framing processes and lobbying in EU foreign policy: case study and process-tracing methods
- 819 Downloads
This article discusses the potential of case study and process-tracing methods for studying lobbying and framing in the European Union (EU). It argues that case studies and process tracing allow us to explore different sets of questions than large-N and quantitative approaches and to shed light on the mechanisms that contribute to policy change. Through these methods it is possible to study long-term processes and under-researched areas, to analyse the social construction of frames and to single out the conditions that lead to successful framing. In order to show the advantages of case studies and process tracing, illustrative examples drawn from the case study of EU foreign policy towards the Israeli–Palestinian conflict are provided.
Keywordsframing case study process tracing lobbying EU foreign policy
The author would like to thank Rainer Eising, Helene Helboe Pedersen, the participants of the 2014 ECPR Joint Sessions Workshop in Methodological Challenges and Contradictory Results in the Study of Interest Groups in Salamanca and the anonymous reviewers for their feedback on previous versions of this article.
- Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M.S. (1970) Power and Poverty. Theory and Practice, New York; London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Binderkrantz, A. and Pedersen, H.H. (2016, this issue of European Political Science) ‘What is access? A discussion of the definition and measurement of interest group access’, European Political Science, doi: 10.1057/eps.2016.17.Google Scholar
- Bryman, A. (2004) ‘Interviewing in Qualitative Research’, in A. Bryman (ed.) Social Research Methods, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Bunea, A. and Ibenskas, R. (2016, this issue of European Political Science) ‘Estimating interest groups’ policy positions through content analysis: A discussion of automated and human-coding text analysis techniques applied to studies of EU lobbying’, European Political Science, doi: 10.1057/eps.2016.15.Google Scholar
- Coen, D. and Richardson, J. (eds.) (2009) Lobbying the European Union: Institutions, Actors and Issues, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Collier, D., Brady, H.E. and Seawright, J. (2010) ‘Sources of Leverage in Causal Inference: Toward an Alternative View of Methodology’, in H.E. Brady and D. Collier (eds.) Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Council of the European Union. (2012) ‘Council conclusions on the Middle East peace process – 3209th Foreign Affairs Council Meeting’, available at: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/EN/foraff/134140.pdf, accessed 20 January 2015.
- De Keyser, V. (2012) ‘Working Document. Additional Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement Establishing an EC-Israel Association on an EC-Israel Agreement on Conformity Assessment and Acceptance of Industrial Products (ACAA)’, Committee of Foreign Affairs, European Parliament.Google Scholar
- Eising, R. (2016, this issue of European Political Science) ‘Studying interest groups: Methodological challenges and tools’, European Political Science, doi: 10.1057/eps.2016.14.Google Scholar
- European Voice. (2012) ‘Stuck at the Borders’, European Voice, 26 April, available at: http://www.europeanvoice.com/article/imported/stuck-at-the-border/74217.aspx, accessed 20 January 2015.
- Freedman, D.A. (2008) ‘Does the N’s Justify the Means?’ Qualitative and Multi-Method Research 6(2): 4–6.Google Scholar
- George, A.L. and Bennett, A. (2005) Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences, Cambridge: BCSIA.Google Scholar
- Gerring, J. (2007) Case Study Research: Principles and Practices, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Goertz, G. (2008) ‘Choosing cases for case studies: A qualitative logic’, Newsletter of the American Political Science Association’s Organised Section on Qualitative and Multi-Method Research 6(2): 11–14.Google Scholar
- Greenwood, J. (2003) Interest Representation in the European Union, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Halperin, S. and Heath, O. (2012) Political Research. Methods and Practical Skills, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- King, G., Keohane, R.O. and Verba, S. (1994) Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Mahoney, C. (2008) Brussels Versus the Beltway. Advocacy in the United States and the European Union, Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
- Thomas, C.S. (ed.) (2004) Research Guide to US and International Interest Groups, Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Tocci, N. (2007) The EU and Conflict Resolution. Promoting Peace in the Backyard, Abingdon; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Varone, F., Ingold, K. and Jourdain, C. (2016, this issue of European Political Science) ‘Studying policy advocacy through social network analysis’, European Political Science, doi: 10.1057/eps.2016.16.Google Scholar
- Voltolini, B. (2015) ‘Non-state actors and framing processes in EU foreign policy: The case of EU–Israel relations’, Journal of European Public Policy, advance online publication 25 September, doi: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1085429.Google Scholar
- Voltolini, B. (2016) Lobbying in EU Foreign Policy-Making: The Case of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Yin, R.K. (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Thousand Oaks, CA; London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar