities 14 (4): 517–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. La Boétie, É. de ([1549] 2015) Discours de la Servitude Volontaire, Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
  12. Leavitt, J. (2011) Linguistic Relativities: Language Diversity and Modern Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Mannheim, K. ([1929] 1954) Ideology and Utopia: An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge, New York, Harcourt: Brace & Co.Google Scholar
  14. May, S. (2015) ‘The problem with English(es) and linguistic (in)justice. Addressing the limits of liberal egalitarian accounts of language’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 18 (2): 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Consortium for Political Research 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • peter a kraus
    • 1
  1. 1.University of AugsburgAugsburgGermany

Personalised recommendations