European Political Science

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 306–321 | Cite as

what is access? a discussion of the definition and measurement of interest group access

  • anne s binderkrantz
  • helene h pedersen
  • jan beyers
Symposium

Abstract

Interest group research has focused extensively on political access. While access does not guarantee influence, it is customarily seen as a crucial step towards gaining political influence. It is argued that groups with access are, all else equal, more likely to be influential than groups without access. Biased access may thus result in biased influence. On the basis of a review of this literature, the article shows how the concept of access rests on an intuitive understanding rather than an explicit definition. This hampers methodological discussions of measurement. We propose to define access as instances where a group has entered a political arena (parliament, administration, or media) passing a threshold controlled by relevant gatekeepers (politicians, civil servants, or journalists). On the basis of this discussion, we compare operationalisations based on our proposed definition with some of the major alternatives found in the literature.

Keywords

interest groups access democracy measurement 

Supplementary material

41304_2016_46_MOESM1_ESM.doc (62 kb)
Online Appendix

References

  1. Andrews, K.T. and Edwards, B. (2004) ‘Advocacy organizations in the U.S. political process’, Annual Review of Sociology 30: 479–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ansolabehere, S., Snyder, J.M. and Tripathi, M. (2002) ‘Are PAC contributions and lobbying linked? New evidence from the 1995 lobby disclosure act’, Annual Review of Political Science 4(2): 131–155.Google Scholar
  3. Austen-Smith, D. (1998) ‘Allocating access for information and contributions’, Journal of Law, Economics & Organization 14(2): 277–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumgartner, F.R. and Leech, B.L. (1998) Basic Interests. The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Beyers, J. (2004) ‘Voice and access: Political practices of European interest associations’, European Union Politics 5(2): 211–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beyers, J. and Kerremans, B. (2007) ‘Critical resource dependencies and the Europeanization of domestic interest groups’, Journal of European Public Policy 14(3): 460–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beyers, J. and Kerremans, B. (2012) ‘Domestic embeddedness and the dynamics of multilevel venue shopping in four EU member states’, Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 25(2): 263–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beyers, J., Eising, R. and Maloney, W. (2008) ‘Researching interest group politics in Europe and elsewhere: Much we study, little we know?’ West European Politics 31(6): 1103–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Binderkrantz, A.S., Pedersen, H.H. and Christiansen, P.M. (2015) ‘Interest group access to the administration, parliament and media’, Governance 28(1): 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bouwen, P. (2004a) ‘The logic of access to the European parliament: Business lobbying in the committee on economic and monetary affairs’, Journal of Common Market Studies 42(3): 473–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bouwen, P. (2004b) ‘Exchanging access goods for access: A comparative study of business lobbying in the European Union institutions’, European Journal of Political Research 43(3): 337–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Braun, C. (2013) ‘The driving forces of stability: Exploring the nature of long-term bureaucracy-interest group interactions’, Administration & Society 45(7): 809–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brunell, T.L. (2005) ‘The relationship between political parties and interest groups: Explaining patterns of PAC contributions to candidates for congress’, Political Research Quarterly 58(4): 681–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buksti, J. (1980) ‘Corporate structures in Danish EC policy: Patterns of organizational participation and adaptation’, Journal of Common Market Studies 19(2): 140–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chalmers, A.W. (2011) ‘Interests, information and influence: Comparing the influence of interests groups in the European Union’, Journal of European Integration 33(4): 471–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chalmers, A.W. (2013) ‘Trading information for access: informational lobbying strategies and interest group access to the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy 20(1): 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Christiansen, P.M., Nørgaard, A.S. and Sidenius, N.C. (2004) Hvem skriver lovene? Interesseorganisationer og politiske beslutninger, Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
  18. Cohen, J.S. (1970) ‘The Washington lawyer – A contrived legend’, The George Washington Law Review 38(4): 767–776.Google Scholar
  19. Cotton, C. (2012) ‘Pay-to-play politics: Informational lobbying and contribution limits when money buys access’, Journal of Public Economics 96(3-4): 369–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dahl, R.A. (1961) Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  21. De Bievre, D. and Eckhardt, J. (2011) ‘Interest groups and EU anti-dumping policy’, Journal of European Public Policy 18(3): 339–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dür, A. (2007) ‘The question of interest group influence’, Journal of Public Policy 27(1): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dür, A. (2008) ‘Measuring interest group influence in the EU: A note on methodology’, European Union Politics 9(4): 559–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dür, A. and de Bièvre, D. (2007) ‘Inclusion without influence? NGOs in European trade policy’, Journal of Public Policy 27(1): 79–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dür, A. and Mateo, G. (2012) ‘Who lobbies the European Union? National interest groups in a multilevel polity’, Journal of European Public Policy 19(7): 969–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dür, A. and Mateo, G. (2013) ‘Gaining access or going public? Interest group strategies in five European countries’, European Journal of Political Research 52(5): 660–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Eising, R. (2007a) ‘The access of business interests to EU institutions: Towards elite pluralism?’ Journal of European Public Policy 14(3): 384–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Eising, R. (2007b) ‘Institutional context, organizational resources and strategic choices: Explaining interest group access in the European Union’, European Union Politics 8(3): 329–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Eising, R. (2016, this issue of European Political Science) ‘Studying interest groups: Methodological challenges and tools’, European Political Science, doi: 10.1057/eps.2016.14.Google Scholar
  30. Grant, J. (1978) Insider Groups, Outsider Groups and Interest Group Strategies in Britain, Volume 19 of Warwick University, Department of Political Science, Working papers 19.Google Scholar
  31. Gullberg, A.T. (2011) ‘Access to climate policy-making in the European Union and in Norway’, Environmental Politics 20(4): 464–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hansen, J.M. (1991) Gaining Access. Congress and the Farm Lobby, 1919–1981, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. Leech, B.L. (2010) ‘Lobbying and Influence’, in S.L. Maisel and J.M. Berry (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of American Political Parties and Interest Groups, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 234–567.Google Scholar
  34. Orman, J. (1988) ‘The president and interest group access’, Presidential Studies Quarterly 18(4): 787–791.Google Scholar
  35. Reenock, C.M. and Gerber, B.J. (2008) ‘Political insulation, information exchange, and interest group access to the bureaucracy’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18(3): 415–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Riker, W.H. (1964) ‘Some ambiguities in the notion of power’, The American Political Science Review 58(2): 341–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Truman, D.B. (1951) The Government Process. Political Interests and Public Opinion, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  38. Tsujinanka, Y. and Pekkanen, R. (2007) ‘Civil society and interest groups in contemporary Japan’, Pacific Affairs 80(3): 419–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vannoni, M. (2016, this issue of European Political Science) ‘Studying preference attainment using spatial models’, European Political Science, doi: 10.1057/eps.2016.13.Google Scholar
  40. Varone, F., Ingold, K. and Jourdain, C. (2016, this issue of European Political Science) ‘Studying policy advocacy through social network analysis’, European Political Science, doi: 10.1057/eps.2016.16.Google Scholar
  41. Voltolini, B. (2016, this issue of European Political Science) ‘Framing processes and lobbying in EU foreign policy: Case study and process tracing methods’, European Political Science, doi: 10.1057/eps.2016.18.Google Scholar
  42. Yishai, Y. (1998) ‘Civil society in transition: Interest politics in Israel’, The Annals of American Academy of Political and Social Science 555(1): 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Consortium for Political Research 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • anne s binderkrantz
    • 1
  • helene h pedersen
    • 1
  • jan beyers
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Political Science, Aarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark
  2. 2.Antwerp Centre for Institutions and Multilevel Politics, University of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium

Personalised recommendations