European Political Science

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 432–439 | Cite as

The (Political) Idea of a University: Political Science and neoliberalism in English Higher Education

  • heather savigny


This article is concerned primarily with the relationship between academic ideas and the ‘real world’ of politics. Disciplinary histories often assume a one-way influence of ideas, that of the academy into political practice. This article reverses that relationship and explores the way in which real-world ideas about politics have the potential to influence the way in which the academy develops, and the kind of responses it might offer. The primary focus is upon England and the marketisation of higher education; it asks are we burning all our books? This article also raises broader questions about the relationship between academia and that which it observes, with specific reference to political science.


higher education reform funding politicisation neoliberalism 



This article emerged from a panel at the ECPR conference at Reykjavik (2011) and I would like to thank the participants and organisers at that event. I’d also like to thank Bob Reinalda and Simon Gerrard for their support, encouragement and critical insights and the anonymous reviewers for their comments on an earlier version of this piece.


  1. Bailey, M. and Freedman, D. (eds.) (2011) The Assault on Universities: A Manifesto for Resistance, London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, M. (2010) ‘Higher education white paper could open the doors to private sector: will the long-awaited white paper give private colleges the boost they are looking for?’, The Guardian, 20 June.
  3. Birch, A. (1984) ‘Overload, ungovernability and delegitimation: the theories and the British case’, British Journal of Political Science 14 (2): 135–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradbury, R. (2004, 1953) Fahrenheit 451, London: Harper.Google Scholar
  5. Brecher, B. (2011) ‘The AHRC and the “Big Society”: reflections on the neo-liberal takeover of the academy’, Open Democracy, 28 June 2011. available at:
  6. Browne Report. (2010) ‘Securing a sustainable future for higher education’,
  7. Callender, C. and Jackson, J. (2005) ‘Does the fear of debt deter students from higher education?’, Journal of Social Policy 34 (4): 509–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campaign for the Public University Manifesto. (2011)
  9. Collini, S. (2012) What Are Universities For? London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  10. Curtis, P. and Lipsett, A. (2009) ‘Top universities face cuts in research funding’, The Guardian, 5 March.
  11. Dearing Report. (1997) Reports of the National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education,
  12. Eagleton, T. (2011) ‘AC grayling's private university is odious: the money-grubbing dons signing up at the £18k a year new college of the humanities are the thin edge of an ugly wedge’, The Guardian comment is free 6 June.
  13. Freedman, D. and Fenton, N. (2011) ‘Business first, students second: the future of English higher education?’, Open Democracy, 29 June.
  14. Freire, P. (1970) Pedagogy of the Oppressed, New York: Herder and Herder.Google Scholar
  15. Gill, J. (2008) ‘Labour concedes that it won’t deliver its 50% target on time’, Times Higher Education, 17 April.Google Scholar
  16. Guardian Datablog. (2011) ‘Tuition fees 2012: what are the universities charging?’,
  17. Harrison, L. and Saez, L. (2009) ‘Political studies in the UK: a twenty-first century health check’, European Political Science 8 (3): 345–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Henehan, M.T. and Sarkees, M.R. (2009) ‘Open doors and closed ceilings: gender-based patterns and attitudes in the International Studies Association’, International Studies Perspectives 10 (4): 428–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holmwood, J. (2011) ‘The history of higher education reform, and the Coalition's betrayal’, Open Democracy, Scholar
  20. Neary, M. (2011) ‘The social science centre: a radical new model for higher education’, Open Democracy, 7 October.
  21. Niskanen, W.A. (1971) Bureaucracy and Representative Government, Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  22. Paton, G. (2011) ‘Two-thirds of universities “want to charge £9,000 fees”’, Daily Telegraph, 5 April.
  23. Robbins Report. (1963) History of Education in England,
  24. Ryan, D. (1998) ‘The thatcher government's attack on higher education in historical perspective’, New Left Review, January-February, Scholar
  25. Salusbury, M. (1989) Thatcherism Goes to College, London: Canary Press.Google Scholar
  26. Sandel, M. (2012) What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets, New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.Google Scholar
  27. Stoker, G. (2010) ‘Blockages on the road to relevance: why has political science failed to deliver?’, European Political Science 9 (1): 72–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Turner, F. (ed.) (1996) The Idea of a University: John Henry Newman, Yale: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Vasagar, J. (2010) ‘How many privately-educated students attend each university?’, Guardian, Online 22 December.
  30. Waldegrave, W. (1982) ‘Speech at Westfield college, university of London, 17 november 1982’, Discussion Paper 12, University of Exeter Teaching Services.Google Scholar
  31. Walt, S.M. (2005) ‘The relationship between theory and policy in international relations’, Annual Review of Political Science 8: 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ward, K. (2005) ‘Geography and public policy: a recent history of “policy relevance”’, Progress in Human Geography 29 (3): 310–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Woodward, W. (2003) ‘Top up fess will alter choices of university’, The Guardian, 20 January.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Consortium for Political Research 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • heather savigny
    • 1
  1. 1.The Media School, Weymouth House, Bournemouth UniversityPooleUK

Personalised recommendations